Automated Selection of Patients for Clinical Trials Eugene Fink Lawrence O. Hall Dmitry B. Goldgof Bhavesh D. Goswami Matthew Boonstra Jeffrey P. Krischer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enterprise Use Cases. Levels LevelDescriptionExamples 0 0aVerbal CommunicationNon-permanent, e.g. verbal communication 1Non-electronic dataMail, phone.
Advertisements

How to Write a Research Proposal Detroit Medical Center Nursing Research Council.
Controversies in Breast Cancer Allan Arkush, DO, FACOS.
Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis: applications to health care programs and policies Greg Mason PRA Inc. and University of Manitoba October.
The 70-Gene Profile and Chemotherapy Benefit in 1,600 Breast Cancer Patients Bender RA et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract 512. (Oral Presentation)
Parent and Provider Impressions of Emergency Planning for CSHCN; Midwest Emergency Medical Services for Children Information System (MEMSCIS.com) Lee A.
Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator Nov 2010 PROTOCOL FEASIBILITY.
Cancer Staging. What is cancer staging? Staging describes the severity of a person’s cancer based on the extent of the original (primary) tumor and whether.
Selection of Clinical Trials: Knowledge Representation and Acquisition Committee: Eugene Fink Lawrence O. Hall Dmitry B. Goldgof Savvas Nikiforou.
Coding of Selection Criteria for Cancer Treatment Plans Savvas Nikiforou.
Knowledge Acquisition for Clinical-Trial Selection Savvas Nikiforou Eugene Fink Lawrence O. Hall Dmitry B. Goldgof Jeffrey P. Krischer.
A Cost-Effective Agent for Clinical Trial Assignment Princeton K. Kokku Lawrence O. Hall Dmitry B. Goldgof Eugene Fink Jeffrey P. Krischer.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2011.
JEOPARDY! JEOPARDY! I Can’t Believe It’s Not JEOPARDY!
a judgment of what constitutes good or bad Audit a systematic and critical examination to examine or verify.
Re-Examination of the Design of Early Clinical Trials for Molecularly Targeted Drugs Richard Simon, D.Sc. National Cancer Institute linus.nci.nih.gov/brb.
Early Detection of breast cancer Anthony B. Miller, MD, FRCP Associate Director, Research, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.
Quality Cancer Data The Vital Role of Cancer Registrars in the Fight against Cancer Saves Lives.
By: Sydney Trecarichi, Hayley Cash and Jordan Wittig Esophageal Cancer.
SYNOPSIS OF THE PROTOCOL Title: Pregnancy Associated Breast Cancer (PABC); Prospective Data Registry in Saudi Arabia Sponsor: Oncology Department, King.
The influence of Breast Cancer Pay for Performance Initiatives on breast cancer survival and performance measures: a pilot study in Taiwan Raymond NC Kuo,
Breast Cancer Awareness By: Dominick Phillips. What Is Breast Cancer? If a cell changes into a abnormal, sometimes harmful form, it can divide quickly.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Chapter Data Collection 1.
Clinical Trials. What is a clinical trial? Clinical trials are research studies involving people Used to find better ways to prevent, detect, and treat.
ACRIN 6671/GOG 0233 Consent for Research Study A study for Women with Advanced Cervical Cancer: Learning whether a PET/CT scan using an imaging agent called.
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Toxicity of Sparing Radiation to the Pathologic N0 Side of the Neck in Squamous Cell.
Oral Bisphosphonate and Breast Cancer: Prospective Results from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Chlebowski RT et al. SABCS 2009; Abstract 21.
Cancer Staging.
AJCC Staging Moments AJCC TNM Staging 7th Edition Supraglottic Larynx Case #2 Contributors: Jatin P. Shah, MD Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New.
Slide 1 Long-Term Care (LTC) Collaborative PIP: Medication Review Tuesday, October 29, 2013 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP.
Turning a clinical question into a testable hypothesis Lauren A. Trepanier, DVM, PhD Diplomate ACVIM, Diplomate ACVCP Department of Medical Sciences School.
EDRN Approaches to Biomarker Validation DMCC Statisticians Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Margaret Pepe Ziding Feng, Mark Thornquist, Yingye Zheng,
Testing, Piloting and Evaluating RiskMAP Interventions Annette Stemhagen, DrPH, FISPE Vice President, Strategic Development Services.
Evidence in The ED: Is venipuncture contraindicated post-mastectomy? Brynn Utley, MDEM3 01/16/2013 Departments of Emergency Medicine University of Pennsylvania.
Real-World Assessment of Clinical Outcomes in Lower-Risk Myelofibrosis Patients Receiving Treatment with Ruxolitinib Davis KL et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 9 Continuity of Care.
Lung Cancer Case Presentation Presenter Date:. Educational Objectives.
An Integrated Approach to Breast Cancer Control A flexible approach that can be adapted to national or local circumstances.
Adrenal Anatomy of the adrenal gland. Compton, C.C., Byrd, D.R., et al., Editors. AJCC CancerStaging Atlas, 2nd Edition. New York: Springer, ©American.
Effect of 21-Gene Reverse- Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay on Treatment Recommendations in Patients with Lymph Node-Positive and Estrogen.
CDRP Program Steering Committee Dwight E. Heron, MD UPMC McKeesport February 2, 2007 Tampa, FL.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
Quality Assurance Report TTUHSC Breast Center of Excellence January 1, 2009 – December 31, 2009.
Quality Assurance Report TTUHSC Breast Center of Excellence January 1, 2010 – December 31, 2010 Compiled by Lynn Day, RN BSN CCM CCRP.
S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients.
Linking Electronic Health Records Across Institutions to Understand Why Women Seek Care at Multiple Sites for Breast Cancer Caroline A. Thompson, PhD,
Assessing Quality of Pathology Reporting: The Case of Tongue Cancer Lihua Liu 1, PhD Wesley Y. Naritoku 2, MD, PhD Juanjuan Zhang 1, MS Lenard Berglund.
Using CDC Edits Metafile in the Registry to Support Clinical Trials Recruitment Alan R. Houser, MA, MPH C/NET Solutions Dennis Deapen, DrPH Los Angeles.
Dr. Rachel Syme AD, Institute of Cancer Research, CIHR Dr. Bernie Eigl Provincial Director, Clinical Trials, BCCA Incremental Costs of Cancer Clinical.
PRAGMATIC Study Designs: Elderly Cancer Trials
Presented By Shin Fujita at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting
Adjuvant autologous renal tumour cell vaccine and risk of tumour progression in patients with renal- cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy: phase III,
SYMPTOMS | DIAGNOSIS | TREATMENT
Immunoscore Prognostic in Colon Cancer
Maintaining Recruitment and Informed Consent in the Later Stages of a Trial: the By-Band-Sleeve Study Paul Whybrow, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Jane Blazeby,
How to Write a Research Proposal
Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ
SEER Case Consolidation Study: Design & Objective
Critical Reading of Clinical Study Results
Figure 2 Underreporting by physicians of specific treatment-associated symptoms by physicians in the TORCH trial Figure 2 | Underreporting by physicians.
Cancer Staging.
Survivorship Pathway Template
Jones SE et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5082.
Observational Studies vs. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT)
Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
Medical Students Documenting in the EMR
SYNOPSIS OF THE PROTOCOL
NSCLC: Staging and TNM classification
Low initial levels of CD4+ Tregs, proliferating CD8+, and Granzyme B+ CD8+ T cells and high posttreatment tumor MHC class II expression predict better.
Presentation transcript:

