1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oklahoma Strategic Highway Safety Plan – Vision, Mission and Goal presented to SHSP Leadership Group SHSP Working Group presented by Susan Herbel, Cambridge.
Advertisements

AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
County Road Safety Plans Experiences with Development and Implementation Richard (Rick) West, PE Otter Tail County Public Works Director/County Engineer.
57 th Traffic Conference. The National Problem — ,200 Fatalities 2.68M Injuries $230.6B / year $820 per person 3.3 Million Deaths Since 1928.
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Roadway Departure Crash
GAMPO. Randy Clayton Operations Manager, Strategic Highway Safety Plan Georgia Governor’s Office of Highway Safety.
Type Name Here Technical Program Services Eduardo C. Serafin, PE, AICP.
Hardin County Engineering Department September 12, 2006.
Carver County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/15/ Year Crashes Carver.
Lisa Gilmour Department for Transport Update on Young Driver Green Paper.
Meeting the AASHTO Safety Goal Daniel L. Carter, PE UNC Highway Safety Research Center AASHTO Safety Mgmt Subcommittee Meeting September 2, 2009.
Learning Outcomes Identify safety issues unique to local and rural areas. Identify common challenges to improving road safety. Explain why road agencies.
1 Hawaii Strategic Highway Safety Plan: FACILITY DESIGN Dan Galanis Injury Prevention and Control Program Hawaii Department of Health 1250 Punchbowl St.,
Countdown Signal Heads For Vehicles. Outlines zProblem Statement zHypothesis  What are the benefits of the countdown timer?  How would the countdown.
Early 2009 SD Crash Statistics Transportation Safety Conference “Working together to Save Lives” Office of Accident Records Chuck Fergen.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting 1 Metro June 21, 2012.
Annual Safety Meeting February 21, 2007 Ron Marshall, SD LTAP Local Rural Road Safety in SD - What does the data tell us?
The Safety Solution is Local and Personal !!! Business of Saving Lives The Safety Problem Is Global.
IDAHO’S CRASH PROBLEM & PROGRAMS. Mission - Zero traffic deaths on Idaho roads Fewer than 200 annual traffic deaths by 2012 Goals.
Safer Journeys: New Zealand’s Road Safety Strategy to 2020 Chris Foley NEW ZEALAND.
Teens and Trucks and Defeating Distracted Driving July 2011.
1 FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION November 5, 2010.
City of Henderson Citizens Traffic Advisory Board NDOT SAFETY UPDATE.
October 17, 2012 Connie S. Sorrell Chief of Systems Operations.
Saving Lives: A Vital FHWA Goal Safety Priorities for 2003 Michael Halladay FHWA Office of Safety Michigan Traffic Safety Summit; April 29, 2003.
1 Ramsey County Review Meeting 1 June 21, Metro* County Crash Data Overview 2 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury.
1 Washington County Review Meeting 1 June 21, 2012.
October 24, 2015 The Vermont Highway Safety Alliance Vermont Highway Safety Alliance AARP Driver Safety Annual Meeting October 29, 2014 Presented by: Kevin.
Other Road Users  Motorists should always be on the look out for pedestrians and oncoming traffic Pedestrian Laws: Failure to yield Penalties Include:
Statewide Analysis Strategies Missouri’s Blueprint for Safer Roadways.
1 MnDOT County Roadway Safety Plans Review Meeting #1 - ATP 2 June 25, 2012.
Rural Transportation Planning Eunice Fitzpatrick Transportation Planner Kentucky River ADD Hazard, KY.
Lane Departures By: Deborah S. McAvoy, M.S., P.E., PTOE Tapan K. Datta, Ph.D., P.E.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
1 September 28, 2011 Safety Strategies Workshop Brown County Faribault County Martin County Watonwan County.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.
1 Update Update MnDOT’s County Roadway Safety Plans CTS Transportation Research Conference May 23, 2012 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
1 Watonwan County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
Name Agency Date, Year Understanding Younger Drivers.
Caltrans External Advisory Liaison Committee October 2015.
Jurisdictionally Blind Safety Doug Bish OTCDC March 8th.
Director Malcolm Dougherty California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) October 28, 2015 Caltrans’ Highway Safety Improvement Program.
Presented by Cory Hutchinson October 26, Funded by the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Research group within the Information.
Polk County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes Polk.
1 Marshall County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
ATP 2 Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 6/1/ Year Crashes ATP 2 7,072.
2011 National Association of County Engineers Conference Mn/DOT County Roadway Safety Plans April 20, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
ATP 1 County Road Safety Plan 1 Brad Estochen MnDOT Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology
Iihs.org Automated enforcement. Number of U.S. communities with speed cameras and red light cameras January 2016 Automated enforcement uses technology.
TRAFFIC SAFETY Presented By Sgt. Debra Newsome Canton Police Department.
Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Rural Intersection Decision Support - Crash Analysis Presented at Pooled Fund Meeting April 19, 2004.
1 Faribault County Review Meeting 1 August 31, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
1 Polk County Review Meeting 1 June 25, ATP 2 County Crash Data Overview 06/25/2012 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious.
1 St. Louis County Review Meeting 1 August 29, 2011 CH2M HILL, SRF Consulting Group, P.E. Services.
Older Road Users Emphasis Area Team
Understanding Younger Drivers
What’s UP with County Roads?
Unlicensed Driving.
Other Road Users Motorists should always be on the look out for pedestrians and oncoming traffic Pedestrian Laws: Failure to yield Penalties Include: •Up.
Intersection Crash Analysis in the State of Oregon
Crash Analysis of Lincoln Way and Dakota Ave. Ames, IA
Driver Education Committee June 25, 2018
D R I V E R S E D G E USA Curriculum Use mouse to advance slides.
Crash Severity for Lane Departures Crashes
Presentation transcript:

1 Red Lake County Review Meeting 1 June 25, 2012

ATP 2 County Crash Data Overview 06/25/2012 Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 5 Year Crashes ATP 2 7, Year Crashes ATP 2 7, State System 3,963 – 53% 128 – 43% State System 3,963 – 53% 128 – 43% CSAH/CR 1,705 – 23% 139 – 46% CSAH/CR 1,705 – 23% 139 – 46% Rural 1,353 – 79% 131 – 94% Rural 1,353 – 79% 131 – 94% Urban 352 – 21% 8 – 6% Urban 352 – 21% 8 – 6% All Way Stop 3 – 2% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 3 – 2% 0 – 0% Run off Road 461 – 67% 51 – 65% Run off Road 461 – 67% 51 – 65% On Curve 153 – 33% 23 – 45% On Curve 153 – 33% 23 – 45% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 42 (48%), 1 (50%) “Other” – 8 (9%), 1 (50%) Left Turn – 12 (14%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 6 (7%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 42 (48%), 1 (50%) “Other” – 8 (9%), 1 (50%) Left Turn – 12 (14%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 6 (7%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop 88 – 60% 2 – 100% Thru-Stop 88 – 60% 2 – 100% Rear End – 12 (25%), 0 (0%) Ran Off Road – 9 (19%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 8 (17%), 0 (0%) “Other” – 4 (8%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 12 (25%), 0 (0%) Ran Off Road – 9 (19%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 8 (17%), 0 (0%) “Other” – 4 (8%), 0 (0%) Signalized 8 – 5% 0 – 0% Signalized 8 – 5% 0 – 0% Inters-Related 317 –28% 41 – 33% Inters-Related 317 –28% 41 – 33% City, Twnshp, Other 1,837 – 24% 34 – 11% City, Twnshp, Other 1,837 – 24% 34 – 11% Inters-Related 147 – 42% 2 – 25% Inters-Related 147 – 42% 2 – 25% Not Inters-Related 126 – 36% 5 – 63% Not Inters-Related 126 – 36% 5 – 63% Run Off Road – 32 (25%), 2 (40%) Head On/SS Opp – 10 (8%), 2 (40%) Rear End – 33 (26%), 1 (20%) Right Angle – 10 (8%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 32 (25%), 2 (40%) Head On/SS Opp – 10 (8%), 2 (40%) Rear End – 33 (26%), 1 (20%) Right Angle – 10 (8%), 0 (0%) Animal 204 – 15% 7 – 5% Animal 204 – 15% 7 – 5% Not Inters-Related 692 – 60% 79 – 64% Not Inters-Related 692 – 60% 79 – 64% Head On, SS Opp 47 – 7% 13 – 16% Head On, SS Opp 47 – 7% 13 – 16% On Curve 16 – 34% 4 – 31% On Curve 16 – 34% 4 – 31% Unknown/Other 79 – 22% 1 – 12% Unknown/Other 79 – 22% 1 – 12% Unknown/Other 140 – 12% 4 – 3% Unknown/Other 140 – 12% 4 – 3% Other/Unknown 48 – 33% 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 48 – 33% 0 – 0% Right Angle – 50 (31%), 17 (55%) “Other” – 39 (24%), 8 (26%) Rear End – 20 (12%), 2 (6%) Run Off Road – 16 (10%), 1 (3%) Right Angle – 50 (31%), 17 (55%) “Other” – 39 (24%), 8 (26%) Rear End – 20 (12%), 2 (6%) Run Off Road – 16 (10%), 1 (3%) Thru-Stop 161 – 51% 31 – 76% Thru-Stop 161 – 51% 31 – 76% Run Off Road – 49 (34%), 5 (56%) Right Angle – 14 (10%), 2 (22%) “Other” – 29 (20%), 1 (11%) “Not Coded” – 1 (1%), 1 (11%) Run Off Road – 49 (34%), 5 (56%) Right Angle – 14 (10%), 2 (22%) “Other” – 29 (20%), 1 (11%) “Not Coded” – 1 (1%), 1 (11%) Other/Unknown 143 – 45% 9 –22% Other/Unknown 143 – 45% 9 –22% Not Animal 1,149 – 85% 124 – 95% Not Animal 1,149 – 85% 124 – 95% All Way Stop 7 – 2% 1 – 2% All Way Stop 7 – 2% 1 – 2% Signalized 6 – 2% 0 – 0% Signalized 6 – 2% 0 – 0%

