Giuseppina Coppola1 First predicted by the Russian scientists Sunayaev and Zel’dovich in 1969. Galaxy Clusters have hot gas that produce electrons by bremsstahlung.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Notes… Handouts available for today and yesterday
Advertisements

CMB Polarization Jack Replinger Observational Cosmology Lab
Planck 2013 results, implications for cosmology
Prospects for the Planck Satellite: limiting the Hubble Parameter by SZE/X-ray Distance Technique R. Holanda & J. A. S. Lima (IAG-USP) I Workshop “Challenges.
2. The Particle-like Properties Of Electromagnetic Radiation
Parameterizing the Age of the Universe The Age of Things: Sticks, Stones and the Universe
Dark Energy Observations of distant supernovae and fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background indicate that the expansion of the universe is accelerating.
Cosmology topics, collaborations BOOMERanG, Cosmic Microwave Background LARES (LAser RElativity Satellite), General Relativity and extensions, Lense-Thirring.
SZE in WMAP Data Jose M. Diego & Bruce Partridge 2010, MNRAS, 402, 1179 La Thuile, March 2012.
Sub-THz Component of Large Solar Flares Emily Ulanski December 9, 2008 Plasma Physics and Magnetohydrodynamics.
1 Studying clusters and cosmology with Chandra Licia Verde Princeton University Some thoughts…
Particle Physics and Cosmology Dark Matter. What is our universe made of ? quintessence ! fire, air, water, soil !
The Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect The Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect AMI day, 2011 September 30 Mark Birkinshaw University of Bristol.
K.S. Dawson, W.L. Holzapfel, E.D. Reese University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA J.E. Carlstrom, S.J. LaRoque, D. Nagai University of Chicago,
CMB as a physics laboratory
Quintessence – Phenomenology. How can quintessence be distinguished from a cosmological constant ?
Inverse Compton Radiation Rybicki & Lightman Chapter Review of the Compton Effect 2 – Review of Thomson Scattering 3 – Klein-Nishima Cross-section.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
A Primer on SZ Surveys Gil Holder Institute for Advanced Study.
Feb. 2, 2011 Rosseland Mean Absorption Poynting Vector Plane EM Waves The Radiation Spectrum: Fourier Transforms.
Constraining Galactic Halos with the SZ-effect
LESSON 4 METO 621. The extinction law Consider a small element of an absorbing medium, ds, within the total medium s.
Cosmic Rays Discovery of cosmic rays Local measurements Gamma-ray sky (and radio sky) Origin of cosmic rays.
Quiz 4 Distribution of Grades: No Curve. The Big Bang Hubble expansion law depends on the amount of matter and energy (both are equivalent!) in the Universe;
Ch. 5 - Basic Definitions Specific intensity/mean intensity Flux
Modelling radio galaxies in simulations: CMB contaminants and SKA / Meerkat sources by Fidy A. RAMAMONJISOA MSc Project University of the Western Cape.
Craig Lawrie Advisor: Dr. John Ruhl Abstract Software is developed for the detection of galaxy clusters in data gathered by the South Pole Telescope (SPT).
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
Attenuation by absorption and scattering
Early times CMB.
130 cMpc ~ 1 o z~ = 7.3 Lidz et al ‘Inverse’ views of evolution of large scale structure during reionization Neutral intergalactic medium via HI.
Ch. 5 - Basic Definitions Specific intensity/mean intensity Flux
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Lecture 4a. Blackbody Radiation Energy Spectrum of Blackbody Radiation - Rayleigh-Jeans Law - Rayleigh-Jeans Law - Wien’s Law - Wien’s Law - Stefan-Boltzmann.
Survey of the Universe Tom Burbine
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
How can CMB help constraining dark energy? Licia Verde ICREA & Institute of space Sciences (ICE CSIC-IEEC)
Using the Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect to Determine H o and the Baryon Fraction by Michael McElwain Astronomy 278: Anisotropy and Large Scale Structure in.
Lecture 5: Matter Dominated Universe: CMB Anisotropies and Large Scale Structure Today, matter is assembled into structures: filaments, clusters, galaxies,
Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect CMB anisotropies: S-Z effect and how it is used in practice The theoretical foundation of the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect.
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
Observations of SNR RX J with CANGAROO-II telescope Kyoto, Dec., 16, 2003 H. Katagiri, R. Enomoto, M. Mori, L. Ksenofontov Institute for cosmic.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 3: The Growth of Structure Growth of structure in an expanding universe The Jeans length Dark matter Large scale structure simulations.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
The measurement of q 0 If objects are observed at large distances of known brightness (standard candles), we can measure the amount of deceleration since.
COST 723 Training School - Cargese October 2005 KEY 1 Radiative Transfer Bruno Carli.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
The effects of the complex mass distribution of clusters on weak lensing cluster surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
INFRARED-BRIGHT GALAXIES IN THE MILLENNIUM SIMULATION AND CMB CONTAMINATION DANIEL CHRIS OPOLOT DR. CATHERINE CRESS UWC.
Relativistic Corrections to the Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect for Clusters of Galaxies Satoshi Nozawa Josai Junior College for Women 1/33 Collaborators: N.
Bwdem – 06/04/2005doing cosmology with galaxy clusters Cosmology with galaxy clusters: testing the evolution of dark energy Raul Abramo – Instituto de.
X-ray Astronomy School 2002 Clusters of Galaxies (and some Cosmology) Scientific and Data Analysis Issues Keith Arnaud NASA/GSFC and UMCP.
Lecture 8 Optical depth.
Big Bang f(HI) ~ 0 f(HI) ~ 1 f(HI) ~ History of Baryons (mostly hydrogen) Redshift Recombination Reionization z = 1000 (0.4Myr) z = 0 (13.6Gyr) z.
Universe Tenth Edition Chapter 25 Cosmology: The Origin and Evolution of the Universe Roger Freedman Robert Geller William Kaufmann III.
Lecture 27: The Shape of Space Astronomy Spring 2014.
ASTR 113 – 003 Spring 2006 Lecture 12 April 19, 2006 Review (Ch4-5): the Foundation Galaxy (Ch 25-27) Cosmology (Ch28-29) Introduction To Modern Astronomy.
Basic Definitions Specific intensity/mean intensity Flux
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
Lyα Forest Simulation and BAO Detection Lin Qiufan Apr.2 nd, 2015.
Option D. 3. Universe was born around 13.8 billion years ago in process called Big Bang In the beginning, all matter & energy in the entire universe was.
Biased total mass of CC galaxy clusters by SZE measurements Andrea Conte Astronomy PhD, XXIII Cycle “Sapienza” University of Rome. School of Astrophysics.
Cosmic Microwave Background
Harrison B. Prosper Florida State University YSP
Towards the first detection using SPT polarisation
Really Basic Optics Instrument Sample Sample Prep Instrument Out put
Cosmological constraints from tSZ-X cross-correlation
CMB Anisotropy 이준호 류주영 박시헌.
Presentation transcript:

