TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 1 ATLAS Tau Trigger Belanger-Champagne, C; Benslama, K; Bosman, M; Brenner, R; Casado, MP; Czyczula, Z;

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Japanese activities in LHC Takahiko Kondo, KEK November 28, 2005 KEK-DESY 1st Collaboration Meeting in Tokyo.
Advertisements

Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
10/26/2005 ATLAS Visit Dr Pierre Coulombe President, National Research Council Canada Short introduction by Peter Jenni and Robert Orr.
Aras Papadelis, Lund University 8 th Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Nov , Lund 1 The ATLAS B-trigger - exploring a new strategy for J/  (ee) ●
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
Kostas KORDAS INFN – Frascati XI Bruno Touschek spring school, Frascati,19 May 2006 Higgs → 2e+2  O (1/hr) Higgs → 2e+2  O (1/hr) ~25 min bias events.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
Top Trigger Strategy in ATLASWorkshop on Top Physics, 18 Oct Patrick Ryan, MSU Top Trigger Strategy in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics Grenoble.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
17th Sep JapanTau04 - International workshop on Tau Lepton Physics1 Discovery Potential of the SM Higgs at the LHC Junichi Tanaka ICEPP, University.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
ATLAS detector commissioning with cosmics and first beam Alessandro Cerri on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Roger Jones: The ATLAS Experiment Ankara, Turkey - 2 May The ATLAS Experiment Roger Jones Lancaster University.
. APS meeting April 14 h, ATLAS Detector – status and plans David Lissauer Brookhaven National Lab. ATLAS Technical Coordination APS meeting April.
1 ATLAS installation: Status about 3 years ago…. 2 ATLAS installation: Status half a years ago…
Andrea Ventura University of Salento & INFN Lecce on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration New Trends in High-Energy Physics Alushta, Crimea, Ukraine, September.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Taming the beast: Using Python To Control ATLAS Software David Quarrie NERSC Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 3 July 2006.
The Large Hadron Collider project is a global scientific adventure, combining the accelerator, a worldwide computing grid and the experiments, initiated.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Copyright © 2000 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Title – 1 Distributed Trigger System for the LHC experiments Krzysztof Korcyl ATLAS experiment laboratory H.
Simulation Calor 2002, March. 27, 2002M. Wielers, TRIUMF1 Performance of Jets and missing ET in ATLAS Monika Wielers TRIUMF, Vancouver on behalf.
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
The ATLAS Trigger: High-Level Trigger Commissioning and Operation During Early Data Taking Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London On behalf.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
January 12th 2009MICINN-IN2P3 meeting1 ATLAS and CMS in France Construction Integration and Commissioning Test beam LHC computing Physics Plans for sLHC.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
January 21, 2003 Transition from the Construction Project to Pre-Ops and Operations Howard Gordon.
2003 Conference for Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics La Jolla, California Giovanna Lehmann - CERN EP/ATD The DataFlow of the ATLAS Trigger.
ATLAS, ATLAS through first data Fabiola Gianotti (on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration)
1 Silke Duensing DØ Analysis Status NIKHEF Annual Scientific Meeting Analysing first D0 data  Real Data with:  Jets  Missing Et  Electrons 
CHEP March 2003 Sarah Wheeler 1 Supervision of the ATLAS High Level Triggers Sarah Wheeler on behalf of the ATLAS Trigger/DAQ High Level Trigger.
F.Gianotti, ATLAS RRB, Collaboration and Management matters First results from 900 GeV and 7 TeV collision data (in particular: first observation.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
M. Pilar Casado 1 Optimization of Tau Menus: L1 & L2 Trigger & Physics week (19-22 March 2007) M. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) on behalf of the Tau Trigger.
Tau06, 9 th Workshop on Tau Lepton Physics Pisa, Italy September 2006 Reconstruction and Identification of hadronic  -decays in ATLAS Fabien Tarrade.
Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.
Kostas KORDAS INFN – Frascati 10th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle & Radiation Detectors (IPRD06) Siena, 1-5 Oct The ATLAS Data Acquisition.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
1 Arnold Pompoš, SUSY03, Tucson, Arizona, June 5-10, 2003.
Hardeep Bansil (University of Birmingham) on behalf of L1Calo collaboration ATLAS UK Meeting, Royal Holloway January 2011 Argonne Birmingham Cambridge.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Top Higgs Yukawa Coupling Analysis – Status Report Hajrah Tabassam Quai-i-Azam University, Islamabad ON BEHALF OF: R. Yonamine, T. Tanabe, K. Fujii, KEK.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Marcel Vreeswijk (Nikhef/UvA-IoP) First Results of ATLAS at the LHC -- The rediscovery of the Standard Model-- Contents: Intro: The Standard Model Elementairy.
Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states PANIC th -14 th November 2008, Eilat, ISRAEL A.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
Establishing large international research facilities: the HEP case 1st ASEPS Summit Tsukuba March 25, 2010 Sergio Bertolucci CERN LHC.
Searching for Compositeness with ATLAS Kaushik De University of Texas at Arlington For the ATLAS Collaboration DPF/JPS 2006, Hawaii November 1, 2006.
The ATLAS Trigger and Data Acquisition System John Strong Royal Holloway, University of London.
DOE/NSF Project Experience Key Ingredients to Success
ATLAS as an example of a large scientific collaboration
Depleted CMOS Pixel Detectors
ATLAS through first data
Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL BNL Analysis Jamboree – Aug. 6, 2007
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
ATLAS Canada Alberta Carleton McGill Montréal Simon Fraser Toronto
ATLAS Canada Alberta Carleton McGill Montréal Simon Fraser Toronto
Presentation transcript:

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 1 ATLAS Tau Trigger Belanger-Champagne, C; Benslama, K; Bosman, M; Brenner, R; Casado, MP; Czyczula, Z; Dam, M; Demers, S; Farrington, S; Igonkina, O; Kalinowski, A; Kanaya, N; Osuna, C; Pérez, E; Ptacek, E; Reinsch; A; Saavedra, A; Sopczak, A; Strom, D; Torrence, E; Tsuno, S; Vorwerk, V; Watson, A; Xella, S X-th International workshop on Tau Lepton Physics Novosibirsk, 22 – 25 Sep, 2008

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 2 Contents LHC start-up ATLAS experiment Motivation of tau trigger ATLAS Trigger and Tau Trigger Tau Trigger Efficiency from data Timing measurements Conclusions

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 3 ATLAS first event ATLAS first event (10 Sep) Triggered by L1TAU, L1 Min. Bias and L1JET

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 4 LHC project LHC cooldown status (24 Sep):

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 5 Expected LHC Performance Year/Parameter Beam energy5 TeV7 TeV Peak luminosity10 31 cm -2 s cm -2 s -1 Integrated luminosity ~10 pb-1~few fb-1 Latest news: Start-up in spring 2009.

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 6 ATLAS experiment

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 7 Length= 55 m Width = 32 m Height = 35 m Depth =100 m Underground cavern in Point 1 for the ATLAS detector The Underground Cavern at Point-1 for the ATLAS Detector

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 8 15-April-2008 ATLAS RRB 8 37 Countries 169 Institutions 2500 Scientific Authors total (1800 with a PhD, for M&O share) Albany, Alberta, NIKHEF Amsterdam, Ankara, LAPP Annecy, Argonne NL, Arizona, UT Arlington, Athens, NTU Athens, Baku, IFAE Barcelona, Belgrade, Bergen, Berkeley LBL and UC, HU Berlin, Bern, Birmingham, UAN Bogota, Bologna, Bonn, Boston, Brandeis, Bratislava/SAS Kosice, Brookhaven NL, Buenos Aires, Bucharest, Cambridge, Carleton, Casablanca/Rabat, CERN, Chinese Cluster, Chicago, Chile, Clermont-Ferrand, Columbia, NBI Copenhagen, Cosenza, AGH UST Cracow, IFJ PAN Cracow, UT Dallas, DESY, Dortmund, TU Dresden, JINR Dubna, Duke, Frascati, Freiburg, Geneva, Genoa, Giessen, Glasgow, Göttingen, LPSC Grenoble, Technion Haifa, Hampton, Harvard, Heidelberg, Hiroshima, Hiroshima IT, Indiana, Innsbruck, Iowa SU, Irvine UC, Istanbul Bogazici, KEK, Kobe, Kyoto, Kyoto UE, Lancaster, UN La Plata, Lecce, Lisbon LIP, Liverpool, Ljubljana, QMW London, RHBNC London, UC London, Lund, UA Madrid, Mainz, Manchester, CPPM Marseille, Massachusetts, MIT, Melbourne, Michigan, Michigan SU, Milano, Minsk NAS, Minsk NCPHEP, Montreal, McGill Montreal, FIAN Moscow, ITEP Moscow, MEPhI Moscow, MSU Moscow, Munich LMU, MPI Munich, Nagasaki IAS, Nagoya, Naples, New Mexico, New York, Nijmegen, BINP Novosibirsk, Ohio SU, Okayama, Oklahoma, Oklahoma SU, Olomouc, Oregon, LAL Orsay, Osaka, Oslo, Oxford, Paris VI and VII, Pavia, Pennsylvania, Pisa, Pittsburgh, CAS Prague, CU Prague, TU Prague, IHEP Protvino, Regina, Ritsumeikan, UFRJ Rio de Janeiro, Rome I, Rome II, Rome III, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, DAPNIA Saclay, Santa Cruz UC, Sheffield, Shinshu, Siegen, Simon Fraser Burnaby, SLAC, Southern Methodist Dallas, NPI Petersburg, Stockholm, KTH Stockholm, Stony Brook, Sydney, AS Taipei, Tbilisi, Tel Aviv, Thessaloniki, Tokyo ICEPP, Tokyo MU, Toronto, TRIUMF, Tsukuba, Tufts, Udine/ICTP, Uppsala, Urbana UI, Valencia, UBC Vancouver, Victoria, Washington, Weizmann Rehovot, FH Wiener Neustadt, Wisconsin, Wuppertal, Würzburg, Yale, Yerevan ATLAS Collaboration

