Forward Pixel Beamtest Analysis Carsten Rott Purdue University Januar 24, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
Advertisements

1 Status of the CMS Pixel project Lorenzo Uplegger RD07 Florence 28 June 2007.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
FNAL TB09 Plots Alessandra Borgia Syracuse Unviersity Marina Artuso, Jianchun Wang, Ray Mountain January 20, 2010.
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
Track Fitting and Comparator Results Emu UC Davis Feb. 26, 2005 Yangheng Zheng University of California, Los Angeles  Motivation & Introduction.
Read-out strips (roughly). Some initial observations: *) We are exercising the chip well above the “tracking” region. Lowest workable input charges are.
Testbeam 2010 with CAPTAN System Jianchun Wang Syracuse University.
9/11/2007JC Wang1 Track Resolution Scale, assume equal  meas for different planes. HP3 HP4 All 6 measurements. Without leftmost one. Without rightmost.
Status of Oxford Setup Matthew Chalk, Erik Devetak, Johan Fopma, Brian Hawes, Ben Jeffery, Nikhil Kundu, Andrei Nomerotski University of Oxford ( 18 August.
Striplet option of Super Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Talk at Joint Super B factory workshop, Honolulu 20 April 2005 T.Tsuboyama.
Slide 1 sCVD Diamond for the CMS Pixel Detector May 2004 R.Stone, Rutgers J.Doroshenko, L.Perera, S.Schnetzer RD42 Collaboration Meeting Overview.
Progress towards a Long Shaping-Time Readout for Silicon Strips Bruce Schumm SCIPP & UC Santa Cruz SLAC LCWS05 July 28-31, 2004.
Jianchun (JC) Wang, 08/21/99 RICH Electronics and DAQ Chip Carrier Short Cable Transition Board Long Cable Data Board Crate J.C.Wang Syracuse University.
TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. Introduction SCT Week – March 03 Jose E. Garcia TB & Simulation results Simulation results Inner detector.
Jianchun Wang Marina Artuso Syracuse University 11/06/00 MC Simulation of Silicon Pixel Detector.
ATLAS SCT module performance: beam test results José E. García.
JC and Marina 04/02/01 Pixel Cross Talk Study  Modeling: Linear coupling between neighbor rows  Parameters in the simulation:  FPIX0-Pstop gain curve.
FPIX0 Electronic Test Marina Artuso Paul Gelling Jianchun Wang  The system works fine with charge injection calibration  Gain curve, threshold, and noise.
Angular orientation reconstruction of the Hall sensor calibration setup By Zdenko van Kesteren Supervisor: prof. dr. Frank Linde.
A new idea of the vertex detector for ILC Y. Sugimoto Nov
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.
SPiDeR  First beam test results of the FORTIS sensor FORTIS 4T MAPS Deep PWell Testbeam results CHERWELL Summary J.J. Velthuis.
Development of Readout ASIC for FPCCD Vertex Detector 01 October 2009 Kennosuke.Itagaki Tohoku University.
The ATLAS Pixel Detector - Running Experience – Markus Keil – University of Geneva on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Vertex 2009 Putten, Netherlands,
Fine Pixel CCD Option for the ILC Vertex Detector
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
SPiDeR  SPIDER DECAL SPIDER Digital calorimetry TPAC –Deep Pwell DECAL Future beam tests Wishlist J.J. Velthuis for the.
Test-beam Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector Carsten Rott Daniela Bortoletto, Gino Bolla, Amitava Roy Purdue University 28 April 2001.
Wire Bonding and Analogue Readout ● Cold bump bonding is not easy ● Pixel chip is not reusable ● FE-I3 is not available at the moment ● FE-I4 is coming.
3D-FBK pixel sensors with CMS readout: first tests results M. Obertino, A. Solano, A. Vilela Pereira, E. Alagoz, J. Andresen, K. Arndt, G. Bolla, D. Bortoletto,
11 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 TPAC test beam analysis tasks Paul Dauncey.
Fine Pixel CCD for ILC Vertex Detector ‘08 7/31 Y. Takubo (Tohoku U.) for ILC-FPCCD vertex group ILC vertex detector Fine Pixel CCD (FPCCD) Test-sample.
1 HBD Update: DC Meeting June 2006 Thomas K Hemmick for the HBD Crew…
Pixel Offline Study Jianchun Wang Syracuse University 11/05/04, Pixel testbeam meeting.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
Fast Tracking of Strip and MAPS Detectors Joachim Gläß Computer Engineering, University of Mannheim Target application is trigger  1. do it fast  2.
Radiation hardness of Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS)
REQUIREMENTS FOR A NEW PIXEL CHIP L. Demaria - Torino INFN Lino Demaria - New Pixel Chip - Torino 01/06/2011.
STS simulations: Layout, digitizers, performance Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
On a eRHIC silicon detector: studies/ideas BNL EIC Task Force Meeting May 16 th 2013 Benedetto Di Ruzza.
Test of Single Crystal Diamond Pixel Detector at Fermilab MTEST Simon Kwan Fermilab April 28, 2010.
Testbeam Post Mortem Immediate reflections on successes and failures Richard Plackett – University of Glasgow VELO Upgrade.
May 14, 2001C.Rott1 The CMS Forward Pixel Detector Carsten Rott Purdue University May 14, 2001.
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
1 Oct 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of 2D efficiency study Paul Dauncey.
EMCal Sensor Status (* M. Breidenbach*,
FIRST RESULTS OF THE SILICON STRIP DETECTOR at STAR Jörg Reinnarth, Jonathan Bouchet, Lilian Martin, Jerome Baudot and the SSD teams in Nantes and Strasbourg.
Pixel Results from CRAFT09 U. Langenegger (PSI), G. Giurgiu (JHU) Pixel General Meeting November 10, 2009.
TRACKING AND VERTEXING SUMMARY Suyong Choi Korea University.
FNAL beam test data analysis A Hands-on session at CMS Upgrade School Aiwu Zhang Florida Institute of Technology On behalf of the CMS GEM collaboration.
Performance Study of Pair-monitor 2009/06/30 Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ.
Test Beam Meeting Monday, January 31, 2000 Fpix1 Calibration Status 1.What we have 2.What to do Monitor Software to use now 1.Current Version 2.Calibration.
10/25/2007Nick Sinev, ALCPG07, FNAL, October Simulation of charge collection in chronopixel device Nick Sinev, University of Oregon.
Upgrade with Silicon Vertex Tracker Rachid Nouicer Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) For the PHENIX Collaboration Stripixel VTX Review October 1, 2008.
Elena Rocco Nikhef, The Netherlands On behalf of the ALICE Utrecht-Nikhef group Jamboree – Utrecht December 2012.
Ideas on MAPS design for ATLAS ITk. HV-MAPS challenges Fast signal Good signal over noise ratio (S/N). Radiation tolerance (various fluences) Resolution.
NA62 Collaboration Meeting – Anacapri 1 September 2009 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Pixel 3D Sensor Test Beam Analysis Update
Thought on SCIPP’s Participation in SiLC Test Beam Activities
Status of the UK active pixel collaboration
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Status report Minjung Kim
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
Presentation transcript:

Forward Pixel Beamtest Analysis Carsten Rott Purdue University Januar 24, 2001

New Results Strong correlation between pedestal level of pixels Correction of common noise improves signal Readout data Corrected for pedestal level Corrected for ped. level + common noise Signal Pedestal

New Results Looking at a region where pixel have a similar gain Signal Pedestal Readout data Corrected for pedestal level Corrected for ped. level + common noise

New Results Signal of 10 pixels with common gain after correction of common noise Signal of pixels in double column after correction of common noise

New Results Pixel gain (difference between signal and pedestal in ADC) ADC

Summary of previous Results Resolution along rows and columns was investigated Resolution depends on hit position Resolution for 0 0, 20 0 with and without 3T field was found Charge sharing can be used for a great improvement in resolution Resolution

Summary of previous Results So far no direct measurement of absolute efficiency possible because of time stamp problem Strong correlation between tracked position and hit, indicates high efficiency Efficiency

Summary of previous Results Bump bonding, pixel, (readout chip) are working Demonstration of a working system in a 3T field. The high magnetic field does not effect the system Lorentz angle problem (not enough charge sharing due to mag. Field) General Results

Future Plans We might be able to get efficiency from X5 results We can get a relative efficiency by looking at the correlation between tracks and hits A set of runs with 0 0, 10 0 and 20 0 angle would further help to understand charge sharing and give a resolution for expected CMS-environment (pixel are rotated by 20 radial and tracks make approx. 10 angle along beam axis) Simulation … expected result from charge sharing Further Analysis that could be done

Future Plans Build a working system (DAQ,Telescope,Pixel, …) at home, learn how to use it / train people on it and ship it to the test beam Sensor needs to be able to be rotated about multiple rotation axes, so that tracks can pass through the sensor at a 20 0 vertical and 10 0 horizontal angle Need to be able to readout/activate multiple columns Need to develop an on-line log book, to save run parameters automatically plus allows extra entries What to learn for the next beam test ?

Future Plans Publishing Results + What should we publish ? - what is good ? - what is new ? + Where are we going to publish it ? - NIM, Journal of Phys. G, CMS Note + Where is it going to be presented ? - APS meeting, … other conferences ?