2015 PSSA/Keystone Data and Information Monday, October 12, 2015 Presented by Dr. Tammy Stern.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Advertisements

Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.

Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :

1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.

1 Title III Access to Core Instructional Coach AMEEL NOOS Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and School Support Language Acquisition Branch.

1 Joe Serna, Jr. Charter School Annual Report Lodi Unified School District Board of Education November 16, 2010 Michael Gillespie, Principal.

ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Executive Summary  Did not meet API/AYP goals in language arts for the school or significant subgroups.  Did not meet API/AYP goals in math for the school.

A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.

Grade 3-8 Mathematics Test Results. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With.

Supplemental Reading and Math Instruction Grades K-6.

JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)

Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?

MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

MCAS REPORT Spring 2013 Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent.

2015 MAP Scores Fulton 58 School District MAP Facts  Grades 3-8 and English II, Biology, Government and Algebra I and II  First year for online.

PROGRESS MONITORING OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2nd Quarter Data.

Welcome WASC Report: School-wide Critical Areas for Follow-up 1.Continue horizontal planning and explore vertical planning 2.Increase parent.

Grades 6-8 MONITORING REPORT HIGHLIGHTS DECEMBER 2013.

Governing Board Meeting September 29, 2011 Annual State of the School Address Mr. R. Hackler, Principal.

Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY

7 th Grade: Decreased # of students in Basic by 7% 8 th Grade: Students are moving from BB to BAS scale EOC Literacy: Students are moving from BB to BAS.

Spring 2009 MCAS Results. Dedham Elementary Schools.

NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.

Testing Landscape: PSSA, Keystone Exams, Project- Based Assessment and Classroom Diagnostic Tools December 9, 2013.

Accountability Report Dedham Public Schools October 3,

MCAS Results Report to School Committee 2003 MCAS Results October 21, 2003.

SUCCESSFULLY PREPARING ALL STUDENTS FOR THEIR FUTURES SE 256 TH STREET, KENT, WA | SUMMARY i-Ready End of Year Report

CHS State Assessment Data % Advanced & Proficient Algebra 1 End of Course Exams % Advanced & Proficient.

Governor Edward G. Rendell GERALD L. ZAHORCHAK, D.ED., ACTING SECRETARY PSSA and AYP Results STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN PENNSYLVANIA.

September 2014 Information Provided by Misty L. Slavic, Director of Curriculum & Instruction.

RESULTS Spring 2015 End-Of-Course tests Student Score Interpretation Guide.

Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST High School.

Tanaina Elementary SBA Data Look May rd Grade SBA Advanced Proficient Below Proficient Far Below 91.9%

National Conference on Student Assessment Developing and Implementing High Quality Assessments June 23, >

Grades 3-8 Assessment Results. English Language Arts.

Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.

What does it mean? August 17, 2015 MAXIMIZING OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUCCESS.

Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.

November 2015 PVAAS Update PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE

A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.

Tift County High School ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING SY16 Tap Knowledge – Capture Wisdom - Harness Talents -Sculpt Minds.

WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.

Boyertown Area School District Data Summary

D EER L AKES S CHOOL D ISTRICT PARENT INFORMATION NIGHT Deer Lakes School District P ARENT I NFORMATION N IGHT.

Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals

2011 MEAP Results Board of Education Presentation | 07 May 2012 Romeo Community Schools | Office of Curriculum and Instruction.

Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals

Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals

Policy IG Curriculum Development, Adoption, and Review …[D]esign a curriculum to carry out the instructional goals of the district. The curriculum will.

Millbrae Elementary School District

PARCC Results Summary Report.

NHCS READY Report October 2016.

Spring 2017 Georgia Milestones State Results

Spring 2011 MCAS Results.

Indiana Area School District

Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools

Professional Learning – October 12, 2015

Preliminary PARCC & NJ ask DATA

Shaler Area School District

Assessment & Achievement |

An Introduction to the Future Ready PA Index

Education Services October 3, 2017.

WELCOME TO THE SCHOOL YEAR!!

Presented to the Octorara Area School Board on December 3, 2018

An Introduction to the Future Ready PA Index

Willie J. Williams Middle School For Staff Use July 14, 2014

Mayra Perez, Ed. D. October 10, 2016

So what is PVAAS? PVAAS measures a group of students as they move from one grade level to the next. PVAAS is not concerned with “Achievement” PVAAS is.

Presentation transcript:

2015 PSSA/Keystone Data and Information Monday, October 12, 2015 Presented by Dr. Tammy Stern

2015 PSSA Data Concerns New assessment in 2015 The State Board of Education adopted new standards for grades 3 – 8 in ELA and math in the fall of Because of the methods used at the state level, the scores were lower than they should be. There has been no massive in-servicing or funding from the state to in-service staff members across the state to prepare the students for the new content in the new standards. There is now new content at various grade levels that had not been taught or assessed as in the past.

Grade 3 ELA Data Group Summary: Scale Scores and Performance Levels PSSA+PASA, Year 2015, Grade 3 English Language Arts GroupYearN - Below Basic% Below BasicN - Basic% BasicN - Proficient% ProficientN - Advanced% Advanced State Connellsville Area SD Bullskin El Sch Clifford N Pritts El Connellsville Twp El Dunbar Boro El Sch Dunbar Twp El Sch South Side El Sch Springfield El Sch West Crawford El School The state average of students who scored proficient or advanced was 61.9%. Bullskin Twp. exceeded the state average with 63.4% proficient/advanced. CNP exceeded the state average with 64% proficient/advanced.

Grade 3 Math Data Group Summary: Scale Scores and Performance Levels PSSA+PASA, Year 2015, Grade 3 Mathematics GroupYearN - Below Basic% Below BasicN -Basic%BasicN -Proficient% ProficientN- Advanced% Advanced State Connellsville Area SD Bullskin El Sch Clifford N Pritts El Connellsville Twp El Dunbar Boro El Sch Dunbar Twp El Sch South Side El Sch Springfield El Sch West Crawford El School The state average of students who scored proficient or advanced was 48.5%. Bullskin Twp. exceeded the state average with 57.7% proficient/advanced. CNP exceeded the state average with 52% proficient/advanced.

Grade 4 ELA Data Group Summary: Scale Scores and Performance Levels PSSA+PASA, Year 2015, Grade 4 English Language Arts GroupYearN- Below Basic% Below BasicN- Basic% BasicN- Proficient% ProficientN - Advanced% Advanced State Connellsville Area SD Bullskin El Sch Clifford N Pritts El Connellsville Twp El Dunbar Boro El Sch Dunbar Twp El Sch South Side El Sch Springfield El Sch West Crawford El School The state average of students who scored proficient or advanced was 58.6%. We had NO schools exceed the state average in the percentage of proficient or advanced students. The district average was 45.2%.

Grade 4 Math Data Group Summary: Scale Scores and Performance Levels PSSA+PASA, Year 2015, Grade 4 Mathematics GroupYear N - Below Basic% Below BasicN- Basic% BasicN- Proficient% ProficientN - Advanced% Advanced State Connellsville Area SD Bullskin El Sch Clifford N Pritts El Connellsville Twp El Dunbar Boro El Sch Dunbar Twp El Sch South Side El Sch Springfield El Sch West Crawford El School The state average of students who scored proficient or advanced was 44.6%. We had NO schools exceed the state average in the percentage of proficient or advanced students. The district average was 27.8%.

Grade 4 Science Data Group Summary: Scale Scores and Performance Levels PSSA+PASA, Year 2015, Grade 4 Science GroupYear N - Below Basic% Below BasicN - Basic% BasicN -Proficient% ProficientN - Advanced% Advanced State Connellsville Area SD Bullskin El Sch Clifford N Pritts El Connellsville Twp El Dunbar Boro El Sch Dunbar Twp El Sch South Side El Sch Springfield El Sch West Crawford El School The state average of students who scored proficient or advanced was 77.1%. The district average was 77.4% of students who were proficient or advanced. CNP exceeded the state average with 93.4% proficient or advanced. South Side exceeded the state average with 92.7% proficient or advanced.

Grade 5 ELA Data The state average of students who scored proficient or advanced was 61.7%. Bullskin Twp. exceeded the state average with 65.1% proficient/advanced. Connellsville Twp. exceeded the state average with 64.7% proficient/advanced. Springfield Twp. exceeded the state average with 63.4% proficient/advanced. Group Summary: Scale Scores and Performance Levels PSSA+PASA, Year 2015, Grade 5 English Language Arts GroupYearN -Below Basic% Below BasicN - Basic% BasicN - Proficient% ProficientN - Advanced% Advanced State Connellsville Area SD Bullskin El Sch Clifford N Pritts El Connellsville Twp El Dunbar Boro El Sch Dunbar Twp El Sch South Side El Sch Springfield El Sch West Crawford El School

Grade 5 Math Data Group Summary: Scale Scores and Performance Levels PSSA+PASA, Year 2015, Grade 5 Mathematics GroupYearN -Below Basic% Below BasicN -Basic% BasicN -Proficient% ProficientN - Advanced% Advanced State Connellsville Area SD Bullskin El Sch Clifford N Pritts El Connellsville Twp El Dunbar Boro El Sch Dunbar Twp El Sch South Side El Sch Springfield El Sch West Crawford El School The state average of students who scored proficient or advanced was 42.9%. Bullskin Twp. exceeded the state average with 48.5% proficient/advanced. Connellsville Twp. exceeded the state average with 52.9% proficient/advanced.

Grade 6 ELA Data Group Summary: Scale Scores and Performance Levels PSSA+PASA, Year 2015, Grade 6 English Language Arts GroupYearN -Below Basic% Below BasicN -Basic% BasicN -Proficient% ProficientN -Advanced% Advanced State Connellsville Area SD Bullskin El Sch Clifford N Pritts El Connellsville Twp El Dunbar Boro El Sch Dunbar Twp El Sch South Side El Sch Springfield El Sch West Crawford El School The state average of students who scored proficient or advanced was 60.6%. Connellsville Twp. exceeded the state average with 77% proficient/advanced.

Grade 6 Math Data Group Summary: Scale Scores and Performance Levels PSSA+PASA, Year 2015, Grade 6 Mathematics GroupYearN -Below Basic% Below BasicN -Basic% BasicN - Proficient% Proficient N - Advanced% Advanced State Connellsville Area SD Bullskin El Sch Clifford N Pritts El Connellsville Twp El Dunbar Boro El Sch Dunbar Twp El Sch South Side El Sch Springfield El Sch West Crawford El School The state average of students who scored proficient or advanced was 40%. CNP exceeded the state average with 40.7% proficient or advanced. Connellsville Twp. exceeded the state average with 53.9% proficient/advanced. Springfield Twp. exceeded the state average with 54.5% proficient/advanced.

Grade 7 ELA Data Group Summary: Scale Scores and Performance Levels PSSA+PASA, Year 2015, Grade 7 English Language Arts GroupYearN - Below Basic% Below BasicN Basic% BasicN -Proficient% ProficientN -Advanced% Advanced State Connellsville Area SD Connellsville JH The state average for the percentage of students who scored proficient or advanced was 58.6%. We had 43.6% of our students who scored proficient or advanced.

Grade 7 Math Data Group Summary: Scale Scores and Performance Levels PSSA+PASA, Year 2015, Grade 7 Mathematics GroupYearN - Below Basic% Below Basic N - Basic% BasicN - Proficient% ProficientN - Advanced% Advanced State Connellsville Area SD Connellsville JH The state average for the percentage of students who scored proficient or advanced was 33.1%. We had 27% of our students who scored proficient or advanced.

Grade 8 ELA Data Group Summary: Scale Scores and Performance Levels PSSA+PASA, Year 2015, Grade 8 English Language Arts GroupYearN -Below Basic% Below BasicN - Basic% BasicN -Proficient% ProficientN - Advanced% Advanced State Connellsville Area SD Connellsville JH The state average for the percentage of students who scored proficient or advanced was 57.9%. We had 49.7% of our students who scored proficient or advanced.

Grade 8 Math Data Group Summary: Scale Scores and Performance Levels PSSA+PASA, Year 2015, Grade 8 Mathematics GroupYearN -Below Basic% Below BasicN - Basic% BasicN -Proficient% ProficientN - Advanced% Advanced State Connellsville Area SD Connellsville JH The state average for the percentage of students who scored proficient or advanced was 29.9%. We had 17.4% of our students who scored proficient or advanced.

Algebra I Keystones Group Summary: Performance Levels Algebra I, Spring 2015 GroupAdminN Below Basic% Below BasicN Basic% BasicN- Proficient% ProficientN Advanced% Advanced StateSpring Connellsville Area SDSpring Connellsville Area SHSpring Connellsville JHSpring GroupAdminN Tested Mean Scale Score StateSpring Connellsville Area SDSpring Connellsville Area SHSpring Connellsville JHSpring The state average for the percentage of students who scored proficient or advanced was 38.7%. The Junior High exceeded the state average with 80.9% of the students who took the Algebra I Keystone scored proficient or advanced. The Senior High had 27.1% of the students who took the Algebra I Keystone scored proficient or advanced.

Grade 8 Science Data Group Summary: Scale Scores and Performance Levels PSSA+PASA, Year 2015, Grade 8 Science GroupYearN -Below Basic% Below BasicN -Basic% BasicN -Proficient% ProficientN - Advanced% Advanced State Connellsville Area SD Connellsville JH The state average for the percentage of students who scored proficient or advanced was 58.5%. The Jr. High exceeded the state average with 62.7% of our students who scored proficient or advanced.

Biology Keystones Group Summary: Performance Levels Biology, Spring 2015 GroupAdminN Below Basic% Below Basic N Basic% BasicN Proficient% ProficientN Advanced% Advanced StateSpring Connellsville Area SDSpring Connellsville Area SSpring GroupAdminN Tested Best Mean Scale Score StateSpring Connellsville Area SDSpring Connellsville Area SSpring The state average for the percentage of students who scored proficient or advanced was 46.4%. The Senior High exceeded the state average with 47.7% of the students who scored proficient or advanced.

Literature Keystones Group Summary: Performance Levels Literature, Spring 2015 GroupAdminN Below Basic% Below Basic N Basic% BasicN Proficient% ProficientN Advanced% Advanced StateSpring Connellsville Area SDSpring Connellsville Area SSpring GroupAdminN Tested Best Mean Scale Score StateSpring Connellsville Area SDSpring Connellsville Area SSpring The state average for the percentage of students who scored proficient or advanced was 58.5%. The Senior High had 57.5% of the students score proficient or advanced.

Points to Consider Although the overall PSSA scores are a point of focus, 2015 data provided a baseline for the new assessment. Principals are required to develop Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) targeted at PVAAS data, which will serve as measureable growth goals for this year. Instructional coaches are in place at all elementary buildings and the junior high to provide on-site professional development, aimed at assisting the teachers with the teaching of the PA Common Core Standards. Due to the new PSSA and the federal waiver, the only schools which will receive an School Performance Profile will be schools that have an 11 th Grade. Therefore Senior High and CTC will receive a School Performance Profile for 2015.