Intellectual Property Right Bernard Denis, DG-KTT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WP6: Dissemination and exploitation Vladimir Meglič.
Advertisements

Final Report Presentation By Mohammad Saber Sakhizada March,26 – 2009.
Research and Innovation Summary of MS questions on the Commission's proposal for DG Research & Innovation Research and Innovation Rules for Participation.
IP rights in FP7 PROTECT Study Visit 10th June 2008 (Alicante) IPR-Helpdesk is a constituent part of the IP-BASE project which is financed by the CIP Programme,
RD51 collaboration meeting October 2008 MoU section on Intellectual Property Bernard Denis, CERN-DSU-TT
Principal Patent Analyst
Brussels, 29 October 2007 Bart Janse DG Research IPR in FP7.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS A STRATEGIC TOOL Alison Campbell OBE PhD RTTP Belgrade 30 October 2012.
FP7 Regler för deltagande 18 december 2006 Monica Hjertman, Enheten för Europaprogrammen, VINNOVA
Universities and Patents From Open Science to Open Innovation Gilles Capart Chairman of ProTon Europe.
N Intellectual Property Rights and Research in the Digital Age CRASSH 2 February 2011 Dr Richard Jennings, Deputy Director Cambridge Enterprise Limited,
Knowledge Translation Mechanisms Movement of highly skilled students Publication of results Professional interactions Industry sponsored research Multi-firm.
Intellectual property Introduction Miloš Martínek 17 th December 2013.
WIPO TRAINING OF TRAINERS PROGRAM ON EFFECTIVE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ASSET MANAGEMENT BY SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES (SMEs) organized by the.
Collaboration Spotting for Technology Transfer. Technology Transfer  “ active and intentional process to disseminate or acquire knowledge, experience.
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Cern.ch/knowledgetransfer. Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation Charlyne Rabe CONTRACTS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Charlyne RABE KT Legal Advisor.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
Intellectual Property in the Context of Growth and Development of the World Economy Luciano Daffarra, Attorney at Law Daffarra, d’Addio & Partners China-Italy.
Constructing the “Price” of the Technology in IP Licensing Negotiations Sub Regional Training Program on IP Valuation Maribor November 5 to 7, 2012.
Presented by Vladimir Yossifov Consultant, IP Services “IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY.
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
Polimi Case study: Procedures, tools, facts & Figures
Protection FITT (Fostering Interregional Exchange in ICT Technology Transfer)
Market Health The (Re)New(ed) Ethics of Utilization IPR and The Role of the University in the Knowledge Economy Bowman Heiden CIP – Center for Intellectual.
Dr. Marie Talnack, Director, TechnologyTransfer Office and Industry Clinic.
A possible Intellectual Assets acquisition initiative for 4TU Proposal.
National Smartcard Project Work Package 8 – Intellectual Property Report.
Intellectual Property Rights & Valorisation of Research Results
Elements of a Workable Intellectual Property Policy OPIC IP Roundtable Noel Courage Bereskin & Parr November 21, 2007.
Intellectual Property Alignment of Current Policies Tana Pistorius UNISA Government CIO Summit Towards reducing costs of doing business in government and.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY IP Policy for Universities Tamas Bene, IP manager University.
1 WIPO – Geneva – April 2005 European Commission – Research DG D. Dambois European Patent Attorney IPR disputes in international.
DIS 605 BY DOROBIN AGOTI REG NO: D61/71443/2008 ICT INNOVATION, LEGAL AND PIRACY ISSUES.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property VS Standard of Living Thesis: How to increase your standard of Living through IPR Abstract: Private Vs Government.
Moscow, Russia, 10 September 2012 HSE Intellectual Property Policy Aliya Ermakova, Head of IP Department, Innovation and Enterprise Office, HSE
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
Why an Intellectual Property Policy? Sofia, November 24 and 25, 2015 Mr. Evgeniy Sesitsky, Department for Transition and Developed Countries, World Intellectual.
Industry’s Perspective on Industry-University Intellectual Property External Research Directors Network Industrial Research Institute, Inc. April 17, 2001.
Intellectual Property Valorization
© 2004 The IPR-Helpdesk is a project of the European Commission DG Enterprise, co-financed within the fifth framework programme of the European Community.
Follow-Up on the Crystal Clear Collaboration Agreement H. Hillemanns May, 22 nd 2007.
Intellectual Property Law Introduction Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University.
Technology transfer – The Hungarian experience Legal background Innovation Act: - Public R&D institutions are required to establish IP policy - IP created.
Lecture 27 Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property simply defined is any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It includes.
IPR Issues and Web2.0 Engagement Naomi Korn & Dr Charlotte Waelde 18/02/20161www.web2rights.org.uk.
1 Teaching Innovation - Entrepreneurial - Global The Centre for Technology enabled Teaching & Learning, N Y S S, India DTEL DTEL (Department for Technology.
WIPO Guidance – Intellectual Property Policy for Universities and Research Institutions for Countries in Transitions Prague, April 21 and 22, 2016 Mr.
1 Intellectual Property Rights David Worrall – Legal Department.
Intellectual Property Guide WP4 delivrables Tristan Rouillé, Ifremer 19 / 20 April 2011.
What can we expect from the lawyers ?
Annex: Berlin Contract
NSE Technology screening week – November 03, 2008
Towards a roadmap for collaborative R&D
Director Department for Transition and Developed Countries
National Contact Points (NCP) Training
Dai Davis, Solicitor and Chartered Engineer
University & Industry Collaborative IP Development
Jakob Wested and Helen Yu and Timo Minssen
IPR in FP7 Bart Janse DG Research A.2.
Knowledge Transfer Office
Perspective of an International Research Center
U.S. Army Technology Transfer Mechanisms
What can we expect from the lawyers ?
Presentation transcript:

Intellectual Property Right Bernard Denis, DG-KTT

Technology Transfer Intellectual Property Right Vs Technology Transfer Intellectual Property Right is about the right you have to control the access and use of your knowledge and innovation Technology Transfer is about transferring public research knowledge and innovation to industry for commercial exploitation using: - licensing - collaborative R&D - consultancy - spin-off 2

Technology Transfer Intellectual property: what is IP(R)? Intellectual Property Invention, know-how, drawings, specifications, photographs, samples, models, processes, procedures, instructions, software, reports, papers, semiconductor IC topography,... Intellectual Property Right Any protection offered by law to Intellectual Property: patents, utility models, design rights, copyrights, database rights, secrets,… 3

Technology Transfer Patents Vs copyright Patent Formal procedure Protect the invention described in the patent Requirements: novelty, utility and non-obviousness Geographic limitations Costs Copyright Automatic Protect the expression (words, images,…) not the underlying ideas 4

Technology Transfer Patenting at CERN* Motivation Image of CERN as source of innovation with an economic impact Revenues is NOT the primary motivation  Fair share of commercial revenues  while allowing free access for research in the HEP community Benefits of the patent system The originator and owner of the invention are clearly identified Inventions are better formalized, tangible and easier to transfer When do we patent? Invention made in the framework of HEP programme Invention made in the framework of collaborative R&D Why do we patent? We patent when we believe the invention has a commercial potential * Strategy currently being reviewed 5

Technology Transfer IP in collaborative R&D Managing IP in collaborative R&D means: Identifying pre-existing IP(R) (so called background IP ) Defining the access to background IP in the framework of the R&D project and for commercial exploitation Defining the rules for the protection of the results (so-called foreground IP ) Defining the principles for the ownership of the foreground IP Defining the mechanisms and rules for the use and dissemination of the results and in particular for the commercial exploitation of results 6

Technology Transfer Importance of IP management in collaborative R&D “The IP aspects of the relationships between the participants in collaborative research determine the nature and success of these activities, and play a crucial role in the design of the structures of the collaboration; they cannot be added as an afterthought” Expert Group Report on the Role and strategic Use of Intellectual Property Rights in International Research Collaborations, April The aim is to allow : Freedom to research and wide dissemination of results Access to public funds Effective management of financial return 7

Technology Transfer IP in collaborative R&D at CERN* Principles: Identification of background IP(R) Clear ownership of background IP(R) (the owner should be a party to the collaborative R&D) Access to background IP(R) for the execution of the project Foreground IP(R) (results) owned by the party generating it Decision to patent made by a coordination committee. Party non interested may transfer the right Industrial partner has the right to commercially exploit (with possible exclusivity) in his field Industrial partner pays the costs of patenting Academic partner retain the right to use the foreground IP(R) for R&D Clear revenue sharing scheme 8 * Strategy currently being reviewed

Technology Transfer Conclusion “Intellectual property rights can be used to promote openness and cumulative innovation as much as they are used to promote exclusivity” (O’Mahony, 2003) 9