Status of the LHCb experiment Andrei Golutvin ( Imperial & CERN & ITEP ) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Outline:  Introduction  Detector Subsystems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb Alignment 12 th April 2007 S. Viret Coseners Forum « LHC Startup » 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Advertisements

B. List, ETH Zürich Page 1 Report from H1: PRC Open Session, H1: Status and Prospects Benno List Institute for Particle Physics, ETH Zürich.
Status of the LHCb Experiment 杨振伟 Tsinghua Group on LHCb 2010 高能物理学术年会.
JWG, 14 October, 2009, Vladislav Manko Status of work and plans of the Russian group in the ALICE Collaboration as of October, 2009.
Yasmine Amhis EPFL Yasmine Amhis EPFL Status of the LHC and LHCb Adrenaline.
P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC University M&O Personnel University with major hardware responsibility at CERN Based on > 10 years of US Zeus experience.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
The LHCb Inner Tracker Marc-Olivier Bettler SPS annual meeting Zürich 21 February 2007.
CMS Alignment and Calibration Yuriy Pakhotin on behalf of CMS Collaboration.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
1 Performance of the LHCb VELO Outline LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb VELO LHCb VELO VELO performance.
1 Perspectives for quarkonium production in CMS Carlos Lourenço, on behalf of CMSQWG 2008, Nara, Japan, December 2008.
Chris Parkes First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator Act 1: LHCb Intro. Act 2: Velo Design Act 3: Initial Performance for LHCb VELO groupVienna Conference.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
108 Mar 2007L. Musa TPC Commissioning ALICE Technical Forum, CERN, 8 th March 2007 L. Musa Outline Pre-commissioning above ground (2006) Preparing for.
A. Gibson, Toronto; Villa Olmo 2009; ATLAS LAr Commissioning October 5, 2009 Commissioning of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Adam Gibson University.
Prompt J/  and b ➝ J/  X production in pp collisions at LHCb Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 7 Dec 2010 For the LHCb Collaboration KRUGER 2010 Workshop.
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Bernhard Schmidt DESY - HH PRC open session, October 30, 2002 HERA-B.
First Results from the NA62 Straw Spectrometer E uropean P hysical S ociety 2015, Wien Vito Palladino - CERN On Behalf of NA62 Collaboration.
26 June 2006Imaging2006, Stockholm, Niels Tuning 1/18 Tracking with the LHCb Spectrometer Detector Performance and Track Reconstruction Niels Tuning (Outer.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
The Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detectors of the LHCb Experiment
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
Review of τ -mass measurements at e + e - - colliders Yury Tikhonov (Budker INP) Contents  Introduction  Current status of τ-mass measurements and μτ.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
1. Efficient trigger for many B decay topologies Muon System CALORIMETERS PRS + ECAL+ HCAL RICH1 VERTEX LOCATOR Efficient PID Good decay time resolution.
H C A L 11 th International Conference on Advanced Technology and Particle Physics Villa Olmo (Como - Italy), October 5 - 9, 2009 THE PERFORMANCE OF THE.
The LHCb Vertex Locator Lars Eklund LHCb VELO Group of the LHCb Collaboration CERN (Geneva), EPFL (Lausanne), NIKHEF (Amsterdam), University of Glasgow,
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Clara MatteuzziFPCP, Paris 2-6 june 2003 The LHCb experiment: status and physics program Clara Matteuzzi On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Università.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
A. Zoccoli - PRC open session 16-May-2002 HERA-B A. Zoccoli Università and INFN - Bologna PRC open session 16 th May 2002.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Status of the LHCb experiment Andrei Golutvin ( Imperial & CERN & ITEP ) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Outline:  Introduction  Detector Subsystems.
LHCb trigger: algorithms and performance Hugo Ruiz Institut de Ciències del Cosmos March 12 th -17 th 2009, Tsukuba, Japan On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
Alignment Challenge at LHCb Steven Blusk Syracuse University LHC Alignment Workshop, Aug 3-5, 2006.
LHCb Alignment Strategy 26 th September 2007 S. Viret 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator Thomas Latham (on behalf of the LHCb VELO group) 11/06/20111TIPP Chicago.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
First collisions in LHC
The LHCb Calorimeter system
Preparation of LHCb for data taking
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
The LHC collider in Geneva
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
11th Pisa meeting on advanced detectors
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
LHCb Trigger LHCb Trigger Outlook:
How can we study the magnetic distortion effect?
First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator
Presentation transcript:

Status of the LHCb experiment Andrei Golutvin ( Imperial & CERN & ITEP ) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Outline:  Introduction  Detector Subsystems  Trigger/Online/Computing  First Look at the data  Cost and funding issues  Collaboration matters  Preparation for LHCb upgrade  Physics goals in 2010 RRB April

2  Commissioning of LHCb with data was the main activity since last RRB  Detector is time aligned to optimal working point within 1–2 ns. Data taken with and without magnetic field for position alignment  A total of 300k collision events at 900 GeV recorded in Overall operation went very smoothly. Due to beam optics Vertex Detector (VELO) modules can approach only ±15 mm from the beam. The VELO powering and closing procedures have been optimized and commissioned  In 2010, from first collisions onwards, LHCb is taking successfully data at 7 TeV with high efficiency  LHCb is in excellent shape for the Physics Run in RRB April 2010 Brief Summary

LHCb Collaboration 3RRB April members 15 countries 54 intitutes

VErtex LOcator (CH,DE,GB,NL) 2×21 pairs of Si sensors arranged in 2 halves; each pair consists of one sensor with R- and one sensor with  -strips 4 RRB April % of channels operational –For first collisions at 900 GeV VELO was operated in a safe mode utilizing an “incremental” powering scheme. VELO was powered in its open position and then each half moved to within 15 mm of the nominal physics position (full closure possible only above 2 TeV /beam) –Primary vertex distributions from both beam-beam and beam-gas events –The module alignment is stable within 4 μm. Two halves relative position is aligned to better than 30 μm, as evaluated with 2009 and 2010 data

RRB April When running at 3.5 TeV per beam VELO has been successfully closed During closing procedure The distance between two VELO halves has been measured using reconstructed primary vertices at each step of the 1 st closing with beam Closing procedure works well ( takes ~ 15 min now ) Will be further improved ! Reconstructed distance between VELO halves as a function of time during 1 st closure

RRB April Status of VELO replacement All 42 hybrid replacement modules have been built and tested Burn in programme in Q The replacement mechanics is expected to be completed by October 2010 Complete VELO replacement halves are planned to be ready for the LHC start in 2011

RRB April Outer Tracker – OT (CERN,CF,CN,DE,NL,PL) Three stations with each 4 stereo layers of straw tubes 5 mm diameter and 5m length; 55k channels OT Calo Muon Detector is 100 % efficient and running with low noise at the nominal threshold. All Front-End spares are available In order to improve aging behavior a 1.5% fraction of O 2 has been added to the gas mixture. Aging tests in situ show mitigating effect of O 2 and a general improvement with flushing time. Furthermore the possibility of curing gain losses in situ by means of HV training procedure has been demonstrated One of the first LHCb collision 3.5 TeV per beam registered on March 30

RRB April Drift-time space relation (R(t))  R(t) from test beam  R(t) from fit to proton data R Plateau efficiency 98.7 % R [mm] Hit residuals: Data/MC differences due to missing module alignment straw tube OT performance: Without O 450 GeV With O 3.5 TeV No effect caused by addition of O 2 Cell efficiency profile: Efficiency vs. distance in mono layer plane

ST: Tracker Turicensis & Inner Tracker (CERN,CH,DE,ES,UA) TT covers area of 1.4  1.2 m 2 ; 4 stereo layers with ladders consisting of 3 or 4 chained Si- sensors with strip pitch 183 micron; 143k channels IT: 3 stations with 4 boxes each arranged around beam pipe; each box has 4 stereo layers x-u-v-x, modules with one or two chained Si-sensors; strip pitch 198 micron; 130k channels RRB April Both TT and IT run smoothly and without problems (> 99.5% of TT channels and 99% of IT channels are operational) Significant progress in improving stability and reliability of the control and monitoring software The problem of breaking bonds on the TT hybrids has stabilized. No new broken bonds since May New hybrids are being ordered and the nine affected modules will be repaired Internal alignment of IT has been verified with beam and a global alignment relative to the other tracking components performed

RRB April TT and IT performance σ = 77.3µm unbiased residual σ~72μm TT Unbiased TT residuals is still broader than expected in MC (49 μm). Further improvement will be achieved soon IT tracks and efficiencies (alignment fixed from TED data) IT Unbiased residuals (2009 data) still show room for improvement (expect ~ 50 μm) Efficiencies O(98%)

