Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ODOT’s Section 106 Training
Advertisements

Guidance on New CEs Emergency Repair Projects Operational Right-of-Way Limited Federal Funds EUM – March questions to:
Update on FHWA/FTA Proposed Rulemaking. MAP-21 Requirements Section 1318(a)(3) o Solicit requests from state DOTs, transit authorities, and MPOs, for.
Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) Updates questions to:
Section 4(f) Section 6(f). Section 4(f) Process Overview 2 Project Initiation Package Field Review 4(f) Property Present Use Coordination NEPA Document.
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 36 CFR Part 800 Protection of Historic Properties Section 106 Managing the Environmental & Project.
NEW PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION AGREEMENT A WORK IN PROGRESS… ODOT—Office of Environmental Services Environmental Update Meeting20 November 2014.
The Ohio Department of Transportation’s work to preserve low-volume bridges in place or to move to trails (and thereby avoid a Section 106 Adverse Effect)
Program Alternatives under 36 CFR Part 800 Dave Berwick Army Affairs Coordinator Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Tribal Issues & Project Delivery Case Studies & Lessons Learned Federal Highway Administration Washington Division FHWA Environmental Meeting, June 29,
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
NEPA ASSUMPTION SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DELIVERY PROGRAM.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Surface Transportation project delivery program
Ohio Department of Transportation ODOT Training & Environmental Prequalification Requirements questions to:
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Federal Preservation Activities: Part 1. What did With Heritage So Rich (1965) and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provide to administer.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act ____________________ Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP Program Projects.
Completing the NEPA Process for CatEx Projects: Part 3 to CE Closeout.
SAFETEA-LU Changes  Exemption of the Interstate System from Section 4(f) [Section 6007]  de minimis impacts to historic sites [Section 6009(a)]  de.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Dean McMath Regional Environmental Programs Manager FAA – Southwest Region NEPA Essentials Selected Special.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division Working Through The S106 Process FY 2015 CDBG Applicant Workshop December 4 th, 2014Meg.
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
Section 106: Historic Preservation Review and Compliance as it relates to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 “How Can State Agencies Assist.
Community Impacts Environmental Justice Public Involvement Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
Section 4(f)/6(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division 1 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act Review and Compliance for CDBG/CHIP.
1 Historic Preservation Webinar "Reporting Through PAGE and to PMC"
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
Raising the Bar: Improving the Roles of the State, MPO, and FHWA in Tribal Consultation Tribal Transportation Planning, Partnering and Consultation James.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Environmental Site Assessments Hazardous Materials/ Regulated Substances Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Railroad Towers ISSUES AND UPDATES FOR TOWERS PROPOSED IN RAILROAD RIGHTS OF WAY.
Community Impacts Environmental Justice Public Involvement Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
Waterway Permits Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
Programmatic Agreements
Regulated Material Review and Environmental Site Assessments
101 New London Road Newark, Delaware
Community Impacts Underserved Populations Public Involvement
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project FERC Project No February 26, 2008.
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
Environmental Prequalification Requirements
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
Environmental Commitments
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Presentation transcript:

Categorical Exclusion Training Class Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Cultural Resources Process Project Initiation Package Request for Scoping Field Investigations Cultural Resource Document ODOT Review Agency Coordination NEPA Document Categorical Exclusion Training Class

National Historic Preservation Act (1966) Significant historic resources were being lost due to “urban renewal” Provided for expansion and maintenance of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Formed Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) Requires federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Categorical Exclusion Training Class Section 106 - NHPA Requires consideration of effects on historic properties listed on OR eligible for the NRHP Ensures preservation values are factored into decision-making and planning process Considers views of the public (may be done concurrently with NEPA Public Involvement) Federal agencies responsible for Section 106 compliance Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Categorical Exclusion Training Class 36 CFR Part 800 Implementing regulations of the NHPA www.achp.gov/regs-rev04.pdf Spells out the process in identifying historic resources and determining effects Mandates the review process be completed prior to the expenditure of Federal Funds Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Categorical Exclusion Training Class Section 106 PA Between FHWA, ODOT, SHPO, ACHP Current agreement executed in 2011 Lays out process for Section 106 compliance Allows ODOT to act on FHWA’s behalf Allows ODOT to clear projects with minimal potential to cause effects without further coordination Allows for 15-day review period for projects with No Historic Properties Affected and No Adverse Effect Revision in progress Later on this fall… Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Section 106 Scoping Request Information submitted to OES for scoping Project Description Mapping Previously Inventoried Resources Ohio Historic Inventory Ohio Archaeological Inventory National Register of Historic Places Historic Bridges Etc. Photolog Other project information See Section 106 Toolkit Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Categorical Exclusion Training Class 106 Coordination Once OES receives the Scoping Request Form: Assess to determine what, if any, additional work is required Clear in-house with PA OR Recommend consultant complete Phase I Once studies are complete: OES issues IOC or formal letter Includes resources identified in APE Includes effect call for project Includes language to be included in CE May include Section 4(f) language (de minimis) Categorical Exclusion Training Class

***READ ALL DOCUMENTATION*** Categorical Exclusion Training Class Project Effect 36 CFR Part 800/PA Minimal Potential to Cause Effects per ODOT’s revised Programmatic Agreement (11/30/11) No Historic Properties Affected No Adverse Effect Adverse Effect Effects determined in consultation with OHPO Only one effect determination for an undertaking ***READ ALL DOCUMENTATION*** Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Online CE – Cultural Resources Tab Description of Efforts Discuss resources identified through records check Include who conducted and when Discuss resources identified through field review Who equals OES, District Staff, or consulting firm… Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Online CE – Cultural Resources Tab Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Online CE - Cultural Resources Tab Remarks Include information from end of IOC or letter. Effect Call Bulleted items Who equals OES, District Staff, or consulting firm… Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Online CE – Cultural Resources Tab Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Online CE – Cultural Resources Tab Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Online CE – Cultural Resources Tab Categorical Exclusion Training Class

READ ALL CORRESPONDENCE Categorical Exclusion Training Class Commitments List commitments out of coordination Who equals OES, District Staff, or consulting firm… READ ALL CORRESPONDENCE Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Categorical Exclusion Training Class Documentation Agency Coordination Letters (part of CE) ODOT generated coordination (part of CE): ORC Section 149.53 Section 106 PA IOC Survey Reports (project file) Documentation for Consultation/Determination of Effects Report (project file) MOA (Memorandum of Agreement) (project file) PA (Programmatic Agreement) (project file) HABS/HAER (project file) Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Categorical Exclusion Training Class Points To Remember Section 106 applies to any federal undertaking Must consider effects on eligible or listed NRHP properties Imperative to read all documents generated Agency Letters IOCs from ODOT-OES and/or ODOT District Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Categorical Exclusion Training Class Points To Remember Lead Federal Agency is responsible for all decisions Commitments out of coordination must be included Cross-over areas: Section 4(f), Public Involvement Document everything Decisions, findings, consultation, etc. Categorical Exclusion Training Class

Contacts/Information Cultural Resource Staff Erica Schneider - AEA Susan Gasbarro - H/A Team Leader Stan Baker - Archaeology Team Leader Cultural Resource Website Report requirements Agreements Historic Contexts Historic Bridges General guidance and related links Section 106 Toolkit Cultural Resources Manual Categorical Exclusion Training Class