3-5 March 2004 ESA ODFCB, 3-5 March 2004 ESA Columbus Ground ODF Validation ESA ODFCB, 3-5 March 2004 Simon Challis, MSM-EO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Quality Plans Gillian Sandilands Director of Quality
Advertisements

Transition from Q1- 8th to Q1- 9th edition
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
ITIL: Service Transition
22000 Food Safety Management Systems
Post Approval Monitoring Program Presented by Carolyn Malinowski Manager, Quality Assurance and Training.
GLAST LAT Project ISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.3 Verification and Validation 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
Secure System Administration & Certification DITSCAP Manual (Chapter 6) Phase 4 Post Accreditation Stephen I. Khan Ted Chapman University of Tulsa Department.
Implementation/Acceptance Testing / 1 Implementation and Acceptance Testing Physical Implementation Criteria: 1. Data availability 2. Data reliability.
Performance Monitoring All All Contracts require basic monitoring once awarded. The Goal of contract monitoring is to ensure that the contract is satisfactorily.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
Introduction to Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
Civil Air Patrol CITIZENS SERVING COMMUNITIES Flight Release Officer Refresher Training Course.
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
D. McMahon Generation of Ground ODFs ESA ODF-CB 3-5 March 2004 Gerd Soellner (DLR/Col-CC) Co-author Nathalie Gérard.
Roles and Responsibilities
Preparing for the Launch Mohammed El- Affendi. Launch Major Tasks  The Launch is performed according to script “LAU1”, table 3.1 in the book (page 39),
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Getting Started Conservation Coaches Network New Coach Training.
Mechanical Integrity Written Procedures. Lesson Objectives  Describe Required Written Procedures for Establishing an MI Program  List Acceptable Sources.
1 Thank you for visiting our site and welcome to the “Introduction to ISO 22000” Presentation that you requested. For more information.
© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Configuration Management QMS Training.
SpaceOps Stockholm Page 1 SpaceOps 2012 Stockholm Col-CC Voice System Migration During On-Going Operations Thomas Mueller, DLR,
Recommendations for transfer from TISPAN to 3GPP SP For information Source: Goran Engstrom: TISPAN WG1 chairman Stephen Hayes: 3GPP SA Chairman.
Page 1 ESA ODF Control Board # Mar. 04 Columbus Flight ODF Status.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) AS9104/2A Presentation San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company 1 Other Party.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
Click on Next to continue Next Introductio n Inputs Tools and Techniques Outputs The process of managing procurement relationships, monitoring contract.
International Space Station (ISS) Mission and Program Integration Contract (MAPI) White Paper December 20, 2011.
Chapter 6: THE EIGHT STEP PROCESS FOCUS: This chapter provides a description of the application of customer-driven project management.
Project management Topic 1 Project management principles.
ESA ODFCB # 4 Peter Granseuer1 ESA ODFCB Charter Peter Granseuer MSM-EOI
1 Technology Infusion of the Software Developer’s Assistant (SDA) into the MOD Software Development Process NASA/JSC/MOD/Brian O’Hagan 2008 Software Assurance.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
Judges Score Card Overview Mark Turner NASA Ames Research Center.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
1 PDS MC Requirements Process March 29, 2007 (v2).
The Planning Phase Recognize the problem MIS steering committee 7. ManagerSystems analyst Define the problem Set system objectives Identify system constraints.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Development of the Basis Document for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
1 SCR756 – Enhancements to the MarkeTrak application –Fondly called - MarkeTrak Phase 3 –ERCOT CEO determined that SCR756 is not necessary prior to the.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Early Delivery System Testing Environments & Planning – Involving Market Participants TPTF May.
1 Columbus Control Center - Teams and Responsibilities - Roland Luettgens ESA Columbus Lead Flight Director Tel:
IPLFOR POIF Process Review Eric Melkerson Payload Operations Director Operations Directors’ Office / EO03 Marshall Space Flight Center
MOL The Mission Operations Laboratory MOL The Mission Operations Laboratory NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Huntsville, Alabama PROCESS REVIEW Training.
- 1 - MSFC / ESA TIM #3 – J.D. Schiemann / P. Boisvert; 17 August 2004ESA OPERATIONS CHANGE PROCESS J.D. Schiemann / P. Boisvert ESA/ESTEC MSM-EPO MSFC.
July 26, 2005 Nelda Allen/Colsa1 Configuration Management Process 2 Minor Changes (pages 2 & 5)
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Experiment Development and Integration Process Philippe Schoonejans, Head of Robotics and Future Projects Office ESA.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Payload Operations and Integration Function Overview Payload Operations.
NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory Increment 19/18 Soyuz.
ITIL Project Change Management Workshop 7 February 2007
This document is the property of EADS SPACE. It shall not be communicated to third parties without prior written agreement.Its content shall not be disclosed.
Inventory and Stowage Overview Kay Standridge February 26, 2004 MSFC/ESA TIM #2.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory POIWG 23 Increment 17 Payload Operations Status Patricia Patterson.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Kelvin Nichols, EO50 March 2016 MSFC ISS DTN Project Status.
Payload Inventory Management & Stowage Operations Processes 10/19/99 Point of Contact Gordon Boswell MSFC/POIF/OI (256)
ITIL: Service Transition
12.3 Control Procurements The process of managing procurement relationships, monitoring contract performance and making changes or corrections as needed.
Software Configuration Management
Software and Systems Integration
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
Phase 3 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Our Change Management Approach
HDV CO2 certification CoP provisions
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
Issues for preparation and implementation of training sessions
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

