Poverty Thresholds Analysis: Reassessing and Revalidating Quantitative Indicators Zulfiqar Ali 02 May 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Employment Trendswww.ilo.org/trends Theo Sparreboom Employment Trends International Labour Organization Geneva, Switzerland Working poverty in the world.
Advertisements

1 Financial inclusion and Targeting Efficiency: How well can we identify the poor? A CMF study Principal Researcher: Abhijit Banerjee (MIT), Esther Duflo.
K. Ravi Kumar Dy. Commissioner Godda, Jharkhand. No. of Total Households : 2,52,756 Registered HHs under MGNREGA : 1,79,015 SC -: 11,243 ST -: 38,713.
Rates of Return of Social Protection The case for non-contributory social transfers in Cambodia Franziska Gassmann Arusha, Tanzania – 17 December 2014.
Poverty Thresholds Analysis: Reassessing and Revalidating Quantitative Indicators Zulfiqar Ali 23 August 2011.
RAPID FOLLOW UP FOOD SECURITY ASSESSMENT Flood and Water Logging Affected Areas of Satkhira and Jessore.
Socio-Economic and Food Security (SEFSec) Survey and Agricultural Census /05/2011 CAP MYR- FAO 2011.
Shonali Pachauri and Daniel Spreng Some remarks on the choice and use of indicators of development.
THE ROLE OF RURAL FACTOR MARKETS IN REDUCING POVERTY, RISKS AND VULNERABILITY IN RURAL KENYA: Evidence from Kakamega and Vihiga Districts. BY Joseph Karugia.
The Impact of HIV and AIDS on Food Security and Agricultural Production in Botswana K. Gobotswang, L.Gabaitiri P. Malope, P. Ntseane P. Malope, P. Ntseane.
GENEVA JULY, 2015 The limits of cash transfer in addressing child labour.
MAXIMISING POTENTIAL IN THE WORKPLACE A lunchtime seminar series about employment relations & the world of work London, 31 March 2005
Filling the Gender Data Gap in Agriculture and Rural Development 1.
Key messages. IFAD’s Rural Poverty Report targets Assets Rural Poverty Technology Institutions The report Markets Rural poverty eradication.
POVERTY PRESENTATION AT UNDP OFFICE POVERTY STATUS AND TREND IN TANZANIA MAINLAND, /12 Presented by Sango A. H. Simba National Bureau of Statistics.
2000/2001 Household Budget Survey (HBS) Conducted by The National Bureau of Statistics.
Allocating House and Garden Plots to Benefit the Rural Landless Jennifer Brown Rural Development Institute.
Gender equity in water management Vasudha Pangare Director World Water Institute.
HOUSEHOLD INCOME AND EXPENDITURE SURVEY (HIES) 2010 – IMPLICATIONS FOR EXTREME POVERTY RESEARCH.
CARE Bangladesh Strategic Impact Inquiry. Areas of Inquiry What are the underlying assumptions in CARE B’s literature on gender and power Men’s and women’s.
1 Developing Poverty Assessment Tools A USAID/EGAT/MD Project Implemented by The IRIS Center at the University of Maryland Poverty Assessment Working Group.
Introduction to 2012 Census of Agriculture Data for Oklahoma Damona Doye Rainbolt Chair of Agricultural Finance Extension Economist.
Land Rental Markets in the Process of Structural Transformation: Productivity and Equity Impacts in China Songqing Jin and Klaus Deininger World Bank.
First Results on the Quantitative Data Analysis in Madagascar.
Michigan State University, Dept. of Agricultural Economics Measuring Impacts of HIV/AIDS on African Rural Economies T.S. Jayne Michigan State University.
Women’s Role in Agriculture and Gender Issues in Syria Prepared by Samira Soubh Rural Development Division.
Upali Amarasinghe, Stefanos Xenarios Rajendran Srinivasulu, Dhrubra Pant, Madar Samad Water Poverty Analysis IGB Basin Focal project.
1 VAISHALI ICAR research complex for eastern region Patna, Bihar India SITE PRESENTATION.
Agro-industry investments, smallholders and workers: evidences on household income effects from Tanzania Raoul Herrmann 1, 2, Khamaldin Mutabazi 3, Ulrike.
PKSS Community Survey – Analysis and Conclusions Sep 11 th, 2009.
Near East Regional Workshop - Linking Population and Housing Censuses with Agricultural Censuses. Amman, Jordan, June 2012 Tabulations and Analysis.
Bureau of Economic Research, University of Dhaka The Role of Credit in Food Production, Food Security & Dietary Diversity in Bangladesh Authors Dr. Sayema.
Key Food Security Indicators Food Security Indicators Training Bangkok January 2009.
The Welfare Impact of Land Redistribution: Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Initiative in Malawi Mariapia Mendola (Università di Milano Bicocca) Franklin.
The geographical distribution of poverty and food security in Bangladesh: Implications for the design of policy & agricultural R&D&E interventions IRRI.
Change Monitoring System CMS 5(S) Baten (DSK), Hannah (shiree) and Sonia (Uttaran)
MIRPAL CONFERENCE ON REMITTANCES Remittances and economic development: the case of Kosovo 1 Borko Handjiski Economist Cholpon-Ata, Kyrgyzstan 11 th of.
Non-experimental methods Markus Goldstein The World Bank DECRG & AFTPM.
FANRPAN HIV & AIDS Database Lindiwe Majele Sibanda
WFP Bangladesh - Vulnerability Analysis & Mapping 1 Food Security Assessment in Bangladesh Issues and Implications for Mapping Food Insecurity and Vulnerability.
1 Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Samurdhi Welfare Benefits Board The Targeting Formula: Analysis Using Pilot Data Welfare Workshop Colombo,
LAND OWNERSHIP AND FARM MANAGEMENT IN ECUADOR: PERCEPTIONS OF HUSBANDS AND WIVES Jennifer Twyman, University of Florida IAFFE Annual Conferemce. Barcelona.
2008 Commissioners Indaba 19 – 21 st November 2008 Sun City, North West Province Pro-Poor Economic Growth and the Labour Market in South Africa: Exploring.
Haroon Bhorat & Carlene van der Westhuizen Development Policy Research Unit University of Cape Town October 2009 P OVERTY, I NEQUALITY AND THE N ATURE.
Using microsimulation model to get things right: a wage equation for Poland Leszek Morawski, University of Warsaw Michał Myck, DIW - Berlin Anna Nicińska,
PROGRSS REPORT EMBU J.O.Ouma 1, J.Oduol 1,F.M.Murithi 2 __________________________ 1 Regional Research Centre – Embu 2 KARI – Headquarters – Nairobi.
DISPARITIES IN MEXICO LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1.TO EXPLAIN THE DISPARITIES THAT EXIST WITHIN MEXICO.
CHECKING THE CONSISTENCY OF POVERTY IN POLAND: EVIDENCE by Adam Szulc Warsaw School of Economics, Poland.
Bangladesh Poverty Assessment: Building on Progress Poverty Trends and Profile Dhaka, October 23 rd 2002.
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Household Questionnaire: Household Characteristics.
Workshop on Improving the Integration of a Gender Perspective into Official Statistics 16 – 19 April, 2013 Chiba, Japan. Integrating Gender Statistics.
SECC 2011 CHHATTISGARH. Automatic Inclusion Total household (rural)45,32,725 Automatically included HHs WITHOUT SHELTER7,082 DESTITUTES/LIVING ON ALMS23,894.
SOCIAL ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY POPULATIONS  Household Composition  Employment  Household Expenditure Patterns  Land Ownership  HH Consumption.
WFP/REACH CFSME (2015) KEY FINDINGS. Introduction (2) Methodology The findings outlined in this presentation are from the following data collection exercises:
Bamboo Roofing Sheets.
Hong Kong Population : 7 million Per Capita GDP : about US$40,000 Unemployment Rate end 2014 : 3.3% Life Expectancy: Men 81.2; Women 86.7 Gini Coefficient.
Department of Economics The University of Melbourne
Quality of Growth for Whom
Are the Chronic Poor Happy about Pro-Poor Growth
Measuring Women’s Empowerment on the chars of north-west Bangladesh: Lessons Learnt and Results Welcome: Thank you to gender-working group for allowing.
Chars Livelihoods Programme
ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံရွိ ထိခုိက္လြယ္မႈ အေျခအေန လိုအပ္ခ်က္မ်ား၊ လြမ္းၿခဳံမႈမ်ားႏွင့္ ကြာဟခ်က္မ်ားအေပၚ ဆင့္ပြားအခ်က္အလက္မ်ားအား သံုးသပ္မႈ ၂၀၁၈ ခုႏွစ္၊ ဇြန္လ.
Shared-Growth and Job Creation: Exploring Employment and Shared Growth Linkages in Madagascar Margo Hoftijzer.
Household Budget Survey
Session 1.4. The EFSA Analysis Plan
SLIDE I: CONTEXT Welfare and forest in Mozambique Pindanganga
Potentiality of homestead forests aspect of biodiversity conservation and socio-economic development in Bangladesh Academic skill in Forest Science ,
Independent Variables Neither land no livestock
POVERTY MESUREMENT IN UGANDA
Presentation transcript:

Poverty Thresholds Analysis: Reassessing and Revalidating Quantitative Indicators Zulfiqar Ali 02 May 2011

Mean Values of and Household Distribution by Candidate Poverty Indicators IndicatorsBottom 10%Ex-poor (lpl)Mod-poor (upl)Non-poor Household size Female headed household Total cultivable land (acre) Homestead land (acre) Total operated land (acre) Livestock Poultry Bamboo Timber Total non-land asset value8,80511,50917,85331,119 Access to electricity Poor roof material (% of hhs) Access to sanitary toilet (% of hhs) HH head illiterate (% of hhs) HH head primary complete and above (%) Spouse illiterate (% of hhs) Spouse primary complete and above (%) HH head wage labourer (% of hhs)

Mean Values of and Household Distribution by Candidate Poverty Indicators (SHIREE/HIES/PRCPB) IndicatorsSHIREE (CMS1)HIES (Bottom 5%)HIES (Bottom 10%)PRCPB (Bottom 10%) Household size Female headed household Total cultivable land (acre) Homestead land (acre) Total operated land (acre) Livestock Poultry Bamboo Timber Total non-land asset value3446,6148,8052,457 Access to electricity Poor roof material (% of hhs) Access to sanitary toilet (% of hhs) HH head illiterate (% of hhs) HH head primary complete and above (%) Spouse illiterate (% of hhs) Spouse primary complete and above (%) HH head wage labourer (% of hhs)

Probit Model for the Extreme Poverty (Bottom 10%) Indicators IndicatorsCoefficientsSignificant Level Household size Female headed household Total cultivable land (acre) Livestock Poultry Bamboo Timber Total non-land asset value Access to electricity Poor roof material (% of hhs) Access to sanitary toilet (% of hhs) HH head illiterate (% of hhs) HH head primary complete and above (%) Spouse illiterate (% of hhs) Spouse primary complete and above (%) HH head wage labourer (% of hhs).28.00

OLS Regression for Per Capita Expenditure IndicatorsCoefficientsSignificant Level Household size Female headed household Total cultivable land (acre) Livestock Poultry Bamboo Timber Total non-land asset value Access to electricity Poor roof material (% of hhs) Access to sanitary toilet (% of hhs) HH head illiterate (% of hhs) HH head primary complete and above (%) Spouse illiterate (% of hhs) Spouse primary complete and above (%) HH head wage labourer (% of hhs)

Factor Scores in Principal Component Analysis (Component 1) Indicators Household size.13 Female headed household-.03 Total cultivable land (acre).29 Livestock.12 Poultry.11 Bamboo.19 Timber.20 Total non-land asset value.33 Access to electricity.24 Poor roof material (% of hhs)-.16 Access to sanitary toilet (% of hhs).27 HH head illiterate (% of hhs)-.37 HH head primary complete and above (%).38 Spouse illiterate (% of hhs)-.27 Spouse primary complete and above (%).31 HH head wage labourer (% of hhs).29

Comparison of Significance of Poverty Indicators by Different Models IndicatorsProbitOLSPCASig in All Household sizeYYYYYY Female headed householdYY- Total cultivable land (acre)YYYYYY Livestock-YY Poultry--Y Bamboo--Y TimberY-Y Total non-land asset valueYYYYYY Access to electricityYYYYYY Poor roof material (% of hhs)YY- Access to sanitary toilet (% of hhs)YYYYYY HH head illiterate (% of hhs)-Y- HH head primary complete and above (%) -YY Spouse illiterate (% of hhs)--- Spouse primary complete and above (%) --Y HH head wage labourer (% of hhs)Yy-YYY

Distribution of Households by Household Size and Poverty Status Household SizeSHIREEHIES Bottom 10%HIES Ex-poor (lpl)PRCPB (Bottom 10%) 1-2 members members or more members Total100.0

Distribution of Households by Cultivable Land and Poverty Status Land OwnershipSHIREEHIES Bottom 10%HIES Ex-poor (lpl)PRCPB (Bottom 10%) Absolutely landless (no land at all) Functionally landless (up to.50 acre) Marginal farmer ( acre) Small/medium/large farmer (over 1.00) Total100.0

Distribution of Households by Non-land Asset and Poverty Status Non-land Asset Holding (value in Taka) SHIREEBottom 10%HIES Ex-poor (lpl)PRCPB (Bottom 10%) No or very little asset holding (<8,806) Poor asset holding (8, ,000) Moderate asset holding (20,001-32,000) High asset holding (over 32,000) Total100.0

Distribution of Households by Access to Electricity and Poverty Status Households’ Access to Electricity SHIREEBottom 10%HIES Ex-poor (lpl)PRCPB (Bottom 10%) No Yes Total100.0

Distribution of Households by Access to Sanitary Toilet and Poverty Status Households’ Access to Sanitary Toilet SHIREEBottom 10%HIES Ex-poor (lpl)PRCPB (Bottom 10%) No Yes Total100.0

Distribution of Households by Employment Status of the HH Head and Poverty Status Employment Status of the HH Head SHIREEBottom 10%HIES Ex-poor (lpl)PRCPB (Bottom 10%) Wage labourer Others Total100.0

What do we get from the analyses presented above? THREE indicators may be taken into consideration in combination to identify the extreme-poor households as follows: - Land ownership (cultivable): Not more than.50 acre; - Total non-land asset: Not more than Taka 20,000; and - Employment status: At best wage laborer

Distribution of Households That Satisfy the Above Criteria Criteria % of Total Households (HIES 2005) Average monthly per capita expenditure Expenditure Taka/person/day Satisfy all three Satisfy at least two Satisfy at least one

Distribution of Households That Satisfy the Above Criteria (contd.) CriteriaBottom 10% (HIES 2005) Ex-poor (lpl) (HIES 2005) SHIREE (CMS1) Satisfy all three Satisfy at least two Satisfy at least one