Giuseppina Coppola1 First predicted by the Russian scientists Sunayaev and Zel’dovich in Galaxy Clusters have hot gas that produce electrons by bremsstahlung (T gas ~ Kelvin). CMB photons are cold (T CMB ~ 2.7 Kelvin). Inverse Compton scattering occurs between CMB photons and the hot electrons of clustrer atmosphere. Energy will be transferred from the hot electrons to the low energy CMB photons changing the shape of their intensity vs. frequency plot : measuremnts made at low frequencies will have a lower intensity, since photons which originally had these energies were scattered to higher energies. This distorts the spectrum by ~0.1%.

Giuseppina Coppola2 SZ effect distorsion of the CMB signal Note the decrement on the low frequency side, and the increment at higher frequencies. The amplitude of the distorsion is proportional to T e, although shape is indipendent of T e. The relativistic equation has a slightly more complicated shape.

Giuseppina Coppola3 Overview 1.CMB 2.Radiation basic 3.Scattering by electron population 4.Kompaneets approximation 5.SZ and galaxy cluster 6.Struments

Giuseppina Coppola4 The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation The CMBR is the dominant electromagnetic radiation field in the Universe. Isotropy Photon density: Peak brightness: at Specific intensity of the radiation: Energy density: Principal Properties T rad ~ 2.7K

Giuseppina Coppola5 Thermal history of the Universe and CMBR The origins of the CMBR lie in an early hot phase of the expansion of the Universe. Very high z Very high z: matter and radiation were in good thermal contact because of the abundance of free electrons. z of recombination z of recombination: most electrons have become bound to ions. z of decoupling z of decoupling: the interaction lenght of photons and electrons exceeds the scale of the Universe. z ~ z ~ : the Universe was becoming neutral, matter-dominated and transaprent to radiation. Most of the photons that are now in the CMBR were scatterated by electrons for the last time. After recombination…… Potential fluctuations grow to form Large Scale Structure overdensities collapse to form galaxies and galaxy cluster; underdensities expand into voids.

