Transformation Accountability (TRAC) Center for Mental Health Services November 2015 Version 6 NOMs Client-level Measures for Programs Providing Direct.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACCESS TO RECOVERY (ATR) Mady Chalk, Ph.D. Director, Division of Services Improvement Center for Substance Abuse Treatment SAMHSA.
Advertisements

Everything you ever wanted to know about using URS Cenk Erdil, HMIS Manager Caitlin Madevu-Matson, SI Specialist Strategic Information Unit 22 May 2014.
2012 PATH Data Reporting Tison Thomas Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Rachael Kenney & Amy SooHoo SAMHSA Homeless and.
LAKESIDE WELLNESS PROGRAM - PBHCI LEARNING COMMUNITY REGION #3 ORLANDO, FLORIDA, RUTH CRUZ- DIAZ, BSN EXT
Training for OCAN Users Day 2
Matrix reporting For FHPAP and LTH. wilderresearch.org Today’s Webinar You can listen using your computer or calling in by phone Phone: (914) ,
SIS – NBS Online Specimen Tracking System Training
Overview and Discussion of NRS Changes. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 2 NRS Changes for FY13 AGENDA  Review changes.
Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Data Bigger Picture Updated 5/22/14.
OCAN Education Training for OCAN Users Day 2. Objectives Learn how to: Complete staff assessment Interpret and make use of information from OCAN in a.
April 2015 Latin Spanish Recording (25 minutes):
Application Process USAJOBS – Application Manager USA STAFFING ® —OPM’S AUTOMATED HIRING TOOL FOR FEDERAL AGENCIES.
PBHCI Grantee Technical Assistance - Physical Health Indicator Data Jam Session Friday, February 11, :00 PM - 2:00 PM EST.
ADDICTIONS AND MENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Supported Employment Reporting and Data Sharing Wendy Chavez, MPA September 16, 2014 Developed By: Wendy Chavez,
At the login page, you will enter the following: Click “Logon” Do not use dashes in User ID.
ASAP (Assessment Submission and Processing) Submission Processing Overview for IRF-PAI IRF Conference May 2, 2012.
BHSD Service Tracking and Reporting Basic System Functions
Copyright 2011 OnCorps Reports™ Customer Examples.
6. Implications for Analysis: Data Content. 1 Prerequisites Recommended modules to complete before viewing this module  1. Introduction to the NLTS2.
Performance Management Using SBA’s Entrepreneurial Development Management Information System (EDMIS)
THE LONG TERM CARE UNDERWRITING PROCESS:  UNDERSTANDING FULL UNDERWRITING  MONITORING UNDERWRITING PROCESS FOR AGENT USE ONLY. NOT FOR SOLICITATION PURPOSES.
Improving Data Entry and Reporting for the HOPWA Program May 2012.
California Outcomes Measurement System – Treatment
STUDENT ASSISTANCE LIAISON ONLINE QUARTERLY REPORTING Guidance On Understanding and Completing the Quarterly Reporting Form.
Improving Collection of Poverty Level in ARIES April 27, 2011.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) and Provision 2.
SFY 2013 (July 1, 2012 – June 30, 2013).  DARMHA stands for Data Assessment Registry Mental Health and Addiction.  Providers can submit information.
SAMHSA SSH Program Outcomes Georgia Supportive Housing Policy Day 2013 Khurram “Ko” Hassan, Advantage Consulting.
New Jersey Department of Human Services Division of Addiction Services Substance Abuse Treatment Services Provider Performance Report Substance Abuse Treatment.
HPRP: New Reports HPRP new reports and data entry reporting review April 2010.
Access Online Cardholder Transaction Approval Training 1 Client Logo.
Outcome Evaluation of the Shelter-A-Family Program Kimberly Jacob Arriola, PhD, MPH Associate Professor November 20, rd Annual Georgia Supportive.
RAD Central Station: The Next Stop on the Data Train RAD Central Station: The Next Stop on the Data Train July 30, 2010.
HPRP Reporting Training For Quarterly Reporting Nov. 20 th wilderresearch.org.
August, 2013 This training was funded by the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (MHSOAC). Audio will begin shortly.
