Beam MC progresses for beam MC sub-group. Summary of update in 09b,c,10a 09b Geometry of baffle, target, 1st horn, dump and MUMON is updated. 09c MUMON.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Beam stability (direction/flux) 2.Absolute  beam flux.
Simulation of Neutrino Factory beam and quasielastic scattering off electrons in the near detector Yordan Karadzhov University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
T2K neutrino experiment at JPARC Approved since 2003, first beam in April Priorities : 1. search for, and measurement of,   e appearance  sin.
ISS, 23 September 2005E. Gschwendtner, CERN1 Beam Instrumentation at CNGS 1. Introduction 2. Layout 3. Beam Instrumentation 4. Summary.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
MINOS Feb Antineutrino running Pedro Ochoa Caltech.
2015/6/23 1 How to Extrapolate a Neutrino Spectrum to a Far Detector Alfons Weber (Oxford/RAL) NF International Scoping Study, RAL 27 th April 2006.
April 1, Beam measurement with -Update - David Jaffe & Pedro Ochoa 1)Reminder of proposed technique 2)Use of horn-off data 3)Use of horn2-off data?
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Event generator comparison Zhiwen Zhao 2013/12/03 original 2014/02/12 update 2014/11/04 update.
Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Anne Dabrowski 26 February Semileptonic Analysis from Low Intensity Run Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48 Collaboration Meeting 26 February.
Beam MC activity A.K.Ichikawa for beam group For more details,
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
Mass production (Super-K) Setup of jnubeam – 3 horn 250 kA – 30-GeV proton beam of Gaussian distribution (  x,y = cm) – On center, parallel beam.
UC Davis June st Rosi Reed Low Energy Test Run Results Rosi Reed University of California at Davis.
Simulations Report E. García, UIC. Run 1 Geometry Radiator (water) 1cm x 2cm x 2cm with optical properties Sensitive Volume (hit collector) acrylic (with.
Optimization of  exclusion cut for the  + and  (1520) analysis Takashi Nakano Based on Draft version of Technical Note 42.
RCCN International Workshop sub-dominant oscillation effects in atmospheric neutrino experiments 9-11 December 2004, Kashiwa Japan Input data to the neutrino.
Interaction Length A. Murakami. L = (interaction length of proton in carbon by PDG) change of constant : means uncertainty of L (change 0.8, 0.9,
Bartol Flux Calculation presented by Giles Barr, Oxford ICRR-Kashiwa December 2004.
Muon absolute flux measurement in anti-neutrino mode A.Ariga 1, C. Pistillo 1, S. Aoki 2 1 University of Bern, 2 Kobe University.
1 Medium modifications on vector meson in 12GeV p+A reactions Introduction Result of   e + e - analysis Result of   e + e - analysis Result of 
Search for the  + in photoproduction experiments at CLAS APS spring meeting (Dallas) April 22, 2006 Ken Hicks (Ohio University) for the CLAS Collaboration.
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
T2K muon measurement 2014 Momentum module A.Ariga, C. Pistillo University of Bern S. Aoki Kobe University 1.
School of Collective Dynamics in High-Energy CollisionsLevente Molnar, Purdue University 1 Effect of resonance decays on the extracted kinetic freeze-out.
Proposal for the study to define what is really necessary and what is not when the data from beam, ND and SK are combined A.K.Ichikawa 2008/1/17.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
1 A study to clarify important systematic errors A.K.Ichikawa, Kyoto univ. We have just started not to be in a time blind with construction works. Activity.
1 Limitations in the use of RICH counters to detect tau-neutrino appearance Tord Ekelöf /Uppsala University Roger Forty /CERN Christian Hansen This talk.
Neutrino Beam MC We propose to adopt ‘jnubeam’ as the official T2K code for flux calculation. –It is well established and almost ready for flux calculation.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Marina Golubeva, Alexander Ivashkin Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow AGeV simulations with Geant4 and Shield Geant4 with Dpmjet-2.5 interface.
1 Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump Siva Darbha Supervisors: Lewis Keller and Takashi Maruyama.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
1 Translation from Near to Far at K2K T.Kobayashi IPNS, KEK for K2K beam monitor group (K.Nishikawa, T.Hasegawa, T.Inagaki, T.Maruyama, T.Nakaya,....)
Horns, Hadron production etc. (from hadron production to neutrino beam) A.K.Ichikawa KEK 200/9/26 Study on horns Changing -beam energy Hadron.
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
Beam direction and flux measured by MUMON K. Matsuoka (Kyoto) for the MUMON group Contents: 1.Horn focusing effect 2.Beam stability (direction/flux) 3.Beam.
Particle identification by energy loss measurement in the NA61 (SHINE) experiment Magdalena Posiadala University of Warsaw.
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
NEAR DETECTOR SPECTRA AND FAR NEAR RATIOS Amit Bashyal August 4, 2015 University of Texas at Arlington 1.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
Characterization of muon beam in T2K with emulsion detectors A. Ariga, T. Ariga, C. Pistillo AEC-LHEP University of Bern 1.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Osaka University RCNP Toshinao Tsunemi
MUMON / emulsion total flux uncertainty
The Hadrontherapy Geant4 advanced example
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Antoine Cazes Université Claude Bernard Lyon-I December 16th, 2008
Presentation transcript:

