Summary of Inspectional Findings Food Allergen Partnership 1999 - 2000 Theresa C. Dziuk Minneapolis District FDA August 13, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FDA’s Proposed Rule under FSMA for Preventive Controls
Advertisements

Strategies for Implementing a Listeria Control Plan The Big Picture.
Presenter: Leslie Schaller ACEnet 94 Columbus Road Athens, Ohio Ohio Food Cottage Law.
Lessons from the Food Safety Front: What if you had used peanut butter in your products? Wendy Campbell, Food Defense Coordinator Food & Drug Protection.
Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Key Themes/Concepts Jeannie Perron, JD, DVM Covington & Burling LLP.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03G Fully Cooked Not Shelf Stable Tool Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through.
Complying with FSMA: What a cashew exporter to the U.S. needs to do.
External Peer Review of the FDA Office of Regulatory Affairs Pesticide Program FDA Science Board Advisory Committee Meeting Nov. 4, 2005.
Data and Decisions/Actions Based on Common Deficiencies Georgia Department of Agriculture.
Establish Verification Procedures (Task 11 / Principle 6)
1 Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act
Objectives Objectives: Food safety management systems
GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES Training about our Food Safety Plan
Role of Testing to Ensure FSMA and Global Safety Compliance for Functional Food and Dietary Ingredients Douglas L. Marshall, Ph.D., CFS Chief Scientific.

Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
Natural Resource Concerns. In 2007 there were a number of food borne illness attributed to fresh produce People became sick Business’s lost market share.
Proposed Rule for Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food
SQF ISO FSSC GMP Programs
+ The Food Supply and Food Allergens Module 3. + Module Content  Statistics and background information  Challenges and issues in food allergen control.
Ashland Specialty Ingredients IFAC’s cGMP Audit Guide How the Food Ingredient Industry has Responded to FSMA and Food Safety Audits Priscilla Zawislak.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Undeclared Allergen Prevention Webinar Labeling and Program Delivery Division.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
FDA Gluten-Free Labeling Public Meeting Compiled by: Jill A. Kuzo, Food Scientist Presenter: Lee Tobin, Team Leader August 19, 2005.
North Carolina’s Response to the Peanut Butter Incident
Food Safety Modernization Act Proposed Rules Tim Slawinski Food and Dairy Division Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.
Inspection Issues in the Analytical Laboratory: An FDA Perspective Yvonne McKnight Chemist US Food and Drug AdministrationPhone: x
Procedures, Training & Verification A method for safer food. Angie Wheeler Washington County Public Health & Environment Stillwater, Minnesota.
6-1. Key Sanitation Condition No. 6: Proper labeling, storage and use of Potential toxic compounds.
FSIS Notice Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) District Correlation Meeting November 3,
Edible Extended Food Safety & Licensing Pete Haase Director, Bureau of Food Safety and Inspection WDATCP August 2015.
Licensing with the Meat Bureau Cindy Klug Director State of WI Meat Safety and Inspection Bureau.
1 Food Allergen Labeling. 2 Regulations Revised January 2006 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires food manufacturers to: List common allergens.
Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)
1 FSIS Notice Notice of Reassesment for E. Coli O157:H7 Control And Completion of Checklist for all beef operations.
Important informations
Chapter 3 Prerequisite Programs and Preliminary Steps.
1. Directive Ongoing Verification of Product Formulation and Labeling Targeting the Eight Most Common (“Big 8”) Food Allergens Scott Seys Risk,
Lessons Learned from the Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein Incident Jenny Scott FDA CFSAN Office of Food Safety.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
8-2 Service Objectives: Food safety management systems Active managerial control Hazard Analysis Critical Control point (HACCP)
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
Doane Pet Care Company Pet Food Safety System (PFSS) M.W. Merkel September 23, 2003 Animal Feed Safety System Public Meeting.
Listeria Surveillance, Decision Making, and Corrective Actions at Retail Carrie Rigdon, PhD Rapid Response Team Supervisor Dairy & Food Inspection Division.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Validation – In Plant Findings Kenneth Petersen, DVM, MPH Assistant Administrator.
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
FDA Preventive Control Regulation Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health AFDO 2014.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03B Raw Ground Meat Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through December 18, 2008.
December 8, 2011 Chris Bodendorfer.  Regulatory Requirement ◦ 9 CFR 417 ◦ Notices (2)  Options ◦ CCP ◦ SOP  Recordkeeping.
CM&C Inspections The Pre-Approval Inspection (PAI) in the US 27 May 2010.
Jennifer L. Johnson, Ph.D. Director of Food Safety & Quality Salm Partners LLC.
Final Rule for Sanitary Transportation. Background Proposed Rule: February 5, 2014 Public Comments: More than 200 Final Rule: On Display April 5, 2016.
Starting a Food Manufacturing Business
Author: Nurul Azyyati Sabri
Warren Majerus, VP QA Pharmore Ingredients
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
Prerequisite Programs
Chapter 4 PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS
Allergen Control.
FDA Inspections Stephen Joseph Joy’s Quality Management Systems
SQF ISO FSSC GMP Programs
Prerequisite Programs
The Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point
The Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point
Madison chemical food division
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
Presentation transcript:

Summary of Inspectional Findings Food Allergen Partnership Theresa C. Dziuk Minneapolis District FDA August 13, 2001

Food Allergen Partnership Establishments Inspected Minnesota 41 Inspections Planned 40 Inspections done (1 bakery firm OOB) 31 Bakery 3 Ice Cream 6 Candy Wisconsin 45 Inspections Planned & conducted 23 bakery 10 ice cream 12 candy

Establishment Size Based on Annual Gross Sales Small 1: $ 25,000 - $ 49,999 2: $ 50,000 - $ 99,999 3: $100,000 - $499,999 Medium 4: $500,000 - $999,999 5: $1,000,000 - $4,999,999 6: $5,000,000 - $9,999,999 Large 7: $10,000,000 - $24,999,999 8: $25,000,000 - $49,999,999 9: $50,000,000 and over

Food Allergen Partnership Key Inspection Focus Areas Raw Ingredients & Formulations –Compared ingredients with labels Processing & Production Schedules – Observed potential for cross-contact Sanitation –Observed cleaning “allergen clean” Observed rework procedures Employee Practices & Education Packaging & Labeling –Obtained labels Recall procedures & Obtained samples

Food Allergen Partnership Inspectional Findings

Food Allergen Partnership Firms Inspected that Verified Labels by Commodity

Food Allergen Partnership Inspectional Findings - Label Verification 45 Firms felt that they had adequate procedures to verify label accuracy; However, 15% had incorrect finished product labels. Of the firms that did not verify label accuracy; 51% had incorrect finished product labels.

Inspectional Findings Advisory Labeling

Food Allergen Partnership Firms Inspected that Utilize Rework by Commodity

Food Allergen Partnership Summary of Findings - Rework Of the firms that utilized rework, 48 % of had product that tested positive for undeclared allergen residues.

Food Allergen Partnership Procedures to Prevent Cross-Contact by Commodity

Food Allergen Partnership Summary of Findings – Cross-Contact Scheduling –“First-in / First-out” –Product Color Non-dedicated equipment Inadequately cleaning –Water only –Reused without cleaning

Food Allergen Partnership Sampling & Analysis

Food Allergen Partnership 118 Partnership Samples 73 Samples for peanut protein 40 bakeries, 10 ice cream, 23 candy 45 Samples for egg protein 34 bakeries, 6 ice cream, 5 candy

Food Allergen Partnership Analytical Findings - Peanut Sample Results

Food Allergen Partnership Inspectional Findings - The Total Picture

Food Allergen Partnership Partnership Workshops - Industry Education 3 Industry workshops - Fond du Lac & Madison, WI - Minneapolis, MN Presentations on subject from many angles - Local partners- Physicians - Industry representatives - Lawyers - CFSAN - National expert Distribution of allergen educational materials

Food Allergen Partnership Follow-up Activities

Food Allergen Partnership Follow-up Inspection & Samples MinnesotaWisconsin InspectedSampledInspectedSampled Bakery7543 Ice Cream1144 Chocolate1144 Total971211

Food Allergen Partnership Follow-up Inspection - Firm Response Change in Standard Operating Procedures TotalMNWI Allergen Policy615 Label Verification505 Rework523 Cross-Contact945 Test Verification312

We Are All In This Together Labeling is a Food Safety Concern