6/26/06David Gerstle1 Photon and Electron Cosmic Ray Flux Study David Gerstle LArTPC – Yale University Undergraduate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulations with ‘Realistic’ Photon Spectra Mike Jenkins Lancaster University and The Cockcroft Institute.
Advertisements

DHC 101 Introduction to scintillation detectors. How many PE/MIP should we expect? Scintillation & Fluorescence WSFWSF PMTPEs  (MIP)
Particle interactions and detectors
Measurement of lifetime for muons captured inside nuclei Advisors: Tsung-Lung Li Wen-Chen Chang Student: Shiuan-Hal Shiu 2007/06/27.
EAS EXPERIMENT ON BOARD OF THE AIRBUS A380 J. N. Capdevielle, F. Cohen, PCC, College de France K. Jedrzejczak, B. Szabelska, J. Szabelski, T. Wibig The.
Cosmic rays in solar system By: Tiva Sharifi. Cosmic ray The earth atmosphere is bombarded with the energetic particles originating from the outer space.
Dark Matter Explanation For e^\pm Excesses In Cosmic Ray Xiao-Gang He CHEP, PKU and Physics, NTU.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Presented by Steve Kliewer Muon Lifetime Experiment: A Model.
Counting Cosmic Rays through the passage of matter By Edwin Antillon.
Radioactivity – inverse square law, absorption, and rates presentation for Apr. 30, 2008 by Dr. Brian Davies, WIU Physics Dept.
Particle Interactions
GLAST background review dec Simulating rates: the big picture Incoming rate into the 6 m 2 sphere: is it right? Corresponding trigger rate: implies.
Lecture 2-Building a Detector George K. Parks Space Sciences Laboratory UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
1 Photon Interactions  When a photon beam enters matter, it undergoes an interaction at random and is removed from the beam.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
Measuring the Attenuation Coefficient of Biological Materials Sarah DeLeo Kyle Gautreaux Shreya Purohit Eric Richard.
G EANT 4 energy loss of protons, electrons and magnetic monopole M. Vladymyrov.
First energy estimates of giant air showers with help of the hybrid scheme of simulations L.G. Dedenko M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow,
Centre de Toulouse Radiation interaction with matter 1.
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
Department of Physics University of Oslo
Size and Energy Spectra of incident cosmic radiation obtained by the MAKET - ANI surface array on mountain Aragats. (Final results from MAKET-ANI detector)‏
Energy Distribution of Cosmic Ray Muons Paul Hinrichs With David Lee Advised by Phil Dudero.
Physics Modern Lab1 Electromagnetic interactions Energy loss due to collisions –An important fact: electron mass = 511 keV /c2, proton mass = 940.
Detection of cosmic rays in the SKALTA experiment Marek Bombara (P. J. Šafárik University Košice), Kysak, August 2011.
6/26/2006David Gerstle1 Muon Cosmic Ray Flux Study David Gerstle LArTPC – Yale University Undergraduate.
Radius To use a Compton polarimeter, the possible range of the backscattered photons’ energy should be calculated. Applying the laws of conservation of.
Atmospheric shower simulation studies with CORSIKA Physics Department Atreidis George ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI.
Synchrotron radiation at eRHIC Yichao Jing, Oleg Chubar, Vladimir N. Litvinenko.
Alpha and Beta Interactions
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
Spectra of the Thunderstorm Correlated Electron and Gamma-Ray Measured at Aragats Bagrat Mailyan and Ashot Chilingarian.
© Jimoid.com 2005 Ionising Radiation There are two types of radiation; ionising and non-ionising. Radiation Ionising Non-ionising Indirectly ionising (neutral.
Electrons Electrons lose energy primarily through ionization and radiation Bhabha (e+e-→e+e-) and Moller (e-e-→e-e-) scattering also contribute When the.
M. Dugger, February Triplet polarimeter study Michael Dugger* Arizona State University *Work at ASU is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation.
1 Lead glass simulations Eliane Epple, TU Munich Kirill Lapidus, INR Moscow Collaboration Meeting XXI March 2010 GSI.
1 Photons: X-rays, γ- rays; electrons, positrons Lecture 2 Shell structure of the atoms. Notion of the cross section of the interaction.
Radiation Detectors In particular, Silicon Microstrip Detectors by Dr. Darrel Smith.
Interactions of Particles with Matter
Aa GLAST Particle Astrophysics Collaboration Instrument Managed and Integrated at SLAC/Stanford University The Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST)
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
MUONS!. What are we going to talk about? How muons are created Detecting methods Muon half life and decay rate Muon decay data Problems with the data.
Variations of Cosmic Rays during Thunderstorms N.S. Khaerdinov & A. S. Lidvansky Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF SIMULATIONS L.G. Dedenko M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
A Cross Check of Atmospheric Attenuation for the High Resolution Fly’s Eye Astroparticle Experiment Chris Cannon Advisor: Lawrence Wiencke University of.
November 4, 2004Carl Bromberg, FNAL LAr Exp. Workshop Nov. 4-6, Liquid argon as an active medium Carl Bromberg Michigan State University & Fermilab.
Table of Contents Exponential Function - Graphing Example Sketch the graph of the exponential function... Find a few ordered pairs... f(-2) = 3 -2 = 1/9.
The Hybrid Scheme of Simulations of the Electron- photon and Electron-hadron Cascades In a Dense Medium at Ultra-high Energies L.G. Dedenko M.V. Lomonosov.
1 FK7003 Lecture 17 – Interactions in Matter ● Electromagnetic interactions in material ● Hadronic interactions in material ● Electromagnetic and hadronic.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #9.
10 Feb 2009PS638 T. Gaisser1 Lecture 1: Introduction Cosmic-ray spectrum and measurements.
INTERACTIONS OF RADIATION WITH MATTER. twCshttp:// twCs
Time-dilation experiment Prof Raghava Varma. This experiment is an indirect verification of special theory of relativity using cosmic ray muons. The picture.
Learning Objectives Calorimetry and Showers
Workshop on AstroParticle Physics, WAPP 2009 Bose Institute, Darjeeling, December 2009 Extensive Air Showers and Astroparticle Physics Observations and.
The Gulmarg Neutron Monitor Ramesh Koul Astrophysical Sciences Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Mumbai
NEVOD-DECOR experiment: results and future A.A.Petrukhin for Russian-Italian Collaboration Contents MSU, May 16, New method of EAS investigations.
David Finley / PPD Engineering Meeting / June 24, Fermilab Slide 1 R&D Toward Large Liquid Argon Time Projection Chambers “Large” means up to 100.
NuMI MINOS Seasonal Variations in the MINOS Far Detector Eric W. Grashorn University of Minnesota Thursday, 5 July, 2007.
A Precision Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark Abazov, V. M. et al. (D0 Collaboration). Nature 429, (2004) Presented by: Helen Coyle.
2 pion photoproduction from G11A E. Golovach MSU Analysis Status for.
Chapter 2 Radiation Interactions with Matter East China Institute of Technology School of Nuclear Engineering and Technology LIU Yi-Bao Wang Ling.
“Performance test of a lead glass
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
Analysis of 14/20 mrad Extraction Line Energy Chicane
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Presentation transcript:

6/26/06David Gerstle1 Photon and Electron Cosmic Ray Flux Study David Gerstle LArTPC – Yale University Undergraduate

6/26/06David Gerstle2 Contents Photon and Electron flux data. Photon and Electron length in argon data. Conclusions

6/26/06David Gerstle3 Electron and Photon Flux Data Photons: Beuermann and Wibberenz, “Secondary spectra of electrons and photons in the atmosphere,” Can. J. Phys., 46, S1034, –Apparatus was a ‘lead scintillator sandwich’ with Cherenkov detector. Insisted on only single passing electrons (this excluded 10% of events). –Geomagnetic cutoff: 4.5 GV –Atmospheric depth: 750 g/cm^2 Data were taken from a log/log dN/dE as a function of E plot; I only trusted myself to two significant figures. –Photons: from 0.03 GeV to 1 GeV dN/dE goes as ~E -2 ; from 1 GeV to 25 GeV as ~E –Electrons: from 0.03 GeV to 1 GeV dN/dE goes as ~E -1.7 ; from 1 GeV to 25 GeV as ~E I calculated the integral flux [integral (dN/dE)*dE)] of each particle type by a trapezoidal integral approximation from the highest energy to E. Data have been adjusted to 990 g/cm^2 by the method Beuer…&W… (sort of) suggest, as outlined on the following slide.

6/26/06David Gerstle4 e - Depth Correction and Photon Factor Correction is proposed only for electrons. Exponential attenuation correction: I(E,d)=I 0 (E)*exp[-(d- d 0 )/Λ] where Λ is the attenuation length and d 0 is the original depth. There are two components of the electron flux though, π 0 and  decay. Thus the total adjusted flux is a weighted average of the two: –I(E,d)=I 0 (E)*(0.55*exp[-(d-d 0 )/Λ pi ]+0.45*exp[-(d-d 0 )/Λ mu ) –The relative weights were reported in the paper. Calculation shows that photon flux is ~1.7 times electron flux for all energies and ~1.3 times over 1 GeV [Richards and Nordheim, 1948]. I multiplied the electron flux by 1.5 to get the photon flux.

6/26/06David Gerstle5 Electrons E -2.6 E -1.7 Yellow is original depth differential flux

6/26/06David Gerstle6 Blue are original Differential Flux Photons E -2.7 E -2.0

6/26/06David Gerstle7 Photons are Blue Electrons are Pink Emax ∫ (dN/dE)*dE E

6/26/06David Gerstle8 Interaction Length Data from NIST Photons done by NIST XCOM: Photon Cross Sect. Database. –I entered my own E and it calculated (among other things) pair production in the nuclear field and electron field (dn/dx in cm^2/g). –Used g/cm^3 for the density of LAr. Electrons done by ESTAR: Stopping Powers and Range Tables for Electrons –Only went up to 10 GeV → last e point omitted. –I could enter my own E values and it calculated collision, radiative and total -dE/dx (in MeV cm^2/g). –Used g/cm^3 for the density of LAr.

6/26/06David Gerstle9 This is the distance a photon will likely travel in liquid argon before it produces an electron-positron pair; note that logarithmic x-axis. Photons ~0.18 m

6/26/06David Gerstle10 Electrons These values are calculated from a density-dependent -dE/dx by integrating (by trapezoidal approximation). Electrons

6/26/06David Gerstle11 THE (sort of) BOTTOM LINE Energy Range (GeV) Integral Flux (m^2 s sr)^-1Range of lower Energy (m) ElectronsPhotonsElectronsPhotons