6/25/20123 Red Lake County Crash Data Overview Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A). 5 Year Crashes Red Lake Year Crashes Red Lake State System 60 – 59% 3 – 43% State System 60 – 59% 3 – 43% CSAH/CR 34 – 34% 4 – 57% CSAH/CR 34 – 34% 4 – 57% Rural 28 – 82% 4 – 100% Rural 28 – 82% 4 – 100% Urban 6 – 18% 0 – 0% Urban 6 – 18% 0 – 0% All Way Stop 0 – 0% All Way Stop 0 – 0% On Curve 0 – 0% On Curve 0 – 0% Example All – % Severe – % Example All – % Severe – % Right Angle – 1 (100%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop 1 – 50% 0 – 0% Thru-Stop 1 – 50% 0 – 0% Unknown – 1 (100%), 0 (0%) Signalized 0 – 0% Signalized 0 – 0% Inters-Related 7 –35% 1 – 33% Inters-Related 7 –35% 1 – 33% City, Twnshp, Other 7 – 7% 0 – 0% City, Twnshp, Other 7 – 7% 0 – 0% Inters-Related 2 – 33% 0 – 0% Inters-Related 2 – 33% 0 – 0% Not Inters-Related 3 – 50% 0 – 0% Not Inters-Related 3 – 50% 0 – 0% Run Off Road – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Rear End – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Animal 8 – 29% 1 – 25% Animal 8 – 29% 1 – 25% Not Inters-Related 11 – 55% 2 – 67% Not Inters-Related 11 – 55% 2 – 67% Head On, SS Opp 1 – 9% 0 – 0% Head On, SS Opp 1 – 9% 0 – 0% On Curve 0 – 0% On Curve 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 1 – 17% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 1 – 17% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 2 – 10% 0 – 0% Unknown/Other 2 – 10% 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 1 – 50% 0 – 0% Other/Unknown 1 – 50% 0 – 0% Right Angle – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) “Other” – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Right Angle – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) “Other” – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Run Off Road – 1 (33%), 0 (0%) Thru-Stop 3 – 43% 0 – 0% Thru-Stop 3 – 43% 0 – 0% “Other” – 2 (50%), 1 (100%) Run Off Road – 2 (50%), 0 (0%) “Other” – 2 (50%), 1 (100%) Run Off Road – 2 (50%), 0 (0%) Other/Unknown 4 – 57% 1 – 100% Other/Unknown 4 – 57% 1 – 100% Not Animal 20 – 71% 3 – 75% Not Animal 20 – 71% 3 – 75% All Way Stop 0 – 0% All Way Stop 0 – 0% Signalized 0 – 0% Signalized 0 – 0% Run off Road 7 – 64% 1 – 50% Run off Road 7 – 64% 1 – 50%

