ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 1 Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC GianLuca Sabbi for the LARP – HiLumi LHC Collaboration 2012 Applied.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superconducting Magnet Program S. Gourlay CERN March 11-12, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory IR Quad R&D Program LHC IR Upgrade Stephen A.
Advertisements

MQXF Quench Protection Analysis HiLumi workshop – KEK, Tsukuba Vittorio Marinozzi 11/18/2014.
DOE Review of LARP – February 17-18, 2014 Overview and Responses to Recommendations Giorgio Ambrosio 2/17/14 1.
ASC 2012, 10/10/2012Test results and analysis of LQS03 – G. Ambrosio 1 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Test Results and Analysis of LQS03 Third Long Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole.
Nb3Sn Cable and Insulation for LARP High-Gradient Quadrupole Magnets
11 Oct , 2013 by Video LBNL Cable Experience for HiLumi HiLumi LARP/LHC Strand and Cable Internal Review Oct , 2013 by Video D.R. Dietderich,
LARP review, Fermilab, 6/10/2013Magnet Project Overview – G. Sabbi 1 HL-LHC IR Quadrupole Magnet Project Overview GianLuca Sabbi Internal Review of proposed.
Collaboration Mtg, St Charles, IL 10/5-6, 2005 A. Ghosh1 Conductor R&D Plan Arup K. Ghosh BNL.
HL-LHC: UPDATE ON MAGNETS
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
DOE Review of LARP – February 17-18, 2014 Helene Felice P. Ferracin, M. Juchno, D. Cheng, M. Anerella, R. Hafalia, Thomas Sahner, Bruno Favrat 02/17/2014.
FCC Week 2015Design Options for 16 T LTS Dipoles – G. Sabbi 1 Overview of Magnet Design Options for LTS Dipoles in the 16 T Range GianLuca Sabbi, LBNL.
Magnets for muon collider ring and interaction regions V.V. Kashikhin, FNAL December 03, 2009.
LQ Goals and Design Study Summary – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collab Mtg – SLAC, Oct , 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC LQ Goals & Design Summary Giorgio Ambrosio.
AARD Sub-panel at Fermilab Feb , 2006 LARP Magnet R&D Program - S. Gourlay1 BNL -FNAL - LBNL - SLAC LARP Magnet R&D Program Steve Gourlay AARD Sub-Panel.
Design optimization of the protection heaters for the LARP high-field Nb 3 Sn quadrupoles M. Marchevsky, D. W. Cheng, H. Felice, G. Sabbi, Lawrence Berkeley.
Development of the EuCARD Nb 3 Sn Dipole Magnet FRESCA2 P. Ferracin, M. Devaux, M. Durante, P. Fazilleau, P. Fessia, P. Manil, A. Milanese, J. E. Munoz.
LQ status and plans – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collaboration Meeting - LBNL, April , 2006 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC OUTLINE: Goals, Input and Output Sub-tasks.
HiLumi-LHC / LARP Conductor and Cable Internal Review October 16 th and 17 th 2013 H. Felice LARP Short Magnets Fabrication and Test experience relevant.
F LARP magnet R&D program Giorgio Ambrosio TD/MSD FNAL Annual Program Review September 07 OUTLINE LARP goals FNAL contribution to LARP FNAL core-program.
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Design and Test of the 1 st Nb 3 Sn Long Quadrupole by LARP Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab Acknowledgement: many people contributed.
Plans and schedule for QXF Giorgio Ambrosio and Paolo Ferracin Joint LARP/CM20 HiLumi meeting Napa Valley, CA, USA 8-10 April, 2013 The HiLumi LHC Design.
ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 1 Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC GianLuca Sabbi for the US LHC Accelerator.
Title – xxxx 1 LARP & US-HiLumi Contribution to the Inner Triplet Quadrupoles G. Ambrosio Cost and Schedule Review CERN, March 9 th -11 th 2015.
Lab Coordination Meeting 3/21/13LHC IR Quadrupole Plan – G. Sabbi 1 LARP Magnet Systems Plan GianLuca Sabbi Lab Coordination Meeting March 21, 2013.
HL-LHC Annual Meeting, November 2013HQ Planning – G. Sabbi 1 HQ Status and Plans G. Sabbi High Luminosity LHC Annual Meeting Daresbury, UK, November 11-14,
ASC 2014Nb 3 Sn Block Coil Dipoles for a 100 TeV Hadron Collider – G. Sabbi 1 Performance characteristics of Nb 3 Sn block-coil dipoles for a 100 TeV hadron.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Progress and Schedule Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP Collaboration Meeting – CM13 Port Jefferson November 4-6, 2009.
Helene Felice 11/16/2011 LARP Collaboration Meeting 17 1 st HiLumi Collaboration Meeting CERN Status on HQ Coil Design and Fabrication.
LARP DOE Review, 7/9/2012Magnet Systems Introduction – G. Sabbi 1 Magnet Systems Overview and HQ Program GianLuca Sabbi 2012 DOE Review of LARP SLAC, July.
