MINERvA Status Report Deborah Harris, Gabe Perdue, Kevin McFarland, Jorge Morfin October 15, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
L. Greiner 1HFT PXL LBNL F2F – March 14, 2012 STAR HFT The STAR-PXL sensor and electronics Progress report for F2F.
Advertisements

PXL RDO System Requirements And meeting goals 11/12/2009BNL_CD-1_SENSOR_RDO - LG1.
June 19, 2002 A Software Skeleton for the Full Front-End Crate Test at BNL Goal: to provide a working data acquisition (DAQ) system for the coming full.
The LAr ROD Project and Online Activities Arno Straessner and Alain, Daniel, Annie, Manuel, Imma, Eric, Jean-Pierre,... Journée de réflexion du DPNC Centre.
T2K – Canada Accelerator & Detector Status D. Karlen University of Victoria & TRIUMF ACOT meeting, May 12, 2007.
April 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DAQ Status o Goal for BTF o Status o First results o To be done.
MINER A NuMI MINER A DAQ Review 12 September 2005 D. Casper UC Irvine WBS7: Electronics and Data Acquisition  Overview (this talk): D. Casper  Front-end.
MINER A NuMI MINER A DAQ Review 12 September 2005 D. Casper UC Irvine WBS 7.2 & 7.3: Data Acquisition D. Casper (UC Irvine)
Detector Systems Update MICO March 3, MICE Detector Systems  CKOV u CKOV humidity (HIH4000) and temperature (LM35) sensors in hand for installation.
PXL Electronics Status update for HFT TC meeting on May 11, 2010 at LBNL 1HFT TC 05/11/ LG.
Electronic Detector status and run organization Logistics and organization Updates on the electronic detector since last year run Conclusions.
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester April 1, 2013.
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester July 8, 2013.
Update on Database Issues Peter Chochula DCS Workshop, June 21, 2004 Colmar.
14 Sep 2005DAQ - Paul Dauncey1 Tech Board: DAQ/Online Status Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Group Electronique Csnsm AGATA SLOW CONTROL MEETING 19th fev AGATA PROJECT PREPROCESSING MEZZANINE SLOW CONTROL GUI FOR THE SEGMENT AND THE CORE.
Oct C. Smith - PCAL/EC Commissioning 1 PCAL/EC Commissioning Document
SPSC Questions to the 2014 NA62 Status Report 1 Beam: which is the beam structure expected in October? Which is the intensity you can reasonably expect?
VC Feb 2010Slide 1 EMR Construction Status o General Design o Electronics o Cosmics test Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva.
CM26 March 2010Slide 1 EMR Status o Intro o Construction o Magnetic shielding o Electronics o Prototype Cosmics test o Schedule Jean-Sebastien Graulich,
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester Aug 5, 2013.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester June 17, 2013.
Update on the CDC GlueX Collaboration Meeting October 2006.
Ronald Lipton PMG June Layer 0 Status 48 modules, 96 SVX4 readout chips 6-fold symmetry 8 module types different in sensor and analog cable length.
M&O status and program for ATLAS LAr calorimeter R Stroynowski (on vacations)
STAR Collaboration Meeting, Nantes Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Commissioning for the run Review of last.
PHENO 2010 Christopher White, IIT 1 The Daya Bay Reactor Antineutrino Experiment Christopher White 1.
MINERvA Main INjector ExpeRiment for -A is the symbol for the neutrino. The beam that is sent to MINERvA is made out of neutrinos. In chemistry, an A stands.
DEPARTEMENT DE PHYSIQUE NUCLEAIRE ET CORPUSCULAIRE JRA1 Parallel - DAQ Status, Emlyn Corrin, 8 Oct 2007 EUDET Annual Meeting, Palaiseau, Paris DAQ Status.
IoP HEPP Lancaster 31/03 – 02/04/08 Gavin Davies Dr. Athanasios Hatzikoutelis Dr. Laura Kormos Lancaster University T2K UK Collaboration  DS-Ecal Design.
Forward Muon Installation and Commissioning Dmitri Denisov Fermilab Director’s review 7/12/1999 Plan Forward muon detectors Mini-drift tubes installation.
