Research Findings March 2007 Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey, Wave II – in Partnership with the National Center for Missing & Exploited.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Community Awareness Rosalie O’Neale Content Assessment Section 12 September 2006.
Advertisements

Facebook Twitter MySpace Cell Phones ???!!!!
Protecting children online  How can you protect your child online?  Are you aware of the dangers?  Do you know what you can put in place to protect.
Technology SafeKEY.
Internet Online Safety How to have FUN and Stay in Control.
Kids and Family Reading Report™ Harry Potter: The Power of One Book
172 Commercial Street, 2 nd Floor Portland Maine 1 May 2014 Full Service Market Research and Public Opinion Polling 172 Commercial.
I. S. W. M.It Starts With Me Cyber Communication Awareness.
EU research on the use of SNS by Children Dr Leslie Haddon EU Kids Online Meeting on European Social Networking Taskforce, Brussels, 26 th June, 2008.
Harmless Joke or Cyber-Bullying?
American Teens & Online Safety: What the research is telling us… Amanda Lenhart Family Online Safety Institute December 6, 2007 Washington, DC.
Herkimer and Oneida Counties Teen Assessment Project Tapping Into Teen Concerns, Perceptions and Behaviors Since 1997.
Cyber Bullying By B Bryant.
This week is anti-bullying week.
Cyber-safety January 21, 2011 UFO. Cyber-safety Social Networking is a way of life.
How to keep your kids safe online
Internet Safety Family Sciences. Goals To increase student knowledge of Internet safety To aid the student in identifying dangers on the Internet To build.
Florida Statistics April Road Map: – Research Purpose & Methodology – Summary – Detailed Findings – How Dangerous Is….? – How Distracting Is….?
Cross-tab ‘Think Before You Post’ An Internet Safety Survey Report Restricted & Confidential.
CYBER-SAFETY Things to think about when raising a “Digital Native”
E SAFETY. SOME FACTS A Talk Talk survey of 500 children aged 6-15 in Feb 2010 found: 5% had communicated with a stranger via webcam. 2% have actually.
E-safety resources Lucinda Searle Senior ICT Adviser Ian Gover Education Technology Adviser E-Safety Live 09 SWGfL.
Cyberbullying By: Kayla Banks EDF 204 Spring 2015.
Tween and Teen Dating Violence and Abuse Study Contact: Anne Glauber Office: Cell: July 2008.
Social Networking: The Differences Around The World By: Haley Thacker, Emily Gray Powell, Wright Queen, Holden Chapman, and Rob Willis.
Prevention - Smart Parents Ms. Anna Nabulya Deputy Executive Director Uganda Youth Development Link (UYDEL)
What Is the Internet? The Net is a worldwide collection of interconnected networks. The Internet Society
Hutton All Saints’ Online Risks and Dangers Workshop WEDNESDAY 19 TH NOVEMBER 2014.
© 2009 SCHOOL FAMILY MEDIA Keeping Your Child Safe on the Internet © 2009 SCHOOL FAMILY MEDIA.
Kara LaRose, School Counselor Willow Dale Elementary School
Trends in Teen Communication and Social Media Use: What’s Really Going On Here? Wednesday, February 9, 2011 Kimberlee Salmond Senior Researcher Girl Scout.
Question  What was the internet attended for?  What is the internet known as?  Ans. Information super high way.
Abby Brunner ITC 525 Summer I.  Question 1 Question 1  Question 2 Question 2  Question 3 Question 3  Question 4 Question 4  What can harm me on the.
Teens, Online Stranger Contact and Cyberbullying What the research is telling us… Amanda Lenhart Internet Safety Task Force April 30, 2008 Washington,
Electronic Safety Keeping yourself safe on the internet and cell phone Intended for Grades 4-5.
NetSmartZ Curriculum Resources from NetSmartZ.
Internet Safety Mrs. Oliver Technology
Social Networking Sites National Center For Missing and Exploited Children Dialogue on Social Networking Web Sites June 22, 2006 Washington, DC.
E-Safety E-safety relates to the education of using new technology responsibly and safely focusing on raising awareness of the core messages of safe content,
Cyber Bullying By Sarah Chaouk and Astede Woldegebriel.
Tweens and Internet Safety (Fielded among young people aged 8-12) Cox Communications.
Campus Crusade For Christ Global Religion Survey Topline Report Prepared by: Infosurv, Inc. November 1, 2013.
CyberSavvy Day 2 CyberSavvy Internet Safety and Privacy – Playing it Safe and Smart Grade Internet Safety: Online Protection and Cyber Predators.
ITC Summer I Table of Contents Glossary of terms Glossary of terms Safety Tips Quiz Credits Standards Multimedia Connections Multimedia.
CHAT ROOMS What Makes Them Dangerous And How YOU Can Make Them Safe! MARY B. CONYERS PROTECT EVERYCHILD P. O. Box 749, Knightdale, NC
Koessler Family Library Media Center Nardin Academy Buffalo, NY.
Cyberbullying: Implications & Responses Adrienne Katz Regional Adviser West Midlands.
Teens, Social Networks & Safety An Overview Amanda Lenhart Family Online Safety Institute Launch February 13, 2007 Washington, DC.
Parental Involvement in Children’s Social Networking Activities.
Electronic Safety Keeping yourself safe on the internet and cell phone Intended for Grades 4-5.
HART RESEARCH ASSOTESCIA Key findings from telephone survey of parents of children who access the Internet, conducted for Who Needs Parental Controls?
Parent Workshop OnlineSafety. Computer Safety Quiz.
Safer Internet Day 2016 Let’s create a better internet together. What are the key messages we want the children to understand about safe online behaviour?
Steven Wilson Barry Evans Administration, Business & Computing Faculty Gryffe High School.
Research Findings March 2007 Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey, Wave II – in Partnership with the National Center for Missing & Exploited.
Internet Safety Sam Farnsworth Utah PTA Technology Specialist
E-safety Parent Workshop Helping to keep your children safe online.
Kender Primary School E-Safety for Parents and Carers *Look at how children use the internet *Raise awareness of eSafety issues *Offer guidance on how.
CHILDREN’S INTERNET USAGE STUDY CHILDREN’S INTERNET USAGE STUDY SUMMARY OF FINDINGS.
PROTECT YOURSELF Cyberbullying. Why do you think people cyberbully? How does your school deal with cyberbullying? Have you ever sent a mean message because.
Data Privacy Request Janet Rash Intel Corporation Oregon Community Relations Manager October 3, 2008.
Teen Dating Abuse Luanne Vickery. Teen Dating Abuse Statistics  Teens experienced dating abuse as follows: 47% had a partner exhibit controlling behaviors.
Internet Safety. Online Concerns: Contact Content Conduct.
What is the Internet? The large network of millions of computers around the world that are connected to each other through smaller networks. It is a very.
CRIME AND SAFETY SURVEY TOPLINE RESULTS MAY 2013.
Keeping your children safe with technology
Internet Safety How to stay safe online.
Intervention and Prevention