Automated Selection of Patients for Clinical Trials Eugene Fink Lawrence O. Hall Dmitry B. Goldgof Bhavesh D. Goswami Matthew Boonstra Jeffrey P. Krischer

A clinical trial is an evaluation of a new treatment procedure. Clinical trials When physicians conduct a trial, they recruit patients with matching health problems and medical histories.

Selection of patients The selection of trial participants is a manual procedure, and physicians may miss eligible patients. Gotay [1991] demonstrated that physicians choose only 39% of the eligible patients Fallowfield et al. [1997] showed that they choose less than 50% of the eligible patients

Expert system We have developed a system that automatically selects prospective trial participants.

Outline Knowledge base Selection results Cost reduction

Knowledge base Tests and questions Eligibility criteria

Tests and questions Example Mammogram, $150 What is the cancer stage? Does the patient have invasive cancer? Biopsy, $400 How many lymph nodes have tumor cells? What is the greatest tumor diameter? The knowledge base includes a list of medical tests. A test description includes a dollar cost and related questions about a patient’s health.

Eligibility criteria The knowledge base also includes logical expressions that represent eligibility for the available trials. AND cancer-stage  {II, III} OR invasive-cancer = NO lymph-nodes  3 tumor-diameter  2.5 Example

Selection process The system collects data until it can determine whether the eligibility expressions are TRUE or FALSE. If patient records do not provide enough data, the system identifies the required medical tests.

Outline Knowledge base Selection results Cost reduction

Experiments We have used fifteen breast-cancer trials at the Moffitt Cancer Center. Past data from 187 patients Current data from 169 patients

Finding eligible patients Past data for 187 patients Clinical Trial Parti- cipants Other Eligible

Finding eligible patients Current data for 169 patients Clinical Trial Parti- cipants Other Eligible

Participation in other trials Current data for 169 patients Clinical Trial Incom- patible Compa- tilbe No Other Trial

Summary The results suggest that the system can increase the number of trial participants by a factor of three.

Outline Knowledge base Selection results Cost reduction

Medical tests The selection of trial participants may require medical tests. The total cost of tests may depend on their ordering Finding the right ordering is often a complex problem

Ordering of tests The system chooses the ordering of tests that reduces their expected total cost. The ordering is based on the test costs, number of trials that require each test, and structure of eligibility expressions. After getting the results of the first test, it revises the ordering of the remaining tests.

Cost reduction Past data for 187 patients Clinical Trial Mean Cost W/O Test Reordering With Test Reordering $70. $209. $35. $11. $60. $19.

Cost reduction Past data for 187 patients $0 $250 $200 $150 $100 $ W/O Reordering With Reordering

Cost reduction Current data for 169 patients Clinical Trial Mean Cost W/O Test Reordering With Test Reordering $192. $36. $107. $192. $3. $107.

Cost reduction Current data for 169 patients $0 $250 $200 $150 $100 $ W/O Reordering With Reordering

Conclusions We have developed a system that selects prospective trial participants. Helps physicians to identify eligible patients Can increase the number of trial participants Can reduce the cost of the selection process

Future work Deploy the system at the Moffitt Cancer Center Evaluate the satisfaction of physicians and nurses Add probabilistic reasoning