Updated RsMA Overview TR45.5.3.1/98.11.17.09 Updated RsMA Overview Submitted by: Hughes Network Systems & QUALCOMM Incorporated November 17, 1998 ©1998.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Communication Networks Lecture 5 NETW 501-L5: NETW 501-L5: Medium Access Control Dr.-Ing. Khaled Shawky Hassan Room: C3-222, ext: 1204,
Advertisements

Broadcast Indicator & MS Power Consumption Manuary Stash Czaja, Feng Qian VIA Telecom grants a free, irrevocable license.
Design of the CDMA Allocation A-MAP IE for Bandwidth Request Procedure Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/1067 Date Submitted: Source: Heejeong.
June DENSO Dynamic T_TDROP1 Dynamic Pilot Drop Timer for cdma2000 June 12th, 2001 Notice The proposals in this submission have been formulated by.
Using Probability Factor for MS feedback in E-MBS Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0071 Date Submitted: Source: Hua Xu, Steven Xu, Suresh Kalyanasundaram,
ARQ support for Primary Management connection IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16maint-08/140 Date Submitted:
Common Header design in m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0178 Date Submitted: Source:
C Date:30 March, 2009 Abstract: This contribution contains the active set management proposal for cdma2000 1x Rev E Notice Contributors.
Title: Source: Contact: Date: Abstract: Recommendation: Notice © 2000, Panasonic. All rights reserved. The information contained in this contribution is.
Title: Source: Contact: Date: Abstract: Recommendation: Notice © 2000, Panasonic. All rights reserved. The information contained in this contribution is.
C C /18 12/04/2000 QUALCOMM Inc Use subject to restrictions on cover page TITLE: Presentation of QUALCOMM’s 1X-EV-DV Study.
1 Consideration on the Update Procedure of the System Information for M2M IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216p-10/0023r1.
Persistent Allocation Signaling Messages IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16maint-08/010r2 Date Submitted:
Doc.: IEEE /0039r0 Submission January 2007 SooYoung Chang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Soft.
Date:16 February, 2009 Abstract: This contribution contains OFDMA preamble proposal for EV-DO Rev. C Notice Contributors grant a free, irrevocable license.
Section 3:cdma2000 Reverse Link 1 cdma2000 Reverse Link.
1 Hybrid ARQ Operation for IEEE m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/454 Date Submitted:
HARQ Operational Modes for m Document Number: S80216m-08/322 Date Submitted: Source: Yih-Shen Chen, Kelvin Chou, I-Kang Fu, and Paul Cheng.
Section 4: cdma2000 MAC Overview 1 Section 4: cdma2000 MAC Section 4: cdma2000 MAC.
Text Proposals of HR-MS Forwarding in 16n Network IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16n-11/0074 Date Submitted:
Text Proposal of SA-Preamble Partition in IEEE m/D1 ( ) Document Number: S80216m-09/1902 Date Submitted: Source: Yu-Hao Chang,
Decode and Forward Based Cooperative Receiving ARS Group for UL Channel Enhancement (AWD-relay) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09_1820 Date Submitted:
Sleep Mode Configuration via BR Header ( ) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/2297 Date Submitted: Source: Yih-Shen Chen, Kelvin Chou,
Title: Type: Arial Bold Size : 32-36pt Color : The theme blue Subtitle: Type : Arial Size : 24pt Color: The theme gray 1 TSG-AC WG2 HRPD/eHRPD enhancements.
Dedicated BR preamble and tile assignment in Femtocell (AWD-Femto) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09_1564r1 Date Submitted: Source: Kanchei(Ken)
HARQ Processing Time (AWD ) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/1459 Date Submitted: Source: Aran
Doc.: IEEE /0651r0 Submission May 2006 Royce Fernald - Intel CorporationSlide 1 Video Delivery vs. Attenuation in a Conducted Environment Notice:
Bit selection and repetition IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: C80216m-08_1271 Date Submitted: Source:
C80216m-08_216 ProjectIEEE Broadband Wireless Access Working Group TitleDownlink Physical Resource Allocation Unit Date Submitted.
C XTREME Call Origination with Service Negotiation page: 1 Copyright Statement The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2.
Active Call Hand-in in cdma2000 1x Airvana Qualcomm October 27 th, GPP2 Seoul, Korea Notice ©2008. All rights reserved. The contributors grants a.
New Fast Power Control IE for CLPC Document Number: IEEE S802.16maint-08/068 Date Submitted: Source: Jungnam Yun
Proposal for differentiating bandwidth request based on Proposal for differentiating bandwidth request based in service class and retry attempts Document.
HARQ Architecture (Protocol and Timing) in IEEE m Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-08/411 Date Submitted: Source: Doo-hyun Sung, Hyungho.
Idle mode modification for the smooth evolution from 16e to 16m Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-10_0253r1 Date Submitted: Source: Lin Chen, Feng.
VIA Telecom Confidential 1 Date:30 March, 2008 Abstract: This contribution contains proposed modifications on 1x Rev. E Power Control Notice Contributors.
Page 1 C.S Bug Fix Masa Shirota, QUALCOMM Inc. October 25, 2010 Recommendation: FYI Notice QUALCOMM Incorporated.
SOURCE: Tony Lee David Wang ABSTRACT: To control SACK.
Design Considerations for UL Ranging Channels in m Document Number: S80216m-08/321 Date Submitted: Source: Yih-Shen Chen, Kelvin Chou,
Doc.: IEEE /0125r0 Submission July 2006 Slide 1 Huawei Interference Detection for Sensing IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors:
IEEE m Identifying Femtocell BS and its Accessibility Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_0068 Date Submitted: Source: Ying Li, Zhouyue Pi,
EHRPD-LTE Inter Technology Spectrum Optimization Source: Qualcomm Incorporated Contact: Jun Wang/George Cherian September 9, 2013 Notice ©2013. All rights.
TITLE: RL Framework Proposal for Revision D SOURCE: Lucent Technologies grants a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2 and its Organizational Partners to.
Access Procedure Enhancement for HRPD Rev C VIA Telecom grants a free, irrevocable license to 3GPP2 and its Organizational Partners to incorporate text.
C80216m-08/288r1 1 UL Control Channel Allocation Document Number: IEEE C80216m-08/288r1 Date Submitted: Source: Xiaoyi Wang, Yousuf Saifullah,
TSG-C SWG2.3 Source: Lucent Technologies Contact: Krishna Balachandran Kenneth Budka Joseph Kang
Date:20 July, 2009 Abstract: This contribution contains DO Rev. C Mobile Transmit Diversity Proposal. Notice Contributors grant a free, irrevocable license.
1 Power Saving Considerations for IEEE m Femtocell IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1411 Date.
Multi-Level Codes Sequence for Simultaneous MCS Feedback IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S80216m-08/1152 Date.
IEEE C80216m-08/289r5 1 Group Resource Allocation Document Number: IEEE C80216m-08/289r5 Date Submitted: Source: Xiaoyi Wang, Voice:
ProjectIEEE Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access TitleOA&M Suggested Text Date Submitted
Ad Hoc Relay Mode for Mobile Coverage Extension and Peer-to-Peer Communications IEEE Presentation Submission Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-07/260r2.
C August 19, 2003 Page 1 SMS Push Teleservice Nobuyuki Uchida QUALCOMM Incorporated Notice ©2003 QUALCOMM Incorporated. All rights reserved.QUALCOMM.
Doc.: IEEE /0022r0 Submission January 2007 Wu Yu-Chun, Huawei HisiSlide 1 Enhanced Beacon Sync Frame for the IEEE P Wireless RANs.
1 Title: 1xEV-DO Forward Link Enhancement Proposal Source: Naga Bhushan, QUALCOMM Incorporated , Date: April 14, 2003 Recommendation:
Date:03 June, 2009 Abstract: This contribution contains detailed proposal for implementing subband OFDMA in DO Rev. C Notice Contributors grant a free,
Discussion of Explicit vs. Implicit PC-A-MAP IE Assignment (15.2.3)
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
Downlink Control Channel Design Considerations for IEEE m
Group Resource Allocation for DL Data
Group resource allocation for DL data Date Submitted
Contention-based Random Access BR Procedure
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Closed versus Open Loop Comparisons
Contention-based Random Access BR Procedure
Proposed PHY Structure for the IEEE m Bandwidth Request Channel
Closed versus Open Loop
Hybrid ARQ Operation for IEEE m
MAP NACK Channel for Persistent Allocation
QoS Metrics Date: Authors: January 2005 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Updated RsMA Overview Submitted by: Hughes Network Systems & QUALCOMM Incorporated November 17, 1998 ©1998 Hughes Network Systems & ©1998 QUALCOMM Incorporated. The information contained in this contribution is provided for the sole purpose of promoting discussion within the TIA and is not binding on the contributors. The contributors reserve the right to add to, amend or withdraw the statements contained herein. The contributors grants a free, irrevocable license to the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) to incorporate text contained in this contribution and any modifications thereof in the creation of a TIA standards publication; to copyright in TIA's name any TIA standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at TIA's sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting TIA standards publications. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring by implication, estoppel, or otherwise any license or right under any patent, whether or not the use of information herein necessarily employs an invention of any existing or later issued patent, or copyright. The contributors reserves the right to use all material submitted in this contribution for their own purposes, including republication and distribution to others.

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Motivation for Improved Access Existing access scheme has marginal performance, is wasteful of system resources, and is poorly suited for data applications. Improved call set-up reliability is needed. Data services require an access protocol that: –minimizes latency and maximizes throughput –maximizes system capacity Protocol flexibility is critical to cdma2000 –existing requirements: »PSMM’s & MAC signalling (no dedicated channels active) »SMS, meter reading, POS applications –future data service requirements: »unknown --> flexibility desirable

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Existing IS-95 A/B Access IS-95 A/B access scheme is based on a slotted aloha protocol Accessing mobiles send probes on R-ACH: –probes consist of: »preamble portion (typically 80 ms) »message portion (typically 120 ms) Acknowledgements are transmitted on the paging channel –acknowledgement time-out (typically 320 ms) If no acknowledgement is received, mobile increases power and tries again. –Access slotting is typically 200 ms –back-off delays (multiple of 200 ms) –persistence delay (multiple of 200 ms)

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Existing IS-95 A/B Access Scheme (cont.) Access channel performance –impact on capacity »95% success requires large probe power (6 dB to 10 dB greater than Eb/No) »lower power --> greater probability of retransmission and increased latency –throughput & delay »typical access times: ~620 ms. »typical worst case: ~1340 ms.

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Limitations of IS-95 A/B Access Scheme Detection and acquisition: –power required to detect is actually ~ 2% of what is typically transmitted Message error rate performance: –in order to get message through error free, mobile must transmit at high power (> 8 db over operating Eb/No) –if message error, retransmission at higher power and increased latency Latency performance: –long preamble typically used (base station constraint) –data rate is low, so message duration is long –protocol delays are large, with average access times > 620 ms. Impact on data services: –reduced system capacity –low throughput and large delays –no connectionless packet data service capability

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Requirements for Improved Access Increase System Capacity –Minimize power required to service transactions »reduce power on preamble for detection »reduce power on message portion »minimize message retransmission probability –Facilitate better flow control and admissions policies Increase Throughput and Reduce Delay –Minimize service transaction times »increased data rates (9.6, 19.2 and 38.4 kbps) »shortened preamble »reduce message error probability »reduce protocol latency (i.e. slot duration, ack. timeout, etc.) –Increased call setup reliability

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Overview of Proposed Approach Reservation Multiple Access (RsMA) is really two distinct access protocols –Improved Slotted Aloha mode: »used for short messages (e.g. < 20 ms.) »open loop power control only –Reservation mode: »message duration: 20 ms < T_msg < 500 ms »closed loop power control on RL

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Summary of Enhancements Slotted Aloha Mode: –Throughput (per channel): »40 msg/sec vs. 4 msg/sec (~10x over IS-95 A/B) –Average latency (per message): »100 ms vs. 620 ms (>6x over IS-95 A/B) –System Capacity: »improvement of ~3 dB due to shorter preamble & 3 dB due to better modulation/coding (4x over IS-95 A/B) Reservation Mode: –Throughput efficiency (per channel): »90% vs. 20% (~4.5x over IS-95 A/B) –Average latency (per message): »~ 5x better for same conditions –System capacity: »~11 db improvement (i.e. ~3 dB modulation & coding + 8 dB closed loop power control)

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Required Changes to RTT Forward Link: »Power Control Channel (F-PCCH) »Channel Assignment Channel (F-CACH) Reverse Link: »Request Access Channel (R-RACH)

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Level of Effort to Incorporate Physical Layer: –Draft baseline text for RsMA submitted in Burlington (10/98) »no text exists for R-CCCH without RsMA, so incremental effort is negligible –Incorporate RsMA into Phase 1 –Implications of pushing RsMA to Phase 2: »Infrastructure & handset hardware changes REQUIRED »Inferior access methodology Signaling Layer: –Draft baseline text not yet started (~1-2 months) –Incorporate into Phase 1 (i.e. 1/99) MAC Layer: –Baseline text ready for Colorado Springs (11/98) –Incorporate MAC layer support in Phase 1

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Reverse Channel Overview Reverse Reservation Access Channel (R-RACH) –Slotted Aloha random access channel used in two modes: »Reservation Mode: reservation requests sent »Aloha mode: short messages sent –multiple R-RACH’s supported Reverse Common Control Channel (R-CCCH) –assigned dedicated access channel –slotted operation –Pilot sub-channel Modulation per IS-95C for R-CCCH and R-RACH (Aloha mode) –Data rates supported : »9.6 kbps (20 ms frame),19.2 kbps (10, 20 ms frames), 38.4 kbps (5, 10, 20 ms frames) –R-RACH: »reservation access probe (RAP) = initial preamble + mode indicator + hash ID »message access probe (MAP) = initial preamble + mode indicator + message –R-CCCH: »packet = channel estimation preamble + message/pilot

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Forward Channel Overview Forward Common Assignment Channel (F-CACH) –single Walsh code control channel supporting multiple R-RACH’s and R-CCCH’s –multiple F-CACH’s supported –used to carry channel assignments, and load control messaging –F-DCCH format (modulation, coding, CRC’s, 9.6 kbps, 5 ms. frames) Forward Power control Control Channel (F-PCCH) –single Walsh code channel, divided into sub-channels –multiple PC sub-channels per F-PCCH, each supporting a single R-CCCH –PC rate and number of PC sub-channels is a system parameter (0, 200, 400, 800 bps) Modulation –Both F-CACH & F-PCCH are DTX –When ON, F-CACH uses QPSK (same modulation/coding as F-DCCH) –When ON, F-PCCH uses QPSK

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Example Channel Structure

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Reverse Waveform Description R-RACH: –Initial preamble : integer number 1.25 ms. segments of unmodulated pilot –Mode Word : 1.25 ms (4 bits each repeated 3x) »Mode Indicator (1 bit) : RAP or MAP »Rate/Frame Indicator (3 bits): data rate and frame duration –Reservation Mode: 2.5 ms »Hash ID : 16 bits, r=1/4, k=9 conv. Coded. »The hash ID can be divided into 2 pools: managed: distributed by the system random: selected by mobiles –Aloha Mode: »Short message: maximum duration is system parameter R-CCCH: –Channel estimation preamble : integer number 1.25 ms. segments of unmodulated pilot –Message portion (integer number of frames) –Physical layer CRC’s per frame –Pilot used to aid in coherent detection

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Forward Waveform Description F-CACH: –fixed message duration (5 ms.) –9600 bps, k=9, rate 1/2 coding with 16-bit frame CRC’s –message types: »Channel assignment messages »Wait message (admissions/flow control) »2 reserved message types F-PCCH: –PC rate determines the number of PC sub-channels supported: 800 bps, 400 bps, 200 bps. –PC Sub-channel assignment implicit in F-CACH channel assignment msg.

Updated RsMA Overview TR / System Timing Parameters R-RACH Access Slot (n*1.25 ms) –interval between permitted accesses on R-RACH F-CACH Slot –slotting used on F-CACH (5 ms, minimum) Min. Delay to Channel Assignment –minimum interval from request to earliest channel assignment message –5 ms, typical. Max. Delay to Channel Assignment –maximum interval from request to last channel assignment message –40 ms. typical Number of channel assignment message repeats –1-2, typical Power Control Delay in RL closed loop PC bits –1.25 ms, typical

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Admission/flow Control Admission/flow control: –Slow Response Time (~ 200 ms, typical): »access parameters conveyed on F-BCCH give current persistence parameters and delays »these parameters control flow on the R-RACH(s) »sent periodically with dynamic control possible –Moderate Response Time ( 5 ms): »“wait message” is used to affect mobiles already accessing »sent when “overload” or “all busy” condition is near or prevailing »parameters affect: flow on both the R-RACH and R-CCCH for reservation mode traffic system loading

Updated RsMA Overview TR / e.g. F-CACH Messages Messages are fixed length (5 msec): –Overhead Bits (24 bits):  Encoder Tail (8 bits)  CRC (16 bits) –Channel Assignment Message (24 bits):  Message Type (2 bits)  Mobile Hash ID (16 bits)  R-CCCH/F-PCCH Channel Assignment (5 bits)  Reserved (1 bit) –Wait Message (24 bits):  Message Type (2 bits)  Mobile class mark threshold (4 bits)  Max data rate for mobiles with class marks over the threshold (2 bits)  Max data rate for mobiles with class marks under the threshold (2 bits)  Minimum delay to retransmission for all reservation mode mobiles(10 bits)  Reserved (4 bits)

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Mobile Procedures Aloha Mode: –Mobile determines that aloha mode is best based on Tx. data rate and message size –If F-CACH is supported, mobile first monitors F-CACH to determine whether blocking condition prevails. –If not blocking, mobile “randomly” selects from the corresponding R- RACH set and transmits a Message Access Probe (MAP) –Aloha mode access channel protocol: »mobile uses persistence parameters to regulate access attempts –After MAP transmitted on R-RACH, mobile monitors F-CCCH for acknowledgement: »If no ACK within time out, retry at higher power

Updated RsMA Overview TR / Mobile Procedures (cont.) Reservation Mode: –Mobile “randomly” selects a R-RACH and transmits a Reservation Access Probe (RAP) conditioned on: »observed Ec/Io > T_rqst dB »“current” persistence parameters and non-blocking condition –Aloha access channel protocol: »mobile uses persistence parameters to regulate access attempts –After initial RAP, mobile monitors corresponding F-CACH for: »Channel Assignment Message or Wait Message –Conditions: »If no message within time-out, retransmit RAP at higher power »If wait message sent, retransmit RAP later »If channel assignment rcvd., transmit message on assigned R-CCCH at next access slot and begin closed loop power control. »Stop transmission if either: Ec/Io falls below T_fade for T1 seconds Ec/Io exceeds T_good and Ec/Io of PC bits is below T_bad for L PC bits

Updated RsMA Overview TR / System Procedures System monitors R-RACH’s for messages & requests on R-RACH slot boundaries –search windows set to accommodate PN randomization (if not 0) + prop. delay + multipath spread Aloha Mode: –If MAP detected on R-RACH, system: »demodulates and decodes message »send ACK back on F-CCCH Reservation Mode: –If RAP detected on R-RACH, system: »decodes hash ID, »queue’s channel assignment/access control message, »transmits the message in the assigned F-CACH slot(s). –If request granted: »system monitors the assigned R-CCCH for channel estimation preamble »If preamble detected system demodulates and power controls message portion »Else if preamble not detected system releases R-CCCH for subsequent requests and ceases sending PC bits on F-PCCH after timeout

Updated RsMA Overview TR / e.g. Channel Organization R-RACH: –up to 32 –may have 1 F-CACH associated with each R-RACH F-CACH: –no. of F-CACH’s supported (0 to 7) R-CCCH: –24 per F-CACH (0 to 23) F-PCCH: –24 sub-channels uniquely paired with 800 bps PC –PC rate determines number of sub-channels per F-PCCH »800 bps --> 24 subchannels »400 bps --> 48 subchannels »200 bps --> 96 subchannels Notes: –R-RACH’s can segregate RAP and MAP traffic, or mixed traffic –0 F-CACH’s can be supported (pure Aloha mode)