Michigan Statewide HMIS Performance Improvement using Outcome & Indicator Measures.
Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey and Assessment 2007 Website.
OCTOBER 2012 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2013 Project Recovery: Performance Assessment Report.
Report Samples The MAERS Development Team 1. Data Management Report Samples Characteristic Reports Participant Characteristics (AEPARTCHAR) Instructional.
Improving Eligibility Documents November, Improving Data Collection The State Office of AIDS (OA) is now working with providers to improve the quality.
Family Care Community Partnerships (FCCP) Selected Logic Model Outcomes in the System of Care CY15 1 st and 2 nd Quarters Rhode Island Department of Children,
“The Monitor" System Training Guide For Providers IMS Health.
Dr. Fowler AFM Unit 8-1 Organizing & Visualizing Data Organize data in a frequency table. Visualizing data in a bar chart, and stem and leaf display.
Family Care Community Partnerships (FCCP) Selected Logic Model Outcomes in the System of Care CY14 3 rd and 4 th Quarters Rhode Island Department of Children,
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Understanding and Sharing BERS-2 Information and Scoring with Parents, Caregivers and Youth May 1, 2012.
Alabama’s Professional Development Management System
Transformation Accountability (TRAC) Center for Mental Health Services Version 11 October 2015 NOMs Client-level Measures for Programs Providing Direct.
SCIENCE FAIR 2011 PARENT PRESENTATION. Purpose of Tonight To give you information concerning what constitutes a science fair project To make you aware.
Transformation Accountability (TRAC) Center for Mental Health Services Version 10 October 2015 NOMs Client-level Measures for Programs Providing Direct.
Transformation Accountability (TRAC) Center for Mental Health Services NOMs Client-level Measures Guide for Grantees and CMHS Staff Reassessment Interview.
DHHS COE Meeting Agenda May 19, 2011 Welcome Introductions Contract Compliance Reporting Questions and Answers DHHS Open Windows Update.
Migrant Student Information Exchange (MSIX) MSIX Reports March 3, 2011 Sponsored by: U.S. Department of Education Deloitte Consulting LLP.
Transformation Accountability (TRAC) Center for Mental Health Services NOMs Client-level Measures Guide for Grantees and CMHS Staff Notification Report.
Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Introduction to the Indicator 14 Post School Outcomes (PSO) Report
Transformation Accountability (TRAC) Center for Mental Health Services
Understanding the Data on the Educational Settings for Children Ages 3-5 with Disabilities Annual Performance Report Indicator 6 January 12, 2016
Transformation Accountability (TRAC) Center for Mental Health Services Version 4 November 2015 NOMs Client-level Measures for Programs Providing Direct.
1 Evaluation and Accountability of a Government Funded Program: Targeted Capacity Expansion Using Government Performance And Results Act Core Client Outcome.
Transformation Accountability (TRAC) Center for Mental Health Services NOMs Client-level Measures Guide for Grantees and CMHS Staff Number of Consumers.
The Hospital CAHPS Program Presented by Maureen Parrish.
TRAC e-Training. What are the TRAC Annual Goals? Required for all grantees Specific to TRAC activities o Number of consumers served o Infrastructure indicators.
HMIS Mark For Delete Training 211 Orange County1.
Transformation Accountability Center for Mental Health Services Infrastructure Development, Prevention and Mental Health Promotion (IPP) TRAC System Overview.
ePREM & YVM Data Information Session
Module 4: Building Reports
NYSDOH AIDS Institute Quality of Care Program eHIVQUAL
Module 5: Data Cleaning and Building Reports
Customer Satisfaction Research 2018 Q3 Results October 22, 2018
Chlamydia Learning Collaborative
Performance Indicators
Presentation transcript:

Transformation Accountability (TRAC) Center for Mental Health Services November 2015 Version 6 NOMs Client-level Measures for Programs Providing Direct Treatment Services (Services Activities) Outcome Reports—Training Presentation (Outcome Measures, Consumer-Level Outcome Measures, Multi-Year Outcome Measures, Point in Time, and Cross Tabulation & Frequency Reports)

Table of Contents Training Outcomes – Slide 3 Accessing Reports- Slide 5 Outcome Measures Report- Slide 10 Consumer-Level Outcome Measures Report – Slide 28 Multi-Year Outcome Measures Report- Slide 37 Multi-Year Outcome Measures Report- Slide 37 Point In Time Report- Slide 50 Cross Tab and Frequency Report- Slide 62 Cross Tab and Frequency Report- Slide 62 TRAC Help Desk Information- Slide 70 2

Training Outcomes By the end of this presentation, you should: Be able to access the TRAC system WesDax Reports Have a general understanding of the four reports 3

Important Points Reports are: Available to CMHS staff and Grantees New users may not have access for up to 36 hours Updated once every 24 hours Outcome Measures reports require data at two time points: Will not populate much data for the first 6 months of the grant 4

5

6

7

8

9

Outcome Measures Report

Purpose: Summarizes information about changes in the outcomes of consumers served by CMHS grants. Allows comparisons between baseline and later interviews. Summarizes data for all consumers within a grant, program(s), or CMHS as a whole; does not show individual, client-level data 11

Outcome Measures Report Key Points: Counts the number of consumers with valid data at both Baseline and second interview (i.e., reassessment or discharge) Only active episode of care is included Consumers who were discharged, then returned are only counted once Outcome (second interview) occurs in the FFY shown 12

Filters Ability to include only specific consumers in the report based on: Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) Quarter Grant Status Data Collection Status Assessment Population Region Program or Grant 13

Report Inclusion Rules Must have completed: A Baseline interview; and Either a Reassessment or Discharge interview Cannot be administrative interviews/records 14

Client-level Measures—Services Tool Functioning Retention Stability in Housing Education and Employment Crime and Criminal Justice Social Connectedness Perception of Care 15 Overall health Perception of everyday functioning Psychological Distress Substance use, tobacco use, and binge drinking Overall health Perception of everyday functioning Psychological Distress Substance use, tobacco use, and binge drinking

16

17 *Please note this report is an example and does not contain real data.

What do the Numbers Mean? Number of Consumers 18

What do the Numbers Mean? B1: How would you rate your overall health right now? 13,925 consumers answered (baseline & second interview) with a “valid response” Valid responses include: Poor Fair Good Very Excellent Good 19

What do the Numbers Mean? 20

What do the Numbers Mean? B1: How would you rate your overall health right now? 52.4% Positive at Baseline 59.5% Positive at Second Interview Percentage of consumers that answered: Good VeryExcellent Good 21

What do the Numbers Mean? B1: How would you rate your overall health right now? 17.4% Outcome Improved Percentage of consumers that had a negative outcome at first interview and a positive outcome at second interview. IMPROVED = Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent 22

What do the Numbers Mean? Percent Change 23

What do the Numbers Mean? B1: How would you rate your overall health right now? Percent change Grant-level measure of improvement (not client-level) Includes only consumers with “positive overall health” Good Very Excellent Good Compares: Group (%+) from baseline  Group (%+) at 1 st 6-month Reassessment 24

*Data Example: Percent Change* Baseline 52.4% reported: 1 st 6-month Reassessment 59.5% reported: 25 Good Very Excellent Good Good Very Excellent Good 13.6% INCREASE in consumers reporting positive overall health from baseline to the 1 st 6-month reassessment PERCENT CHANGE 1 st 6-month Reassessment - Baseline) %Positive at Baseline * 100 ( ) (.524) * 100 OR

Consumer Level Outcome Measures Report

Purpose: Presents outcomes analyses at the consumer level. Allows comparisons between baseline and later interviews or other combinations of two time points. Shows individual, client-level data 27

Consumer Level Outcome Measures Report Key Points: Shows consumers with valid data for at least one interview and shows outcome improved for consumers with data at both the first and second interview Only active episode of care is included For consumers who were discharged, then returned the current episode of care is shown 28

Report Criteria The following report criteria are available: Grant Status Consumer ID/Exact Match Assessment Data Collection Status Measures Show Glossary Grant 29

Report Inclusion Rules Must have completed: An interview for the first selected interview time point or The second selected interview time point Cannot be administrative interviews/records Has a Baseline only option 30