RRB April Demonstration of tracking performance with reconstructed particles Ξ from ~ 65 µb -1 Λ from ~ 65 µb -1 K S from ~ 65 µb -1

RICH (CERN,CF,GB,IT) RICH1 and RICH2 with 3 radiators covers momentum range GeV; RICH1: 5cm aerogel with n=1.03 & 4m 3 C4F10 with n=1.0014; RICH2: 100m 3 CF4 with n=1.0005; ~500 HPD to readout RRB April Both RICH1 and RICH2 take data with great success RICH2 was fully aligned. For RICH1 more data are required to align the mirrors in the outer region from where aerogel rings are reflected. Also some indication that the poor resolution for the aerogel rings is due to low photon yield. Evolution of each HPD lifetime using ion feedback is continuously monitored. In March those tubes predicted to glow in 2010 have been replaced with refurbished ones. The repair process is proceeding regularly and the extracted tubes are being sent to PHOTONIS. Satisfactory stability of HV system and gas system PID performance has been calibrated using kinematically reconstructed K s mesons and Λ hyperons.

RRB April after alignment momentum spectrum before alignment RICH 1 LHCb data (preliminary) Kaon ring RICH 2 LHCb data (preliminary) Kaon ring  Orange points  photon hits  Continuous lines  expected distribution for each particle hypothesis (proton below threshold) PID with RICH

RRB April Demonstration of RICH PID performance with reconstructed particles Φ from ~ 65 µb -1 K* from ~ 65 µb -1

Calorimeters (CERN,CF,ES,FR,RO,RU,UA) PS/SPD: 12k scint. tiles readout by WLS; ECAL: 6k shashlik cells; HCAL: TILE Calo, 1.5k channels 15 RRB April 2010 The four calorimeter systems operate very effectively providing the principle trigger for LHCb Initial time alignment has been significantly improved. The current inter-cell time alignment is 1 ns for HCAL/ECAL and 2 ns for PS/SPD Energy calibration is being gradually improved using collected data. Inter-calibration at the start-up was close to 9% for ECAL, <4% for HCAL and ~15% for PS The reconstructed masses and widths of the  0 and  signals agree well with expectations. In order to reach ~1% calibration accuracy for ECAL and PS one needs ~50 M events.

RRB April π0π0 = (135.0±0.6) MeV/c 2 σ = (10.9±0.7) MeV/c 2 E t (γ)> 300 MeV; E t (di-γ)> 2 GeV η = (547±5) MeV/c 2 σ = (24±3) MeV/c 2 N(πº)=849±36 N(η)=146±32 R(η/ πº)=17.2±3.8 % N(πº)=719±31 N(η)=163±27 R(η/ πº)=22.7±3.8 % 2009 dataMonte Carlo 2009 data MeV/c^2 E t (γ)> 500 MeV; E t (di-γ)> 2 GeV E t (γ)> 300 MeV; E t (di-γ)> 2 GeV Demonstration of CALO performance with reconstructed particles

Muon (CERN,CF,IT,RU) Arranged in 5 SuperLayers; M1 consists of 12 double triple GEM chambers and 264 MWPC’s; M2-M5 consists of 1104 MWPCs 17 RRB April 2010 The Muon system operates successfully, both the efficiency and the noise level are in perfect agreement with expectations from the test beam

RRB April Muon detector hardware performs very well: - Only ~0.1% chamber gaps showed some HV problems - <0.1% dead readout channels - Negligible number of noisy channels Time alignment in perfect agreement with expectations Space alignment: analysis of collision data taken in 2009 confirmed ~7-8 mm shift in X of M4 A-side that was seen with cosmics  M4 position was corrected in January 2010 Stability of HV modules is of some concern. Full review of the HV control system has been made and some hardware modifications have been applied to the CAEN power supply system to achieve more reliable operation M UON performance

