1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training February 27, 2012 Part 1 – Welcome Back!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Please go to WELCOME Please go to Click “Join This Space” Sign in to (or create)
Advertisements

Introducing Instructional Expectations
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
RTTT Teacher Evaluator Training
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 June 12, 2012 Welcome BT BOCES, SV, ME, Chenango Forks, Newark Valley, Windsor, Tioga and Vestal.
Day 2: Learning and Teaching Session 2: Recording Evidence NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Kentucky Teacher Internship Program: Teacher Performance Assessment (TPA) Career and Technical Education Session November 18, :00 – 6:00 pm.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
Effective Use of Assessment and Data Winterhill School – October 2014.
November 1, 2011 with Dawn Shannon and Barb Phillips.
Checking For Understanding
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back! Can I have your attention please?
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1.
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING October 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome!
The 5 E Instructional Model
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome Back! Have you signed the roster?
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome Back!
Created and facilitated by: Melissa Aviles-Ramos ELA Instructional Specialist, Network 603 Tel:
RTTT Teacher Evaluator Training Day 8 Based on the Training of Teaching Learning Solutions (TLS) and Community Training and Assistance Center (CTAC)
Reflective Practice Creating Opportunities for Exploration and Growth 25 Industrial Park Road, Middletown, CT · (860) Connecticut.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back! Can I have your attention please?
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back! Can I have your attention please?
Day 6. Agenda Just how is this thing supposed to go? Math! Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability.
Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Day 3 Welcome Back!
Active Participation Through Student Responses facilitated by April Kelley.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
August 19, 2015 Do Now  On a ticket, write your name.  On scratch paper, write down definition of formative assessment  Find a partner to work with.
Cooperative Learning Please sit in groups of 5.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
1 Happy Halloween Visit the candy table and choose your favorite Halloween treat Visit the candy table and choose your favorite Halloween treat.
C CC Checking For Understanding & Guided Practice Amanda Conklin Domonique Ragni Rene Milano Samantha Fulin Amy Moeller.
Long and Short Term Goals To develop a responsible and positive attitude we chose Respect for Self, Others and Learning for the long term goal. Our students.
A brief introduction to
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back!
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1 – Welcome Back!
Hosted by Julie Milder Unpacking the Classroom Environment and Culture and Professional Collaboration and Communication Dimensions of 5D+
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 1.
Welcome to Effective Instruction Day 2! Visit the different posters. Place your dots on the continuum for each statement to reflect your use of feedback.
QUADRANT PARTNERS VIDEO SUCCESSFUL COACHING Know contemporary views & standards Model & demonstrate effective instructional behaviors Provide.
Good Morning Please come in and pick a table. At least 2 people need to sit at each table. Take a piece of purple paper out of the basket. Trace your hand.
Adding & Subtracting Within 5 TTE 316: Teaching Mathematics/Technology with Young Students Victoria Vega.
Personal Communication as Classroom Assessment. “What’s in a question, you ask? Everything. It is a way of evoking stimulating response or stultifying.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Welcome!
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
CFU Strategies MJHS Problem of Practice Problem of Practice: Based on classroom observations and administrative/department meetings, it is.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training Part 2 – Session 1 November 14 th, 2012 Welcome!
Measuring Growth Mindset in the Classroom
Lead Evaluator Training
The Learning Cycle 1 Prepare for learning 2 6 Review – Step back
Why bother – is this not the English Department’s job?
Lead Evaluator Training
The Framework for Teaching
Lead Evaluator Training
Lead Evaluator Training
Lead Evaluator Training
HANDOUT Page for facilitators that lists all the hand outs needed for the workshop and the meanings of icons used on the slides in this workshop. SLIDE.
Lead Evaluator Training Part 1
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Lead Evaluator Training
Can I have your attention please?
Lead Evaluator Training
Checking For Understanding & Guided Practice
Seminar Four Quality Academic feedback: oral and written
Presentation transcript:

1 Evidence Based Observation Lead Evaluator Training February 27, 2012 Part 1 – Welcome Back!

 “I want to be sure I collect relevant evidence. By relevant, I mean what makes good teaching and learning.”  “To remain unbiased when taking detailed notes.”  “To keep my bias in check and focus on specific criteria.”  “I want to practice with other administrators and compare notes.”

1. How do you ensure all students have an opportunity to demonstrate their understanding during a lesson? 2. What were the students and the teacher doing that gives the observer evidence that the students understood the objective of the lesson? 3. What criteria do you look for in your classrooms to know that checking for understanding is happening?

 We really all need to work on being consistent.  The practice with videos is helpful. (you want more!)  That being “unbiased” is harder than you thought…  You appreciate the opportunities for interaction and conversation.

Collection of factual information Free of bias or opinion Based on specific criteria Used to provide feedback for reflection and improvement of teacher practice

“There is no power for change greater than a community discovering what it cares about.” Margaret Wheatley

 Continue to practice collecting evidence of “check for understanding.”  Bring an observation that you have completed.  Identify the presence of “check for understanding” in your current observation tools.

 Explain the difference between current practice and evidence based observation  Identify and define criteria for one area of effective instruction around which evidence collection will be focused  Define the differences between the definitions of “Engaged Learners” in the rubrics approved by SED.

 Explain the impact of confusing and/or ambiguous language on the process of teacher evaluation.  Describe strategies that a district could employ to increase the quality of evaluations and the agreement of evaluators.

 Pink: Danielson’s Framework for Teaching (ASCD)  Orange: Danielson (2011 Revised Edition)  Tan: Marshall’s Teacher Evaluation Rubric  Green: Marzano’s Causal Teacher Evaluation  Blue: NYSTCE Framework for the Observation of Effective Teaching (Pearson)  White: NYSUT’s Teacher Practice Rubric  Purple: Thoughtful Classroom Teacher Effectiveness (Silver Strong & Associates)

All students are visibly participating in activities/learning that is relevant to the objective.

Continuum of Engagement TEACHER ONLY SIMULTANEOUS ACTIVE PARTICIPATION OPTIONAL STUDENT PARTICIPATION OCCASIONAL TEACHER DIRECTED PARTICIPATION

All students used the response clickers to answer the question the teacher posed, “How many sides does a square have?” The teacher stated to the class, “Using the index cards on your desk, write three pieces of information you must include in your resume.” All of the students wrote their answers on the index cards.

Envelopes (with “cut up” sentences enclosed) were placed on the table. All students took an envelope from the table, returned to their desks, and put the cut up sentences in order. The teacher stated, “Write 6X4= on your white board and then solve.” All students wrote the equation on their boards and solved. When the teacher said, “Show!” all the students held up their boards for the teacher to see.

What did you collect? All students mirrored the teacher’s physical actions when she stated, “Mirror me please.” The teacher clapped and said, “Teach.” Students clapped and said, “Ok.” Then, all students faced one another (in pairs) to mirror their partner’s physical actions. The 4 types of slopes of lines were stated by the student labeled “North” in each pairing.

What did you collect? During the “quiz,” the teacher pointed to lines posted on the board in the front of the room. All students faced Ms. Dewit and used hand gestures to represent negative, positive, undefined or no slope.

What did you collect? The 7 students were told, “Your job is going to be to construct a pen.” The students were given envelopes with pen parts inside and were timed while they put the pens together. Teacher stated to the class, “Look around the room for things with interchangeable parts.” Teacher asked, “What kind of revolution is this?” One student replied, “A good revolution to a better future.” Another student replied, “Industrial revolution”

What did you collect? Teacher stated, “The person sitting in the 4 position-at every table except for this one when it is the 3 person-I need you to come to the front and stand in a line.” 7 students came to the front of the room. Teacher stated to the seven students, “Raise your hands if you can answer yes to the following questions.” 3 questions were posed about having expertise with pens. No students responded yes.

On your feedback sheet: 1. Write one question that you think everyone should be able to answer about “engaged learners.” 2.Write a personal goal that you have around “engaged learners.”

 Practice collecting evidence of “engaged learners.”  Examine an observation that you have completed, looking for evidence and bias/opinion  Identify the presence or absence of “engaged learners” in your current observation tool.