2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, 14.-16.10.2015Viktor Kaufmann1/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICC 2009, Santiago de Chile Visualization of Glacier Surface Movement Samuel Wiesmann Institute of Cartography, ETH Zurich.
Advertisements

Role of Space Geodesy In GEOSS Timothy H. Dixon University of Miami/RSMAS and Center for Southeastern Advanced Remote Sensing (CSTARS)
ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS
Full Name: Post /Designation: Qualification (Highest) : CNIC # Organisation Name: Postal Address: Field of Interest: City: Postal Code: Cell: Fax: .
MONITORING EVAPOTRANSPIRATION USING REMOTELY SENSED DATA, CONSTRAINTS TO POSSIBLE APPLICATIONS IN AFRICA B Chipindu, Agricultural Meteorology Programme,
Centre for Integrated Petroleum Research University of Bergen & Unifob, Norway Walter Wheeler & Simon Buckley Unifob, UiB Bergen, Norway Lidar laser scanning.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Remote Sensing of Hydrological Variables over the Red Arkansas Eric Wood Matthew McCabe Rafal Wojcik Hongbo Su Huilin Gao Justin Sheffield Princeton University.
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
Simulation for a volcano monitoring network Rainer Mautz ETH Zurich, Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry November 22 nd, 2008 Session 9: Natural hazards.
Ad-Hoc Wireless Sensor Positioning in Hazardous Areas Rainer Mautz a, Washington Ochieng b, Hilmar Ingensand a a ETH Zurich, Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry.
Comparison of LIDAR Derived Data to Traditional Photogrammetric Mapping David Veneziano Dr. Reginald Souleyrette Dr. Shauna Hallmark GIS-T 2002 August.
9. GIS Data Collection.
13/06/13 H. Rho Slide 1 Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick Evaluation of Precise.
Dr. Sarawut NINSAWAT GEO Grid Research Group/ITRI/AIST GEO Grid Research Group/ITRI/AIST Development of OGC Framework for Estimating Near Real-time Air.
GEOMORPHOMETRY 2015, Poznań, Poland Kaufmann & Kellerer-Pirklbauer 1/16 Regional quantification of rock glacier movement in Austria using governmental.
How Global Positioning Devices (GPS) work
New Scientific Applications with Existing CGPS Capabilities Earthquakes, Soil Moisture, and Environmental Imaging Andria Bilich Geosciences Research Division.
1. Idea 3. Workflow 2. Installation 4. First Results Study site
Presented by Amira Ahmed El-Sharkawy Ibrahim.  There are six of eight turtle species in Ontario are listed as endangered, threatened or of special concern.
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA RPC – March, Evaluation for the Integration of a Virtual Evapotranspiration Sensor Based.
Malcolm McMillan1, Peter Nienow1, Andrew Shepherd1 & Toby Benham2
Inklinometri Uredjaj za merenje promene nagiba u odnosu na horizont Princip trigonometrijskog određivanja Tačnost do deg kamere, kompenzatori i drugi.
FIG Working Week- Bridging the Gap Between Cultures Marrakech, Morocco May Using of both fast Static and RTK Modes for GNSS.
Comparative analysis of climatic variability characteristics of the Svalbard archipelago and the North European region based on meteorological stations.
Urs Wegmüller Gamma Remote Sensing AG, Gümligen, Switzerland Monitoring Alpine Transportation Infrastructures Using Space Techniques.
Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,
Determining the flow fields of two glacier outlets of the Jostedalsbreen ice cap, Norway, using digital photogrammetry B. Wangensteen, T. Eiken, K. Melvold,
Slide 1EGU 2005, Vienna, Austria, April 2005Tuesday, 26 April 2005 M. Troller (1), E. Brockmann (2), D. Ineichen (2), S. Lutz (1), A. Geiger (1),
Third International Conference on Cartography and GIS June, 15-20, 2010 Nessebar, Bulgaria ASSESSING OF THE OVERALL QUALITY OF GNSS DETERMINATIONS,
InCORS INDIANA’S STATEWIDE GNSS-GPS REAL TIME NETWORK Presented by Derek Fuller, PLS Land & Aerial Survey Office.
Lecturer: Jinglin Wang Student name: Hao Li Student ID:
Determination of seasonal geocenter variations from DORIS, GPS and SLR data.
Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Calais E, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, Han JY,
GGOS User Requirements and Functional Specifications Richard S. Gross Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA Global.
Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick 01/06/27 S.Bisnath A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR GPS-BASED.
A comparison of the ability of artificial neural network and polynomial fitting was carried out in order to model the horizontal deformation field. It.
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
The Austrian absolute gravity base net: 27 years of spatial and temporal acquisition of gravity data Ullrich Christian and Diethard Ruess, Federal Office.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 4 June 2008 Recommendations from “RT/NRT user requirements” 1.E-GVAP recommends IGS to support PPP strategy with high quality.
Assessment of Reference Frame Stability trough offset detection in GPS coordinate time series Dragan Blagojević 1), Goran Todorović 2), Violeta Vasilić.
ICC 2013, Dresden, Germany Viktor Kaufmann 1/21 Documentation of the glacier retreat in the eastern part of the Granatspitz Mountains (Austrian Alps) using.
Introduction to GPS/GNSS Introduction to Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums Corbin Training Center January 7, 2009 Jeff Little Guest Speaker ,
GALOCAD GAlileo LOcal Component for nowcasting and forecasting Atmospheric Disturbances R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*, J. Spits*,
1 Airport mobiles surveillance and control by means of EGNOS METIS Workshop Benefits of EGNOS in Civil Aviation Istanbul 18 November 2009 Pierre GRUYER.
Surface displacements and surface age estimates for creeping slope landforms in Northern Iceland using digital photogrammetry B. Wangensteen¹, Á. Guðmundsson.
Geocenter Variations Derived from GRACE Data Z. Kang, B. Tapley, J. Chen, J. Ries, S. Bettadpur Joint International GSTM and SPP Symposium GFZ Potsdam,
Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic Survey Real-Time Mantra Pass.
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Mapping high-latitude TEC fluctuations using GNSS I.I. SHAGIMURATOV (1), A. KRANKOWSKI (2), R. SIERADZKI (2), I.E. ZAKHARENKOVA (1,2), Yu.V. CHERNIAK (1),
Technical Specifications for Monitoring Ground Displacements at a National Highway Project K. Lakakis, P. Savvaidis and I. Ifadis Laboratory of Geodesy.
Technique and precision At all sites a fixed point for global reference were established; a bolt was drilled into the bedrock and its position measured.
1. Analysis and Reanalysis Products Adrian M Tompkins, ICTP picture from Nasa.
NATO Workshop Veszprem 2004 Recent Monitoring of Crustal Movements in the Eastern Mediterranean The Usage of GPS Measurements G. Stangl, Federal Office.
Surface Displacement and Volume Changes of a Debris Covered Glacier and a Moving Debris Body at the Tröllaskagi Peninsula, Northern Iceland, by the use.
Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea and Jim Davis Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Time Dependent Mining- Induced Subsidence Measured by DInSAR Jessica M. Wempen 7/31/2014 Michael K. McCarter 1.
IGARSS 2011, Vancuver, Canada July 28, of 14 Chalmers University of Technology Monitoring Long Term Variability in the Atmospheric Water Vapor Content.
2002/05/07ACES Workshop Spatio-temporal slip distribution around the Japanese Islands deduced from Geodetic Data Takeshi Sagiya Geographical Survey Institute.
GALOCAD GAlileo LOcal Component for nowcasting and forecasting Atmospheric Disturbances R. Warnant, G. Wautelet, S. Lejeune, H. Brenot, J. Spits, S. Stankov.
Estimating intra-annual changes in the surface area of Sand Mesa Reservoir #1 using multi-temporal Landsat images Cody A. Booth 1 with Ramesh Sivanpillai.
An oceanographic assessment of the GOCE geoid models accuracy S. Mulet 1, M-H. Rio 1, P. Knudsen 2, F. Siegesmund 3, R. Bingham 4, O. Andersen 2, D. Stammer.
Company LOGO Technology and Application of Laser Tracker in Large Space Measurement Yang Fan, Li Guangyun, Fan Baixing IWAA2014 in Beijing, China Zhengzhou.
Application of Probability Density Function - Optimal Interpolation in Hourly Gauge-Satellite Merged Precipitation Analysis over China Yan Shen, Yang Pan,
Dynamics of landfast sea ice near Jangbogo Antarctic Research Station observed by SAR interferometry Hoonyol Lee 1 and Hyangsun Han 2 1 Division of Geology.
Recent developments on micro-triangulation
R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*,
Making a good thematic map – Extracting or collecting geographic data
Presentation transcript:

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann1/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review V. Kaufmann Institute of Geodesy Working Group Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Graz University of Technology, Austria

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann2/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review Contents 1. Introduction 2. Total Station Measurements GPS/GNSS Measurements Photogrammetric Measurements 5. Results 6. Conclusions and Outlook

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann3/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 2. Total station measurements Rock glacier inventory (Kellerer-Pirklbauer et al. 2014)

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann4/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 1. Introduction Dösen Lake (2269 m) Dösen rock glacier Arthur-v.-Schmid Haus (2275 m) August 17, 2015

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann5/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 1. Introduction August 17, m

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann6/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 1. Introduction Classical deformation analysis … Stable reference points … Observation points Object t1t1 (1) Rigid body movement (2) Affine deformation Stable reference frame t2t2 dX 12

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann7/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 1. Introduction July 26, 1994 A first visit to Dösen rock glacier

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann8/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 1. Introduction July 26, 1994

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann9/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 1. Introduction July 26, 1994

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann10/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 2. Total Station Measurements Set-up of a geodetic network and initial (zero) measurement in 1995  7 stable reference points marked with brass bolts & 3 points of BEV  3 additional points (N5, N6 and N7) were added in later stage.  107 observation points on the rock glacier  34 points marked with brass bolts  4 profiles (107 points in total, marked with hammer and chisel)  2 longitudinal profiles  2 transversal profiles  Measurement of the stable reference frame  Total station (1995, …)  GPS (1996, …)  Initial (zero) measurement of the observation points  Total station (1995)  Annual measurements in August

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann11/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 2. Total station measurements

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann12/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 2. Total Station Measurements observation points marked with brass bolts 4 profiles: , , , , and additional 3 points 1016, 5001 and 5002

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann13/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 2. Total Station Measurements Gerhard Kienast at point S1 Kaufmann, Tilg, Kienast, HeilandJuly 26-28, 1995Check point at S4 Geodetic survey at the triangulation point AVSTransport of heavy geodetic equipmentAugust 13-21, 1995August 12-15, 1997

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann14/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 2. Total Station Measurements S4 Reflector put on brass bolt Polar method surveying from point S4August 13-21, 1995 August 5-11, 1996August 13-21, 1995

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann15/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 2. Total Station Measurements Annual repeat measurements between 1996 and 2013  No measurements were carried out in 2003 because of financial constraints.  Measurements using a total station terminated in Surveying team 2013August 12-14, 2013

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann16/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 2. Total Station Measurements Assessment: +High accuracy: m X = m Y = m Z = ±1 cm +Fast (1 day) +Independent measurement technique (no third-party service is needed) ­Experienced operator is needed for the total station. ­Strong dependency on the weather (visibility) ­Personnel intensive (5-6 persons) ­Physically strong helpers needed ­High costs because of the personnel ­Difficult and dangerous climb to reach point S4 ­S4 is not stable but gradually moving downward.

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann17/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 2. Total Station Measurements D displacement vectors

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann18/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 3. GPS/GNSS Measurements GNSS-based surveying since 2014  2014: Validation of the real-time kinematic (RTK) positioning technique at Dösen rock glacier.  Reference station (base): Triangulation point (AVS) near Arthur-v.-Schmid Haus  Additional stable points M1, M2 and M3 for ease of work  Equipment used: Leica Viva GNSS  Accuracy: 2-3 times inferior to the classical method used previously  2015: RTK-GNSS measurements only

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann19/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 3. GPS/GNSS Measurements August 18, 2015 Reference point (AVS) (2278 m) August 18, 2015 August 12, 2014

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann20/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 3. GPS/GNSS Measurements Assessment: +Less personnel needed (2-4 persons) +More cost-efficient +Measurement is independent of weather conditions (visibility). +Measurements can be carried out by anybody after a short training. ±Adequate accuracy: m X = m Y = m Z = ±2-3 cm (= ~10% relative accuracy in respect to the average annual flow velocity) ­Daily output of measured points is limited. On a fine day all 34 observation points can be measured within 1 day. ­Thus, the measurement of the 4 profiles had to be abandoned. ­Possible problems with bad satellite constellation, signal shadowing, and multipath effects

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann21/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 3. GPS/GNSS Measurements D displacement vectors

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann22/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 4. Photogrammetric Measurements Computer animation: 1969 – 1998 – 2010 Horizontal movement of Dösen rock glacier

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann23/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 4. Photogrammetric Measurements Horizontal displacement vectors derived from large-scale aerial photographs 1993 and Automatic tracking of thousands of points through image matching

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann24/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 4. Photogrammetric Measurements Total horizontal movement Equidistance of isolines: 1 m Accuracy: ±0.9 m (3σ-level) Maximum movement: m (in 56 years) non-significant valid measurements

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann25/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 5. Results

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann26/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 5. Results Mean annual horizontal flow velocity of Dösen rock glacier for the time period The velocities shown are mean values derived from 11 representative observations points (10-17, 21-23) cm/a

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann27/28 20 Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review 6. Conclusions and Outlook  Mean annual flow velocity is a good indicator to describe rock glacier kinematics.  RTK-GNSS has proofed to be beneficial.  Accuracy obtained is sufficient. (Satellite availability will increase in the future: Galileo, Beidou, etc.)  Deformation analysis is possible.  Estimation of permafrost degradation (surface lowering due to ice melt) based on sparse point data is difficult. Annual rates computed are in the centimeter- level.  GPS/GNSS-equipped Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) for monitoring rock glacier kinematics: unattended operation, high spatial and temporal coverage and low cost (cp. Buchli et al. 2012)  To resolve intra-annual variations in rock glacier movement  To better support process understanding (influence of atmospheric warming, hydrology, etc.)

2. Permafrost Austria Workshop, Schloss Trautenfels, Viktor Kaufmann28/28 For further information, please contact: Viktor Kaufmann Institute of Geodesy Working Group Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Graz University of Technology Steyrergasse 30 A-8010 Graz, Austria Years of Geodetic Monitoring of Dösen Rock Glacier (Ankogel Group, Austria) – A Short Review