1 Services Consumer Level Outcome Measures Report Grant Status: All grants Consumer ID: ABC1234 Exact Match: Yes Assessment: From Baseline to 1 st 6-Month Reassessment Interview Data Collection Status: Assessments conducted in window only Measures: *Healthy overall (NOMs); *Functioning in everyday life (NOMs); *No serious psychological distress (NOMs); *Were never using illegal substances (NOMs); *Were not using tobacco products (NOMs); *Were not binge drinking (NOMs); *Retained in the Community (NOMs); *Had a stable place to live (NOMs); *Attending school regularly and/or currently employed/retired (NOMs); *Had no involvement with the criminal justice system (NOMs); *Socially connected (NOMs) Show Glossary: No Selected Program(s): Prog1 Grant(s): SM0001 Data entered as of: January 14, :01 AM *Indicates NOMs Measure NOTES: 1.This report is updated once every 24 hours, and includes all data entered as of the time it was last updated. Check the date and time at the top of this report to see when it was last updated 2.A dash “-” alone indicates that the consumer did not have valid data at the interview. Outcome Improved is only calculated if the consumer has a valid response for the outcome measure at both interview time points. 3.Functioning in Everyday Life is considered positive if the mean of the TRAC NOMs questions B2a-B2h is greater than No serious psychological distress is considered positive if the mean of the TRAC NOMs questions B3a-B3f is < For MAI-TCE grants, "Were never using illegal substances" the number displayed is the sum of days entered in TRAC for questions B4g-B4t and therefore can be greater than Global Assessment of Functioning is considered positive if the GAF score entered in TRAC is >= Social Connectedness is considered positive if the mean of TRAC NOMs questions G1a-G1d is greater than “No Change” under Outcome Improved indicates that the two time points had the same response. CONFIDENTIAL 31

32 *Please note this report is an example and does not contain real data. Grant IDConsumer IDNational Outcome Measure (NOMs) First Interview Score/ Response Second Interview Score/ Response Outcome Improved SM0001ABC1234 *Healthy overall (NOMs)PoorFairNo SM0001ABC1234 * Functioning in everyday life (NOMs) Yes SM0001ABC1234 * No serious psychological distress (NOMs)87Yes SM0001ABC1234 * Were never using illegal substances (NOMs)NeverWeeklyNo SM0001ABC1234 * Were not using tobacco products (NOMs)Never No change SM0001ABC1234 * Were not binge drinking (NOMs)B4b= Never No change SM0001ABC1234 * Retained in the Community (NOMs)Yes 0 No change SM0001ABC1234 * Had a stable place to live in the community (NOMs) Owned or rented house, apartment, trailer, room Group HomeNo SM0001ABC1234 * Attending school regularly and/or currently employed/retired (NOMs) D3= Unemployed, disable D3= Unemployed looking for work No SM0001ABC1234 *Had no involvement with the criminal justice system (NOMs, # of arrests in past 30 days) 20Yes SM0001ABC1234 *Socially connected3.84.5Yes 2 Services Consumer Level Outcome Measures Report

First or Second Interview Score/Response 33 Grant IDConsumer IDNational Outcome Measure (NOMs) First Interview Score/ Response Second Interview Score/ Response Outcome Improved SM0001ABC1234 *Healthy overall (NOMs)PoorFairNo SM0001ABC1234 * Functioning in everyday life (NOMs) Yes SM0001ABC1234 * No serious psychological distress (NOMs)87Yes SM0001ABC1234 * Were never using illegal substances (NOMs)NeverWeeklyNo SM0001ABC1234 * Were not using tobacco products (NOMs)Never No change SM0001ABC1234 * Were not binge drinking (NOMs)B4b= Never No change SM0001ABC1234 * Retained in the Community (NOMs)Yes 0 No change SM0001ABC1234 * Had a stable place to live in the community (NOMs) Owned or rented house, apartment, trailer, room Group HomeNo SM0001ABC1234 * Attending school regularly and/or currently employed/retired (NOMs) D3= Unemployed, disable D3= Unemployed looking for work No SM0001ABC1234 *Had no involvement with the criminal justice system (NOMs, # of arrests in past 30 days) 20Yes SM0001ABC1234 *Socially connected3.84.5Yes

