P-20 in Action – Michigan’s Focus on Career and College Ready Students: Success through Cross- Agency Collaboration 2012 MIS Conference February 16, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
Advertisements

2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.
The State of Ohio’s Ninth Graders Will they be in this picture? Ninth Grade Make-It or Break-It Year Retreat March 31, 2006 Presented by Kathy Shibley,
Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
Iowa Assessment Update School Administrators of Iowa November 2013 Catherine Welch Iowa Testing Programs.
The ADE-Post- Secondary SLDS Project Presented to: CTE Administrators Meeting February 7, 2013 Mark T. Masterson Chief Information Officer.
Individualized Learning Plans A Study to Identify and Promote Promising Practices.
April 2010 Minnesota’s P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Education Data System (SLEDS) Minnesota Office of Higher Education.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
CTE and Workforce Inquiry in MISchoolData Portal These materials are provided as part of the Official Training Resources and Professional Development Activities.
Why College- and Career- Ready Expectations for All Nevada Students? Updated February 2013.
GEAR UP GEAR UP NASSFA Conference Maureen McLaughlin Deputy Assistant Secretary Office of Post Secondary Education JULY 9, 2000.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Adult Education Career Pathways: A New Beginning.
Reporting college and career readiness results to the public DQC Public Reporting Task Force | January 9, 2014.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
(MSP) 2 : Minority Student Pipeline, Math Science Partnership Strengthening the Early-College Minority Student Pipeline in Science with a Multi-Faceted.
Using Data to Identify Student Needs for MME Stan Masters Coordinator of Curriculum, Assessment, and School Improvement Lenawee ISD August 26, 2008.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
January Virginia Strategies for Reducing the Need for Remediation After Graduation Education Commission of the States January 7, 2010 Dr. Patricia.
School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.
Why College- and Career- Ready Expectations for All Georgia Students? Updated February 2013.
Special Education Briefing April 10, 2015 HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HawaiiPublicSchools.org.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning California’s Teaching Force 2004 Key Issues and Trends Research conducted by SRI International California.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
Education in Kansas. Where have we been? Where are we now? Where are we headed?
State Charter Schools Commission of Georgia SCSC Academic Accountability Update State Charter School Performance
Why College- and Career- Ready Expectations for All Wisconsin Students? Updated February 2013.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
MI-SAAS: Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System Overview of Key Features School Year.
Direction of Kansas Education Brad Neuenswander Interim Commissioner, KSDE Fall, 2014.
ESC Region XI Module Two B Studying Local Data for Region XI Fort Worth Partners All AVATAR artifacts :
Michigan School Data (MI School Data). What is MI School Data? MI School Data is the web presence for district users, the public, researchers, etc. to.
Vision for Education in Tennessee Our Strategic Priorities ESEA Directors Institute Kathleen Airhart, Deputy Commissioner August 2014.
MEAP / MME New Cut Scores Gill Elementary February 2012.
P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION State Policies: Orchestrating the Common Core Mathematics Classroom Ilene W. Straus, Vice President California State.
Introduction to the MI School Data Portal These materials are provided as part of the Official Training Resources and Professional Development Activities.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
State of Michigan’s P-20 Longitudinal Data System and MI School Data Portal Progress.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM Haymon-Morris Middle School NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
Michigan School Data (MI School Data). Agenda  Overview of MI School Data Portal  Navigation 101  Sample Reports  Training and TA  Q & A 2.
College Data on MISchoolData.org. MI School Data – MI School Data –  MI School Data is an online data portal created by the.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
Using MI School Data Michigan Association of Secondary School Principals EdCon 2016 Conference- June 28, 2016 Nicholas Armit- MI School Data Portal Manager-
Annual Report to the Public CENTERPOINT OCTOBER 10, 2016 SCHOOL DISTRICT.
How Can High School Counseling Shape Students’ Postsecondary Attendance? Exploring the Relationship between High School Counseling and Students’ Subsequent.
Wicomico County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Washington County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
TESTING, RESEARCH & ACCOUNTABILITY
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
National Conference on Student Assessment June 2016
New Statewide Accountability System
Special Education Inquiry MI School Data Portal
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report
Presented to the Octorara Area School Board on December 3, 2018
Starting Community Conversations
Meet and Greet/Open House A Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

P-20 in Action – Michigan’s Focus on Career and College Ready Students: Success through Cross- Agency Collaboration 2012 MIS Conference February 16, Photo(s) are stock photos.

