Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments October 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Liberty District Workshop Sacred Cowshands off! Significant historic structures Mildred Terry Library The Liberty Theater Places of Worship Ma Rainey.
Advertisements

WHAT DOES THE CITY of New Orleans ZONING ORDINANCE DO?
Planning & Community Development Department East Green Street Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting November 4, 2013.
First step in the City Parking Study Changes.
CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION.  PURPOSE OF NUISANCE ORDINANCE:  It is the purpose of the nuisance ordinance to establish means whereby the City may remove.
Agenda Presentation: Background Proposed Corridors Uses Standards & Building Examples Q & A Small Group Discussions Report Back.
Roosevelt Road Form-Based Zoning Berwyn City Council Committee of the Whole December 8, 2009.
Height Recommendations September 25, 2008 Zoning Commission Case No The District of Columbia Office of Planning’s Comprehensive Review of Zoning.
Community Development Department BUILDING ADDITIONS: EXTERIOR FINISHES AND LDC CHAPTER 13 ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENTS.
Planning & Community Development Department 55 Fillmore Street Predevelopment Plan Review City Council December 15, 2014.
Planning Legislation – Prof. H. Alshuwaikhat ZONING Zoning is the division of a municipality, city or town into districts for the purpose of regulating.
Planning & Community Development Department 245 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council December 8, 2014.
City of Rehoboth Beach Managing Impacts of Current Development Trends on Residential Neighborhoods: Issues and Possible Solutions City of Rehoboth Beach.
Fences, Walls and Drinking Establishments City Council Public Meeting July 7, 2015.
Fences, Walls and Drinking Establishments Planning & Land Development Regulation Board Public Hearing June 3, 2015.
PALM COAST COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL CENTER – PHASE Application No. SP-MAJ
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester May 21, 2012.
Presentation to the German Village Historic Preservation Committee August 22, 2013.
OCTOBER 22,  Process of Updating Zoning Ordinances.  Variances (prompted by State law changes).  Downtown District update.  Accessory Buildings.
February 24, 2015 First Public Hearing 1.  Workshop proposed ULDC changes: 1/27/15  Request to Advertise: 1/27/15  First Public Hearing: 2/24/15 
City Council 2642 Second Street Appeal of Landmarks Commission Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness 07CA-009 February 12, 2008.
HRB Meeting June 9, 2015 City Council Remand of AP 14-02/ZC
Draft Zoning Code Residential Focus Neighborhood Meeting May 8, 2007.
Proposed DRAFT New City Ordinance for Water Use in Landscaped Areas Public Meeting September 15, 2009.
Shireen Abdelrahman Lecture 5. Individual development projects - new construction, expansion, or renovation - can affect the surrounding environment in.
City of New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2005 Agenda Item: 6A (Public Hearing) Special Use Permit for Detached Garage Exceeding 624.
March 10, 2015 Second Public Hearing 1.  Workshop proposed ULDC changes: 1/27/15  Request to Advertise: 1/27/15  First Public Hearing: 2/24/15  Second.
Zoning Regulations Zoning authority is a “police power” granted to the City by the State. Land Development Code Purpose: To implement the City’s Comprehensive.
Updates to Title 8. Anticipated Timeline… July - December 2013 Ideas Compiled Research and Drafting January 2014 Planning Commission Worksession Review.
Subcommittee on Heights, Massing, and Alternate Standards    Third Report – January 20, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission.
Fences, Walls and Drinking Establishments Planning & Land Development Regulation Board Workshop May 20, 2015.
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 2006 Public Hearing: Special Use Permit (06-004) for a porch addition at th Avenue NW.
Northwest Quadrant Draft Zoning Ordinance NWQ Draft Zoning Ordinance Planning Commission Review February 21, 2006 Phil Carlson, AICP DSU Planning Consultant.
Housing Committee October 19, 2015 Accessory Dwelling Units Department of Sustainable Development and Construction.
Quality of Life & Environment Committee October 12, 2015 Presented by the Department of Sustainable Development and Construction Non-required Fence Standards.
1 Presented to the Fort Worth League of Neighborhood Associations By the City of Fort Worth, Planning and Development Department August 24, 2009 CONSERVATION.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments December 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Historic Review Board Continued Public Hearing: DR – th St. October 20, 2015.
Historic Review Board Public Hearing: DR – th St. September 15, 2015.
Planning Commission Second Unit Study Session. Tonight’s Conversation Project Background (10 minutes) Community Process (10 minutes) Council Direction—Ord.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
CITY OF TEHACHAPI DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION October 2, 2008.
Community Meeting May 22, 2013 City of Richmond Department of Planning & Development Review.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Historic Landmarks Commission Type II Appeal of Approval LU HDZ –
To provide for alcohol-free commercial uses that serve as a transition between commercial districts and one- and two-family residential areas. PURPOSE.
Planning & Community Development Department Zoning Code Amendment: Neighborhood District Overlay Zone City Council April 25, 2016.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT REGULATIONS ZOA Tuesday, October 9, 2012.
Residential Infill Project Scale of Houses (a primer) Stakeholder Advisory Committee October 6, 2015.
TREE ORDINANCE WORKSHOP DISCUSSION September 3, 2014.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Review Hearing LU DZM AD – Grant.
206 THIRD STREET DR/TRP Appeal of. Planning Commission Hearing March 12, 2014, P/C approved a Design Review Permit: - Demolition of the existing.
City of East Palo Alto Planning Commission
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: CLEARING UP THE CONFUSION
Zoning Code Amendment: Neighborhood District Overlay Zone
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Site Analysis ID 240 Spring
MarketStreet Advisory Committee Updates
Early Experience with HAA & SB 35 Objective Standards Requirements
With funding from the Appalachian Regional Commission
City Commission Workshop
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
115-Unit Mixed-Use Project (711 E
Section 8: SIGNS.
12 D. Variance Request – 211 Jennifer Lane
Design Regulations Update
Presentation transcript:

Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments October 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning & Economic Development / City Council Research

The trends…

The concerns… High number of vacant buildings –1,668 residential buildings of 1,730 total as of 10/13/09 Growing number of vacant lots, partially as a result of demolitions What will replace these buildings and go up on these lots? How might buildings be rehabilitated? The questions…

Timeline City Council directed the Planning Commission to study options for design standards for 1- and 2-family dwellings (Jan. 2009) City Council passed the interim ordinance (Feb. 2009) Staff developed a public hearing draft The Planning Commission held public hearings on May 22 and June 5, 2009 The Neighborhood Planning Committee considered public testimony and staff recommendation

The interim ordinance Before it, existing design standards (§63.110) were only applied to uses that require site plan review (not 1- and 2- family homes) The interim ordinance has required a site plan review of 1- and 2-family homes –The proposed amendments would continue to require this

Public hearing highlights Residential & nonresidential buildings should relate to the street (entrances, pedestrian connections and windows & doors facing street) Creativity and innovation should not be thwarted Avoid obstacles to green building techniques, designs, and technologies What is “traditional”? What does “relate to” mean? Subjective concepts Avoid fruitless aesthetic debates (costly, time-consuming) Focus on clear, measurable, objective standards Limit parking locations and the amount of pavement used but consider common site constraints (no alley, etc.)

§ General Design Standards The following design standards shall be used in site plan review, as applicable, unless the applicant can demonstrate that there are circumstances unique to the property that make compliance impractical or unreasonable.... (b) New development should relate to the design of adjacent traditional buildings, where these are present, in scale and character. This can be achieved by maintaining similar setbacks, facade divisions, roof lines, rhythm and proportions of openings, building materials and colors. Historic architectural styles need not be replicated.

The following design standards shall be used in site plan review, as applicable, unless the applicant can demonstrate that there are circumstances unique to the property that make compliance impractical or unreasonable.... (b) New development should relate to the design of adjacent traditional buildings, where these are present, in scale and character. This can be achieved by maintaining similar setbacks, facade divisions, roof lines, rhythm and proportions of openings, building materials and colors. Historic architectural styles need not be replicated. (f) For property with local historic site or district designation, compliance with applicable historic guidelines shall be sufficient... Better to use the regular variance process (unique circumstances) “Traditional” and “relate to” are too ambiguous and subjective Avoid fruitless aesthetic debates (costly, time-consuming) Focus on clear, measurable, objective standards Amended § General Building Design Standards

The location of primary entrances of buildings –Principal structures, including 1- and 2-family residential Other amendments to §63.110

Primary entrances for all buildings and additional requirements for 1- and 2-family residences a)A primary entrance of principal structures shall be located within the front third of the structure; be delineated with elements such as roof overhangs, recessed entries, landscaping, or similar design features; and have a direct pedestrian connection to the street. In addition, for one- and two-family dwellings, a primary entrance shall either: 1) face an improved abutting street; or 2) be located off of a front porch, foyer, courtyard, or similar architectural feature, and set back at least eight (8) feet from the side lot line.  Not within front 1/3  Within front 1/3,  Located off a foyer  Not within front 1/3  Faces front

