Nucleon-Nucleon collisions. Nucleon-nucleon interaction at low energy Interaction between two nucleons: basic for all of nuclear physics Traditional goal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Edward Sarkisyan-Grinbaum ISMD2005 On similarities in multihadron production in nuclear and particle collisions Edward SARKISYAN-GRINBAUM (CERN and University.
Advertisements

CMS Heavy Ion Physics Edwin Norbeck University of Iowa.
Yorito Yamaguchi For the PHENIX collaboration CNS, University of Tokyo 10/14/2008ATHIC2008 1/13.
Jet probes of nuclear collisions: From RHIC to LHC Dan Magestro, The Ohio State University Midwest Critical Mass October 21-22, 2005.
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
A probe for hot & dense nuclear matter. Lake Louise Winter Institute 21 February, 2000 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez.
Particle Production in p + p Reactions at GeV K. Hagel Cyclotron Institute Texas A & M University for the BRAHMS Collaboration.
Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions: Recent Results from RHIC David Hardtke LBNL.
5-12 April 2008 Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics STAR Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration.
1  /e + e - arXiv: [nucl.th]. 2 3 Sometime ago it was noted that: “The ratio of the production rates (  /  +  - ) and (  o,  /  +  -
November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.
Monte Carlo 2005, Chattanooga Parton String Models in Geant4 Gunter Folger, Johannes-Peter Wellisch CERN PH/SFT.
The angular dependence of the 16 O(e,e’K + ) 16  N and H(e,e’K + )  F. Garibaldi – Jlab December WATERFALL The WATERFALL target: reactions on.
Glauber shadowing at particle production in nucleus-nucleus collisions within the framework of pQCD. Alexey Svyatkovskiy scientific advisor: M.A.Braun.
Masashi Kaneta, LBNL Masashi Kaneta for the STAR collaboration Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. First results from STAR experiment at RHIC - Soft hadron.
D. Toivonen, M. Tokarev JINR, Dubna Z-scaling & High- pT and cumulative particle production in pp and pA collisions at high energies Z XXXII International.
Identified Particle Ratios at large p T in Au+Au collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV Matthew A. C. Lamont for the STAR Collaboration - Talk Outline - Physics.
Signatures of Quark- Gluon-Plasma/1 Dilepton production.
Study of hadron properties in cold nuclear matter with HADES Pavel Tlustý, Nuclear Physics Institute, Řež, Czech Republic for the HADES Collaboration ,
An experimental perspective on first jet measurements at LHC: Lessons from RHIC Dan Magestro, The Ohio State University ALICE-USA Collaboration Meeting.
U N C L A S S I F I E D 7 Feb 2005 Studies of Hadronic Jets with the Two-Particle Azimuthal Correlations Method Paul Constantin.
Particle Physics Chris Parkes Experimental QCD Kinematics Deep Inelastic Scattering Structure Functions Observation of Partons Scaling Violations Jets.
Study the particle ratio fluctuations in heavy- ion collisions Limin Fan ( 樊利敏 ) Central China Normal University (CCNU) 1.
Self-similarity of hadron production in pp and AA collisions at high energies D.A. Artemenkov, G.I. Lykasov, A.I. Malakhov Joint Institute for Nuclear.
EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR HADRONIC DECONFINEMENT In p-p Collisions at 1.8 TeV * L. Gutay - 1 * Phys. Lett. B528(2002)43-48 (FNAL, E-735 Collaboration Purdue,
Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.
M. Cobal, PIF 2003 Resonances - If cross section for muon pairs is plotted one find the 1/s dependence -In the hadronic final state this trend is broken.
High Pt physics with TOF ALICE B.V.Zagreev ITEP
1 Jeffery T. Mitchell – Quark Matter /17/12 The RHIC Beam Energy Scan Program: Results from the PHENIX Experiment Jeffery T. Mitchell Brookhaven.
Energy Scan of Hadron (  0 ) Suppression and Flow in Au+Au Collisions at PHENIX Norbert Novitzky for PHENIX collaboration University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Strangeness opportunities at the LHC RIKEN BNL Research Center Workshop - BNL - 15/02/06 1.Strangeness at LHC energies Extrapolations / Motivations 2.Strange.
Light nuclei production in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC Md. Rihan Haque, for the STAR Collaboration Abstract Light nuclei (anti-nuclei) can be produced.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
Charged Particle Multiplicity and Transverse Energy in √s nn = 130 GeV Au+Au Collisions Klaus Reygers University of Münster, Germany for the PHENIX Collaboration.
First measurements in Pb—Pb collisions at  s NN =2.76 TeV with ALICE at the LHC M. Nicassio (University and INFN Bari) for the ALICE Collaboration Rencontres.
Lecture 07: particle production in AA collisions
Robert Pak (BNL) 2012 RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting 0 Energy Ro Robert Pak for PHENIX Collaboration.
9 th June 2008 Seminar at UC Riverside Probing the QCD Phase Diagram Aneta Iordanova.
07/27/2002Federica Messer High momentum particle suppression in Au-Au collisions at RHIC. Federica Messer ICHEP th international Conference on high.
Structure and Fine Structure seen in e + e -, pp, pA and AA Multiparticle Production Wit Busza MIT BNL workshop, May 2004.
Olena Linnyk Charmonium in heavy ion collisions 16 July 2007.
1 Charged hadron production at large transverse momentum in d+Au and Au+Au collisions at  s=200 GeV Abstract. The suppression of hadron yields with high.
News from ALICE Jan PLUTA Heavy Ion Reaction Group (HIRG) Warsaw University of Technology February 22, XIII GDRE Workshop, SUBATECH, Nantes.
1 Diffractive heavy quark production in AA collisions at the LHC at NLO* Mairon Melo Machado GFPAE – IF – UFRGS
Itzhak Tserruya Initial Conditions at RHIC: an Experimental Perspective RHIC-INT Workshop LBNL, May31 – June 2, 2001 Itzhak Tserruya Weizmann.
Results from ALICE Christine Nattrass for the ALICE collaboration University of Tennessee at Knoxville.
24 Nov 2006 Kentaro MIKI University of Tsukuba “electron / photon flow” Elliptic flow measurement of direct photon in √s NN =200GeV Au+Au collisions at.
PHOBOS at RHIC 2000 XIV Symposium of Nuclear Physics Taxco, Mexico January 2001 Edmundo Garcia, University of Maryland.
QM08, Jaipur, 9 th February, 2008 Raghunath Sahoo Saturation of E T /N ch and Freeze-out Criteria in Heavy Ion Collisions Raghunath Sahoo Institute of.
Christina MarkertHirschegg, Jan 16-22, Resonance Production in Heavy Ion Collisions Christina Markert, Kent State University Resonances in Medium.
Intermediate pT results in STAR Camelia Mironov Kent State University 2004 RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting Workshop on Strangeness and Exotica at RHIC.
Hadron Spectra and Yields Experimental Overview Julia Velkovska INT/RHIC Winter Workshop, Dec 13-15, 2002.
Review of ALICE Experiments
for the ALICE collaboration University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Event generators.
Collective Dynamics at RHIC
String Parton Models in Geant4
ALICE and the Little Bang
Charged particle multiplicity in Pb-Pb collisions from NA50 experiment
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
Modeling Min-Bias and Pile-Up University of Oregon February 24, 2009
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Predicting “Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at the LHC
Single Diffractive Higgs Production at the LHC *
Heavy Ion Physics at NICA Simulations G. Musulmanbekov, V
Cronin Effect of  K p from d+Au Collisions at 200 GeV
Identified Charged Hadron Production
Multiplicity Dependence of Charged Particle, φ Meson and Multi-strange Particle Production in p+p Collisions at
Perspectives on Physics and on CMS at Very High Luminosity
Hadron Formation in Nuclei in Deep-inelastic Scattering
Presentation transcript:

Nucleon-Nucleon collisions

Nucleon-nucleon interaction at low energy Interaction between two nucleons: basic for all of nuclear physics Traditional goal of nuclear physics: to understand properties of atomic nuclei in terms of the bare interactions between pair of nucleons With the advent of QCD the NN interaction became less fundamental However, still two reasons for its importance: ● In nuclear structure and low energy nucleus-nucleus collisions, nucleons are still considered to be elementary particles ● In high energy heavy ion collisions, NN collisions constitute a reference point for complex systems

A reference for the NN interaction at low energy

Nucleon-nucleon data provide information to nucleus-nucleus collisions To what extent is the longitudinal kinetic energy dissipated by the collisions into other degree of freedoms? Is the longitudinal energy dissipated in nucleus-nucleus collisions high enough to allow for QGP formation? Are exotic behaviours of QGP expected from nucleon- nucleon extrapolations?

Nucleon-nucleon total cross section For 3 GeV < √s < 100 GeV: about 40 mbarn Elastic ( about 10 mbarn) + inelastic (about 30 mbarn) Inelastic processes create particles

pp cross sections

pd, pn, np cross sections

π p cross sections

Parametrization of nucleon-nucleon cross section Total cross section: σ total = (ln p) (ln p) Elastic cross section: σ elastic = (ln p) 2 – 1.85 (ln p) p P in GeV/c

Diffractive processes: One nucleon is considered as a region of absorption and the interference of the scattering amplitudes from different impact parameters produces a diffractive pattern in the very forward/backward directions In diffractive scattering, nucleons loose only a small amount of energy In a non-diffractive inelastic event, colliding nucleons loose a large fraction of their energy and a large number of particles is produced. Separation of diffractive and non diffractive component is difficult. The diffractive component is about 10 %.

Particle production NN collisions produce particles. Most of them (80-90 %) are pions, the rest are mainly kaons, baryons and antibaryons. Multiplicity: total number of particles produced in the collision Charged multiplicity: total number of charged particles produced Quite often, only the charged multiplicity is measured, and the multiplicity is only inferred (for instance neutral pions are not detected, and it is assumed that π +, π - and π 0 are equally produced)

Average charged multiplicity in e+e- and pp collisions Charged multiplicity in pp collisions is lower than in e+e- collisions, since only about half of the c.m. energy is used to produce particles

Parametrization of multiplicity Charged multiplicity increases with √s in a logarithmic way Parametrization by Thomé et al. = (ln s) (ln s) 2

Understanding the multiplicity in pp collisions is a prerequisite to study the multiplicity in AA collisions The inclusive hadron rapidity density in the process pp -> h X is: The hadron rapidity density grows with √s and can be parametrized in several ways at y=0 (i.e. at mid-rapidity): (dN/dy) ch = ln √s ln 2 √s (dN/dy) ch = ln √s ln 2 √s (dN/dy) ch = 0.6 ln (√s /1.88) σ(s) = pp inelastic cross section

Facility Energy (c.m.) Charged-particle rapidity density SPS 20 GeV about 2 RHIC 200 GeV about 2.5 LHC up to 14 TeV ?? Starting from November 2009 we have new data from LHC!

The first ALICE data on charged particle rapidity density in pp 900 GeV (Nov.2009) dN_charged/dη = 3.10 (INEL= all inelastic) The ALICE Collaboration, Eur. Phys. Journal C65(2010)111 The first LHC publication

Classification of pp inelastic collisions: If one (two) beam particles are excited to a high mass state, the process is single (double) diffractive, otherwise is non-diffractive INEL: Sum of non-diffractive, single diffractive and double-diffractive NSD: Non single-diffractive, i.e. non- diffractive + double-diffractive

Next ALICE data: pp 2.36 TeV First energy ever probed beyond Tevatron The ALICE Collaboration, Eur. Phys. Journal C68(2010)89

The ALICE Collaboration, Eur. Phys. Journal C68(2010)345 Recent ALICE data: pp 7 TeV

Multiplicity distributions pp collisions

Rapidity and transverse distributions of particles Longitudinal momentum distribution (pseudorapidity) At lower energy gaussian shape At higher energy a plateau is observed

ALICE results: GeV and 2.36 TeV Pseudo-rapidity distributions

Transverse momentum distribution Average momentum of pions around 350 MeV/c Invariant cross section exhibits an exponential shape (less steep at higher transverse momenta)

Transverse mass spectra m t -scaling: Invariant cross sections of different types of particles have the same shape when plotted vs. their transverse mass

Soft particles << 1 GeV/c Hard particles >> 1 GeV/c

Baryon energy loss In a NN collision, an incident projectile nucleon loses a non- negligible fraction of its light-cone momentum. The degree of inelasticity may be characterized by the forward light-cone light-cone momentum of the detected baryon light cone momentum of the incident parent baryon (See Wong, Chapter 2) x =

The shape of the pt-distribution depends on the baryon energy loss. For pp collisions with x close to 1, the invariant cross section has an almost exponential shape. For collisions with x very small, the shape is close to a gaussian. However, the average pt value is almost the same in the two cases.

The shape of the x-distribution is nearly independent of the incident energy Except for x close to 1, the distribution is nearly flat. After an inelastic NN collision, there is the same probability to find the nucleon with x between 0 and 1. The average value is ½. This means that on average, about half of the initial light-cone momentum is lost.

It can be shown that the average rapidity after a pp inelastic collision is = y b -1 i.e. on the average the incident proton loses about one unit of rapidity in a pp inelastic collision. In nucleus-nucleus collisions, nucleons from one nucleus suffer many inelastic collisions with nucleons from the other nucleus. In multiple-collisions processes, the loss of incident energy and momentum can be large (stopping) Energy loss and particle production are related Baryon energy loss

To search for new effects when going from pp collisions to AA collisions, the multiplicity may be compared with the number of participants For pp collisions: No. of participants is about 2 For central AA collisions: about 2 A May be estimated from geometrical models as a function of the impact parameter

Interesting result: in pp collisions at √s=200 GeV: 2.5/participant in AA collisions at √s=200 GeV: 3.8/participant

A few remarks concerning the comparison between theoretically and experimentally multiplicities: -Experiments measure usually the charged multiplicity, theory predicts the total - Experiments usually measure the pseudo-rapidity distributions, theory evaluates the rapidity - Central collisions are not exactly defined - Experiments probe the final state, theory often predicts the formation stage, which is modified during the system evolution

Proton-proton measurements as a reference for heavy ion physics Where to look? A non-exhaustive list of observables Particle multiplicities Slopes of transverse-mass distributions Particle yields and ratios Ratios of momentum spectra Strangeness enhancement Dilepton spectra Photon spectra Production of short-lived resonances

References: Wong, Chapter 3 Particle Data Group