Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document1 SAISD 2003 - 2005 TAKS Performance Board Work Session June 2005 Office of Research, Evaluation,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outcomes At the end of the training session, participants will have an in-depth knowledge of state and local student accountability standards, understand.
Advertisements

August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
Minnesota Assessment System Update Jennifer Dugan “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
SAISD Gold Performance Acknowledgements SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation.
Brad Neuenswander, Interim Commissioner Kansas State Department of Education 2014 Summer Leadership Conference.
1 SAISD Vision 2009: Fulfilling the Promise SAISD Board Presentation October – 2006 District Improvement Plan: District Performance Objectives.
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR): What You Need to Know January 2012 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEMENTARY.
State Accountability and Federal Adequate Yearly Progress.
San Antonio Independent School District Attendance Issues ALT Presentation November 2003.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
FotherGile School District Mission, Vision and Graduation Proposal.
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
STAAR TEST Class of 2015 and beyond. What is STAAR? The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) is the new state assessment for students.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Texas Public School Accountability Presented at Midwinter by the Texas Education Agency.
Ysleta Independent School District 2004 Accountability State and AYP.
State law and the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act require Report Cards for every local school, every school district and for the state.
Next-Generation Standards and Accountability Terry Holliday, Ph.D. Kentucky Education Commissioner Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
El Paso Collaborative for Academic Excellence P-16 Summit: Creating a College-Going Culture and Well-Educated Communities June 20-21, 2007 M. Susana Navarro,
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report January 20, 2009 Dr. Joan Bowman Assistant Superintendent Sheldon ISD.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document1 SAISD TAKS Performance Board Work Session June 2004 Office of Research, Evaluation,
Lazbuddie ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Draft...proposals may change1 Proposed Changes to the Texas Accountability System Adapted from “Accountability System for 2006 and Beyond- Standard Procedures”
Context for El Paso’s K-16 Partnership K-12 Enrollment in twelve El Paso area school districts:170,692 Ethnic breakdown of student enrollment: Hispanic:88.2%
2009 Report Card and TVAAS Update Recalibration 2009 October 26, 2009.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
A GUIDE FOR CANTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS The Mississippi Literacy-Based Promotion Act
Edgewood ISD of San Antonio Annual Performance Report February 9, 2012.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
understanding LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
What we know as of … February 21, 2011
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Accountability Update
Advancing ELL Progress
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
CTE and Accountability: July 2018
Impact of EL Students and TELPAS Performance on State Accountability
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document1 SAISD TAKS Performance Board Work Session June 2005 Office of Research, Evaluation, and Assessment

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document2 Vision 2005 and Beyond Mission Statement The mission of the San Antonio Independent School District is to graduate all students as responsible citizens with the academic and social preparation to pursue higher education, join the military, or enter the workforce.

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document3 SAISD Fundamental Beliefs Excellence and equity in student performance are achievable for all students. No child will be left behind. The teacher is the program. People support what they help create. Change comes from within.

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document4 District Functions 1. Governance 2. Teaching and Learning 3. Student Support 4. Administration 5. Human Resources 6. Technology 7. Communications 8. School-Community Relations 9. Special Facilities Construction and Improvement

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document5 Elevating Assessment Standards: TAKS (Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills), SDAA II (State Developed Alternative Assessment II), and TELPAS (Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System) Texas is in year three of a phase-in program to transition to a more rigorous state test – TAKS. In order to compare growth from one year to the next, the same performance standards need to be used. In 2005, except for Grade 11, we are at the standard originally intended by the State Board of Education. The current year standard for grades 3 – 10 is known as “Panel Recommendation.” Grade 11 will be at this standard in All slides showing PR in this presentation, show 3 – 10 at PR and Grade 11 at 1 SEM (accountability standard). The 2004 – 2005 school year was the first year for a newly developed State Developed Alternative Assessment II to measure the performance of students in special education receiving instruction below grade level or at grade level, but with needed modifications not permitted by TAKS.

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document6 Elevating Assessment Standards: TAKS (Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills), SDAA II (State Developed Alternative Assessment II), and TELPAS (Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System) In order to meet the new federal requirements for English Language Learners called Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs), the state has developed a new Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS). Information on this system was presented to the Board in February of In an effort to focus on state accountability in this presentation, we will address TAKS, SDAA II – only as it affects state accountability, and we will not address TELPAS in this report. Later reports on federal accountability will address these mandates.

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document7 Comparison Framework The following slides show SAISD achievement across two years of TAKS. The first slide in the series shows the growth measured at the same level of difficulty across two years. Last year’s scores were converted to the same standard as This is true growth – “apples to apples.” The second slide in the series shows the growth measured against the state. Are we making disproportionate gain? How much greater is our gain than state gain? At grade 5 State and District gain is measured for the first administration only, because the figures for the second administration were not yet available at the State level.

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document SAISD TAKS Reading Grades 3- 11* Growth by Panel Recommendation *Grade 11 at 1SEM.

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document9 Reading: Comparison of District to State Pluses Indicate Closing of the Gap

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document – 2005 SAISD TAKS Math Grades 3- 11* at Panel Recommendation NC *Grade 11 at 1 SEM

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document11 Math: Comparison of District to State Pluses Indicate Closing of the Gap

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document – 2005 SAISD TAKS Writing Grades 4, 7 at Panel Recommendation

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document13 Writing: Comparison of District to State Pluses Indicate Closing of the Gap + + +

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document – 2005 SAISD TAKS Science Grades 5, 10, 11* at Panel Recommendation Grade 11 at 1 SEM

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document15 Science: Comparison of District to State Pluses Indicate Closing of the Gap

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document SAISD TAKS Social Studies Grades 8, 10, 11* at Panel Recommendation *Grade 11 at 1 SEM

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document17 Social Studies: Comparison of District to State Pluses Indicate Closing of the Gap

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document18 SDAA II: District Accountability Subject# Tested# Met ARD Expectation % Met ARD Expectation Reading % Math % Writing % TOTAL % Note: Preliminary Accountability Subset is used.

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document19 Summary of District Gains/Losses Compared to State Measures “closing the gap” against State % (81% in 2004) Measures “gap widened 3.5 percentage points or less” 519% (16% in 2004) Measures “gap widened more than 3 percentage points” 310% (3% in 2004) Total 31100% In 90% of measures, the District gain surpassed state gain (74%) or was within 3.5 percentage points of state gain (16%). The State made gain in only 24 measures total (77%), while the District made gain in 28 of the 31 measures (90%).

Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document20 TAKS The District made gains during the school year even with the substantial elevation of standards. Planning for the new school year will address areas revealed by this analysis. Programs are under review for needed changes during the coming year. Substantive gain continues and we are “Proud to be in SAISD.”