Red Lake County Crash Data Overview ATP 2 Crash Data Rural Crashes 94% of the CSAH/CR severe crashes occurred in rural areas. Non-Intersection Related Crashes 64% of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are non-intersection related. o 65% of these are road departure crashes, 45% of which occurred on a curve. Intersection Related Crashes 33% of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are intersection related. o 76% of these crashes occurred at a thru-STOP intersection. Red Lake County Crash Data Rural Crashes 100% of the CSAH/CR severe crashes occurred in rural areas. o 67% (2 crashes) of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are non-intersection related (1 run off the road crash). o 33% (1 crash) of CSAH/CR rural severe crashes are intersection related (1 unknown). 6/25/20124

Red Lake County Emphasis Areas 6/25/20125 Red Lake County Emphasis Areas Emphasis Area Statewide Percentage ATP 2Red Lake County Interstate, US & THCSAH & CR City, Twnshp & Other Interstate, US & THCSAH & CR City, Twnshp & Other Total Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes8, Drivers Young drivers (under 21)24%23%(32)27%(38)36%(17)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Unlicensed drivers8%18%(25)8%(11)9%(4)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Older drivers (over 64)14%20%(28)12%(17)6%(3)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Aggressive driving and speeding-related20%17%(24)21%(30)32%(15)33%(1)33%(2)0%(0) Drug and alcohol-related26%35%(49)44%(62)45%(21)100%(3)100%(6)0%(0) Inattentive, distracted, asleep drivers20%22%(31)15%(21)13%(6)33%(1)17%(1)0%(0) Safety awareness Unbelted vehicle occupants25%36%(51)51%(72)32%(15)100%(3)50%(3)100%(1) Special Users Pedestrians crashes8%6%(9)2%(3)2%(1)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Bicycle crashes4%1%(2)0%(0)4%(2)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Vehicles Motorcycles crashes16%8%(11)11%(16)26%(12)0%(0)33%(2)0%(0) Heavy vehicle crashes10%17%(24)12%(17)2%(1)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Safety enhancements Highways Train-vehicle collisions0% (0)1%(2)6%(3)0%(0)0%(0)0%(0) Road departure crashes28%32%(46)45%(64)45%(21)33%(1)50%(3)100%(1) Consequences of leaving road Intersection crashes42%45%(64)30%(43)34%(16)0%(0)17%(1)0%(0) Head-On and Sideswipe (opposite) crashes15% (21)15%(22)19%(9)0%(0)17%(1)0%(0) Work zone crashes2%0%(0)2%(3)0%(0)0%(0)17%(1)0%(0) EMSEnhancing Emergency Capabilities Management Information and decision support systems More effective processes DPS Crash Data Records, 2006 to 2010 Top Emphasis Areas by Jurisdiction Note: Numbers are not additive, as one crash may involve a young driver at an intersection. The numbers represent severe crashes (Fatal and A-type Injury crashes)

Safety Workshop Objective: Multidisciplinary discussion of a short list of safety strategies (Note: there is no discussion of specific crash locations.) Date: July 26 Location: U of M Crookston – Youngquist Auditorium Agenda 8:30 AM – Coffee and Registration 9:00 AM – Introductions o Presentations – Law Enforcement and Local Safety Advocates o Background Information/Desired Outcomes o Breakout Sessions – Prioritize Strategies 12:00 – 1:00 PM - Lunch o Report Back/Final Presentation 2:45 – 3:00 PM - Wrap-up 6/25/20126

7 Red Lake County’s Sample Invite

6/25/20128 Safety Workshop – County Assignments April/May Confirm groups and select group leaders Select dates June Secure Location and Caterer – Group Coordinator people $12/person (“all in” including delivery, tax and tip) Send invites (example has been provided) July All Counties: RSVP Head Count to Rich Sanders by July 16th Group Coordinator (Rich): Confirm final headcount by July 17th Group Coordinator (Rich): Carla Stueve (SRF) at Provide final headcount Audio-visual availability for the workshop