MQXF support structure An extension of LARP experience Helene Felice MQXF Design Review December 10 th to 12 th, 2014 CERN.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 1 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
LARP Magnets FNAL contribution to LARP (LHC Accelerator Research Program) FNAL core-program support to LARP DOE Annual Program Review - May 16-18, 2006.
LARP Magnet Progress Michael Lamm For the LARP Collaboration bnl - fnal - lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program All Experimenters’ Meeting Monday,
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
LARP Collaboration Meeting, April 26-28, 2006Gian Luca Sabbi HQ Design Study (WBS ) LARP Collaboration Meeting April 26-28, 2006 N. Andreev, E.
D.R. Dietderich Frascati, Italy Nov , 2012 RRP-NbSn Conductor for the LHC Upgrade Magnets RRP-Nb 3 Sn Conductor for the LHC Upgrade Magnets A. K.
MQXF Design Review, 12/10/14R&D basis for MQXF – G. Sabbi 1 IR Quadrupole R&D Program as a basis for MQXF GianLuca Sabbi QXF Design Review CERN, December.
HE-LHC, 10/14/2010GianLuca SabbiUS LARP Magnet Development LHC Accelerator Research Program Magnet Development GianLuca Sabbi for the US LARP collaboration.
HL-LHC Annual Meeting, KEK, 11/21/14WP3 Summary – G. Sabbi 1 Work Package 3 Summary GianLuca Sabbi, Ezio Todesco 4 th HiLumi LHC – LARP Annual Meeting.
LARP CM17, 11/16/2011Magnet Systems Overview – G. Sabbi 1 Magnet Systems Overview GianLuca Sabbi LARP Collaboration Meeting 17 November 16, 2011 BNL -
10/16/2013QXF Requirements – G. Sabbi, E. Todesco 1 QXF requirements relevant to optimization and selection of conductor and cable parameters GianLuca.
E. Todesco INTERACTION REGION MAGNETS E. Todesco On behalf of the WP3 collaboration CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CERN, 27 th October 2015.
1 BNL -FNAL - LBNL - SLAC P. Wanderer IR’07 - Frascati 7 November 2007 U.S. LARP Magnet Programme.
DESIGN STUDIES IR Magnet Design P. Wanderer LARP Collaboration Meeting April 27, 2006.
Long Quad (LQ) & High Gradient (HQ) Series Alexander Zlobin bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program DOE LARP review Fermilab, June.
LARP review, Fermilab, 6/10/2013Magnet Project Overview – G. Sabbi 1 HL-LHC IR Quadrupole Magnet Project Overview GianLuca Sabbi Internal Review of proposed.
DOE Review of LARP – February 17-18, 2014 Helene Felice P. Ferracin, M. Juchno, D. Cheng, M. Anerella, R. Hafalia, Thomas Sahner, Bruno Favrat 02/17/2014.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Magnet Program Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP DOE Review FNAL June 1-2, 2011 BNL Jesse Schmalze Mike Anarella Peter Wanderer Arup Gosh FNAL Rodger.
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab Long Quadrupole Task Leaders: Fred Nobrega (FNAL) – Coils Jesse Schmalzle (BNL) – Coils.
LARP DOE Review, 7/9/2012Long Quadrupole – G. Ambrosio 1 Long Quadrupole Program Giorgio Ambrosio DOE Review of the LARP Program SLAC July 9-10, 2011 LQ.
BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Long Quadrupole Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab Many people contributed to this work, most of all the Long Quadrupole Task Leaders:
MQXFS1 Test Results G. Chlachidze, J. DiMarco, S. Izquierdo-Bermudez, E. Ravaioli, S. Stoynev, T. Strauss et al. Joint LARP CM26/Hi-Lumi Meeting SLAC May.
Answers to the review committee G. Ambrosio, B.Bordini, P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 Quench Protection of Long Nb 3 Sn Quads Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab.
LHC Performance Workshop 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Magnets – G. Sabbi 1 New Magnets for the IR How far are we from the HL-LHC Target? BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC GianLuca.
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 LHQ Goals and Status Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab 2 nd LARP / HiLumi.
DOE Review, 6/2/2011Answers to Committee Questions – Magnet Systems Answers to committee questions - magnets.
CERN QXF Conductor Procurement and Cable R&D A.Ballarino, B. Bordini and L. Oberli CERN, TE-MSC-SCD LARP Meeting, Napa, 9 April 2013.
DOE Review, 7/15/2010GianLuca SabbiMagnet Systems - Progress and Plans Magnet Systems Summary Progress and Plans GianLuca Sabbi DOE Review of the LHC Accelerator.
MQXFPM1 and MQXFS1b Test Results
TQS Overview and recent progress
MQXF Goals & Plans G. Ambrosio MQXF Conductor Review
Nb3Sn IR Quadrupole Program
P. Ferracin and G. Ambrosio
New Magnets for the IR How far are we from the HL-LHC Target?
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Long term behavior and high MIITs test in the LARP program
Presentation transcript:

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 1 Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC GianLuca Sabbi for the LARP – HiLumi LHC Collaboration 2012 Applied Superconductivity Conference

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 2 M. Anerella, J. Cozzolino, J. Escallier, A.K. Ghosh, J. Muratore, S. Peggs, J. Schmalzle, P. Wanderer H. Bajas, M. Bajko, L. Bottura, G. DeRijk, O. Dunkel, P. Ferracin, J. Feuvrier, L. Fiscarelli, C. Giloux, J. Perez, L. Rossi, S. Russenschuck, E. Todesco G. Ambrosio, N. Andreev, E. Barzi, R. Bossert, J. DiMarco, G. Chlachidze, F. Nobrega, I. Novitski, V. Kashikhin, J. Kerby, M. Lamm, P. Limon, D. Orris, E. Prebys, M. Tartaglia, D. Turrioni, G. Velev, M. Whitson, R. Yamada, M. Yu, A. Zlobin S. Caspi, D.W. Cheng, D.R. Dietderich, H. Felice, A. Godeke, S. Gourlay A.R. Hafalia, R. Hannaford, J.M. Joseph, A.F. Lietzke, J. Lizarazo, M. Marchevsky, G. Sabbi, A. Salehi; T. Salmi, R. Scanlan, X. Wang Contributions

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 3 1.Program motivation and goals 2.Overview of LARP magnet R&D 3.Main achievements to date 4.Outstanding technical issues 5.Prototype design and development plans Presentation Outline Related presentations at ASC 2012: G. Ambrosio et al., “Test results and analysis of Long Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Series by LARP” H. Bajas et al., “Cold Test Results of the LARP HQ01e Nb 3 Sn quadrupole magnet at 1.9 K” D. Cheng et al., “Evaluation of insulating coatings for wind-and-react coil fabrication” G. Chlachidze et al., “Test of optimized LARP Nb 3 Sn quadrupole coil using magnetic mirror structure” A. Ghosh “Perspective on Nb 3 Sn Conductor for the LHC Upgrade Magnets” A. Godeke et al., “Review of Conductor Performance for the LARP High-Gradient Quadrupole Magnets” E. Todesco et al., “Design studies of NbTi and Nb 3 Sn Low-β Quadrupoles for the High Luminosity LHC” X. Wang et al., “A system for high-field accelerator magnet field quality measurements”

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 4 High Luminosity LHC Physics goals: Improve measurements of new phenomena seen at the LHC Detect/search low rate phenomena inaccessible at nominal LHC Increase mass range for discovery Required accelerator upgrades include new IR magnets: Directly increase luminosity through stronger focusing  decrease  * Provide design options for overall system optimization/integration  collimation, optics, vacuum, cryogenics Be compatible with high luminosity operation  Radiation lifetime, thermal margins Figure of merit is integrated luminosity, with a target of 3000 fb -1

