LIS512 lecture 2: FRBR 2010-09-29. reading International Federation of Library Association “Fundamental Requirements for Bibliographic Records”, revised.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented to the ALCTS FRBR Interest Group, ALA Annual, 24 June 2011
Advertisements

John Espley and Robert Pillow ALA New Orleans 26 June 2011 The RDA Sandbox and RDA Implementation Scenario One.
Some outcomes of the CRM/FRBR harmonization: the definition of manifestation and a review of attributes Maja Žumer University of Ljubljana.
FRBR Overview and Application Authorities: Part 1 June 2012.
Music Encoding Initiative (MEI) DTD and the OCVE
FRBR QUIZ Start quiz Take quiz by pointing to the answer and clicking on it.
A Brief Presentation of PRESS OO For the CIDOC CRM SIG and FRBR/CRM Harmonisation WG 21 October 2013.
FRBR – A Refresher Course Marjorie E. Bloss RDA Project Manager April 9, 2008.
Bibliographic Relationships and Bibliographic Families.
The “FRBR family” Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Functional Requirements for Authority Data Functional Requirements for Subject Authority.
MARC 21, FRBR, RDA Review terminology (especially for non-native English speakers) Conceptual models Elements Attributes Future: Probably not a bib record,
Georgia Cataloging Summit Dr. Barbara B. Tillett and Judith A. Kuhagen Policy and Standards Division, Library of Congress Library of Congress RDA Workshop.
FRBR Functional requirements for bibliographic records (IFLA, 1998) Don Thornbury, RBSC Technical Services April 5, 2005.
FRBR: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records it is the Final Report of the IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic.
RDA Test at LC Module 1: Overview What RDA Is; Structure.
RDA Terminology: A Summary Atoma Batoma. RDA Terminology RDA Vocabularies: Controlled Vocabularies -Closed – Open –
RDA: A New Standard Supporting Resource Discovery Presentation given at the CLA conference session The Future of Resource Discovery: Promoting Resource.
FRBR: BASICS & INFLUENCE ON AACR A presentation by Kate Harcourt Columbia University Libraries April 19, 2004 ARLIS 2004 New York.
Entity-Groups 1.) product of intellectual or artistic endeavour WORK, EXPRESSION, MANIFESTATION, ITEM 2.) responsibility for intellectual or artistic content.
IMT530- Organization of Information Resources1 Feedback Like exercises –But want more instructions and feedback on them –Wondering about grading on these.
RDA, FRBR & MARC RDA Cataloguing Seminars September 2012.
Understanding FRBR Madely du Preez Lecturer Tel:
Module C: Identifying expressions User task: identify.
The European Manuscript & Hand Press Book Heritage The role of the Consortium of European Research Libraries (CERL) Manuscript Collection in the National.
FRBR Training Wichita State University Libraries.
Cornell CS Bibliographic Concepts CS 502 – Carl Lagoze – Cornell University Acks to H. Van de Sompel.
1 Modelling Intellectual Processes: The object-orient FRBR Model Martin Doerr Center for Cultural Informatics Institute of Computer Science Foundation.
Cataloguing Electronic resources Prepared by the Cataloguing Team at Charles Sturt University.
7/14/09. Robert L. Maxwell RDA Lecture Series National Library of South Africa 22 July /14/09 Cataloging: Still a Professional Asset to Become Excited.
10/14/20151 Bibliographic Ontologies. Bibliontology Providing ontology to model bibliographic information for the libraries.
1 Document Ontologies in Library and Information Science: An Introduction and Critical Analysis Allyson Carlyle iSchool, University of Washington, Seattle,
New MARC Fields with RDA Bibliographic and Authority Formats Bibliographic and Authority Formats.
Entity Relationships for the Bibliographic Universe Jacquie Samples September 7,2010 FRBR.
The “Functional Requirements family” Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Functional Requirements for Authority Data Functional Requirements.
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: FRBR and Millennium
Implementation scenarios, encoding structures and display Rob Walls Director Database Services Libraries Australia.
Module 2: FRBR refresher Adapted from: Teaching RDA: Train-the-trainer course RDA: Resource description and access presented by the National Library of.
Module 2: FRBR refresher This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License
1 herbert van de sompel CS 502 Computing Methods for Digital Libraries Cornell University – Computer Science Herbert Van de Sompel
LIS654 lecture 5 DC metadata and omeka tables Thomas Krichel
What users want & how FRBR can help Diane Vizine-Goetz Research Scientist OCLC Research.
APPLYING FRBR TO LIBRARY CATALOGUES A REVIEW OF EXISTING FRBRIZATION PROJECTS Martha M. Yee September 9, 2006 draft.
Linked Data by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Policy and Standards Division Library of Congress For Texas Library Association Conference April 12, 2011.
What Does FRBR Mean To You? Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program
Evidence from Metadata INST 734 Doug Oard Module 8.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
Building blocks for RDA Theory behind RDA ALLUNY Annual Meeting September 28-30, 2012.
 NOTSL/ALAO-TEDSIG Joint Spring Meeting, May 14, 2010 FRBR Family FRBR: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records FRAD: Functional Requirements.
Intellectual Works and their Manifestations Representation of Information Objects IR Systems & Information objects Spring January, 2006 Bharat.
AACR2 versus RDA Presentation given at the CLA Pre-Conference Session From Rules to Entities: Cataloguing with RDA May 29, 2009 by Tom Delsey.
FRBR: Cataloging’s New Frontier Emily Dust Nimsakont Nebraska Library Commission NCompass Live December 15, 2010 Photo credit:
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records The Changing Face of Cataloging William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library.
Defining Entities for Description The Bibliographic Universe.
RDA: history and background Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT ACOC Seminar, Sydney, 24 October 2008.
FRBR Group 1 entities Melvyn Yabut LIBR Dr. Robert Ellett September 4, 2009.
RDA in NACO Module 1.b Background : FRBR/FRAD. 2 FRBR Foundation of RDA If you want a more detailed background, watch this webcast by Barbara Tillett:
CASEY A. MULLIN WITH: LALA HAJIBAYOVA SCOTT MCCAULAY DECEMBER 8, 2008 FRBR in RDF: a proof-of-concept model 1 ©2008 Casey A. Mullin.
1 CLA June 2, 2010 IFLA’s Conceptual Models and RDA presented by Pat Riva.
Attributes and Values Describing Entities. Metadata At the most basic level, metadata is just another term for description, or information about an entity.
Paul Frank George Prager (You describe the relationships)
From FRBR to FRBROO through CIDOC CRM…
Mapping MARC to FRBR.
FRBRoo and performing arts
Defining Entities for Description
Attributes and Values Describing Entities.
Modelling Intellectual Processes: The object-orient FRBR Model
Attributes and Values Describing Entities.
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
Modelling Intellectual Processes: The object-orient FRBR Model
Presentation transcript:

LIS512 lecture 2: FRBR

reading International Federation of Library Association “Fundamental Requirements for Bibliographic Records”, revised 2008 The version I used is on the course resource page rses/lis512 under the external_doc folder. You don’t need to read the 142 pages. Just refer to it to potentially clarify what I discuss here.

not looked at here Some of the content relates to tasks that a user will perform on a retrieval system. Thus there is some “modelling” of what a user does. This part is off-topic for us since it deals with information retrieval.

step 1 Step 1: What do we describe in the bibliographic universe? What are the things that are of interest to bibliographic data? What we describe is called an entity by FRBR. In fact it is an entity set. The vocabulary is wrong but it is convenient. Example entities are “work” and “event”.

step 2 Once we know what entities we describe we can do two things. The order of the two does not matter. The two are 1: For each entity, what about it do we describe? Example: title of a work, start time and end time of an event. 2: What are relationships between entities? Example: a work “is about” an event. --see next two slides--

attributes to entities Once we know what entity we are describing, we can define what we want to describe about it. The data elements we enter information about are called attributes. For example if the entity is a course, it could be the title of the course, the course number, etc…

relationship between entities If I have two entities, I can define relationships between them. Say if I have a course entity, and a person entity, I can define a relationship that a person is a student in a course, or a person is an instructor for a course. Entities and relationships form an entity- relationship model.

entity groups FRBR groups entities into groups. The groups are numbered Group 1: work, expression, manifestation, item Group 2: person, corporate body Group 3: concept, object, event, place

group 1: work The work is a distinct artistic and intellectual creation. It is an abstract entity. It is difficult to precisely define what a work is. Borders of works may be culturally diverse. Examples: Shakespeare’s Hamlet Bruckner’s fifth symphony Homer’s Iliad

group 1: expression An expression is an intellectual or artistic realization of the work in the form of alpha-numeric, musical or chorographical notation, regardless of physical form that would not alter the contents. Examples: the original text of Hamlet a version of Bruckner’s fifth symphony a Russian translation of the Iliad

group 1: manifestation The manifestation is the particular physical form of the expression a recorded performance of Hamlet a published score of a version of the fifth symphony of Bruckner a translation of the Iliad published in Russian Difference between manifestations depend on physical form and intellectual contents.

group 1: item This is a single physical copy of the manifestation a DVD of a particular performance of Hamlet a physical copy of a score of a version of Bruckner's fifth symphony a copy of the Russian translation of the Iliad on a web site.

group 2: person A person is an individual person. It does not matter whether they are alive or not. The main interest in persons is with their relationship with the work.

group 2: corporate body A corporate “Corporate Body” is a group of persons, an organization, or a group of organizations acting as a unit. Usually the group has to have a name, even though they may have gathered only once for, say, a meeting. Whether a corporate body is defunct or not does not matter.

group 3: concept A concept is an abstract notion or idea. The concept does not need to be precise. Bibliographic records are interested in concepts because they may be the subject of a work.