3-5 March 2004 ESA ODFCB, 3-5 March 2004 ESA Columbus Ground ODF Validation ESA ODFCB, 3-5 March 2004 Simon Challis, MSM-EO

3-5 March ESA Columbus Ground ODF Validation ESA ODF Management Plan currently does not cover the ESA Columbus Ground ODF Validation Process in detail Recommend Validation Process Based on JSC-36054, Annex 3 - SODF Procedure Validation Plan - Ground ODF Developers Determine Validation Requirement for Each Ground ODF - ESA ODF CB Approves these Recommendations to ensure that correct validation level for each procedure has been determined prior to validation campaign Validation Requirements based on Validation Levels first defined in DLR Operations Validation Implementation Plan (Col-CC OP Delivery #3) In order to maximise efficiency of validation campaign a definitive list of Ground ODF should be finalised ASAP (Synthesis of EADS-ST, DLR, Payload Developer and FRCs inputs

3-5 March ESA Ground ODF Validation Levels (Corresponds to ISS ODF PV Requirements) Desk Top Validation - Level-1: Validation by analysis/review Simulation Facility Validation - Level-2: Validation using the Col-CC TQVS - Level-3: Validation during the Col-CC Simulation Campaign - Level-3.1 Stand Alone Simulations (SAS) at Col-CC using TQVS - Level-3.2 Columbus Integrated Simulations (IS) using TQVS or Col-TRE - Level-3.3 Columbus Joint Multi-Segment (JMST) Simulations using SSTF/Col-TRU Flight Equipment Validation -Level-4: Validation during the System Validation Tests (SVTs) using FSF, PFM or SVF/SDIL (NASA ETE Testing)

3-5 March PV Requirements Selection Criteria Working Assumption: As a Minimum all Ground ODF should be Validated up to Level 2 Propose ESA/DLR to Define PV Requirements Selection Criteria. Examples: - Probability of Use during Flight 1E Mission - Response Delay (Immediate Actions/Response in Several Days) - Procedure Complexity (Commanding & Commanding Co-ordination) - Criticality of ODF (Safety/Mission Critical) - Appropriate Validation Fidelity - Others In addition DLR to Propose Facility Configuration and Personnel Roles for Each Validation Level ie Level 2 TQVS Validation DLR to Propose Validation Criteria For Each Level

3-5 March ESA Ground ODF Validation Process New Col-CC Procedure 1 Ground ODF Ready for Use Submit PV requirements to ESA ODF CB Conduct OVRR Conduct POVR Revalidation Required 2 ESA ODF CB approved PV reqmts Facility Required No Yes No DLR OR EADS Yes EADS Yes Co-ordinate and schedule within Col SVT Working Group 4 Co-ordinate and schedule with TQV Team at Col-CC DLR OVRR 5 Required POVR 6 Required ARs Required Yes Update PV/CM Records Submit CRs (ARs) to ESA ODF CB 7 Yes No Yes ODF Approved for use at Col-CC Yes No Incorporate CRs Update PV/CM Records Conduct PV Session Submit to ESA ODF CB for Approval 8 No Yes Determine PV Reqmts 3 Yes No

3-5 March ESA Ground ODF Validation Process Notes: 1. New Procedure Constitutes one of the Following: - DLR Ground SODF Based on EADS-ST Flight ODF (Single or Multi-element) - DLR Ground SODF Based on EADS-ST Input - DLR Ground Multi-Element PODF Based on EADS-ST/FRC Input - Others? 2. Revalidation is determined as part of PV Requirements and the ESA ODF CR Process? 3. Assessment is made by Ground ODF Developer (ie Col-CC). Unless otherwise specified by CR this assessment is only made once and the beginning of the validation process for each Ground ODF. 4. Post Columbus SVT 2 Activities 5. OVRR - Operations Validation Readiness Review. Refer to OPS-PL ESA, MSM GS Operations Validation Plan 6. POVR - Post Operations Validation Review. Refer to OPS-PL ESA, MSM GS Operations Validation Plan 7. The I/F between the ESA ODF CB SPR System and Col-CC AR System is not defined in current Col-CC Documentation. This I/F needs to be defined 8. Do Ground ODF Have to form part of official release to ISS ODF? Release will coincide with Ops Product Delivery Schedule

3-5 March ESA Columbus Ground ODF Validation: Additional Issues There are a number of Issues that Impact the ODF Validation Process that need to be resolved/clarified: ESA ODF Validation Process - One System or Three? (Flight/Ground/Payload ODF) Agreed Working I/F between Flight ODF and Ground ODF Developer Teams Definitive List of Ground ODF Agreed ESA ODF CR System between all ESA ODF Developers Agreed Location(s) where ESA Columbus Ground ODF Validation Process will be documented Clear Flight ODF Validation Process outlined in EADS-ST Documentation