CL A UAV Control and Simulation Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint University Program Quarterly Review - October, 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nonlinear Control of Quadrotor
Advertisements

Parallel and Distributed Simulation
Synchronous Maneuvering of Uninhabited Air Vehicles
Design Presentation Spring 2009 Andrew Erdman Chris Sande Taoran Li.
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Influence of Structure on Complexity Management Strategies of Air Traffic.
AEROPLANE Done by, RAKHI M.R. & SINDHU P. RAKHI M.R. & SINDHU P. Standard 10 E G.M.G.H.S.School Pattom, TVM.
THE PHOENIX PROJECT Coordinated Flight of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles Michael P. Anthony Lab for Control and Automation Princeton University Princeton,
NONLINEAR BACKSTEPPING CONTROL WITH OBSERVER DESIGN FOR A 4 ROTORS HELICOPTER L. Mederreg, F. Diaz and N. K. M’sirdi LRV Laboratoire de Robotique de Versailles,
Luis Mejias, Srikanth Saripalli, Pascual Campoy and Gaurav Sukhatme.
ATMOSPHERIC REENTRY TRAJECTORY MODELING AND SIMULATION: APPLICATION TO REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE MISSION (Progress Seminar Presentation - 2) K. Sivan (Roll.
Automotive Research Center Robotics and Mechatronics A Nonlinear Tracking Controller for a Haptic Interface Steer-by-Wire Systems A Nonlinear Tracking.
Design of Attitude and Path Tracking Controllers for Quad-Rotor Robots using Reinforcement Learning Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos Cairo Lúcio Nascimento.
Ames Research Center 1October 2006 Aviation Software Systems Workshop FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Aviation Software Systems.
CSCE 641: Forward kinematics and inverse kinematics Jinxiang Chai.
CSCE 641: Forward kinematics and inverse kinematics Jinxiang Chai.
GPS Waypoint Navigation 525 Team M-3: Nicholas Bannister, Charles Norman, Jeremy Weagley, Julio Segundo, Steve Nielsen Presentation 1: Preliminary Design.
February 24, Final Presentation AAE Final Presentation Backstepping Based Flight Control Asif Hossain.
Computer Science Prof. Bill Pugh Dept. of Computer Science.
Distributed Cooperative Control of Multiple Vehicle Formations Using Structural Potential Functions Reza Olfati-Saber Postdoctoral Scholar Control and.
Building Knowledge-Driven DSS and Mining Data
Microsoft Operations Manager Presented by: Alen Plicanic.
Introduction to ROBOTICS
Systems Analysis I Data Flow Diagrams
CL A Coordinated Flight of Uninhabited Air Vehicles Olivier Laplace Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint University Program Quarterly Review - April, 2001.
Integration of MSC.FlightLoads and Dynamics at Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company* Dan Egle Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, Fort Worth, Texas John.
Silvia Ferrari Princeton University
SimGen SimGen Rapid aerodynamic prediction tool for UAV flight model development and concepual design.
Lecture 12:Approach Lighting System
Definition of an Industrial Robot
Space Indexed Flight Guidance along Air Streams Mastura Ab Wahid, Hakim Bouadi, Felix Mora-Camino MAIA/ENAC, Toulouse SITRAER20141.
Controlling and Configuring Large UAV Teams Paul Scerri, Yang Xu, Jumpol Polvichai, Katia Sycara and Mike Lewis Carnegie Mellon University and University.
Review Continuous Descent Operations Manual Roosevelt Pena (Dom Rep)
Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos (ITA-Brazil) Sidney Nascimento Givigi Júnior (RMC-Canada) Cairo Lúcio Nascimento Júnior (ITA-Brazil) Autonomous Construction.
Evaluating Impact of Storage on Smartphone Energy Efficiency David T. Nguyen.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 4 April 2003
Landing a UAV on a Runway Using Image Registration Andrew Miller, Don Harper, Mubarak Shah University of Central Florida ICRA 2008.
Optimal Nonlinear Neural Network Controllers for Aircraft Joint University Program Meeting October 10, 2001 Nilesh V. Kulkarni Advisors Prof. Minh Q. Phan.
Dynamics.  relationship between the joint actuator torques and the motion of the structure  Derivation of dynamic model of a manipulator  Simulation.
UC SANTA CRUZ, AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LAB, An Improved Line-of- Sight Guidance Law for UAVs R. Curry, M. Lizarraga, B. Mairs, and G.H. Elkaim University of.
Complete Pose Determination for Low Altitude Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Using Stereo Vision Luke K. Wang, Shan-Chih Hsieh, Eden C.-W. Hsueh 1 Fei-Bin Hsaio.
UC SANTA CRUZ, AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LAB, An Improved Line-of- Sight Guidance Law for UAVs R. Curry, M. Lizarraga, B. Mairs, and G.H. Elkaim University of.
UC SANTA CRUZ, AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LAB, An Improved Line-of- Sight Guidance Law for UAVs R. Curry, M. Lizarraga, B. Mairs, and G.H. Elkaim University of.
Reconfigurable Control Strategies: Towards Fault – Tolerant and High – Confidence Systems George Vachtsevanos Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA.
COBXXXX EXPERIMENTAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION OF GUIDANCE AND CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR UAVS Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos,
Ames Research Center 1 FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Banavar Sridhar Shon Grabbe First Annual Workshop NAS-Wide Simulation.
Yoonsang Lee Sungeun Kim Jehee Lee Seoul National University Data-Driven Biped Control.
UC SANTA CRUZ, AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LAB, An Improved Line-of- Sight Guidance Law for UAVs R. Curry, M. Lizarraga, B. Mairs, and G.H. Elkaim University of.
CS-378: Game Technology Lecture #13: Animation Prof. Okan Arikan University of Texas, Austin Thanks to James O’Brien, Steve Chenney, Zoran Popovic, Jessica.
Chapter 2 Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite 1 Chapter 2 Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite.
Issues and Challenges for Co-operative UAV Missions Chris Halliday and Tony Dodd.
Lecture 3 Intro to Posture Control Working with Dynamic Models.
SIMULINK-Tutorial 1 Class ECES-304 Presented by : Shubham Bhat.
Workforce Scheduling Release 5.0 for Windows Implementation Overview OWS Development Team.
1 Motivation We wish to test different trajectories on the Stanford Test Track in order to gain insight into the effects of different trajectory parameters.
Development of PARAMICS Plug-ins with Application Programming Interfaces Henry X. Liu, Lianyu Chu, Will Recker PATH / UC-Irvine.
1 S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Manuscript “On the Use of Influence Diagrams in a One-on-One Air Combat Game” in Kai Virtanen’s.
1 Center for the Collaborative Control of Unmanned Vehicles (C3UV) UC Berkeley Karl Hedrick, Raja Sengupta.
Nov. 22~24, st International Conference on Research in Air Transportation, Zilina, Slovakia1 Wing Rock Dynamics and Differential Flatness W. LU F.
COMP322/S2000/L111 Inverse Kinematics Given the tool configuration (orientation R w and position p w ) in the world coordinate within the work envelope,
Beard & McLain, “Small Unmanned Aircraft,” Princeton University Press, 2012, Chapter 2: Slide 1 Chapter 2 Coordinate Frames.
Beard & McLain, “Small Unmanned Aircraft,” Princeton University Press, 2012, Chapter 4: Slide 1 Chapter 4 Forces and Moments.
Chapter 5 Linear Design Models.
Interaction and Animation on Geolocalization Based Network Topology by Engin Arslan.
Physically-Based Motion Synthesis in Computer Graphics
Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos Cairo Lúcio Nascimento Júnior
Zaid H. Rashid Supervisor Dr. Hassan M. Alwan
Artificial Intelligence in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV)
Systems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology
Chapter 4 . Trajectory planning and Inverse kinematics
Modeling IDS using hybrid intelligent systems
Presentation transcript:

CL A UAV Control and Simulation Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint University Program Quarterly Review - October, 2000

CL A Outline Introduction A rule-based controller simulation –Rule-based scheduler presentation –Simulation architecture –Simulation results Control law for nonlinear UAV model –Nonlinear model –Trajectory tracking –Barrel roll test Concluding remarks

CL A * Unmanned Air Vehicles New UAV* Requirements Foreseen UAV applications –Unmanned Combat Air Vehicles (Boeing / Lockheed Martin) 1 –Wireless communications relay (Proteus - Scaled Composites) 2 –Meteorological probing (Aerosonde) 3 Requirements –Long and/or dangerous missions –Team approach for increased reliability Aircraft failure accommodation (task redistribution over remaining vehicles) Concerted action (fly different paths for mutual support)

CL A Rule base paradigm  Production rules applied to a database storing the parameters by matching premises LR: Logical Relation (AND,OR) P1,…,Pn: Premises 1 to n Action and Premises are either parameters or procedures returning a value. Rule-based Scheduler Presentation Rule-based scheduler –1 to 1 relation between actions and rules –Hierarchical structure of rules –Uses THEN or SYNC as logical relations between tasks –Leaves of the tree are procedures representing subtasks while the root is the main task. –Parameters take values: “Done”, “Not Done” IF-THEN LR P1P2Pn ACTION Rule

CL A Simulation Architecture AVDS Rigid body equation solver GUI UAV dynamics model FCS Scheduler Procedure base Model parameters Rule base Database Main application Dynamic Link Libraries Associated files

CL A Retracts landing gear Runway Lower landing gear Flaps 15º Flaps 60º Simulation Results Simulated aircraft Event window Rule logic window Simulation visual interface –Tools are provided for the user to follow the rule-based logic –Tools for user interaction with the simulation are under development Airport traffic pattern flight simulation –Aircraft configuration –Waypoints sequence managed by the rule-base scheduler

CL A UAV Nonlinear Model Dynamics equationsAssumptions –Three time differentiable trajectory specified in earth coordinates, x e (t) –No sideslip Notations e - earth frame b - body frame w - wind frame - transformation from frame 1 to frame 2 I - inertia matrix See J. Hauser et al., “Aggressive Flight Maneuvers”

CL A Trajectory Tracking State feedback linearization –Desired trajectory third derivative: –Linearizing control law: Nonlinear dynamic inversion

CL A Barrel roll test 3D view of the UAV trajectory Control inputs used Aileron Elevator Rudder Throttle

CL A Concluding Remarks Tools at our disposal: –A control law to track trajectories specified in earth coordinates. –A controller structure capable of logical reasoning. Future work: –Set up a multi-aircraft simulation. –Use rule-based control to coordinate them.