19 Strategy for trigger settings in 2010 RRB April 2010 Few fills at injection energy  450 GeV, 2-4 bunches 5·10 10 p colliding, β * =10 => rate ~(few) 100 Hz Ramp in energy  3.5 TeV, 2 bunches 1·10 10 p colliding, β*=10 => rate ~100 Hz Squeeze of β*  3.5 TeV, 2 bunches 1·10 10 p colliding, β* = 2 => rate ~500 Hz Increased bunch charge  3.5 TeV, 2 bunches 5·10 10 p colliding, β*=2 => rate ~10 kHz Increasing number of bunches  3.5 TeV, 19 bunches 5·10 10 p colliding, β*=2 => rate ~100 kHz mbias triggers based on Level 0 objects: muon p T, hadron p T, Pile-Up System L0 and HLT optimized for prompt Charm and Beauty + (mbias & random triggers) downscaled Optimized for Beauty Physics Prompt charm efficiency increased by more than a factor 4 w.r.t. design settings without loss in b-physics Evolution of luminosity in first few months  When moving to crossing angle and 50 ns bunch spacing we expect L~1- 2·10 32 cm -2 s -1 with ~200 pb -1 in 2010 and ~1 fb -1 in 2011 (~1/2 of a nominal year for LHCb)

RRB April Online & Computing Data monitoring and online reconstruction are commissioned and in regular use Some minor problems with the switches of the read-out network, which are addressed by the manufacturer with high priority Completion of the HLT farm to its full capacity is foreseen towards the end of 2010 depending on the LHC luminosity progress Data processing chain works well. New data are distributed to the LHCb Tier1s, fully reconstructed on the Grid and made available for analysis within a few hours. Three reprocessing done so far on the Grid, each taking less than one day Simulation campaign to prepare the analyses of data at 3.5 TeV started Some concern with Tier1s stability in particular regarding Storage and Data Access CERN site busy with user analysis

RRB April D 0 →Kπ from ~110 µb -1 D + →Kππ from ~110 µb -1 Towards LHCb physics programme First D mesons have been reconstructed !!!

RRB April J/ψ from ~160 µb -1

RRB April B + →J/ψK + candidate: global view (muons are magenta, kaon is red) 4 J/  candidates have non-zero proper time as expected for production in B decays B  J/   >25  separation between primary and secondary vertices First candidate for reconstructed B meson

RRB April Primary vertex B decay vertex ++ -- K+K+ J/ψ B+B+ [x 0.2mm] [mm] YZ Projection Tracks from primary vertex B→J/ψK candidate: YZ vertex zoom

RRB April Cost and Funding Collaboration Matters Two new institutes accepted as Technical Associates: - Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil - Tier-1 centre CCIN2P3, Lyon, France Guy Wilkinson (Oxford) is the Physics Coordinator for a term of 1 year as from January 1, 2010 Rolf Lindner has been appointed as the Technical Coordinator for a term of 3 years starting from July 1, 2010 Marco Cattaneo (CERN) has been appointed as the Computing Project Leader for 2 years starting from January 1, 2010 Chris Parkes (Glasgow) has been appointed as the Vertex Detector Project Leader for 2 years starting from June 15, 2010 Overall situation is healthy; no cash flow problem foreseen VELO replacement financing mechanism works well Prepare for important interventions on sub-detectors and infrastructure during long shutdown in 2012

RRB April LHCb Upgrade activities A Letter of Intent for the LHCb upgrade is under preparation The strongest part of the LHCb physics case is the flexibility to be prepared for the exploration of New Physics  Staged approach: First stage – Full software trigger -Upgrade to 40 MHz readout keeping sub-detectors unchanged wherever is possible - Construct NEW VELO

RRB April Expected B-physics reach in Sensitive probe for MSSM with large tanβ: Br (B S  μ + μ - ) ~ tanβ 6 / M A 4 Large (non-SM) phase favoured by D0 and CDF analysis: Φ s [ −1.47 ; −0.29 ] ∪ [ −2.85 ; −1.65 ] (90% CL range)  Assume ~200 pb -1 in 2010 and ~1 fb -1 in Exclusion 90% C.L

28 Conclusion I  LHCb is successfully taking data with high efficiency !!! RRB April 2010 LHCb operation over 30/3-13/4 On the ~82 hours of collision delivered -Technic program completed at 95% - 98% DAQ efficiency -95% detector efficiency -Velo closing efficiency 94% - Mostly in beginning - Long fill help In 2010 we have so far recorder ~14M collisions at √s = 7 TeV

29  First data are being used for calibration of the detector and trigger in particular. - First results of low Pt physics are available at LHC energies - Some high class measurements in the charm sector may be possible with 50 pb -1. Charm resonances have been reconstructed.  With ~ 200 pb -1 data sample LHCb will reach Tevatron sensitivity in a few golden channels in the beauty sector  Further consolidation is important prerequisite for efficient long term operation (e.g. R&D on improved reliability of readout cards in EPFL) RRB April 2010 Conclusion II

RRB April