Teen Dating Abuse.
Presentation transcript:

Research Findings March 2007 Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey, Wave II – in Partnership with the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children ® (NCMEC) and John Walsh (Fielded Among Young People Aged 13-17) Contact: Anthony Surratt Cox Communications

CONTENTS March 2007 Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II 2 > Background and Research Objectives > Methodology >Sample Composition > Executive Summary > Detailed Findings >Teen Online Behavior >Teen Perceptions of Internet Safety >Families Talking to Teens about Internet Safety > Appendix >Respondent Profiles

3 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II > Cox Communications is committed to youth and education and, through its Take Charge program ( wants to empower families to make smart choices in the use of TV, the Internet and other mass media in the home. > In 2006, Cox partnered with the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children ® (NCMEC) and TV host and children’s advocate John Walsh to better understand teen online behavior, Internet safety, and the role parents play in their children’s use of online media. They commissioned TRU to conduct a national survey among 1,000 U.S. teenagers ages In early 2007, Cox— again working in partnership with NCMEC and Walsh— commissioned TRU to conduct another teen survey with many of the same questions, revealing some compelling year-over-year trends in Internet use. > Ultimately, Cox seeks to incorporate this research to help craft thought-provoking messages and provide useful resources to encourage Internet safety and parental involvement. BACKGROUND Cox Teen Internet Safety Study Wave II

4 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II > Specific objectives of this new 2007 wave (as in 2006) were again to: >Measure online teens’ tendency to exhibit potentially risky behavior via the Internet as well as other forms of virtual communication (e.g. text, , and IM messaging, etc.). >Gauge youth perceptions about the safety or potential risk associated with online activities such as maintaining an Internet profile and posting personal photos. >Assess current levels of parental involvement and parental knowledge about what teens do on the Internet or other virtual environments. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Assessing Behaviors and Attitudes