Beam MC progresses for beam MC sub-group

Summary of update in 09b,c,10a 09b Geometry of baffle, target, 1st horn, dump and MUMON is updated. 09c MUMON structures were included. Energy deposit in the MUMON detector can be stored. Emittance and Twiss parameters via card. 10a to be released soon Horn2&3 geometry update Mag. field inside inner conductor Store primary proton vector information to enable weighting method New ND280 flux algorithm Store particle interaction history K ± µ3 and K 0 µ3 decay for neutrino Random number generation seeds control

Comparison among different versions K. Matsuoka

T2K horn effect (jnubeam 09c) X9.4x16 On-axisOff-axis A.K.Ichikawa

Horn Magnetic Field How should we treat the magnetic field inside the inner conductor? Horn1 inner conductor Inner radius = 2.7cm, outer radius=3cm Assuming that the elec. current is uniform in the conductor, (skin depth > 5mm) Significant effect on MUMON signal was found Modest effect on neutrino flux K. Matsuoka r B Inner conductor Realistic. B-field

2D Gaussian fitPeak flux (/cm 2 )*  x (cm)  y (cm) Max. B-field(8.74 ±0.03 ) x ± ±0.9 Realistic B-field(8.09 ±0.03 ) x ± ±1.0 Min. B-field(7.41 ±0.03 ) x ± ±1.0 0 kA(1.48 ±0.02 ) x ± ±10 (* per 3.3 x POT) 8~9% effect. (difference from realistic B field) mag. field inside inner conductor -MUMON, all horns on- Max. B-field 1/r-shape field starts from inner surface of the inner conductor Min. B-field starts from the outer surface of the inner condcutor

mag. field inside inner conductor E spectra (SK) Red: Max. Black: Realistic Blue: Min. Red: Max./realistic Blue: Min./realistic <3% effect (need more statistics) All 

mag. field inside inner conductor E spectra (ND on-axis) (Error bars may be under-estimated.See later slides.) All  Red: Max. Black: Realistic Blue: Min. Red: Max./realistic Blue: Min./realistic

mag. field inside inner conductor INGRID profile All  Red: Max. Black: Realistic Blue: Min. All  Red: Max. Black: Realistic Blue: Min. abs(x) ≤ 5.5 m && abs(y) ≤ 0.5 m ND2 abs(x) ≤ 0.5 m && abs(y) ≤ 5.5 m Due to the magnetic field in the inner conductors, flux at ND on the axis gets sharper than that of 09c (min B-field). Peak value: (min) 5.66 x  (realistic) 5.79 x /m 2 /10 21 POT

Horn2 and Horn3 Geometry update update from conceptual shape to real shape Horn2 – outer conductor radius : 40 cm -> cm – B-field region (Z-length) : 200 cm ->199.7 cm Horn3 – outer conductor radius : 70 cm  65.5 cm H.Kubo

Horn2&3 geometry update muon (Si-plane, horn 320kA) flux decreased by 3%, profile shape is same muon peak flux (cm -2 ) sigma X [cm]sigma Y [cm] 09b7.2 x ± 1104 ± 1 new horn geom.6.9 x ± 1105 ± 1 3horns, 11 POT

Horn2&3 geometry update neutrino flux 09b new Far/Near less than 5% difference upto 5GeV

Parents of muons in muon pit -pions- H.Kubo. K.Matsuoka Horn off 1 st Horn 273kA All horns 320kA

Parents of muons in muon pit -kaons- H.Kubo. K.Matsuoka Horn off 1 st Horn 273kA All horns 320kA

Parents of muons in muon pit -K/pi ratio- entries (/5x10^7 POT) Ratio (K / Pi) horn current pion (+/-) K(all)K0K+K- K(all)K0K+K- 0kA kA, 1st horn only kA, 3horns

Proton information Store primary beam information Accumulate POT w/ a flat proton beam and weight t w/ an arbitrary proton profile to simulate that profile No need to make many MC data sets of various proton beam profile. K. Matsuoka x (mm)  x (mm) Peak flux (/cm 2 )*x (cm)y (cm)  x (cm)  y (cm) Weight03.6(2.81 ±0.02 ) x ± ± ±4 129 ±3 Normal03.6(2.84 ±0.02 ) x ± ± ±4 132 ±4 Weight53.6(2.84 ±0.02 ) x 10 4 –4.3 ± ± ±6 128 ±3 Normal53.6(2.87 ±0.02 ) x 10 4 –7.9 ± ± ±6 128 ±3 Weight51.7(2.82 ±0.02 ) x 10 4 –11.8 ± ± ±9 128 ±4 Normal51.7(2.83 ±0.02 ) x 10 4 –8.9 ± ± ±5 132 ±4 Demonstration w/ MUMON profile  y : 1.7 mm (*  +– /3.4 x POT)

Production history Fill ntuples with neutrino history, taking decay chains into account. – information of primary, secondary,... interactions) Include additional decay modes for pions and kaons, updated branching ratios – π ± → e ± ν e – K ± µ3 and K 0 µ3 – neglect K0S semileptonic decays ? (e.g. K2K case) N. Abgrall

new ND flux calculation algorithm current filling routine – SK : treated as a “point”. for every decay of  /K/ , neutrino is forced to go towards SK probability is calculated and stored as “norm”. – ND : repeat parent’s decay randomly (uniformly in CM) by 1,000 times only neutrinos which have proper angle are filled. New method : same method as SK case. 1.choose a detection point (x, y) randomly in the ND plane 2.calculate weight (acceptance) for this direction Motivation – In the current version, high-energy pions are multiply used. Events are not independent. Simple error couting results in underestimate. H.Kubo

Enu spectrum seems to be consistent χ 2 = 19.7 / 39 – to small – due to using same set of parents ?

error histogram (Enu) low energy (< 1GeV) : same or smaller error Original method had been giving underestimated error original new

on-axis xnu (fitting) fit with Gaussian – large chi2 & mean offset (10 sigma) in original algorism indicates under estimation of error originalnew χ 2 / ndf867 / / 17 mean-1.57 ± 0.16 cm-2.0 ± 3.5 cm sigma568 ± 0.4 cm556 ± 8 cm originalnew

Other activity Detailed check of dimensions by P.Perio Treatment of Random numbers – M.Hartz, K.Sakashita – code is modified to select 215 good seed-pairs for GRNDM by K.Sakashita d=2&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=155 OTR simulation by OTR group Target scan simulation – K.Matsuoka, M.Hartz CPU saving effort Review on gcalor (secondary interaction model) Review on INGRID study A.Minamino

Prospect Flux Mass production Received requests from ND280 beam group Need to be done – Implementation of the correct ND280 position – Optimization of proton beam area two flat area? – Release 10a In Next week at 250kA horn current Remaining update Striplines Transfer matrix with new ND280 algorithm Inclusion of NA61 results w/ NA61-T2K group And studies.

Other geometry update MUMON structure has been added. Geometry of the collimator at the entrance of DV has been update based on the measurement. The size of the DV entrance has been changed based on the measurement. Density of dump material – concrete from 2.2 to 2.3 g/cm3 ~1% effect on MUMON – concrete rebars 2.3g/cm3 -> g/cm3 <1% effect on MUMON

mag. field inside inner conductor -MUMON,1 st horn only- Primary proton profile  x= 0.36,  y= 0.17 (mm) Only Horn1 same as April ’09 commissioning Peak flux*  x(cm)  y(cm) 273 kA (min.B-field)(2.76+/-3) x /-6131+/ kA (realistic B-field)(2.99+/-3) x /-5121+/ kA (max. B-field)(3.15+/-3) x /-4120+/-4 0 kA(1.53+/-2) x / /-10 (*per 3.4x10 11 POT, 2D fit peak) A few % effect

Horn2&3 geometry update pion production point (mumon) horn1 horn2 horn3 horn1 horn2 horn3 dump target & horn1 ( -510 < Z < -350) horn2 (-300 < Z < -100) horn3 (350 < Z < 650) b new 10 3 entries / 5.0 x 10 7 POT

Horn2&3 geometry update effect of horn2&3 material total(<10GeV)peak(/50MeV) w/Horn2&3 material1.21x x10 6 w/o horn2&3 material1.33x x10 6 absorption ~ 10% peak) less effect than horn1

Horn2&3 geometry update pions whose daughter muons goes through mumon Si-plane horn 320kA horn [kA]chargedmuons 0, 0, , 0, , 320, , 320, particle flux [10 4 / cm 2 / 3.4 x Si-plane ( peak of X projection-fit )

Muon flux at muon pit Emulsion v.s. MC A.Ariga et. al.

Comaprison Emulsion, Si, MC 31 Horn current Shot # Proton (CT05) Emulsion (trk/cm 2 ) Si (pC) Em/Si (trk/pC) MC July Em/MC July MC Sep Em/MC Sep MC 09c Emu Em/MC 09c Emu 273kA x x x x x kA x x x x kA x x x x x Proton : from beam summary (result_run24.root) Emulsion : cutoff 0.05GeV/c,  <0.3rad Si : using only 1 line (7 sensors) which corresponds emulsion modules. MC : muon, position at emulsion, momentum>0.05GeV/c,  <0.3rad normalized by Proton(CT05). Normalized at POT=3.4e11

Target scan M.Hartz Data for y scan

Review on gcalor Consists of : – NMTC : nucleons < 3.5GeV, π±< 2.5GeV – SCALE : Scaling Model (3GeV to 10GeV) – MICAP : neutron < 20MeV – (FLUKA) : >10GeV & other particles NMTC & Scaling For nucleons below 3.5GeV and π±below 2.5GeV, NMTC is used. Above 10GeV, FLUKA is used. Scaling energy range (3-10GeV) – FLUKA or (scaled)NMTC is called for each interaction with a linear probability function for smooth transition H.Kubo For more details,