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 5 LARP Magnet Program Goal: Develop Nb 3 Sn quadrupoles for the LHC luminosity upgrade Potential to operate at higher field and larger temperature margin R&D phases: : technology development: conductor, coil, structure : length scale-up from 1 to 4 meters : incorporation of accelerator quality features Program achievements to date: TQ models (90 mm aperture, 1 m length) reached 240 T/m gradient LQ models (90 mm aperture, 4 m length) reached 220 T/m gradient HQ models (120 mm aperture, 1 m length) reached 184 T/m gradient Current activities: Completion of LQ program to extend TQ results to long models Optimization of HQ, fabrication of LHQ coils and test in mirror Design and planning of the MQXF IR Quadrupole development

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 6 Overview of LARP Magnets SQ SM TQS LR LQS HQ TQC

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 7 Sub-scale Quadrupoles (SQ) Four “SM” racetrack coils 130 mm bore, length 30 cm Achieved 97% of SSL at 4.5K & 1.9K -Validated conductor for TQ01 models -First shell-based quadrupole structure -Verification/optimization of FEA models -Quench propagation/protection studies C C

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 8 Long Racetracks (LR) SG1SG2SG3SG4SG5SG6 Scale up of “SM” coil and structure: 30 cm to 4 m Coil R&D: first successful length scale-up Structure R&D: friction effects, magnet assembly Achieved 11.5 T, 96% of short sample limit LRS01b: segmented shell LRS01a: single shell P. Ferracin, J. Muratore et al., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. Vol: 18 (2), 2008, pp

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 9 Technology Quadrupoles (TQ) Double-layer, shell-type coil 90 mm aperture, 1 m length Two support structures: - TQS (shell based) - TQC (collar based) Target gradient 200 T/m TQCTQS Three coil series using different wire design MJR 54/61; RRP 54/61; RRP 108/127 More than 30 coils fabricated Distributed coil production line 15 magnet tests in different configurations Two models assembled and tested at CERN

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 10 TQ Highlights Quench performance Maximum gradient 240 T/m 20% above target No retraining Stress limits TQS03a: 120 MPa at pole, 93% SSL TQS03b: 160 MPa at pole, 91% SSL TQS03c: 200 MPa at pole, 88% SSL Peak stresses are considerably higher Considerably widens design window Cycling test 1000 cycles No change in mechanical parameters No change in quench levels

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 11 Long Quadrupole (LQ) S1 (2) D1 (1) S2 (4) S3 (2) S4 (2) D2 (4) D3 (1) TQ length scale-up from 1 m to 4 m Three series of coils All models reached 200 T/m target Recent results and next steps in: G. Ambrosio et al. 4LA-01 (Thursday AM)

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 12 High-Field Quadrupole (HQ) R&D goals: Explore “new territory” in energy and force levels (~3xTQ) Incorporate field quality and full alignment Main parameters: 120 mm aperture, 15 T peak field at 220 T/m (1.9K) Coil stresses approaching 200 MPa (if pre-loaded for SSL)

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 13 R&D issues – Strain during Coil Reaction Results from first HQ models indicated conductor damage in several coils Traced to excessive strain during the coil reaction phase:  No/insufficient gaps in pole segments to limit longitudinal strain  Design/tooling did not include space for azimuthal cable expansion G. Chlachidze et al., 4LA-03 (Thursday AM) HQ02: restored pole gaps and reduced cable size with smaller strand diameter First coil successfully tested in mirror structure: All process improvements incorporated in HQ03 and the Long HQ Coils Coil spring-back from tooling “Inverted” ramp-rate dependence in HQ01a-c

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 14 Large number of insulation failures in coils, coil to parts and coil to heaters Catastrophic failure in HQ01b test due to inter-layer short through end shoe Remediation steps: Redesigned end parts to improve fit, eliminate high pressure areas Application of insulating coatings to coil parts: Improved winding procedures and QA Redesigned quench heaters to minimize crossings above metallic parts Increased insulation between coil layers and between coil and heaters Enhanced electrical QA during coil and magnet fabrication (impulse testing) R&D issues – Electrical Integrity D. Cheng et al., 4MA-08 Thursday AM

