IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser1 IceTop IceTop station 2004 test tanks Calibration Verification 04/05 DOM operation Summary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Anisotropy in Cosmic Ray Arrival Directions Using IceCube and IceTop Frank McNally ISCRA.
Advertisements

Antonis Leisos KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting the calibration principle using atmospheric showers the calibration principle using atmospheric showers Monte.
Antonis Leisos KM3NeT Design Study the calibration principle using atmospheric showers the calibration principle using atmospheric showers construction.
Kay Graf University of Erlangen for the ANTARES Collaboration 13th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow, August 23 – 29, 2007 Acoustic.
TeVPA, July , SLAC 1 Cosmic rays at the knee and above with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav for The IceCube Collaboration South Pole 4 Feb 2009.
The presence of the South Pole Air Shower Experiment (SPASE) on the surface provides a set of externally tagged muon bundles that can be measured by AMANDA.
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
SUSY06, June 14th, The IceCube Neutrino Telescope and its capability to search for EHE neutrinos Shigeru Yoshida The Chiba University (for the IceCube.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Special Issues on Neutrino Telescopy Apostolos G. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University School of Science & Technology Particle and Astroparticle Physics.
IceCube System Testing
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
IceTop Tank Calibration Abstract This report outlines the preliminary method developed to calibrate IceTop tanks using through going single muon signals.
EHE Search for EHE neutrinos with the IceCube detector Aya Ishihara for the IceCube collaboration Chiba University.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
Dec 2, 2003Tom Gaisser IceTop freeze tests Interim report from South Pole December 2, 2003.
Apostolos Tsirigotis Simulation Studies of km3 Architectures KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting April 2007, Pylos, Greece The project is co-funded by the.
Ground Level Enhancement of May 17, 2012 Observed at South Pole SH21A-2183 Takao Kuwabara 1,3 ; John Bieber 1 ; John Clem 1,3 ; Paul Evenson 1,3 ; Tom.
Status of IceTop tank testing Tom Gaisser, Madison, Feb 20, 2003.
SN DAQ for IceCube Marc Hellwig Universität Mainz IceCube DAQ Meeting, Berkeley, Expected Signal Time resolution in Simulation Artificial Deadtime.
NSF Baseline Review February 10-12, 2004 IceTop Tom Gaisser Bartol Research Inst., Univ. of Delaware Jan 28, 2004T. Gaisser, L3 Lead for IceTop1.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Nov 30, 2003Tom Gaisser The IceTop component of IceCube Perspective from the South Pole.
Preliminary MC study on the GRAND prototype scintillator array Feng Zhaoyang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, China GRAND Workshop, Paris, Feb. 015.
Why Neutrino ? High energy photons are absorbed beyond ~ 150Mpc   HE  LE  e - e + HE s are unique to probe HE processes in the vicinity of cosmic.
Paul Evenson June CAU Kiel April 20, 2010 Solar Physics with the IceTop Air Shower Array Paul Evenson University of Delaware Department of Physics.
March 02, Shahid Hussain for the ICECUBE collaboration University of Delaware, USA.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
1 Cosmic Rays in IceCube: Composition-Sensitive Observables Chihwa Song a, Peter Niessen b, Katherine Rawlins c for the IceCube collaboration a University.
Status and first results of the KASCADE-Grande experiment
Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review The IceTop component of IceCube Area--solid-angle ~ 1/3 km 2 sr (including angular dependence of EAS.
KEK, Feb 27, 2006Tom Gaisser1 Cosmic-ray physics with IceCube IceTop the surface component of IceCube.