Giuseppina Coppola6 I. Radiation basics real space volume momentum space volume Distribution function Specific intensity photon frequency Number density of photons in the Universe Energy density of the radiation field

Giuseppina Coppola7 II. Radiation basics transport equation: In the presence of absorption, emission and scattering processes, and in a flat spacetime, I ν obeys a transport equation: emissivity absorption coefficient scattering coefficient scattering redistribution function Specific intensity may be changed by: redistributing photons to different directions and frequencies (e.g. scattering); absorbing or emitting radiation (e.g. thermal bremsstrahlung); making photon distribution function anisotropic (Doppler effect);

Giuseppina Coppola8 I. Single photon-electron scattering Compton scattering formula For classical Thomson cross-section formula The probability of a scattering with angle θ: v e = βc and μ = cosθ Redistribution function:

Giuseppina Coppola9 II. Single photon-electron scattering The scattered photon frequency: Introducing the logarithmic frequency shift: s=log( νʺ/ ν ), the probability that a single scattering of the photon causes a frequency shift s from an electron with speed βc is:

Giuseppina Coppola10 I. Photon Scattering by electron population Averaging over the electron β distribution If every photon is scattered once, then the resulting spectrum is given by: Probability that a scattering occurs from ν 0 to ν Since

Giuseppina Coppola11 II. Photon Scattering by electron population The probability of N scatterings: Optical depth Probability that a photon penetrates the electron cloud The full redistribution function is given by Raphaeli formula: In most situations the electron scattering medium is optically thin, then and

Giuseppina Coppola12 I. The Kompaneets approximation In the non-relativistic limit the scattering process may be described by the Kompaneets equation, which describes the change in the occupation number, by a diffusion process. For small x e, we have: Canonical form of the diffusion equation Solution

Giuseppina Coppola13 II. The Kompaneets approximation

Giuseppina Coppola14 III. The Kompaneets approximation At low y and for an incident photon spectrum of the form of CMBR, we can use the Approximation: The spectrum of the effect is given by a simple analytical function; the location of the spectral maxima, minima and zeros are indipendent of T e in the Kompaneets approximation; the amplitude of the intensity change depends only on y. Kompaneets vs. Raphaeli formula

Giuseppina Coppola15 1.Useful to determine the intrinsic three-dimensional shape of the cluster; 2.Useful to extract information on thermal structure in the intracluster gas; 3.Useful to measure the projected mass of gas in the cluster on the line of sight if the temperature structure of the cluster is simple; 4.Useful to detect clusters; 5.Useful to test the cosmology.

Giuseppina Coppola16 The Sunayaev-Zel’dovich effect from clusters of galaxies If a cluster atmosphere contains gas with electron concentration n e (r), then the scattering optical depth, Comptonization parameter and X-ray surface brightness are: There is no unique inversion of b x (E) to n e (r) and T e (r)

Giuseppina Coppola17 I. Parameterized model for gas cluster They use a parameterized model for the properties of the scattering gas in the cluster and they fit the values of these parameters to the X-ray data. Isothermal beta-model Isothermal beta-model: T e is constant and n e follows the spherical distribution

Giuseppina Coppola18 II. Parameterized model for gas cluster Hughes et al. (1998), on the basis of observations of the Coma cluster, indroduced a useful variation on beta-model Useful to describe the decrease of gas temperature at large radius

Giuseppina Coppola19 z=0.5455; D A =760 h -1 Mpc X-ray emission mapped by ROSAT PSPC Structural parameters by isothermal beta-model β = 0.73 ∓ 0.02 Θ c = 0.69 ∓ 0.04 arcmin r c = (150 ∓ 10) h-1 kpc b 0 = ∓ counts s -1 arcmin -2 ΔT 0c ≈ h-1 mK at low frequency These values are consistent with the results obtained using X-ray spectrum

Giuseppina Coppola20 III. Parameterized model for gas cluster Ellipsoidal model Ellipsoidal model: M encodes the orientation and relative sizes of semi-major axes of the cluster. β = ∓ Θ c = ∓ arcmin ΔT 0c ≈ h-1 mK SZ model X-ray surface brightness model

Giuseppina Coppola21 Mass of the gas For an isothermal model, the surface mass density in gas is: Mean mass of gas per electron If the electron temperature of the gas is constant: This quantity can be compared with mas estimates produced by lensing studies.