group 3: object An object is a material thing. Whether the object actually exists is not of concern. We are interested in objects because they can be the subjects of works. Example in the FRBR document: Apollo 11

group 3: place A place is a geographical location. The place includes geographical location, be they terrestrial or not, and geo-political jurisdictions e.g. the Holy See.

group 3: event An event is an action or occurrence. The entity defined as an event encompasses a comprehensive range of actions and occurrences that may be the subject of a work: historical events, epochs, periods of time, etc.

aggregate entities Many entities can be aggregates of other entities. The USA (place) has 50 states, each of them entities of type place. The Torah (work) has five books. Each is of type work.

attributes of a work title form date (of creation) other distinguishing characteristics (enabling distinction from other works with same title) intended termination intended audience context

attributes of a work context (at creation time) [for musical works] – medium of performance – numeric designation – key [for cartographical works] – coordinates – equinox

attributes of an expression title form date language other distinguishing characteristic extensibility revisability

attributes of an expression extent summarization of content context critical response use restrictions

attributes of expressions [for a serial expression] – sequencing pattern – expected regularity of issue – expected frequency of issue [for musical expressions] – type of score – medium of performance

attributes of expression [for cartographic images or objects] – scale – projection – presentation technique – representation of relief – geodetic, grid, and vertical measurement

attributes of expressions for images – recording technique – special characteristics – technique

attributes of a manifestation title statement of responsibility edition/issue designation place of publication/distribution publisher/distributor date of publication/distribution fabricator/manufacturer series statement

attributes of a manifestation form of carrier extent of the carrier physical medium capture mode dimensions of the carrier manifestation identifier

attributes of a manifestation source for acquisition/access authorization terms of availability access restrictions [for printed books] – typeface – type size [for hand-printed books] – foliation – collation

attributes of a manifestation [for sound recordings] – playing speed – groove width – kind of cutting – tape configuration – kind of sound – special reproduction characteristic

attributes of a manifestation [for serials] – publication status – numbering [for microfilm and visual projections] – color – reduction ratio – polarity – generation – presentation format

attributes of a manifestation [for electronic resources] – system requirements – file characteristics [for remote electronic resources] – mode of access – access address

attributes of an item item identifier fingerprint provenance marks/inscriptions exhibition history condition treatment history scheduled treatment access restrictions

attributes of a person name of the person e.g. “P.D.Q. Bach” dates of the person e.g. “1742 to 1817” title of the person e.g. “very reverend” other designation associated with the person e.g. “junior”

attributes of a corporate body name of the corporate body number associated with the corporate body place associated with the corporate body date associated with the corporate body other designations associated with the corporate body

attributes of concept / object / place / event These three entities each just have one single, the “term”. The term for the concept / object / place / event is the word, phrase, or group of characters used to name or designate the concept / object / place / event.

primary relationships in group 1 A work “is realized through” an expression. An expression “is a realization” of a work. An expression “embodied in” a manifestation. A manifestation “is an embodiment” of an expression. A manifestation “is exemplified by” an item. An item “exemplifies” a manifestation.

group 1 to group 2 relationships A work “is created by” a person or corporate body (P/CB). An expression “is realized by” a P/CB. A manifestation “is produced by” a P/CB An item “is owned by” a P/CB

subject relationships any entity in group one can have a subject relationship with any entity, be it in group 1, 2 or 3. A work can be about – another work – a person – a place / event etc…

relationships within group 1 Relationships within group one are a bit more difficult. Whole to part relationships hold for all entities in group one and they are easy to understand.

work to work relationships is a successor to | has a successor supplements | has a supplement complements | has a complement has a summary | is a summary of has an adaption | is an adaptation of has a transformation | is a transformation of imitation | is an imitation of has part | is a part of

expression to expression relationships, same work has an abridgement | is an abridgement of has a revision | is a revision of has a translation | is a translation of [for musical works] – has a transcription | is a transcription of – has an arrangement | is an arrangement of

expression to expression, different work has a successor | is a successor to has a supplement | supplements has a complement | complements has a summary | is a summary of has an adaptation | is an adaptation of has a transformation | is a transformation of has an imitation | is an imitation of

expression (of different work) to work Such relationships are used when we have a relationship between expressions, but we are not sure what expression of the work we are looking at. an expression “has a successor” in a work an expression “is a successor to” a work an expression “has a supplement” in a work an expression “supplements” a work

expression (of different work) to work an expression “has a complement” in a work an expression “complements” a work an expression “has a summary” in a work an expression “is a summary” of a work an expression “has an adaptation” in a work an expression “is an adaptation” of a work an expression “has a transformation” of a work an expression “is a transformation of” a work an expression “has an imitation” in a work an expression “is an imitation of” a work

manifestation to manifestation relationships These hold for manifestations of the same expression has a reproduction | is a reproduction of has an alternate | is an alternate to is part of | has part

manifestation to item a manifestation “has a reproduction” in an item an item “is a reproduction” of a manifestation

item to item (same manifestation) has reconfiguration | is a reconfiguration of has reproduction | is a reproduction of is part of | has part