The area of window & door openings on above grade exterior walls of principal residential and nonresidential buildings

Window & door openings on above grade exterior walls of residential and nonresidential structures (b)For principal buildings, except industrial, production, processing, storage, public service and utility buildings, above grade window and door openings shall comprise at least fifteen (15) percent of the total area of exterior walls facing a public street or sidewalk. In addition, for new principal residential buildings, above grade window and door openings shall comprise at least ten (10) percent of the total area of all exterior walls. Windows in garage doors shall count as openings; the area of garage doors themselves shall not count as openings. For residential buildings, windows shall be clear or translucent. For nonresidential buildings, windows may be clear, translucent, or opaque. Front: 17%  Total: 8%  Front: 15%  Total: 11% 

“Hold the corner” – further defined (c)In pedestrian-oriented commercial districts characterized by storefront commercial buildings built up to the public sidewalk, new principal structures shall have a maximum setback of fifteen (15) feet from a commercial front lot line. At intersections, buildings shall “hold the corner,” that is, have street facades within fifteen (15) feet of the lot line along both streets, or the site plan shall have vertical structural elements that “hold the corner.” A primary entrance shall face a primary abutting public street.

Rooftop mechanical equipment e)The visibility of rooftop mechanical equipment shall be reduced through such means as location, screening, or integration into the roof design. Screening shall be of durable, permanent materials that are compatible with the primary building materials. Exterior mechanical equipment such as ductwork shall not be located on primary building facades.  solar panels - integrated  equipment set back  rooftop screening

Access to, location of, setbacks of residential parking Garage regulations (doors and width of structure) § Accessory buildings and uses

Access to residential parking 1)Access to off-street parking shall be from an abutting improved alley when available, except where it is determined in the review of a site plan application that there are circumstances unique to the property that make this impractical, unreasonable, or harmful to the public safety. On corner lots, access to parking may be from the side street.  Alley is available, garage would have been required to access it

Location of residential parking 2)Off-street parking spaces shall not be located within the front yard.... 5)Passenger vehicles may be parked on an approved driveway in front or side yards provided the driveway leads to a legal parking space.  Parking space located in front yard  Driveway leads to legal parking space

Garage regulations (doors and width of structure) 3.Garages shall be set back from the front lot line at least as far as the principal structure (in the case of attached garages, this refers to the non-garage part of the structure). 4.Except in the rear yard, garage doors that face a public street shall be no more than nine (9) feet in height and shall not exceed sixty (60) percent of the width of the principal structure facing the same street.  Garage is over 60% of width of house  Garage is not set back at least as far as non-garage part of structure

§ Paving Materials and extent of paving for residential driveways and parking

Materials for residential parking & driveways All parking spaces, driveways and off-street parking facilities shall be paved with standard or pervious asphalt or concrete, or with brick, concrete or stone pavers, or material comparable to the adjacent street surfacing, in accordance with specifications of the zoning administrator, within one (1) year of the date of the permit except as provided in section (e). For one-family and two-family dwellings, driveway pavement may be limited to wheel tracks at least two (2) feet wide.  Brick pavers

Extent of residential driveways For one-family through four-family dwellings, and for townhouses with garage doors that face and front on a public street, driveways in front yards shall be no more than twelve (12) feet in width, except that a driveway may be up to four (4) feet wider than the garage door within 30 feet of the garage door...  Driveway width exceeds 12’

Paving limit for surface parking spaces The total amount of paving for surface parking spaces for one-family and two-family dwellings shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the lot area or one thousand (1000) square feet, whichever is less.

Summary of proposed ordinance amendments Edits to § Applies to all residential; some standards apply to nonresidential Removes problematic subjective design review – buildings to have a “relationship to” or “consistency with… adjacent traditional” buildings Clarifies requirements about primary building entrances Prohibits blank & “windowless” walls from facing streets Clarifies the “hold the corner” requirement - more objective Makes more flexible required screening of rooftop mechanical equipment Edits of §61.402, §63.310, § Requires building elevations in site plan review Requires removal of curbs & driveways when off-street parking removed Limits the extent of driveways in residential front yards Limits surface parking spaces as % of residential lot area Edits of § Requires residential off-street parking to access the alley (when available) Requires garage doors facing public streets to be set back at least as far as the principal structure

Questions?