Giuseppina Coppola22 Sz effect in cosmological terms Method Method: comparison of SZ effect predicted from the model with the measured effect by X-ray data. Since the predicted effect is proportional to h -1/2 via the dependence on D A, this comparison measures the value of H 0 and other cosmological parameters 1.Measuring the CMB decrement from a cluster 2.Mesuring X-ray emission from a cluster Measuring the size of a cluster

Giuseppina Coppola23 Measuring the CMB decrement from a cluster Consider simplest model of cluster  Spherical with radius R  Constant gas number density n  Constant temperature T e SZ effect decrement ΔT  Directly related to density  Directly related to the cluster path length  Directly related to the temperature of the gas, T e R n TeTe Temperature Decrement ΔT = -T rad 2y or ΔT ≈ T rad 2Rn

Giuseppina Coppola24 Measuring X-ray emission from a cluster Model of cluster  Sphere of radius R  Central number density of electron gas, n  Temperature of the gas, T e X-ray surface brightness b X  Directly related to square of density  Directly related to the cluster path length  Temperature of the gas, T e X-ray brightness b X ≈2Rn 2 R n TeTe

Giuseppina Coppola25 Measuring Size and Distance of the cluster Combined observations of b X and ΔT measure the path length along the line of sight Use the radius of the cluster and the angular size to make an estimate at the cluster distance. Remember, we assumed that cluster was spherical ΔT/T rad = 2Rn b X ≈ 2Rn 2 R = ( ΔT/T rad ) 2 /2b X D A ≈ R/θ H 0 is obtained from the measured z of the cluster and the value of D A under some assumption about q 0. R DADA θ

Giuseppina Coppola26 Result of SZ Distance Measurements SZ distance vs. z SZ effect distances are direct (rather than relative); SZ effect distances possible ar very large lookback times; can see the theoretical angular diameter distance relation; Comments H 0 = 63 ∓ 3 km/s/Mpc for Ω M =0.3 and Ω Λ =0.7 But…. selection effect, which caues the value of H 0 to be biased low the value of H 0 depends by cluster model unknown intrinsic shape of cluster atmospheres uncertainties in the parameters of the model

Giuseppina Coppola27 Cluster Detectability The total flux from the cluster that is requested: Angular position on the sky Any SZE clusters survey has some fixed angular resolution, which will not allow to spatially resolve low mass cluster. Therefore a background y b parameter will be present. If the gas temperature profile is isothermal, the integrated flux SZE cay be related to the cluster temperature weighted mass divided by D A 2 : If the temperature profile is isothermal only in the inner regions (Cardone, Piedipalumbo, Tortora (2005))

Giuseppina Coppola28 Interferometers used to measure the SZ effect Cosmic Background Imager (CBI) Located at the ALMA cite in Chajantor, Chile. These 13 antennae operate at GHz Degree Angular Scale Interferometer (DASI) A sister project to CBI, located at South Pole. These interferometers are suited to measure nearby clusters

Giuseppina Coppola29 X-ray telescopes used to measure the SZ effect ROSAT X-ray satellite in operation between 1990 and Mainly, its data has been used in conjunction with the radio observations to make estimates of H 0 and Ω b. Uncertainties of the X-ray intensity are ~ 10%. Chandra X-ray Observatory Provides X-ray observations of the clusters to make etimates of the gas temperature. Chandra currently has the best resolution of all X-ray observatories. XMM-Newton ESA’s X-ray telescope. Has 3 European Photon Imaging Cameras (EPIC)

Giuseppina Coppola30 All-sky project used to measure SZ effect Microwave Anisotropy Probe Measures temperature fluctuations in the CMB. Planck satellite ESA project designed to image the entire sky at CMB wavelengths. Its wide frequency coverage will be used to measure the SZ decrement and increment to the CMB photons.

Giuseppina Coppola31 Systematic Uncertainties in current SZ effect measurements SZ effect calibration ( ∓8%) X-ray calibration (∓ 10% ) galactic absorption column density (∓ 5% ) unresoved point sources still contaminate measurement of the temperature decrement (∓ 16%) Clusters that are prolate or oblate along the line of sight will be affected. Reese et al. 2001

Giuseppina Coppola32 References 1.Birkinshaw astro-ph/ Bernstein & Dodelson Physical Review, 41, Cardone et al. A&A 429, (2005) 4.Carlstrom et al. astro-ph/

Giuseppina Coppola33 CL H 0 = 68 km s -1 Mpc -1 if the cluster is modeled with a sphere isothermal