Outcome Improved 34 Grant IDConsumer IDNational Outcome Measure (NOMs) First Interview Score/ Response Second Interview Score/ Response Outcome Improved SM0001ABC1234 *Healthy overall (NOMs)PoorFairNo SM0001ABC1234 * Functioning in everyday life (NOMs) Yes SM0001ABC1234 * No serious psychological distress (NOMs)87Yes SM0001ABC1234 * Were never using illegal substances (NOMs)NeverWeeklyNo SM0001ABC1234 * Were not using tobacco products (NOMs)Never No change SM0001ABC1234 * Were not binge drinking (NOMs)B4b= Never No change SM0001ABC1234 * Retained in the Community (NOMs)Yes 0 No change SM0001ABC1234 * Had a stable place to live in the community (NOMs) Owned or rented house, apartment, trailer, room Group HomeNo SM0001ABC1234 * Attending school regularly and/or currently employed/retired (NOMs) D3= Unemployed, disable D3= Unemployed looking for work No SM0001ABC1234 *Had no involvement with the criminal justice system (NOMs, # of arrests in past 30 days) 20Yes SM0001ABC1234 *Socially connected3.84.5Yes

Multi-Year Outcome Measures Report

Purpose: Summarizes changes in the percentage of consumers reporting positive outcomes from Baseline to a second interview time point across multiple years Data summarized for all consumers within a grant, program(s), or CMHS as a whole; does not show individual, client-level data 36

Multi-Year Outcome Measures Report Key Points Counts the number of consumers with valid data at both Baseline and second interview (i.e., reassessment or discharge) Only active episode of care is included (c onsumers who were discharged, then returned are only counted once) BUT consumer data is included in the count for each FFY in which they have valid reassessment data Outcome (second interview) occurs in the FFY shown 37

Client-level Measures—Services Tool Multi-Year Outcome Measures Report can also run reports based on the “inverse” of NOMs items: NOMs measure  “were using illegal substances” Inverse measure  “were not using illegal substances” 38 National Outcome Measures Functioning Retention Stability in Housing Education and Employment Crime and Criminal Justice Social Connectedness Perception of Care

Filters Ability to include only specific consumers in the report based on: Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) Grant Status Data Collection Status Assessment Population Measures Region or State Program or Grant 39

Report Inclusion Rules 40 Must have completed: A Baseline interview; and Either a Reassessment or Discharge interview Cannot be administrative interviews/records

41

EXAMPLE MULTI-YEAR OUTCOME MEASURES REPORT* 42 *Please note this report is an example and does not contain real data.

43 *Please note this report is an example and does not contain real data.

44 *Please note this report is an example and does not contain real data.

45 *Please note this report is an example and does not contain real data.

46 *Please note this report is an example and does not contain real data.

Point-in-Time Report

Purpose: Provides a snapshot of the % of consumer records positive for the National Outcome Measures (NOMs) at a specific time point Able to answer the question— “what does the population’s outcome look like at” : Baseline? Reassessment? Discharge? 48

Point-in-Time Report Key Points Counts the number of interview records (baselines, reassessments, or discharges) with valid data: Valid = responses other than REFUSED, MISSING, DON’T KNOW All interviews with valid responses are included Each baseline is included for consumers with multiple baselines (even in the same year) Data reported at the grant or program level 49

Select the Criteria Ability to include only specific consumers in the report based on: Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) Grant Status Assessment Population State or Region Program or Grant 50

51

Example Point-in-Time Report* 52 *Please note this report is an example and does not contain real data.

53 *Please note this report is an example and does not contain real data.

54 *Please note this report is an example and does not contain real data.

55 *Please note this report is an example and does not contain real data.

56 *Please note this report is an example and does not contain real data.

Important Differences: Point-in-Time vs. Outcome Reports Point-in-Time N = # of interviews (baselines, reassessments, discharges) Cases are not matched ( only includes the selected time point) Includes data from multiple episodes of care Outcome Measures Reports N = # of consumers Matched cases (baseline and second interview) Data only from the active episode of care

Cross Tabulation and Frequency Report

Report can: Run a standard frequency (one-variable) Run two-way and three-way cross tabulations Run on any variable in the Services tool Data are aggregated across consumers and displayed at the grantee or program level Can be viewed several ways Table, Bar Chart, or Pie Chart 59

Create Your Table 60

Table Type Tab 61

Variables Tab 62

Table Contents Tab 63

Filters Tab (Optional) 64

Results Tab 65

Transformation Accountability (TRAC) Resources TRAC website: General Info & Training  Services/NOMs Client Level Measures TRAC Help Desk Phone: