Regional Policy Common Indicators: Social Infrastructure, URBAN & ETC Definitions and Discussion Brussels, 22 nd November 2012 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Policy Common Indicators: Infrastructure Definitions and Discussion Brussels, 22 nd November
Advertisements

Regional Policy I MPLEMENTING A CT ON GEOGRAPHIC COVERAGE OF CROSS - BORDER AND TRANSNATIONAL AREAS I MPLEMENTING ACT ON ERDF SUPPORT FOR EACH COOPERATION.
Regional Policy Changes in Common Indicators Definitions and Discussion Brussels, 14 th March
The new European Regional Development Fund DG REGIO.
Regional Policy Common Indicators: Energy & Climate Change Definitions and Discussion Brussels, 22 nd November
Workshop 4: Using the EU Structural Funds to support Independent Living Ines Bulic European Network on Independent Living Strasbourg Freedom Drive, 9 Sept.
Regional Policy Common Indicators: Innovation and Productive Investment Definitions and Discussion Brussels, 22 nd November
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE SEC. GEN. OF INVESTMENTS AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGING AUTHORITY CIP Interreg Interregioanal Cooperation in INTERREG III Programmes.
Shaun Henry Director, Managing Authority (SEUPB) INTERREG VA – Ireland/Northern Ireland/Western Scotland ( )
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Green: Going.
Social Housing Germany Experiences and current issues Thomas Knorr-Siedow.
1 Danube Transnational Programme Zsuzsanna Drahos Ministry for National Economy Department of Territorial Development Planning 17 April 2015.
1 Integrating Service Delivery Systems for Persons with Severe Mental Illness Horwitz & Scheid, Ch. 24.
NEW APPROACH TO MARGINALIZED COMMUNITIES IN SLOVAKIA - ACT ON SOCIALLY EXCLUDED COMMUNITIES EUROMA MEETING, BRATISLAVA, MAY 4, 2012 MARTIN VAVRINČÍK, DEPARTMENT.
Financing Growth and Cohesion in the enlarged EU 24 November 2005 Financing urban actions and sustainable communities Financing urban actions and sustainable.
23/08/20151 European Investment Bank EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK Urban Development Projects 29 th May 2009 Barbara Lemke Urban Planner Projects Directorate.
Common Strategic Framework Commission proposal Dominique Bé 3-4 May 2012, Bratislava.
Pressing Research Needs to Advance an Equitable Health Policy
Lesson 3: Monitoring and Indicator Macerata, 23 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
1 SPACE AND COST NORMS FOR BUILDINGS AS MANAGEMENT TOOL IN HIGHER EDUCATION Gert Steyn Stellenbosch University.
UW Cooperative Extension Land Use Education Programs Comprehensive Planning Overview March 15th Osceola WI Polk County UWEX-Cooperative Extension.
Ministry of Welfare 18 June 2008 Implementation of EU Structural Funds activities within the competence of the Ministry of Welfare and results achieved.
How to Use the Structural Funds ? 1.Financing sustainable energy projects. 2.Practical support – RUSE operation. Jana Cicmanova Energie-Cités.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
Some words about UPA UPA is a non-governmental not-for-profit organization UPA is a non-governmental not-for-profit organization UPA was organized in 1991.
NORTH SEA INTERREG PROGRAMME – Jon Jordan UK Contact Point for the North Sea INTERREG Programme europeanpolicysolutions.
EEA Grants Norway Grants Annual Programme Report Template Brussels, 20 November
Financial Instruments in Cohesion Policy DG REGIO, Open Days, Brussels, October 2013 Financial Instruments for SMEs- A regional example.
Services Overview: Mental Health/Substance Use Disorders Programs and Managed Care Plans 1 Medi-Cal Managed Care Plans (MCP) County Mental Health Plan.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI) Zsolt SZOKOLAI European Commission DG for Regional Policy.
ESPOO meeting, November 2006 workshop 2: Innovation and competitiveness ESPON 2006 Programme ESPOO meeting, November 2006 workshop 2: Innovation.
Project Cycle Management for International Development Cooperation Indicators Teacher Pietro Celotti Università degli Studi di Macerata 16 December 2011.
Progress Report The Czech Republic. The Situation of Roma in 2011 Activities of the Agency for social inclusion in Roma localities were extended to 10.
Project Handicapped People Employed in Co-operatives (HAPECO) Duration: January 2005 – July target regions in Estonia (covering about 50 % of the.
Ministry of Constructions and Regional Development Progress in regional development.
The Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (FP7) supporting innovation Epp Tohver-Bulavs 07. November 2007, Tallinn.
Integrating Mental Health and Psychosocial Interventions into World Bank Lending for Conflict Affected Populations: A Toolkit About the Toolkit: Provides.
REGIONAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME (ROP) SLOVAK REPUBLIC DG REGIO Evaluation Network Meeting, Brussels, 14 March 2012.
NrPriority axisTO / IP 1Qualifications and skills meeting the needs of society and labour market TO 10 ESF iii and TO 10 ERDF 2 Increasing social inclusionTO.
Deinstitutionalization and developing Community Based services International overview Zsolt Bugarszki, PhD.
HELPS PROJECT Housing and Home-care for the Elderly and vulnerable people and Local Partnership Strategies in Central European cities Štěpánka Pfeiferová.
Presentation to Joint Budget Committee on: Urban Renewal and Rural development NATIONAL DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING.
The Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan Republican Center for Health Development November 2015 Development of a network.
EU A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head of Unit.
 Take a copy of the Spider graph and then add a section on commercialism.  Unsure you add in the key terms  Commercialisation  University Scholarship.
With the participation of and supported by European financing opportunities for River contracts Galluccio Emiliano – Project manager – Consorzio Punto.
City: Malmö Cat: City Star 2012 Project: SÖM “South East Malmö” My name: Ola Nord.
1 Second call for proposals – National Information Day EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Benoît Dalbert, Project Officer, Joint Technical Secretariat.
Implementation progress of SPD activities within the competence of the Ministry of Education and Science [as at 31/12/2006] EU Structural Funds for Education.
Operationalizing Indicators for the Incheon Strategy: Make the Right Real Daniel Mont Copenhagen Washington Group Meeting October 2015.
1 RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES in FP7 CARE Collaboration Meeting CERN, Switzerland, November 2005 Presentation by Daniel Pasini,
Committee of Regions Brussels 11 May 2006 GLOCALISATION OF HOMELESS POLICIES How local authorities can strengthen their homeless strategies through transnational.
Capturing the outcomes of the European Territorial Cooperation Programmes Follow up to ex post evaluation of INTERREG III Presentation Template Ieva Kalnina,
Interreg Programmes Preliminary Conclusions May 2016.
Regional Policy Future of Cohesion Policy and Investments in Health Christopher Todd, Head of Unit, Slovakia European Commission, Directorate General for.
ERDF for Education and Science th March 2011.
NDPHS PHC EG Draft Workshop report, Attachment 3
The Islamic University of Gaza- Higher Studies Deanery
LABOUR, SOCIAL AFFAIRS AND FAMILY OF SLOVAK REPUBLIC
Heads of Planning People, Place and Planning
Challenges in Social Inclusion in Serbia
Council of Europe Development Bank (CEB)
Operational Programmes Selected Impressions from Negotiations
EVALUATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR
Specific objectives – intervention logic
German Drug and Addiction Policy
From bio-waste to valuable raw material
Brussels Berlaymont Building April 2010.
Integrated Development and Increasing Prosperity of Southern Estonia
Presentation transcript:

Regional Policy Common Indicators: Social Infrastructure, URBAN & ETC Definitions and Discussion Brussels, 22 nd November

Regional Policy Social Infrastructure -1 (35) Capacity of supported childcare or education infrastructure, persons Number of users who can use newly built or improved childcare or education facilities. It includes new or improved buildings, or new equipment provided by the project. It measures nominal capacity (i.e. number of possible users which is usually higher than or equal to the number of actual users). 2

Regional Policy Social Infrastructure -2 (36) Population expected to use improved health services, persons Population expected to use the health services benefiting from the project. It includes new or improved buildings, or new equipment for various type of health service (prevention, outpatient or inpatient care, aftercare). The indicator excludes multiple counting even if the intervention benefits more services targeting the same persons: one person still counts as one even if that person will use several services which were supported by Structural Funds. 3

Regional Policy Urban Development Specific -1 (37) Population living in areas with integrated urban development strategies, persons Population living in areas with integrated urban development strategies within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation XX (ERDF) (38) Open space created or rehabilitated in urban areas, square metres Size of renovated / newly developed publicly accessible open-air areas 4

Regional Policy Urban Development Specific -2 (39) Public or commercial buildings newly built or renovated in urban areas, square metres Size of renovated / newly developed public and commercial areas (40) Rehabilitated housing in urban areas, square metres Size of renovated / newly developed residential areas 5

Regional Policy ETC Specific -1 (41) Number of enterprises participating in crossborder, transnational or interregional research projects, enterprises Variant of indicator 26 'Number of enterprises cooperating with research institutions' with the difference that the research project must qualify as crossborder, transnational or interregional. 6

Regional Policy ETC Specific -2 (42) Number of research institutions participating in crossborder, transnational or interregional research projects, organisations Variant of indicator 41 'Number of enterprises participating in crossborder, transnational or interregional research projects' with the difference that it counts cooperating research institutions instead of enterprises. 7