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 9 Barrel toroids

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 10 Barrel: 3 independent readouts: I (inner) - M (middle) - O(outer) Muon spectrometer (barrel) O M I Chambers alternate with barrel toroids

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 11 Tile barrel Tile extended barrel LAr forward calorimeter (FCAL) LAr hadronic endcap (HEC) LAr EM endcap (EMEC) LAr EM barrel Calorimetry

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 12 Tracking detectors ~ 6m long, 1.1 m radius Si Strips Tracker : SCT Transition Radiation Tracker : TRT Pixels Beam pipe

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 13 ATLAS Trigger HLTHLT DATAFLOWDATAFLOW 40 MHz 75 kHz ~2 kHz ~ 200 Hz 120 GB/s ~ 300 MB/s ~2+4 GB/s Event Building N/work Dataflow Manager Sub-Farm Input Event Builder EB SFI EBN DFM Lvl2 acc = ~2 kHz Event Filter N/work Sub-Farm Output Event Filter Processors EFN SFO Event Filter EFP ~ sec ~4 GB/s EFacc = ~0.2 kHz Trigger DAQ RoI Builder L2 Supervisor L2 N/work L2 Proc Unit Read-Out Drivers FE Pipelines Read-Out Sub-systems Read-Out Buffers Read-Out Links ROS 120 GB/s ROB LV L1 D E T R/O 2.5  s Calo MuTrCh Other detectors Lvl1 acc = 75 kHz 40 MHz ROD LVL2 ~ 10 ms ROIB L2P L2SV L2 N RoI RoI data = 1-2% RoI requests underground (USA15) surface (SDX1)

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 14 ATLAS contributions Poster by Z.Czyczula (Copenhagen), “Tau Physics with First Data at ATLAS” Talks: –M.P.Casado (Barcelona), “ATLAS tau trigger” –F.Sarri (Pisa), “Search of the Higgs boson decaying into tau-leptons at ATLAS” –A.Kalinowski (Univ. of Regina), “Tau Lepton Reconstruction and ID with the ATLAS Detector at LHC”

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 15 Tau Trigger Motivation ATLAS tau trigger aims at selecting hadronic decays of tau leptons, mainly one or three charged pions plus neutrals and one neutrino. It is difficult due to the high rate and occupancy but increases tremendously the physics potential. More information about tau triger in CERN-OPEN

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 16 Motivation at cm -2 s -1 Fundamental for W→  (first source of taus, with tau15i in 100 pb -1 at cm -2 s -1 ). Measure: –Cross section  (pp→W)xBR(W→  ). –Leptonic branching fractions of W. –Lepton universality. Relevant only for very first data at low instantaneous luminosity due to trigger rates. See CERN-OPEN ATLAS preliminary

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 17 Motivation at cm -2 s -1 Essential in the following studies: –Charged Higgs of Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) H ± → . –In states with more than one lepton, like SM Higgs boson, MSSM neutral Higgs boson, Z’ boson decays, or decay chains in SUSY particles.