Overview 1. Brief overview of Michigan’s P-20 initiative 2. What’s fair game? So much data, so many ways to use it! 3. Michigan’s Career and College Ready Standards Why the new cut scores on the state assessments? How do these modifications better gauge overall student progress? 4. Research to support these changes Michigan Collaborative for Educational Research Work product review Preliminary study items College Enrollment and Persistence Reports 5. Questions and Answers Venessa Keesler Thomas Howell Special Thanks to our Data Portal Partners: Macomb ISD, Calhoun ISD, Shiawassee RESD Education Data Portal Site: OR 2

Michigan’s P-20 Strategy American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Metrics America Competes Act and Data Quality Campaign (DQC) State, District and School-Level Report Cards/Dashboard Governor’s Education Dashboard (state-level) Dashboard Drill-Through (district and school-level views) Accountability and Accreditation Focus for K-12 State Assessment Results MEAP/MME/MI-Access Test scores College Readiness Indicator (ACT scores) Students Not Tested New Cut Scores Annual Education Report required by NCLB-Title I Enrollment Student Count (including additional subgroups – historical data only) Graduation/Dropout Non-resident Reports Postsecondary Enrollment Persistence Remediation Educator effectiveness Effectiveness Ratings (Principals only 2010/11) Evaluation Factors 3 Photo(s) are stock photos.

MI School Data – Coming Attractions 4  New Student Counts  Pupil Attendance  Mobility  Retention in Grade  Persistently Lowest Achieving Reports  School District Financial Comparison Reports  School District Staffing Reports  Special Education Reports  Data portraits (requirements validation in progress)  Public reports (requirements validation in progress)  Help and Professional Development items for current Special Ed data inquiries  Workforce Reports  Career and Technical Education workforce alignment  Site Improvements  Professional Development Materials and Tools  User Interface Improvements  Data Dictionary/Help Photo(s) are stock photos.

5 Photo(s) are stock photos.

Career and College Ready in MI Michigan implemented new career- and college-ready cut scores for the school year. The “proficient” cut score now indicates that a student is on track for career- and college-readiness in the 11 th grade, and on track for proficiency in the next grade in grades 3-9. Gives schools, students and parents a more accurate picture of the preparation of their students for postsecondary endeavors. 6

What are the results? Reading proficiency rates: 61-69% (depending on grade) *Reading proficiency rates previously ranged from mid-80s to the 90s Math proficiency rates: 29-40% *Math proficiency rates previously ranged from 50-70% Science proficiency rates: 15-17% Social studies: 28% Writing: 45-47% Michigan has substantial improvements to make for all students to be on track for career- and college-readiness. 7

Michigan’s Postsecondary Transitions Michigan Merit Curriculum New postsecondary data Research partnership to help us determine the effectiveness of this policy What are the postsecondary outcomes of students in Michigan? How have they changed over time? How have they been impacted by policy changes (like the Michigan Merit Curriculum)? 8

Michigan Consortium for Educational Research (MCER) Five year, $6 million partnership between the University of Michigan, Michigan State University, the Michigan Department of Education and the Center for Educational Performance and Information. Purpose: to study the Michigan Merit Curriculum and the Michigan Promise Scholarship Activities: Linking all of Michigan’s K-12 data together longitudinally; produced the first longitudinally linked research file in Michigan. Tying K-12 data to postsecondary data (National Student Clearinghouse; Michigan-specific data). 9

A note on research partnerships SEA partnerships with external researchers at IHEs can DRAMATICALLY increase research capacity for the SEA However—like all relationships—these relationships take work! A few challenges: Data still not “researcher-ready” Creating a longitudinal file for research….not super easy! Lots of “special requests” Linking external data sources to our UICs 10

Postsecondary Enrollment Percentage of ninth graders who graduate on-time and enroll in postsecondary education within four months of graduation from high school. Results for the 2008 cohort 49% -- go to postsecondary education 29% --four year college 23% --two year college Only 6% go out of state 11

How are those rates different by demographics? More females enrolling than males (55% vs 44%) 10% of special education students 40% of limited English proficient students 35% of economically disadvantaged students Between 31% (Hispanics) and 68% (Asians) of the racial/ethnic groups 12

By student achievement? Quartiles of achievement scores in 11 th grade What are the enrollment rates by quartile? (49%=average rate) Highest quartile: 86% 3 rd quartile: 73% 2 nd quartile: 53% Lowest quartile: 28% 13

Student Persistence in Postsecondary Education 2007 cohort statistics Defined as remaining in PSE on year after on-time graduation Average persistence rate (any postsecondary institution): 35% 14

Persistence by Demographics Females have higher persistence rates than males (39% vs. 30%) 5% of students with disabilities 28% limited English proficient students 21% economically disadvantaged students Between 56% (Asian) and 19% (Hispanic) students 15

Persistence by student achievement? Average persistence rate: 35% Highest quartile: 72% Second quartile: 51% Third quartile: 33% Lowest quartile: 15% 16

Takeaways (so far) Michigan has more of a persistence problem than an enrollment problem (in terms of postsecondary education) We have significant challenges with our lowest achieving students—suggests a stronger focus on achievement gaps (both in K-12 and beyond) ESEA Flexibility application offers us opportunity for this focus 17

QUESTIONS? 18