IATI Indicator Report to IATI Steering Committee – 3 December 2015.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Experiences in sharing information What can be done? Key findings from the IATI pilots.

Advertisements

International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) TAG Overview October 2010.

Report on Draft Definitions TAG meeting 22 March 2010.

International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) Overview Romilly Greenhill Aid Transparency Leader, DFID October 2010.

Summary of Report to IATI Steering Committee, Paris 9 February 2011 Richard Manning.

Copyright The Info-Tech Research Group Inc. All Rights Reserved. D1-1 by James M. Dutcher Strategic IT Planning & Governance Creation H I G H.

Comparative Study of MOPAN and EvalNet Approaches to Assessing Multilateral Organizations’ Development Effectiveness James Melanson Director, Development.

Linn OHLSSON, IATI Secretariat Rudolphe PETRAS, Development Co-operation Directorate, OECD IATI Steering Committee, 3 October 2013 The Common Standard.

Status of implementation of the Ronald Vargas and Ines Beernaerts Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Samarkand, Uzbekistan - 10 September.

Making U.S. Foreign Assistance More Transparent: USG Agenda for Action Presented to IATI Steering Commitee February 9, 2011.

Paper 3b Improving the Standard Around Communities of Interest.

The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Update on Indicator to Measure Transparency IATI Steering Committee, 3 October, Copenhagen

Monitoring Agriculture Richard Moberly Food Group DFID.

Transparency Beyond Mexico IATI Steering Committee Lessons Learnt and proposals on a way forward for the Busan « Transparency » indicator and the common.

Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.

Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.

MICS Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Overview of MICS Tools, Templates, Resources, Technical Assistance.

The LAS Development in Ghana Chatham House Illegal Logging Update and Stakeholder Consultation, July, 2007 By Chris Beeko.

Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.

A Process for Fixing Broken Things Stuart Robbins iCIO Consulting February 2000.

Conclusions and Next steps Conclusions and Next steps EVD Preparedness Meeting: January 2015.

Assessing the Capacity of Statistical Systems Development Data Group.

Transparency Indicator IATI Steering Committee Copenhagen 13 March 2014.

EIS Progress Report Executive Steering Committee Meeting February 4, 2009 (Revised) 10/22/20151.

Interstate Statistical Committee of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS-Stat) Implementing the Global Strategy to Improve Agricultural and Rural.

GEO Strategic Plan : Implementing GEOSS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN WORKING GROUP GEO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MARCH 2015 GENEVA, SWITZERLAND.

PARIS21 Steering Committee26 April 2006 PARIS21 Steering Committee, Paris, 26 April 2006 PARIS21 Work Programme for 2006.

International Statistical Committee of the Commonwealth countries ( CIS Statistical Committee ) CIS Statistical Committee Work on Coordination and Implementation.

South East Fire & Rescue Service Regional Management Board – Achieving Level 3 of the Equality Standard – Update report. Doug Feery 16 th January 2008.

Report from Partner Countries Work Stream – Day 1 Room 2.

Recent Developments of the PEFA Program Video-conference of the PEMPAL BCOP PEFA Working Group February 20, 2009 Frans Ronsholt Head of PEFA Secretariat.

Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities Session 3: Mid-Term Evaluation.

IATI – Version 2.02 Report to IATI Steering Committee – 3 December 2015.

Energy Networks Association RIIO-ED1 Update for Suppliers December 2012.

The FDES revision process: progress so far, state of the art, the way forward United Nations Statistics Division.

5 April, 2013 Indicator 4 on Transparency Consultation IATI Steering Committee, 3 Dec 2015 Alejandro Guerrero UNDP-OECD Joint Support Team (Global Partnership.

A School The Renewed Mathematics Framework PDM 1.

Update on Monitoring IATI Steering Committee Meeting Copenhagen, 15 October.

Framework for the intercalibration process  Must be simple  Aiming to identify and resolve big inconsistencies with the normative definitions and big.

The PEFA Framework – a tool for monitoring government performance ICGFM – New Developments in Governmental Financial Management Miami, May 19-22, 2008.

CCP: Monitoring and Evaluation

ITCRB FY18 Funding Cycle Kickoff

PFM Reform Programmes Presentation by Mary Betley

Session 6 – Communications & Outreach

IATI Version Update.

FY16 Budget Build (Banner)

Microsoft MB6-885 Exam Verified Questions And Answer Dumps4download.in

Understanding Standards An overview of course assessment

The role of the Passport Indicators in Monitoring PFM Strategy

Workstream 5: Governance Financial overview for Year 5

United Nations Statistics Division

IATI Technical Priorities

DRG Implementation Overview

Outline of the control approach

Sub-Regional Workshop on International Merchandise Trade Statistics Compilation and Export and Import Unit Value Indices 21 – 25 November Guam.

Paper 7: Technical Updates

Peer reviews DIME/ITDG Steering Group 15 February 2019 Claudia Junker

Development of energy balance statistics

Policy needs for rural development statistics and data analysis

IATI – Planned evaluation of IATI

February 2007 Note: Source:.

Q2010 Helsinki May 4-6, 2010 Mohammed El Qorchi

Quality Reporting in CBS

COMITOLOGY ITEMS (Point 4. on the agenda)

Activity on Eutrophication

Proposed Approach to Strengthening Information on Development Effectiveness of Multilateral Organizations Presented by: Goberdhan Singh for the Task Team.

Xueman Wang, GPSC, World Bank

UIG Task Force Progress Report

UIG Task Force Progress Report

ESS conceptual standards for quality reporting

Presentation transcript:

IATI Indicator Report to IATI Steering Committee – 3 December 2015

Process Separate Processes for IATI, CRS, FSS June 2015 Steering committee instructed IATI Tech Team to prepare revised methodology Consultation based on IATI Dashboard Publishing Statistics opened end of October Report back to December Steering Committee

Comparison with 2014 Methodology Timely, Forward-looking, Comprehensive + Coverage Busan-based architecture remains unchanged Improvement of Frequency calculation Timeliness Calculations based on count of current activities with budgets Forward-looking Review of elements to inspect Double weighting of core fields Comprehensiveness Review of comparative data for all publishers other than bilateral DAC reporters Coverage

Quality of Content IATI Secretariat 100% committed to developing a quality of content dimension Developing a machine-based assessment is difficult This is a 2016 priority for Tech Team and TAG

Pillars of IATI Indicator All IATI Publishers are assessedAssessment is run nightly Assessment is based 100% on machine logic Indicator will store history and track progress over time

Dashboard Tables Publishing StatisticsTimelinessFrequencyTime LagForward LookingComprehensivenessCoreFinancialsValue AddedCoverageIndicator

Each table contains

Consultation

Overview (

Frequency

Time Lag

Forward Looking

Comprehensiveness Summary

Comprehensiveness Core

Comprehensiveness: Financials

Comprehensiveness: Value Added

Coverage

Next Steps Today: Agree in principle February: Complete detailed work and consult on Coverage and outstanding methodology March: Submit data to GPEDCTAG: Review and RefineTAG: Discuss Quality Dimension