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 18 Z’→  → hh at 800 GeV Trigger: tau35i (*) + met40 Collinear mass distribution for a hadron- hadron final states for a Z’ signal of 800 GeV. (Collinear aproximation: visible products and neutrino travel together.) Reconstructed visible mass distribution for hadron-hadron final states for a Z’ signal of 800 GeV. (*) tauXXi: First part is type of particle, “XX” is the E T threshold, and “i” indicates an isolation requirement in addition. ATLAS preliminary

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 19 The first level trigger (L1) finds regions of activity in the detector, and passes this information to the second level trigger (L2). The second level accesses the data in the region of activity determined by L1 (a few percent of the total). The third level trigger (or Event Filter) can also operate in the region determined by L2. ATLAS Trigger: Regions of Interest (RoI)

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 20 Level 1 Tau Trigger –Tau Cluster: Energy in the two most energetic neighboring EM towers + the central 2x2 hadronic towers. -EM Isolation: Energy in the isolating ring between 2x2 and 4x4 in the EM calorimeter. -Hadronic Isolation: Energy in the isolating ring between 2x2 and 4x4 in the hadronic calorimeter.  x  = 0.1 x 0.1 |  | < 2.5

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 21 Performance of L1 Tau Trigger Efficiencies normalized with respect to offline (optimized to select those tau events which are likely to be reconstructed with the offline tau algorithms). Dijet sample 8<pT<140 GeV ATLAS preliminary ATLAS preliminary

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 22 HLT (L2 + EF) Selection Basic concepts: Guided and simultaneous reconstruction (for the different regions of activity) Each level uses the information of the preceeding level The reconstruction is done simultaneously for the different regions of activity. The rejection is applied as soon as possible. The second level trigger access only a few % of the total amount of data. In the third level the whole even is also accessible. Iso lation pt> 15GeV Cluster shape track finding Iso lation pt> 15GeV Cluster shape track finding TAU15i + tau15i + tau15 + tau +  cand + Signature  L1 seed  STEP1 STEP4 STEP3 STEP2 time Example: Z   +  - tau15i

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 23 Tau HLT Selection Refine ( ,  ) with the calorimeter and calculate shape variables Determine tracking variables including recalculation of ( ,  ) Matching of calorimeter cluster and track collection L2 selection EF selection Similar to L2, but using sophisticated offline algorithms. The whole event and detailed calibrations are available.

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 24 L2 variables (high energy taus) Calorimeter Tracking ATLAS preliminary

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 25 Event Filter variables (high energy taus) ATLAS Calorimeter ATLAS preliminary

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 26 Efficiencies per level Efficiencies calculated with respect to the preceeding level.

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 27 Efficiency curves Efficiencies normalized with respect to offline. tau20i ATLAS preliminary

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 28 Rates per level Rates calculated on QCD background for L= cm -2 s -1.

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 29 Tau Trigger Menus MenuMotivation Single tauTo be used in combination with other triggers (as MissET, leptons or jets), except for very high E T. Single trackSelect RoIs with a single track to align the tracker & for E/p measurements. tau + missing ET Wide spectrum of physics. At priority is W→  tau + l (+jets)Double tau decays (Z,H/A,…) tau + tau (+jets)As tau + l (+jets) with both taus decaying hadronically tau + jets, tau + bjets ttbar studies Commiss. itemsHLT decision is neglected, record only a fraction.

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 30 Tau Trigger Menu at cm -2 s -1

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 31 Z→  : important at cm -2 s events with tau15i in 100pb -1 at cm -2 s -1. Measure: –  trigger efficiency in Z→  (h) lepton –  ID efficiency. –Detector calibration: E T miss &  -jet energy scale determination. –Cross section (SM measurement) See CERN-OPEN ATLAS preliminary

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 32 Efficiency measurement on data Z→  →lep hadron –Tag the lepton (electron or muon) and probe the other side. –Background: top and QCD. –Expect 1200 signal events in 100pb -1 with 30% background. –Do first single tau trigger turn-on curves. 30pb -1

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 33 Efficiency measurement on data tau + MissET trigger with ttbar –Tag 4jet25, study tau decay offline. –Background: hadronic ttbar, single top and QCD. –Expect ~130 signal events in 100pb -1 with ~85 background events. –Strategy to determine combined tau trigger efficiency with first data.

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 34 Timing results Time in ms, per RoI Time in ms, per event Mean algorithm execution time for each signature of the tau slice. The average execution time of each algorithm remains roughly equal between signatures, while the average total time per event decreases as a result of the lower number of RoIs per event for high energy signatures. Timing is important in HLT because it gives latency. If it takes too long, we can not process data!

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 35 Conclusions The tau trigger has recorded the first single beam events from the LHC. The detector and trigger will be commissioned as soon as we have the first collisions. The tau trigger will be used standalone for high thresholds and in combined mode for low energies. Hope to have early measurements with tau data and maybe some discoveries next year…

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 36 Backup slides

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 37 Level 1 Trigger Schematic view of the level 1 trigger Hardware based

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 38 Resolution at each level ATLAS Preliminary

TAU08, NovosibirskM. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) 39 Single Tau Trigger Rates Min. bias with  =70mb, lumi cm -2 s -1 Only statistical errors