RbD Subgroup Dean Johnson 8 th April 2008 RbD Subgroup Dean Johnson 8 th April 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic) Allocations Overview 4 th December 2012.
Advertisements

Proposal to Change the UNC AQ ‘Backstop Date’ to accommodate the 2010 Seasonal Normal Review DESC – 2nd October 2009 NOTE: Instances where TBC is stated.
USRV Incentives Review Chris Warner. USRV Resolution Responsibility and Occurrence  E8.1.1  “…the User shall investigate Reconciliation Values that.
UNC Modification Proposal Revised Timescales for LDZ Shrinkage Arrangements Simon Trivella – 25 th September 2008 Distribution Workstream.
21 May 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Mod 115 An alternative view Phil Broom Gaz de France ESS.
1 Project Nexus Market Differentiation Topic Workgroup 14 th & 15 th July 2009.
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
DESC Action DE0301 & DE0302 (New Project Nexus Allocation Algorithm) 4th April 2012.
AQ Overview.  Annual Quantity (AQ) is a value held for each meter point that reflects the expectation as to the volume of gas that a meter point will.
Mod 0194 Presentation on the conclusions reached by British Gas Nick Wye On behalf of the I&C Group.
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
LDZ Shrinkage - a National Grid Overview Chris Warner Mod 0194/RG 0208 June 2008.
OPNs & LDZ Demand Forecasts Chris Shanley & Nick Reeves.
Shrinkage Forum 04 June 2013 Roy Malin. 2 Best Practice - Areas of Inconsistency AreaBackgroundAction Definition of All-PE systems Used to identify networks.
Shrinkage Forum 22 January 2014 Roy Malin /15 Shrinkage Proposals  Initial proposals issued December 2013  Proposed Shrinkage Quantities calculated.
1 Performance Assurance Workgroup January 2014 A proposal by Xoserve for a Performance Assurance methodology.
Presented by : Steven J Edwards, Head of Income and Pricing, Wales & West Utilities GDN Allowed and collected revenue awareness presentation for Shippers.
Distribution Network Interruption - Initialisation 28 September 2010.
Modification proposal 0073 ‘Revision to the Notice Period regarding the implementation of changes to Transportation charges’ Transmission Workstream, 2.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 2013/14 6 th February 2012.
11 User Pays User Committee 11th January Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
IEA Bioenergy Conference 2015 UK Biomethane Market Update 50 Plants Injecting Gas by End th October 2015 John Baldwin Managing Director CNG.
Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Billing Operations Forum 24 July 2007 RbD Overview Fiona Cottam.
Modification Proposal 0395 & 0398 – Limitation on Retrospective Invoicing and Invoice Correction 1 st December 2011.
1 v1 iGT CSEP Billing Solution ScottishPower Proposals April 08.
Gas Distribution Transportation Charging What are the Risks to Pricing predictability? Stephen Marland Pricing Manager
1 Mod Review Group 126 Mar 2007 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  The review proposal is primarily concerned with restricting.
Leakage Model Development Proposals – Shrinkage Forum Discussion Wednesday 14 December 2011.
Analysis of the Xoserve Read Validation Proposal Author: Alex Cullin 27/08/2014.
11 User Pays User Committee 16th February Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
1 Review Group 264 Rules & Options Analysis for BSSOQ Methodology Changes Post MOD th September 2009.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement – Interim Report findings 17 th September 2012.
PN UNC 4 th September 2012 Reconciliation Issues (Action: NEX06/02)
Development Workgroup 0282 Action 018 – impact on RbD 13 September 2010.
Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 2014/15 15 th May 2013.
Impacts of Mod 244 Steve Nunnington xoserve. Background  96.5% of transportation charges based on capacity.  These are dependent on historical throughput.
UNC Modification Proposal 0380 Periodic Annual Quantity Calculation Calculation of Daily Supply Point Capacity Alan Raper – DNCMF 26 th September 2011.
13 th July 2009 Meeting of Theft of Gas Review Group (UNC245)
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Meter Error – NTS Revenue Flows Gas TCMF – 2 nd December 2010.
Summary of NDM Data Sample Analysis
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
Options for Mod 640 Replacement
Rebecca Knight Mod 644 UIG Analysis.
Extraordinary DSC ChMC
Orifice plate meter error resolution – cash flows
Modification th July 2008.
Project Nexus Workgroup
R&N Timeline June-19 Sept-19 (EUC) Nov-19 Minor Release D4
Weekly Progress Update 11 May 2018
Modification Proposal 115 – ‘Correct Apportionment of NDM Error’
Transporter Initiated SPA Confirmations on behalf of User Potential Impact Discussion with UK Link Committee.
AUG Query Responses 21st November 2013.
Connected System Exit Points - Update
Project Nexus Workgroup
Modification Proposal 115 – ‘Correct Apportionment of NDM Error’
Joint Theft Reporting Review (from meeting 1st March 2019)
Modification 421 – Updates and Benefits Case
Overview of RbD Risk Modelling 31 March 2008
Retail & Networks ChMC Update
Modification Proposal 136
Actions Updates Action 0282/006 – Exclude from AQ process
Pricing and Margins Manager National Grid Distribution
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic)
Extraordinary DSC ChMC
Development Work Group 194
UK Link Timeline June-19 Sept-19 (EUC) Nov-19
Further Considerations
Development Work Group 194
Presentation transcript:

RbD Subgroup Dean Johnson 8 th April 2008 RbD Subgroup Dean Johnson 8 th April 2008

Agenda RbD Verification Update Presentation of updated analysis Discussion of declining DMP sample Options available RbD Forecasting

RbD Verification Analysis Analysis period reflective of MOD152V timescales (Apr-04 to Mar-08) Trend – avg. cumulative over bill per DMP customer of 1,293 kWh for the period (323 / year) BUT: Recent trend indicates an under bill per SSP customer (cumulative difference) Pending analysis and receipt of further reconciliation and DMP data (up to 6 months) Per DMP Customer: Cumulative Billed, Actual & Difference (Billed-Actual)

RbD Imbalance – Causes Billed-Actual Difference LDZ Current Balance (TWH) Theft Of Gas Threshold Crossers Shrinkage Adjustment LDZ Adjustment Duplicates Late Confirmed Inter LDZ Transfers LDZ Postcode Discrepancy 2005 Postcode Discrepancy Remaining Balance (TWH) % Throughput 2004 (No Adjust) 2005 (No Adjust) 2006 (No Adjust) 2007 (Adjust to Flow) EA % EM % NE % NO % NT % NW % SC % SE % SO % SW % WM % WN % WS % Wales % Total %  Items removed or adjusted to reflect the amended analysis period (MOD152: 4 years) 4 Year History (April 2004 to March 2008)

RbD Imbalance Summary LDZ March 2008 (>Apr04)September 07 (>Oct 03)February 2007 (>Feb98) Current Balance Summary No Return Summary Yet To Flow Remaining Balance % of Throughput Remaining Balance % of Throughput Remaining Balance % of Throughput EA % % % EM % % % NE % % % NO % % % NT % % % NW % % % SC % % % SE % % % SO % % % SW % % % WM % % % WN % % % WS % % % Wales % % % Total % % % Imbalance current TWH - reduction from previous (21.64TWH – September 07) Comparison: Mar08 / Sep07 / Feb07

Declining DMP Sample Size  BGT DMP sample utilised in RbD Verification process from February 1998  50% reduction in sample size since DMP inception  Significant reduction since 2004, more apparent in last 1 to 2 years  Potential issues regarding confidence in RbD verification results… Feb98 10,689 Jan08 5,094

Declining DMP Sample Size  DMP sample of 10,000 meter points represents a 0.95% margin of error  i.e. The results presented are accurate to within +/- 0.95%, 95% of the time  Current DMP sample size is 5,094  Represents 1.37% margin of error  DMP sample is imperative to the RbD verification process  Confidence in results not currently regarded as an issue  BUT – sample reduction needs to be addressed and maintained going forward  Additional interest is being placed on verification results  Headings quoted - MOD194 ‘Correct Apportionment of NDM Error – Energy’  xoserve & BGT have discussed the DMP sample issues  Options are available to address the declining DMP sample numbers…

Declining DMP Sample Size: Options  Option 1: BGT to boost DMP sample numbers  BGT solely responsible boost and maintain going forward  Option 2: Additional Shipper involvement  Additional samples from customer base, replicate BGT established process  Option 3: Do nothing  Sample numbers still good, error margin good, but sustainable?  Option 4: Transporters / xoserve run own DMP sample  Central operation and maintenance  Option 5: Combine DMP with Demand Estimation data recorder sample  Established sample - 3,440 data recorders currently installed on SSP sites  Manual collection twice a year – used in deriving NDM Algorithms for allocation  Combined; 8,600 sample (1.06% margin of error)  Available data allows initial analysis - indicates following results…

Declining DMP Sample Size: Data Recorders  Identify billed values and actual value for recorders (replicate DMP analysis)  Data recorder analysis shows a different trend to DMP  DMP indicates SSP Billed >Actual (over): DR indicates SSP Billed < Actual (under)  Further investigation required, data available May Cumulative Billed, Actual & Difference (Billed-Actual) Per DR Customer

DMP Sample Size – Declining: Options  RbD Sub Group to consider options:  Option 1: BGT to boost DMP sample numbers  Option 2: Additional Shipper involvement  Option 3: Do nothing  Option 4: Transporters / xoserve run own DMP sample  Option 5: Combine DMP with Demand Estimation datarecorder sample