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 15 In previous phases of the program, conductor has been adequate to meet the key R&D goals of the model magnets: RRP 54/61 for SQ, LR, and 1 st generation TQ/LQ/HQ/HQM models  Enabled the 2009 milestone of >200 T/m in TQ and LQ RRP 108/127 for TQS03, LQS03, HQ/HQM, and LHQ  Very good results in TQS03, but lower performance in HQ/HQM and LQ  Limitations observed in current density, stability (RRR), piece length Conductor improvements are required for a successful construction project Several developments are underway, but time window is limited  Increase and control J c, RRR, piece length in RRP 108/127  Develop/demonstrate possible alternatives (PIT, higher stack RRP)  Scale-up to larger billets for faster production an lower cost R&D Issues – Conductor and Cable A. Ghosh, paper 2SLE-06 (this session) A. Godeke et al., 4JA-07 (Thursday AM) See presentations by:

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 16 HQ Highlights – Field Quality Discussion of magnetic measurement system by X. Wang et al., 4JE-04 (Thursday PM) Geometric harmonics show good coil uniformity and structure alignment Persistent current effects are large but within limits set by design study Large dynamic effects indicate need to better control inter-strand resistance  Cored cables incorporated in second generation coils Eddy current harmonics for different ramp rates 12 kA, R.ref = mm Block positioning error ~29.6 µm. Analysis of geometric accuracy from random errors R c fit 0.2–3.6 µΩ (LHC target: ~20 µΩ)

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 17 HQ Highlights – Quench Performance Latest results from CERN test of HQ01e at 1.9K: H. Bajas, 4LA-02 (Thursday AM) Achieved 184 T/m at 1.9K (85% of SSL) – well above performance target  However, high rate of coil failures (excessive strain and insulation weakness) Flux jump effects appear less severe at 1.9K (5-10 times smaller amplitude) Quench protection studies: energy extraction delay, then removal of IL heaters

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 18 IR Quadrupole Design Specification - An aperture increase to 150 mm is expected to result in best overall performance - Requires another significant step in energy & force levels with respect to 120 mm Higher Field Larger Aperture (same/lower gradient) Thicker absorbers More Operating Margin (at same gradient / aperture) Longer Lifetime Lower radiation and heat loads Better Field Quality Stronger focusing Higher Gradient (same/lower aperture) Shorter magnets Higher T margin Better IR layout Stable operation Easier cooling More Design Margin (same gradient / aperture) Lower risk Faster development Less cost & time for small production Max. luminosity

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 19 Next Phase: IR Quadrupole Prototype Preliminary layout of HL-LHC final focus using 150 mm bore 140 T/m quadrupoles: Prototype design status: Increased cable size to facilitate coil stress management and quench protection  Cable R&D underway targeting 18.5 mm width, 1.50 mm mid-thickness, 0.65 deg. keystone angle (D. Dietderich)  Strand diameter from mm (HQ) to 0.85 mm to limit aspect ratio Electrical integrity: increase of cable insulation thickness from 0.1 to 0.15 mm Preliminary cross-sections were developed for evaluation Latest developments presented in: E. Todesco et al., 4LA-05 (Thursday AM) 6.77 m2 x 3.99 m6.77 m2 x 3.99 m R. De Maria et al, HiLumi meeting, 7/26/12

ASC 2012Nb 3 Sn IR Quadrupoles for HL-LHC – G. Sabbi 20 Summary A large knowledge base is available after 7 years of fully integrated effort involving three US Labs and CERN  Steady progress in understanding and addressing R&D issues that were perceived as potential show stoppers: conductor performance, mechanical support, degradation due to stress and cycling, length scale-up, coil/structure alignment, field quality, quench protection Remaining challenges include: control of dynamic effects, electrical integrity, process documentation and QA, incorporation of rad-hard epoxies, development and selection of production-class conductors Next few years will be critical and much work is still left to do  Integrating LARP effort with CERN, US core programs, EuCARD HL-LHC IR Quads are a key step for future high-field applications Acknowledgement: