2.4 Deductive Reasoning 2.5 Postulates Geometry R/H Students will be able to distinguish between Inductive and Deductive Reasoning, and to determine the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Warm Up Identify the hypothesis and conclusion of each conditional.
Advertisements

Splash Screen. Over Lesson 2–4 5-Minute Check 1 A.valid B.invalid Determine whether the stated conclusion is valid based on the given information. If.
The original conditional and its contrapositive are logically equivalent. Example. If the bird is Red, then the bird is a Robin. AND If the bird is not.
Warm Up Identify the hypothesis and conclusion of each conditional. 1. A mapping that is a reflection is a type of transformation. 2. The quotient of two.
Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
2-5 Postulates Ms. Andrejko.
Postulates and Paragraph Proofs
Warm Up Make a conjecture based on the following information.  For points A, B and C, AB = 2, BC = 3, and AC = 4. A, B, and C form an equilateral triangle.
Postulates and Paragraph Proofs
Objective Understand the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning.
1 2-5 Postulates andParagraph Proofs. 2 What is a Postulate? A Postulate or axiom is a statement that is accepted as fact.
Axiom: another name for postulate
Chapter 2-4 & 2-5 Reasoning and Proofs. Lesson 5 MI/Vocab postulate axiom theorem proof paragraph proof informal proof Identify and use basic postulates.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2.4 Use Postulates & Diagrams Objectives: 1.To illustrate and understand postulates about lines and planes 2.To accurately interpret geometric diagrams.
10/21/2015Geometry1 Section 2.1 Conditional Statements.
Holt McDougal Geometry 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures Holt Geometry Warm Up Warm Up.
Holt McDougal Geometry 2-3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures Determine if each conjecture is true or false. If false, provide a counterexample.
Reasoning and Conditional Statements Advanced Geometry Deductive Reasoning Lesson 1.
INDUCTIVE REASONING AND CONJECTURE. DEFINITIONS Conjecture: a best guess based on known information. Inductive Reasoning: using specific examples to arrive.
Geometry CH 1-7 Patterns & Inductive Reasoning Using deductive reasoning. Objective.
Over Lesson 2–4 5-Minute Check 4 A.valid B.invalid Determine whether the stated conclusion is valid based on the given information. If not, choose invalid.
Postulates and Paragraph Proofs Section 2-5.  postulate or axiom – a statement that describes a fundamental relationship between the basic terms of geometry.
Holt McDougal Geometry 2-3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures Students will… Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical.
C HAPTER Using deductive reasoning. O BJECTIVES Students will be able to: Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Postulates and Paragraph Proofs
Splash Screen. Lesson Menu Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 2–4) CCSS Then/Now New Vocabulary Postulates: Points, Lines, and Planes Key Concept: Intersections.
Lesson 2 – 5 Postulates and Paragraph Proofs
Holt Geometry 2-4 Biconditional Statements and Definitions Write and analyze biconditional statements. Objective.
CONFIDENTIAL 1 Grade 9 Algebra1 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures.
Reasoning, Conditionals, and Postulates Sections 2-1, 2-3, 2-5.
2.5 Postulates and Proofs GEOMETRY. Postulate (axiom)- a statement that is accepted as true without proof 2.1: Through any two points, there is exactly.
Inductive Reasoning Notes 2.1 through 2.4. Definitions Conjecture – An unproven statement based on your observations EXAMPLE: The sum of 2 numbers is.
Reasoning and Proof Chapter Use Inductive Reasoning Conjecture- an unproven statement based on an observation Inductive reasoning- finding a pattern.
Postulates and Paragraph Proofs LESSON 2–5. Lesson Menu Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 2–4) TEKS Then/Now New Vocabulary Postulates: Points, Lines, and.
Holt Geometry 2-3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures Chapter 2.3 – Deductive Reasoning.
Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Deductive Reasoning, Postulates, and Proofs
Postulates and Paragraph Proofs
2-3 Deductive Reasoning Warm Up Lesson Presentation Lesson Quiz
Drill: Tuesday, 10/14 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.
Splash Screen.
Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 2–3) Mathematical Practices Then/Now
Splash Screen.
02-2: Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
Splash Screen.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Warm up: pick up a half sheet!
Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2.4 Use Postulates & Diagrams
Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Drill: Wednesday, 11/1 Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. Write the contrapositive.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2.3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures
Notes 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Learning Target Students will be able to: Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Splash Screen.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Presentation transcript:

2.4 Deductive Reasoning 2.5 Postulates Geometry R/H Students will be able to distinguish between Inductive and Deductive Reasoning, and to determine the validity of a conjecture.

Deductive Reasoning To review, when you make a conclusion based on a pattern of observations, you are applying inductive reasoning. We also know how to show that a conditional is false – find a counterexample. But how do we show that a conditional is true? We must use deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is the process of using logic to draw conclusions from given facts, definitions and properties.

Is the conclusion a result of inductive or deductive reasoning? Example 1: Media Application There is a myth that you can balance an egg on its end only on the spring equinox. A person was able to balance an egg on July 8, September 21, and December 19. Therefore this myth is false. Since the conclusion is based on a pattern of observations, it is a result of inductive reasoning.

Check It Out! Example 2 There is a myth that an eelskin wallet will demagnetize credit cards because the skin of the electric eels used to make the wallet holds an electric charge. However, eelskin products are not made from electric eels. Therefore, the myth cannot be true. Is this conclusion a result of inductive or deductive reasoning? The conclusion is based on logical reasoning from scientific research, so it is a result of deductive reasoning.

Applying Deductive Reasoning See if you can draw a correct conclusion from the following information. Given: If a team wins 10 games, then they play in the finals. If a team plays in the finals, then they travel to Boston. The Ravens won 10 games. Conclusion: The ravens will travel to Boston.

Inductive or Deductive Reasoning 1.By observing many individual cases, people concluded that malaria was caused by breathing air in swampy areas. 2.All students must study Algebra I before studying Geometry. Mia is studying Geometry. Therefore, Mia has studied Algebra I

3.Any quadrilateral with four congruent angles is a rectangle. A square has four congruent angles. A square is a rectangle. 4.I see that every time it rains Sally has an umbrella. I saw Sally with an umbrella on Tuesday. Therefore it must rain on Tuesday.

Summary: Is the conclusion a result of inductive or deductive reasoning? 1.At Colonia High School, students must pass Geometry before they can take Algebra 2. Emily is in Algebra 2, so she must have passed Geometry.

Valid Conclusions When a conclusion is based on logical reasoning and facts then we say the conclusion is valid. If the reasoning is not logical, then the conclusion is not valid. Look at the following conclusions to see if they are valid or not.

Summary: Determine if each conjecture is valid? 2.Given: If a person is able to vote in a U.S. election, they must be at least 18 years old. Joe is 18 years old. Conjecture: Joe voted in the last election. 3.Given: Two angles that are congruent have the same measure. The measures of two vertical angles are the same. Conjecture: The two vertical angles must be congruent.

MORE DEDUCTIVE REASONING EXAMPLES Look to Word Document FHSUnit B11

2.5 Vocabulary postulate axiom proof theorem

Concept

Example 1 Analyze Statements Using Postulates A. Determine whether the following statement is always, sometimes, or never true. Explain. If plane T contains contains point G, then plane T contains point G.

Example 2 Analyze Statements Using Postulates B. Determine whether the following statement is always, sometimes, or never true. Explain. contains three noncollinear points.

Example 3 A. Determine whether the statement is always, sometimes, or never true. Plane A and plane B intersect in exactly one point. A.always B.sometimes C.never

Example 2 B. Determine whether the statement is always, sometimes, or never true. Point N lies in plane X and point R lies in plane Z. You can draw only one line that contains both points N and R. A.always B.sometimes C.never

Concept

Homework Deductive versus Inductive Reasoning Worksheet Book Work for Section 2.5 Pg. 130 #1-9 odd, all, odd, even