VVS Prototype Construction at Fermilab Erik Ramberg 26 February,2002 Design issues for VVS Details of VVS prototype design Schedule and Budget Testing.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 7 to July 15 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.4pb -1 u Recorded:
P. Shanahan Nov 15, 2003 Page 1 MINOS WBS 2.3: Electronics, DAQ and Database Status Accomplishments since May review Near Detector Electronics production.
Update on the GRINCH Detector SBS meeting, 21 Oct 2015 T. Averett, W&M JLab, NC A&T, JMU, Glasgow Timing-based gas Cherenkov detector PMT array-510 tubes.
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester June 24, 2013.
MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters’ Meeting Steve Hahn, FNAL July 1, 2013.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
Testbeam Post Mortem Immediate reflections on successes and failures Richard Plackett – University of Glasgow VELO Upgrade.
FPD STATUS Carlos Avila Uniandes/UTA 1. FPD overview 2. Roman pot and detector status 3. FPD readout integration status 4. Software status 5. Stand-alone.
1 HBD: Update and Schedule Itzhak Tserruya DC Meeting, BNL, April 13, 2005 Outline:  Full scale prototype status  Light source test  Construction Schedule.
TDAQ Experience in the BNL Liquid Argon Calorimeter Test Facility Denis Oliveira Damazio (BNL), George Redlinger (BNL).
Intelligence and Information Systems 1 3/17/2004 © 2004 Raytheon Company USC/CSE Executive Workshop on Agile Experiences March 17, 2004 A Raytheon Agile.
DAQ Status & Plans GlueX Collaboration Meeting – Feb 21-23, 2013 Jefferson Lab Bryan Moffit/David Abbott.
Plans to Test HBD Prototype in Run 6 Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting March 8, 2006.
October Test Beam DAQ. Framework sketch Only DAQs subprograms works during spills Each subprogram produces an output each spill Each dependant subprogram.
1 Tracker Software Status M. Ellis MICE Collaboration Meeting 27 th June 2005.
IPHC-LBL-BNL video conference 19 Jan 2007 HFT development MimoStar2 based telescope.
1 DAQ.IHEP Beijing, CAS.CHINA mail to: The Readout In BESIII DAQ Framework The BESIII DAQ system consists of the readout subsystem, the.
ONCS Subsystem Status Chris Witzig (BNL), Stephen Pate (NMSU) DC Meeting PHENIX Collaboration Week 22-June-1998 Chain Test Software Subsystem Support Tests.
MINER A at the Triple Point: Three Phases at once Deborah Harris AEM August 31, 2009.
ECAL status and plans C-side A-side Further plans People involved: Alexander Arefiev, Boris Bobchenko, Yury Gilitskiy, Tengiz Kvaratskheliya, Irina Machikhiliyan,
Electronics Status New DCM daughter card works. –Three cards has been assembled. –One daughter card has been send to Jamie yesterday by FedEx overnight.
Status of the NOνA Experiment Satish Desai - University of Minnesota For the NOνA Collaboration APS Meeting - April 2013 Denver, Colorado.
Status of HRS Detectors Barak Schmookler DVCS - 12/19/20131.
IFR Status Report W. Baldini, on behalf of the Ferrara SuperB-Group XIV SuperB General Meeting, Frascati Sept.27 – Oct
1 Projectile Spectator Detector: Status and Plans A.Ivashkin (INR, Moscow) PSD performance in Be run. Problems and drawbacks. Future steps.
Time to resolve Design Issues 1. Disclamer Due to the engineering meeting last week I have not had time to coordinate this material with Tim or the L3.
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester Sep14, 2015.
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester Oct 14, 2013.
Minerva Test Beam 2 Status Geoff Savage for the Test Beam 2 Team March 23, /23/2015AEM - Minerva Test Beam 2 Status1.
MUSE NSF Review March 24, MUSE Project Management Ronald Ransome Rutgers The State University of New Jersey For the MUSE Collaboration.
Overview B A B AR L1 DCT Upgrade FDR Masahiro Morii Harvard University Scope of the Project Current Status Schedule  Commissioning.
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester June 3, 2013.
CLAS12 DAQ & Trigger Status
SNS Status Report Karen S. White 10/15/08.
IEEE Std 1074: Standard for Software Lifecycle
Online Software Status
Presentation transcript:

MINERvA Status Report Deborah Harris, Gabe Perdue, Kevin McFarland, Jorge Morfin October 15, 2009

Outline Installation Status Construction Status PMT Cross-talk Update Data Acquisition Update

3 Fall Installation Status Unit of installation is “module stack” Four modules that share instrumentation Installed 10 of 16 stacks Instrumented 9 of 16 stacks (8 October)‏ MS #10 in progress Modules will come from Wideband for the duration Full detector: 29 stacks

MINERvA Construction Status Scintillator Planes 11 planes left to finish ( total) Rate limited by WLS fiber delivery Currently project to be done by 11/20 Outer Detector Towers 110 towers left to finish (888 total) Baseline rate is 16/week Project to be done by 11/20 Steel Frames Complete! Assembled Modules 39 modules left to make Project to be done by 1/25, if 3/week

We have tested 142 different PMT’s on a test stand on the 14 th floor of Wilson Hall (some boxes tested several times) Of those, 115 have cross-talk that meets our specification Plus 88-12=76 boxes were tested ONLY on the tracking prototype, 72 were good Testing continues at about 50 new PMT boxes per week (530 total, 312 left to test, need 264 for the Fall installation) Plan to complete testing and start repair process in parallel Ramping up on PMT repair in early November Close to identifying solutions for all failure modes PMT Cross-Talk Update Good box 9% xtalk Bad box: 13% xtalk

6 The MINERvA DAQ What we have now, our “Legacy DAQ”: A Windows PC-based System with Acquisition & Configuration Tools. The system does some great things, but is slow and difficult to support for a multi-year run. (It is fine for the short-term though.)  Where we are going next, our “Production DAQ”: Employ the same readout hardware but move to a Scientific Linux platform with absolute minimum amount proprietary code and binaries. Faster and we “own the build.”

7 Basic Architecture CROC Chain Readout Controller FEB (Really, more FEB’s & CROC’s) CRIM Chain Readout Interface Module CAEN Crate Controller Card DAQ PC FEB

8 Monitoring Acquisition Our legacy DAQ has some stability and support issues that are pushing us to build a different system on a more stable operating system. In the interim, we have a lot of tools to trouble-shoot failure modes in the acquisition system and hardware itself. Our wiki contains accurate descriptions of problems and solutions, our monitoring tools are good enough to make classification easy, and we have an on-call staff to handle the “three-sigma” failure modes.

9 Big Picture Schedule Present - January 1, 2010: Run the Legacy DAQ, essentially the TP DAQ with some minor upgrades. This is physics-quality data-taking beginning on (or before) October 23. January 2 - March 31, 2010: Transition to the new DAQ system. (Hopefully done well before March 31.) We will be simultaneously installing and DAQ time will be split between checkout and integration (may be able to do some of both at the same time). By running both DAQ systems in parallel sometimes and just one during other times, we will be in a position to integrate physics data through this whole period. April 1, 2010 and on: Run the Production DAQ system only.

10 Near-Term Schedule We begin 24-7 shift operation on October 23. The plan is to give DAQ priority during daytime hours to the construction crew for module quality check-out, and collect data in the evenings and overnight. To-Do List between now and then: Exercise Light Injection system for basic gain calibration. Time-in the beam spill and fine-tune timing settings for our Front End Boards & link new FEB calibrations from database to analysis framework (machinery is there - simple grunt bookkeeping task). Sanity-check our data handling work-flow. This can realistically be done quickly - timing is a question of prioritization.