Effectiveness of Reading and Math Software Products Findings From the First Student Cohort Mark Dynarski May 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DELAWARE EARLY LITERACY INITIATIVE Dr. Jim J
Advertisements

The Technology Integration Planning Model
Task Design and Results.  Understand why the county developed ELA tasks in grades 3,7, and 10  Learn the steps or questions used in designing extended.
Using Computer Adaptive Testing Software in a College Environment George Alexander UW Rock County Eric Key and Richard O’Malley UW-Milwaukee.
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
Beyond the Classroom: The Use of Essential Skills for Remediation and Extension Christine Koch November 2008.
Is Small Better? The Effect of Class Size on Pupil Performance and Teaching Quality Maurice Galton Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge UK Presentation.
Technology’s Edge: The Educational Benefits of Computer-Aided Instruction Lisa Barrow Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Lisa Markman Princeton University.
Overview of Cognitively Guided Instruction Research.
Fremont Unified School District An Informational Session for Families August 2015 Standards-Based Report Cards.
Improving Sight Word Recognition
Grade 3-8 English. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With the new individual.
Quantitative Research
UNDERSTANDING THE CLASS
ICT TEACHERS` COMPETENCIES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY
Providing Leadership in Reading First Schools: Essential Elements Dr. Joseph K. Torgesen Florida Center for Reading Research Miami Reading First Principals,
National Partnerships Primary Mathematics Specialists Initiative
Diverse Populations in Small Rural Schools Presented by: Amy Trujillo-Conway Amy Trujillo-Conway Madalena Barboa-Archuleta.
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
ESOL Update 2014 Van Wert Elementary 2014/2015 School Year.
Evaluation of a Laptop Program Deborah L. Lowther Steven M. Ross Gary R. Morrison.
Dr. Bonnie J. Faddis & Dr. Margaret Beam RMC Research Fidelity of Implementation and Program Impact.
DO STUDENTS THAT HAVE COMPUTERS AT HOME GET BETTER GRADES IN SCIENCE AND MATH CLASS AT THE HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL? By Kelly Laura.
Jason Cole Consultant As presented at the Sakai Summer Conference 12 June 2007 | Amsterdam, Netherlands The public face of eLearning.
The Technology Integration Planning Model
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
Railside High School Study
1 / 27 California Educational Research Association 88 th Annual Conference Formative Assessment: Implications for Student Learning San Francisco, CA November.
The Information Systems Analyst National Assessment Exam: Factors for Success Mark Segall Loren Gollhardt Joe Morrell.
What Was Learned from a Second Year of Implementation IES Research Conference Washington, DC June 8, 2009 William Corrin, Senior Research Associate MDRC.
Elementary Progress Report Proposal May Process 18 months of committee work. 3 representatives from each elementary school (at the start at least).
Project Director – Dr. Mark Lung Dept of Natural & Environmental Sciences Western State College of Colorado Project Evaluator – Dr. Dave Shannon Educational.
Evaluating a Research Report
Blue Springs Elementary School Standards Based Report Card Parent Meeting.
Research Indicators for Sustaining and Institutionalizing Change CaMSP Network Meeting April 4 & 5, 2011 Sacramento, CA Mikala L. Rahn, PhD Public Works,
MIS and You Chapter 1.
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION MAROBA M. ZOELLER UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS AUGUST 5, 2000.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARD ACTIVE LEARNING IN STATISTIC 2 COURSE AND THEIR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Vanny Septia Efendi.
Case Study Assignment MTT Certification Exam. Graded on four-point scale Purpose – extent to which response addresses the components of the assignment.
CRESST’s Evaluation of the Artful Learning Program: “Findings,” Contexts, and Future Explorations Noelle Griffin,Ph.D UCLA Graduate School of Education.
Linking a Comprehensive Professional Development Literacy Program to Student Achievement Edmonds School District WERA December 4, 2008.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
Interactive Electronic WhiteBoard Storyboard By David Phenix Walden University.
CISB113 Fundamentals of Information Systems IS Development.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Changing Teaching Behaviors: The Road to Student Achievement Powell et al: Technology as a potentially cost-effective alternative to on-site coaching Research.
A Framework for Integrating Technology Mark Grabe.
Researching Technology in South Dakota Classrooms Dr. Debra Schwietert TIE Presentation April 2010 Research Findings.
Session 2 Part 4. Managing Classroom Assessments Teachers give lots of different assessments, to monitor students progress The testing needs to be carefully.
Learning Technologies Across Curriculum Mr. Michael Holmes Means, B. (2010). Technology and education change: Focus on student learning. *Journal of Research.
Seeing myself interact: Understanding interactions with children by embedding the CLASS in professional development Marilyn Chu, WWU – ECE FOCUS on Children.
Effectiveness of Selected Supplemental Reading Comprehension Interventions: Impacts on a First Cohort of Fifth-Grade Students June 8, 2009 IES Annual Research.
Evaluation Results MRI’s Evaluation Activities: Surveys Teacher Beliefs and Practices (pre/post) Annual Participant Questionnaire Data Collection.
Effects of Software Products Findings from the National Evaluation Mark Dynarski Presentation at the 2009 IES Annual Conference Mark Dynarski Presentation.
National Reading Panel Report on Phonics Notes by Constance Weaver
CAHSEE California High School Exit Exam ChipMatt EricCrystal.
1.  Developed to meet the criteria set by the Learning Community and OPS Assessment Steering Committee  Developed as a measure to monitor student progress.
Evaluation of Teachers Trained Through Different Routes to Certification Presentation at the IES Research Conference June 2009 Jill Constantine Mathematica.
EVALUATING A MIDDLE SCHOOL MATH M.ED. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Knowledge, Pedagogy, Practice or Student Achievement:
Federal Education Software Study: Findings & Implications
Gloria Ladson-Billings University of Wisconsin
LLL Listening and Language Lab May, 2013
CCSD Mentoring & Induction
Evaluation of the Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System Pilot: Results of the Teacher Practice Rating System Pilot Curtis Jones, UW Milwaukee Steve.
The integrated Classroom and the role of the educator
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
Scaling-up Effective Interventions for Preventing Reading Difficulties
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARD ACTIVE LEARNING IN STATISTIC 2 COURSE AND THEIR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Vanny Septia Efendi.
The Technology Integration Planning Model
Split-Block Class Schedule at Yorktown High School
Presentation transcript:

Effectiveness of Reading and Math Software Products Findings From the First Student Cohort Mark Dynarski May 2007

2 Study Synopsis Design –Nine reading and six math software products in 132 volunteer schools –Treatment teachers could use products, control teachers could not Implementation –Companies provided training and other types of support –Study purchased various upgrades and hardware components Key Findings –Test scores at the end of the school year were not statistically different –Few relationships between effects and implementation factors Design –Nine reading and six math software products in 132 volunteer schools –Treatment teachers could use products, control teachers could not Implementation –Companies provided training and other types of support –Study purchased various upgrades and hardware components Key Findings –Test scores at the end of the school year were not statistically different –Few relationships between effects and implementation factors

3 Study Size

4 Implementation Framework Teacher training [O, R] Amount of use [I, R] Technical difficulties and teacher support [I] Teacher training [O, R] Amount of use [I, R] Technical difficulties and teacher support [I] Student and teacher roles [O] –Teaching approach [O] –On-task behavior [O] –Consistency with suggested use of products [I] Student and teacher roles [O] –Teaching approach [O] –On-task behavior [O] –Consistency with suggested use of products [I] Key: O indicates observations, R records, I interviews

5 General Implementation Findings Nearly all teachers received training and believed it prepared them to use products Difficulties using hardware mostly were minor Total use of software products higher in treatment classrooms When products are used –teachers more likely to be “facilitators” and students more likely to work on their own –more students on task in math classrooms Nearly all teachers received training and believed it prepared them to use products Difficulties using hardware mostly were minor Total use of software products higher in treatment classrooms When products are used –teachers more likely to be “facilitators” and students more likely to work on their own –more students on task in math classrooms

6 Difference in Technology Use in Treatment and Control Classrooms: First Grade

7 Effects on Classroom Practices Percent Difference: Teacher as Facilitator 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% First Grade Fourth Grade Sixth Grade Algebra Note: * Significantly different from zero at the 0.05 level * * **

8 Effects on Classroom Practices Percent Difference: Students On Task Note: * Significantly different from zero at the 0.05 level 0% 10% 20% 30% * X First Grade Fourth Grade Sixth Grade Algebra

9 Estimating Effects Outcome: spring test score 3-level model (students, classrooms, schools) 3-level model extended to estimate effects of conditions and practices (implementation) –interactions of treatment effect and classroom and school characteristics Outcome: spring test score 3-level model (students, classrooms, schools) 3-level model extended to estimate effects of conditions and practices (implementation) –interactions of treatment effect and classroom and school characteristics

10 Effect Sizes By School: First Grade

11 Test Scores: First Grade SAT - 9 Reading Score Overall Score Effect Size Note: * Significantly different from zero at the 0.05 level Sounds and Letters Sentence Reading Word Reading

12 Test Scores: First Grade Test of Word Reading Efficiency Score Overall Score Phonemic Decoding Efficiency Sight Word Efficiency Effect Size Note: None of the effect sizes is significantly different from zero at the 0.05 level

13 Interactions: First Grade Larger effects –More experienced teachers –Smaller student-teacher ratio Larger effects –More experienced teachers –Smaller student-teacher ratio No relationship –Product usage –Problems getting access –Technical difficulties –Computer specialist in school –Professional development last year on using technology –Poverty, urban area, African-American students, Hispanic, special education students

14 Test Scores: Fourth Grade SAT-10 Reading Score Overall Score VocabularyWord Study Skills Comprehension Note: None of the effect sizes is significantly different from zero at the 0.05 level X Effect Size

15 Interactions: Fourth Grade Larger effects –Product usage Larger effects –Product usage No relationship –Problems getting access –Technical difficulties –Computer specialist in school –Professional development last year on using technology –Poverty, urban area

16 Test Scores: Sixth Grade SAT-10 Math Score Overall Score Procedures Problem Solving Note: None of the effect sizes is significantly different from zero at the 0.05 level Effect Size

17 Interactions: Sixth Grade No statistically significant relationships

18 Test Scores: Algebra ETS Algebra Exam Overall ScoreConceptsProcessesSkills Note: None of the effect sizes is significantly different from zero at the 0.05 level Effect Size

19 Interactions: Algebra Smaller effects when teachers had technical difficulties

20 Study Tradeoffs 15 reading and math products studied –Many products and types of technology not in the study Precision to detect small effect sizes –Average effect reported Experimental design –Teachers have not used these products in current classrooms 15 reading and math products studied –Many products and types of technology not in the study Precision to detect small effect sizes –Average effect reported Experimental design –Teachers have not used these products in current classrooms

21 Second Year Study 10 products, data from 77 schools, treatment and control teachers with new cohort of students Will study relationship between teacher experience using products and effects Effects reported for products 10 products, data from 77 schools, treatment and control teachers with new cohort of students Will study relationship between teacher experience using products and effects Effects reported for products