Program Overview: HPF Grants to Tribes 1. National Historic Preservation Act Enacted in 1966 to Establish a Program for the Preservation of Historic Properties.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office & 106 Reviews
Advertisements

Contract and Grant Provisions and Administration Section 105 (Page 30) Title I The Act.
Understanding the Federal Budget Process Tribal Self-Governance Financial Training Session Elizabeth Fowler March 27, 2012.
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
FINANCIAL PLAN AND FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT FOR FTIPS AND FSTIP FINANCIAL PLAN AND REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS 2013 FTIP/FSTIP WORKSHOP January 17, 2012 Wade Hobbs,
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Section 106 The reasons, the actions, the participants.
Tribal Transit Program August 9, 2013 State Programs Meeting Presented By Élan Flippin, FTA.
Matching for Formula Grants Wednesday, May 25, 2011 Session 66 Presenter: Brenda Barnett Branch Chief, Formula Grants.
2014 Kansas CLG Forum. Welcome! Texting in class is encouraged today todaysmeet.com/KSclg - Ask questions, post comments, propose topics for future trainings.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
A BEGINNERS GUIDE TO SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE: REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
COMPLIANCE WITH GRANT IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES TxDot Grant Fund Project.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force As of:1 Jane Yagley Program Manager ANG/A7CVP (301) Cultural.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
INDIAN HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAM. Native American/Alaskan Program Highway Safety Act of 1966, U.S.C. Title 23, Section 402, provides for U.S. DOT funding.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance September 25, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
Reviewer Conference Call March 12, 2014 Program Representative: LCDR Makeva Rhoden Division of Healthy Start and Perinatal Services Maternal and Child.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
= Yr NG price high point Data Source - AFDC. Natural gas prices historically have remained, in general, below crude oil prices, except during the winter.
The HBGI Program Recipients Network National Association of HBCU Title III Administrators, Inc. Annual Conference June 21-24, 2010 Orlando, FL.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Dean McMath Regional Environmental Programs Manager FAA – Southwest Region NEPA Essentials Selected Special.
Tier 1 Module 7 CERCLA 128(a) Tribal Response Program Establishing a TRP.
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
1 GRIC TAS Development Process Dan Blair Compliance and Enforcement Mgr. Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) Department of Environmental Quality.
OSG & BIA PARTNERS IN ACTION WHEN IMPLEMENTING TRIBAL SELF-GOVERNANCE
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
1 SAFETEA-LU Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Office of Program Management Tribal Transit Outreach.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Low-Income Tax Credit Provisions Beth Mullen March 5, 2009.
National Historic Districts And Why Taylor Should Be Among Them.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
1 Eurostat’s grant policy for 2010 Luxembourg, 23/03/2010 Unit A4 – Financial Management Section 3 – Grant procedures and agreements.
Review of FY 2015 THPO Annual Report and FY 2014 Close-Out Report Requirements.
NPS Historic Preservation Fund Grant Application Instructions Fiscal Year
Lumbee Federal Recognition Termination Policy of the 1950s In the 1950s, the U.S. government decided that the best way to deal with all Indian tribes.
1 Historic Preservation Webinar "Reporting Through PAGE and to PMC"
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
Historic Preservation Fund End of Year Report Review December 2015
AB 23 Review and Update – Do You Want to Gamble? ROGER BROSSMER PRINCIPAL DOWNEY ADULT SCHOOL.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
NPS Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) Grant Application Instructions Fiscal Year
MAP-21 Formula Briefing Preliminary DRAFT. Moving Ahead for Progress into the 21 st Century (MAP-21) MAP-21 was passed by Congress and signed by the President.
1 Hearing to Discuss the Potential Interplay and Effect of the Money Available to States’ Low- Income Weatherization Programs under the American Recovery.
1890 Section 1444 (Extension) Formula Program P. S. Benepal NIFA/USDA 2012 National Extension and Research Administrative Officers Conference Morgantown,
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Anth January 2012.
TIBC Meeting Rapid City, SD Bob Sparrow Designated Federal Official – Tribal Transportation Self-Governance Office, FHWA/USDOT July 14, 2016.
National Treasures: Brownfields and the National Historic Preservation Act Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
TTP Update COLT Meeting Rapid City, SD Bob Sparrow
101 New London Road Newark, Delaware
Program Overview: Tribal Preservation Program and HPF Grants to Tribes
May 8, 2018 Marion Werkheiser, Cultural Heritage Partners
Overview of 2019 Non-BIA Federal Register Notice
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Low-Income Tax Credit Provisions Beth Mullen March 5, 2009.
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
PL 477 Amendment Implementation
Contract Support Costs
Overview of 2020 Non-BIA Federal Register Notice
Contract Support Costs
National Historic Preservation Act
Overview of HHS/CDC Construction Authorities
Presentation transcript:

Program Overview: HPF Grants to Tribes 1

National Historic Preservation Act Enacted in 1966 to Establish a Program for the Preservation of Historic Properties throughout the Nation. In 2015, the Act was codified into the United States Code (U.S.C.) under Title 54, section et seq. It is still commonly referred to as the NHPA. 2

NHPA – Section 101d Section 101d of NHPA (54 U.S.C ) establishes the Tribal Historic Preservation Program, allowing tribes to assume all or any part of the functions of a State Historic Preservation Officer with respect to tribal lands. 3

THPO Program Growth In 1996, when THPOs were first awarded program grants, there were 12 THPOs. In 2016, there are more than 160 THPOs. 4

Partnership Agreement - MOA The Tribe and the National Park Service (NPS) enter into Partnership, through a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), in the National Program of Historic Preservation. The Tribal government designates a person to act as the THPO - the official to administer the tribe’s Historic Preservation Program. 5

THPO/NPS Partnership Agreement Under the MOA, the tribe agrees to assume the functions (all or any) of the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and to submit annual reports on the accomplishments of the tribe’s HPO program. By agreeing to these requirements, the THPO is eligible to apply for annual grants from the Historic Preservation Fund (HPF). 6

THPO MOA Reporting Requirements Annual reporting requirements under the MOA are to submit the following: a)Grants Product Summary Report b)Annual Accomplishments Report These reports are required each year whether or not the tribe applies for/receives Historic Preservation Fund grant monies. 7

The Grants Product Summary Report is used to report statistical data regarding: Section 106 Compliance Reviews National Register Nominations Areas/Properties Surveyed Educational Activities Other Consultations Grants Product Summary (GPS) Report 8

The Annual Accomplishments Report supports the GPS Report by providing: A description of the additional properties surveyed and added to the Tribe's inventory; A description of the Federal undertakings reviewed pursuant to Section 106 of the Act, and; A description of any educational activities and programs carried out. Additionally, NPS requests 3 success stories showing the value of the program. Annual Accomplishments Report 9

Historic Preservation Fund Program The HPF provides grant fund for Tribes (THPOs) to implement the functions agreed to under the partnership MOA. Funding for the HPF is derived from offshore oil and gas lease revenues. 10

Annual HPF Appropriation The HPF fund is authorized at $150 million annually; however, Congress has never appropriated more than million (to SHPOs and Tribes total) in one year. In 2014 and 2015, Congress appropriated 56.4 million in HPF to cover both SHPOs and Tribes. 11

Tribal HPF Grants Congress specifies the total amount of the HPF appropriation that is awarded to SHPOs and the amount that is awarded to Tribes. Congress appropriated 8.9 million in HPF to Tribes in FYs 2014 and Each THPO received an average of around $57,000 in FYs 2014 and

THPO Apportionment Annual HPF funds to Tribes under the HPF support both the THPO Operations Grant Program and the Tribal Heritage Grant program. From the Tribal appropriation, NPS allots a small amount (less than 5% in 2015) to the Tribal Heritage Grant Program. The remaining funds are divided among all eligible THPOs to support each tribe’s HPO program. 13

THPO Apportionment Formula The current amount of each THPO’s award is calculated using the apportionment formula that was developed in consultation with THPOs in 2003 (see formula below). Apportionment Formula - approximately 81% of the total appropriation is divided equally among all THPOs and the remaining 19% is apportioned based on the area of Tribal lands as defined in the National Historic Preservation Act. 14

Recaptured HPF Funds HPF funds not awarded (either because a THPO decides not to request their share of the apportionment, or because NPS determines that a THPO is not eligible for funding) are either redistributed between the remaining eligible THPOs or are moved to the Tribal Heritage Grant Program to fund projects grants (for which THPOs are eligible to apply). 15

To be eligible to apply for an annual award, THPOs must : Be in compliance with their THPO MOA Have a permanent or acting THPO Be in compliance with all past HPF grant requirements Have no other issues that would legally bar the tribe from receiving Federal funds Funding Eligibility Requirements 16