CONTENTS March 2007 Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II 5 > Background and Research Objectives > Methodology >Sample Composition > Executive Summary > Detailed Findings >Teen Online Behavior >Teen Perceptions of Internet Safety >Families Talking to Teens about Internet Safety > Appendix >Respondent Profiles

6 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II INTERVIEWS Boys Girls Total Age 13-15Age , Sample Composition > Sample composition >Youth ages (n=1,070) with online access > Sample distribution (unweighted totals): > Sample Weighting >The number of teens interviewed for this survey is sufficiently large to be projected to all U.S. teenagers. Data are weighted based on key demographic variables—in this case, age and gender—to reflect the national population of young people > Interviews were conducted online in February and March, 2007 among a geographically representative sample. METHODOLOGY

7 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II Teen Groups > In the pages that follow, the primary focus is on differences and similarities in perceptions and behaviors with respect to Internet/virtual communication safety between: >Teens and Teens >Boys and Girls > However, because online experience/behaviors/ attitudes and parental involvement are so intrinsically related among young people, respondents were further segmented and analyzed. Significant differences are noted where applicable for the following groups: >Teens who have received personal online messages from someone they don’t know. >Teens who have a public profile on a social networking site. >Teens whose parents have discussed potential dangers of sharing personal information online with them. METHODOLOGY

CONTENTS March 2007 Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II 8 > Background and Research Objectives > Methodology >Sample Composition > Executive Summary > Detailed Findings >Teen Online Behavior >Teen Perceptions of Internet Safety >Families Talking to Teens about Internet Safety > Appendix >Respondent Profiles

9 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II > A strong majority (71%) of 13-17s have established an online profile, up from 61% in > Nearly half (47%) have an Internet profile that is public and viewable by anyone. >38% of younger teens (13-15) have a public profile. >60% of older teens (16-17) have a public profile. Teens’ creation of online profiles continues to grow EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

10 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II > Nearly two-thirds of teens (64%) post photos or videos of themselves online. > Half or more teens post information online about the city where they live (58%) and the name of their school (49%). > Nearly one in 10 teens (8%) have posted their cell phone number. Teens readily post personal information and photos of themselves online EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

11 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II > A majority (58%) said they do not think posting personal information and photos on public networking sites is unsafe. > Fully 47% said they are not worried about other people using their personal online information in ways they don’t want them to (down from 57% in ’06). > Half (49%) reported they are unconcerned that posting personal information online might negatively affect their future. Many teens are unconcerned about Internet safety or about others using their personal information EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

12 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II > Even with the surge in young people putting themselves “out there” with public profiles, many teens are making safer decisions when it comes to people they talk to online. > When teens receive messages from someone they don’t know: >60% said they usually only respond to ask who the person is (down from 72% in ’06). >57% said they usually ignore these messages (up from 47%). >31% said they usually reply and chat (down from 40%). Despite exposure, teens are showing some signs of making better choices while they are online EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

13 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II > Parental awareness about teens’ online activities has risen significantly since ’06. >Only about one-fourth of teens (25%) said their parents know “little” or “nothing” about what they do online (down from 33%). >Fully 41% said their parents have talked to them “a lot” about Internet safety (up from 36%). > Family discussions have been positive for teens—more of those who said their parents have talked to them “a lot” reported: >Greater concerns about online safety and sharing of personal information and photos. >More limited sharing of information/pictures via the Internet. >Lower incidence of public online profiles. >Lower incidence of talking to or meeting with people they only know from online. Parents talking to teens continues to help reduce exposure to potential online risks EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CONTENTS March 2007 Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II 14 > Background and Research Objectives > Methodology >Sample Composition > Executive Summary > Detailed Findings >Teen Online Behavior >Teen Perceptions of Internet Safety >Families Talking to Teens about Internet Safety > Appendix >Respondent Profiles

15 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II More teens, especially 16-17s, creating online profiles and volunteering personal information Q.3 : Which of the following do you have? DETAILED FINDINGS > The big story is the rise in the number of teens with profiles on social networking sites such as MySpace, Friendster, etc. >71% report having a profile—up 10 points from a year ago. >Blogging has dropped eight points, likely supplanted by teens posting comments and personal information on their own and each others’ profile pages. > Personal and IM screen- names remain commonplace for teens. > Cell phone penetration among s has increased significantly since 2006, up to 71% from 63%. TEENS’ ONLINE ACTIVITIES & PRESENCE Note: Base sizes for charted segments are noted (in parentheses) in chart’s legend. Letters are used to represent segments for statistical testing; a capital letter signifies a value “significantly” higher at the 95% confidence level (lowercase at 90%). Significant changes vs shown in yellow Have any profile: 2006: 61% 2007: 71%

16 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II Half or more teens post detailed information about themselves online Q.4: What type of information do you post online? > An alarming percentage of teens reported they post information online about the city where they live (58%) and the name of their school (49%). >Percentages were significantly higher among older teens (70% and 64%, respectively). > Nearly two-thirds (64%) post photos or videos of themselves. >Girls and older teens, in particular, said they have uploaded personal pictures to the Internet. > One-fourth of teens reported posting a fake age online. > Nearly one in 10 teens (8%) have posted their cell phone number. WHAT DO TEENS POST ONLINE? Note: Base sizes for charted segments are noted (in parentheses) in chart’s legend. Letters are used to represent segments for statistical testing; a capital letter signifies a value “significantly” higher at the 95% confidence level (lowercase at 90%). Significant changes vs shown in yellow. DETAILED FINDINGS

17 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II However, teens growing more cautious about meeting people they only know from online Q.5 : Have you ever received personal messages ( , IM, chat, or text messages—not “junk mail” like spam or blasts) from someone you don’t know? Q.7 :Have you ever considered meeting with someone whom you had only talked to online? Q.8: Have you ever actually met with someone whom you had only talked to online? Q.15: Have you ever been harassed or bullied online or in real life? > It remains routine for young people to receive personal messages online from someone they don’t know (69%). > Nearly one out of five teens (19%) report they’ve been harassed or bullied online. > However, more teens in 2007 are keeping their keyboards between themselves and those they don’t know. >16% said they’ve considered meeting someone they’ve only talked to online (down from 30% in ’06). >8% have actually met someone they only knew online (down from 14% in ’06). TEENS’ EXPERIENCE WITH POTENTIAL ONLINE THREATS Note: Base sizes for charted segments are noted (in parentheses) in chart’s legend. Letters are used to represent segments for statistical testing; a capital letter signifies a value “significantly” higher at the 95% confidence level (lowercase at 90%). Significant changes vs shown in yellow DETAILED FINDINGS

18 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II Teens with public online profiles face greater exposure to Internet risks Q.5 : Have you ever received personal messages ( , IM, chat, or text messages—not “junk mail” like spam or blasts) from someone you don’t know? Q.7 :Have you ever considered meeting with someone whom you had only talked to online? Q.8: Have you ever actually met with someone whom you had only talked to online? Q.15: Have you ever been harassed or bullied online or in real life? > Compared to teens without profiles on social networking sites, more s who have public profiles on sites such as MySpace, Friendster, and Xanga have: >Received personal messages from someone they don’t know. >Been harassed or bullied online. >Considered meeting people they’ve only talked to online. >Actually met someone they’ve only talked to via the Internet. TEENS’ EXPERIENCE WITH POTENTIAL ONLINE RISKS (Teens with a public online profile vs. teens without a profile) Note: Base sizes for charted segments are noted (in parentheses) in chart’s legend. Letters are used to represent segments for statistical testing; a capital letter signifies a value “significantly” higher at the 95% confidence level (lowercase at 90%). DETAILED FINDINGS

19 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II But, teens learning better to ignore online messages from senders they don’t know Q.6: When someone whose name you don’t recognize contacts you online ( , IM, text, or chat messages), do you usually… > Though teens may not tell adults or others when they receive online messages from someone they don’t know, more of them said they usually opt to ignore these messages, compared to >Only respond to ask who the person is: down to 60% from 72%. >Ignore messages: up to 57% from 47%. >Reply and chat: down to 31% from 40%. > More girls and younger teens—who also tend to be the most victimized online—remain cautious about talking to someone they don’t know, either by ignoring them, blocking them, or telling adults. TALKING ONLINE TO SOMEONE YOU DON’T KNOW (Among teens who have received messages from someone they don’t know) Note: Base sizes for charted segments are noted (in parentheses) in chart’s legend. Letters are used to represent segments for statistical testing; a capital letter signifies a value “significantly” higher at the 95% confidence level (lowercase at 90%). Significant changes vs shown in yellow DETAILED FINDINGS

CONTENTS March 2007 Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II 20 > Background and Research Objectives > Methodology >Sample Composition > Executive Summary > Detailed Findings >Teen Online Behavior >Teen Perceptions of Internet Safety >Families Talking to Teens about Internet Safety > Appendix >Respondent Profiles

21 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II One out of five 13-17s report that posting personal information and photos online is safe Q.9: How safe or unsafe do you think it is for someone to have their personal information or photos on a public blog or networking site (like MySpace, Friendster, Xanga, etc.)? > Though concerned about talking to people they don’t know on the Internet, teens appear to be less worried when it comes to posting information about themselves online. >About 21% said that it is safe to post personal information, including photos, online. >Only 28% of teens with a public profile said posting information was unsafe; yet 53% of those without a profile said posting information was unsafe. HOW SAFE DO TEENS THINK IT IS TO POST PERSONAL INFORMATION ONLINE? (Very/Somewhat Unsafe vs. Somewhat/Very Safe) Note: Significant changes vs shown in yellow. DETAILED FINDINGS

22 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II Teens’ concerns about others using their personal information down 10 points from ‘06 Q.13: How concerned are you that someone will use personal information that you posted online (including photos or videos) in a way you don’t want them to? > Nearly half of teens (47%) said they are not concerned about other people using personal information posted online in ways they don’t want them to (vs. 37% in ’06). > Though more younger respondents and girls reported some degree of concern, the unconcerned among these groups rose nine to 12 points in the past year. HOW CONCERNED ARE TEENS THAT OTHERS WILL USED THEIR PERSONAL INFORMATION? (Bottom-two-box scores) Note: Letters are used to represent segments for statistical testing; a capital letter signifies a value “significantly” higher at the 95% confidence level (lowercase at 90%). Significant changes vs shown in yellow % 51%B 44% 42% 56%C DETAILED FINDINGS

23 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II Half of teens reportedly unfazed by the prospect that posting information online might negatively affect their future Q.14: How concerned are you that posting your personal information (including photos or videos) online could have a negative effect on your future? > Fully 49% of teens said they were unconcerned that posting personal information online might impact their future in undesired ways. > Fewer than one out of four (22%) said they were “very” or “extremely concerned.” >More girls than boys reported concerns (26% vs. 19%). >More 13-15s than 16-17s reported concerns (25% vs. 19%). HOW CONCERNED ARE TEENS THAT POSTING INFORMATION ONLINE MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT THEIR FUTURE? (Bottom-two-box scores) Note: Letters are used to represent segments for statistical testing; a capital letter signifies a value “significantly” higher at the 95% confidence level (lowercase at 90%). New question, not asked in % 50% 46% 45% 53%C DETAILED FINDINGS

CONTENTS March 2007 Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II 24 > Background and Research Objectives > Methodology >Sample Composition > Executive Summary > Detailed Findings >Teen Online Behavior >Teen Perceptions of Internet Safety >Families Talking to Teens about Internet Safety > Appendix >Respondent Profiles

25 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II Family awareness about teens’ online activities significantly up from ‘06 Q.10: How much do your parents or guardians know about where you go and what you do on the Internet? > Despite their increasingly nonchalant attitudes about posting information online, more teens overall said their parents know “a lot” or “everything” about what they do on the Internet. >Only about one-fourth reported their parents know “little” or “nothing” about what they do online (down from 33% last year). >Again, more younger teens and girls said their parents are aware of their Internet activities—though 16-17s reported significant increases in parental awareness since ’06. HOW MUCH DO TEENS’ PARENTS KNOW ABOUT WHAT THEY DO ONLINE? (Parents Know Very Little or Nothing vs. Parents Know A Lot or Everything) Note: Significant changes vs shown in yellow. TOTAL Males (A) Females (B) Ages (C) Ages (D) DETAILED FINDINGS

26 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II More teens report their parents are talking to them about dangers of sharing personal information on the Internet Q.12: In just the past year, have your parents or guardians talked to you about the potential dangers of sharing personal information with people on the Internet? > Three out of four teens (75%) said that their parents have discussed potential dangers of posting personal information online with them in the past year. > Girls and young teens, in particular, report that their parents have talked to them, however, discussions are up significantly this year among boys and older teens as well. HAVE PARENTS TALKED TO TEENS RECENTLY ABOUT SHARING INFORMATION ONLINE? Note: Base sizes for charted segments are noted (in parentheses) in chart’s legend. Letters are used to represent segments for statistical testing; a capital letter signifies a value “significantly” higher at the 95% confidence level (lowercase at 90%). Significant changes vs shown in yellow DETAILED FINDINGS

27 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II More teens report parents talking to them “a lot” about safety Q.11: Have your parents or guardians talked to you about Internet safety? > Though one out of five teens (18%) said their parents have never talked to them about Internet safety, 41% report that their parents have talked to them “a lot” (up from 36% in ’06). HOW MUCH HAVE PARENTS TALKED TO TEENS? Note: Base sizes for charted segments are noted (in parentheses) in chart’s legend. Letters are used to represent segments for statistical testing; a capital letter signifies a value “significantly” higher at the 95% confidence level (lowercase at 90%). Significant changes vs shown in yellow DETAILED FINDINGS

28 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II Limited parental involvement fosters less cautious attitudes among teens Q.13: How concerned are you that someone will use personal information that you posted online (including photos or videos) in a way you don’t want them to? Q.14: How concerned are you that posting your personal information (including photos or videos) online could have a negative effect on your future? > Nearly two-thirds of 13-17s who have not discussed Internet safety with family members said they were unconcerned about posting information online and unworried about potential negative effects posting may have on their future. >More teens whose parents have talked to them “a lot” about Internet safety said they were “very” or “extremely concerned” about others using their information in ways they don’t want (32% vs. 13% whose parents had not talked to them) or about potential negative effects on their future (34% vs. 16% whose parents had not talked to them). [not charted] HOW CONCERNED ARE TEENS ABOUT POSTING PERSONAL INFORMATION ONLINE? (Bottom-two-box scores) Note: Letters are used to represent segments for statistical testing; a capital letter signifies a value “significantly” higher at the 95% confidence level (lowercase at 90%). DETAILED FINDINGS

29 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II Family conversations continue to help reduce teens’ exposure to potential online risks Q.3 : Which of the following do you have? > Among teens whose parents have talked to them a lot about online safety, only about 39% reported that they have a public profile on a social networking site. >58% of 13-17s whose parents have not spoken with them said they have a public profile. TEENS’ ONLINE ACTIVITIES & PRESENCE Note: Base sizes for charted segments are noted (in parentheses) in chart’s legend. Letters are used to represent segments for statistical testing; a capital letter signifies a value “significantly” higher at the 95% confidence level (lowercase at 90%). Significant changes vs shown in yellow. Public profile: Parents know some/a lot about what I do online: 43% Parent know little/nothnig about what I do online: 59% DETAILED FINDINGS

30 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II Fewer teens whose parents have talked to them about online safety post personal information or consider meeting people they only know from the Internet Q.4: What do teens post online? Q.5 : Have you ever received personal messages ( , IM, chat, or text messages—not “junk mail” like spam or blasts) from someone you don’t know? Q.7 :Have you ever considered meeting with someone whom you had only talked to online? Q.8: Have you ever actually met with someone whom you had only talked to online? Q.15: Have you ever been harassed or bullied online or in real life? TEENS’ EXPERIENCE WITH POTENTIAL ONLINE THREATS Note: Letters are used to represent segments for statistical testing; a capital letter signifies a value “significantly” higher at the 95% confidence level (lowercase at 90%). WHAT DO TEENS POST ONLINE? DETAILED FINDINGS

CONTENTS March 2007 Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II 31 > Background and Research Objectives > Methodology >Sample Composition > Executive Summary > Detailed Findings >Teen Online Behavior >Teen Perceptions of Internet Safety >Families Talking to Teens about Internet Safety > Appendix >Respondent Profiles

32 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II APPENDIX: DEMOGRAPHIC SAMPLE PROFILE Q16. : What state do you live in? Q18. : Which of the following best describes where you live? EAST 25% MIDWEST 25% SOUTH 28% WEST 23% GEOGRAPHIC REGION COMMUNITY TYPE Note: Base sizes for charted segments are noted (in parentheses) in chart’s legend.

33 March 2007Cox Communications Teen Internet Safety Survey Wave II ETHNICITY (Multiple Responses Allowed) APPENDIX: DEMOGRAPHIC SAMPLE PROFILE Q.19 : Which of the following best describes your family? Note: Base sizes for charted segments are noted (in parentheses) in chart’s legend.