Dearborn Administrator Evaluation Program Dearborn Board of Education Meeting, November 26, 2012 By Andy Denison, ADSA President and Glenn Maleyko, Director of Human Resources

Thank you to the following individuals/groups for their support  The Board of Education  Mr. Whiston, Superintendent  Chris Kenniburg – website support  Administrator Evaluation Committee

Administrator Evaluation Committee Patty Buoy Youssef Mosallam Jill Chochol Shannon Peterson Andrew DenisonGail Shenkman Glenn Maleyko

Legislative Changes  Most of the changes reflect what is required by state law  We had a fair process that included input from all levels.  Our evaluation tool is in compliance with the state legislation.  Our 2008 initial model was also aligned with the intent behind the state legislation

Legislative Changes Beginning : Evaluations Must Include  Annual Year End Evaluation for Administrators.  Student growth data by , 25%; , 40% %.  Administrator’s training and proficiency in using the evaluation tool for teachers.

Legislative Changes Beginning : Evaluations Must Include  Progress made by schools in meeting the school improvement plan  Pupil Attendance  Student, parent, and teacher feedback

Legislative Changes Beginning :  Those rated ineffective or minimally effective would need an improvement plan  If rated ineffective on 3 consecutive year end evaluation the administrator must be dismissed.  If rated highly effective on 3 consecutive evaluations the administrator would only need to be evaluated every 2 years.

Legislative Changes Beginning :  Established the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (Formerly Named the Governor’s council).  Recommendations will hopefully be coming from the council in the near future.

Data Included in School Profile  State Accountability Proficiency Data (MEAP and MME)  Student Growth Data(DRA, SRI, Explore, Plan, Start Math, etc. )  Student Attendance Data  Student Subgroup Data

Data Included in School Profile  School Improvement Data  Intervention Profile Data  Discipline Data  Information on Teacher Evaluations  Other Artifacts

Most Significant Change - We have eliminated the use of the North Carolina rubric. We are now in better compliance with the 4 scale state rating system. -Rating scale, ineffective, minimally effective, effective and highly effective by September 19, This change was already implemented. -Rubric based on work by Kim Marshall in alignment with work by Charlotte Danielson and Bob Marzano

Rubric Standards A.Diagnosis and Planning B.Priority Management and Communication C.Curriculum and Data D.Supervision, Evaluation, and Professional Development E.Discipline and Family Involvement F.Management and External Relations

Administrative Tool Timeline  Self Assessment- By September 30th.  Meeting with Evaluator to discuss goals and data to be gathered by October 31st.  Data Collection and Mid Year Visit to the school by evaluator between November 1st and March 30th.  Administrator provides a brief summary on progress. By May 1st. School Profile should also be completed.  Year End Evaluation Meeting by June 15th. This must be submitted to HR by this date.

Questions?

HR Website for the tools and HR blog for training items employment/hr-evaluation-tools