CEA DSM Irfu Reconstruction and analysis of ANTARES 5 line data Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration XX th Rencontres de Blois 21 / 05.
IceTop DAQ: 1 David Seckel – 8/27/2003, College Park, MD IceTop DAQ David Seckel University of Delaware.
NSF Baseline Review February 10-12, 2004 IceTop Tom Gaisser Bartol Research Inst., Univ. of Delaware Jan 28, 2004T. Gaisser, L3 Lead for IceTop1.
David Seckel, IceTop Baseline Review, Madison, Dec. 4, 2003 IceTop Baseline Review Dec. 4, Madison WI.
RASTA: The Radio Air Shower Test Array Enhancing the IceCube Observatory M. A. DuVernois University of Wisconsin IceCube Research Center for the RASTA.
APRIM Chiang Mai July 28, 2011 Heliospheric Physics with IceTop Paul Evenson University of Delaware Department of Physics and Astronomy.
Hadronic interaction studies with the ARGO-YBJ experiment (5,800 m 2 ) 10 Pads (56 x 62 cm 2 ) for each RPC 8 Strips (6.5 x 62 cm 2 ) for each Pad ( 
IceCube Calibration Overview Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley MANTS 2009 Berlin, 25 September identical sensors in ultraclean,
Hybrid measurement of CR light component spectrum by using ARGO-YBJ and WFCTA Shoushan Zhang on behalf of LHAASO collaboration and ARGO-YBJ collaboration.
June 1, 2005Tom Gaisser CORSIKA summer school Cosmic-ray cascades in the atmosphere 1)Air shower phenomenology 2)Inclusive fluxes in the atmosphere.
June 6, 2006 CALOR 2006 E. Hays University of Chicago / Argonne National Lab VERITAS Imaging Calorimetry at Very High Energies.
Sebastian Kuch, Rezo Shanidze Preliminary Studies of the KM3NeT Physics Sensitivity KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting Pylos, Greece, April 2007.
Nov 30, 2003Tom Gaisser The IceTop component of IceCube Perspective from the South Pole.
Physical Description of IceTop 3 Nov IceTop Internal Review Madison, November 3-4, 2010 Physical Description of IceTop Paul Evenson, University.
Detecting Air Showers on the Ground
South Pole Astro April 4, 2011 Tom Gaisser1 125 m Cosmic-ray physics with IceCube IceTop is the surface component of IceCube as a three-dimensional cosmic-ray.
04/05 IceTop schedule * Power required ** Water required Dec 1 Dec 10 Dec 20 Jan 6 Connect to TCH Fill tanks Jan 20 Feb 3 Backfill Cover tanks Run DOMs.
IceTop Design: 1 David Seckel – 3/11/2002 Berkeley, CA IceTop Overview David Seckel IceTop Group University of Delaware.
Status of Detector Characterization a.k.a. Calibration & Monitoring Project Year 2 objectives ( → Mar ‘04) 1. Calibration plan (first draft in March.
Geant4 Simulation for KM3 Georgios Stavropoulos NESTOR Institute WP2 meeting, Paris December 2008.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Search for Ultra-High Energy Tau Neutrinos in IceCube Dawn Williams University of Alabama For the IceCube Collaboration The 12 th International Workshop.
EHE Search for EHE neutrinos with the IceCube detector Aya Ishihara Chiba University.
Bergische Universität Wuppertal Jan Auffenberg et al. Rome, Arena ARENA 2008 A radio air shower detector to extend IceCube ● Three component air.
Downgoing Muons in the IceCube experiment: Final presentation for Phys 735, Particle, Prof. Sridhara Dasu L.Gladstone 2008 Dec 3.
The dynamic range extension system for the LHAASO-WCDA experiment
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
completed in austral season South Pole completed in austral season.
IceCube System Testing
T. Gaisser, L3 Lead for IceTop
IceCube: Neutrino telescope & cosmic-ray detector
Performance of the AMANDA-II Detector
Results on the Spectrum and Composition of Cosmic Rays
Sergey Abrahamyan Yerevan Physics Institute APEX collaboration
Karen Andeena, Katherine Rawlinsb, Chihwa Song*a
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Estimation of Sensitivity to Gamma Ray point Sources above 30TeV
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser1 IceTop IceTop station 2004 test tanks Calibration Verification 04/05 DOM operation Summary (Season plan)

IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser2 IceTop DAQ must capture three classes of events in 04/05: Single particles (low-energy e ±, ,  for tank calibration) –Remnants of low energy interactions –~ 2.5 kHz for 30 MeV threshold (10 pe) –Muons deposit MeV (70 pe) Small showers (few TeV for tagging single  in deep-ice) –Typical source of  background in deep detector (E  ~ 0.5 TeV initially) –10-20 m footprint on ground Coincidence between two tanks at a station No signal in neighboring stations No IceTop trigger Check each in-ice event for such surface activity Large showers that trigger IceTop (E > 300 TeV for air showers and muon bundles in deep-ice) – 3 or 4 stations hit in ~300 ns window –Primary energy up to 10^7 GeV with 4 stations [ Horizontal multi-m events (later in year or next season) ]

IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser3 IceTop Detector 2 m 0.9 m Diffusely reflecting liner

IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser4 IceTop station Two Ice Tanks 2.7 m 2 x 0.9 m deep (scaled-down version of Haverah, Auger) Integrated with IceCube: same hardware, software Coincidence between tanks = potential air shower Local coincidence with no hit at neighboring station tags muon in deep detector Signal in single tank = potential muon Significant area for horizontal muons Low Gain/High Gain operation to achieve dynamic range Two DOMs/tank gives redundancy against failure of any single DOM because only 1 low-gain detector is needed per station ~ 5-10 TeV

IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser5 Feb 10/11, 2004 Tank 9 with  telescope Tank 10

Tank10 Temperature Sensors 9 Feb 04 9 Apr May ,2,3,6 Tank9 DOMs Tank10 DOMs indicates cold start air DOM MainBoard Temperatures 18 Jul 04 Note that -Tank9 is still 3 deg colder than Tank10 - MB temps 10 deg warmer than ice in normal operation - Glass temp tracks MB temps, warmer by only 5 o - Glass and MB reaches ice temps at cold start - Tankice temps 6 deg warmer than snow - snow temps 10 deg warmer than air 8 Sep 04 3 Oct o

IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser7 Tank 2001 (buried under snow— different temperature sensors)

VEM

IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser9 Tank calibration & monitoring Use characteristic spectrum with muon peak and high-energy tail –Requires calibration data stream –Requires lab station for data template (two water tanks at UD) –Requires detailed simulations of response of tanks to Photons Electrons muons

IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser10 Test tanks for calibration: Full station at UD, 1 tank at UWRF Test tank at UWRF with AMANDA OMs

Fig 1 John Clem, FLUKA

Fig 4 Set discriminator threshold here John Clem, FLUKA

The simulation results are shown as histograms. The dashed green histogram is proton fluxes determined with a higher modulation level primary spectrum. Solid red circle is Bai et al measurement. All other data shown is from Grieder The dashed red line muon measurement at 3250 meters elevation and solid red is 2960 meters. Red diamond 700mbar pressure. Black line is gammas at 750mbars (measurement at unknown geomagnetic cutoff and mod level). Green line is protons at 3250 meters and green circle at 700g/cm2 (cutoff and mod level unknown) John Clem, FLUKA Comparison with measured flux

IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser14 Verification 04/05 Obtain charge spectrum from high- gain DOM in each tank Obtain rates of station hits and coincidences –station hit = both tanks hit within 100 ns –1-folds, 2-folds, 3-folds, 4-folds in 500 ns Zenith and azimuth distributions Coincidence rates with deep detector

Simulated response of single station hits (mostly single muons in deep ice) Low coincidence rate is due to 4-string geometry,  < 6 o in ‘05

Core location distributions, E p =18 TeV

Core locations for E p = 2.7 PeV Note that ring of distant singles from PeV showers will be removed by surrounding stations in larger array

E p, cos(  ) distributions of 4-folds 3-fold rate ~ 0.30 Hz

0o0o 90 o Azimuthal distributions

Spectrum of deposited energy for 4-fold events (VEM*factor)

13, , , ,-71 Numbers in boxes show hit times in ns relative to core time of ideal shower plane

IceTop DOM settings Set voltages so  peak is centered on ATWD0 of HG DOM and on ATWD2 of LG DOM Require local coincidence between tanks to keep data rate low Short calibration runs to collect single tank particle spectra

IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser23 Summary We are on track for 8 tanks in PY3 Ongoing temperature measurements clarify operating range for IceTop DOMs Operation of DOMs requires –Local coincidence (or high threshold) –Implementation of DAQ & data handling –Parallel studies with test tanks in labs at UD and UWRF –Simulation studies in parallel for calibration, event reconstruction (Peter Niessen’s talk)

IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser24 Nominal layout of IceTop Minimize deviations from nominal 125 m grid

Station configurations for 04/05

IceTop Station and Surface Junction Box Interface to IceCube System 24VDC +/-48VDC Freeze Controller Temporary Smurf Cables 2 +/-48VDC Cables 1 RS485 Data Cable Surface Cable from Counting House Surface to DOM Cable From Hole Surface Junction Box IceTop Excavation NOTES: 1. Drawing is in approximate relative scale. 2. Tanks are 10 meters between centers. 3. DOM cables are 17 meters long. 4. RS485 Master source is controlled by plugging in the desired data cable. 5. Tank power source is controlled by plugging in desired power cable. 6. Power Converter contains +/-48VDC to 24VDC converter and EMI filter. George Anderson Sept 17, 2004 File Rev F Power Converter (green box)

04/05 IceTop schedule * Power required ** Water required Dec 1 Dec 10 Dec 20 Jan 6 Connect to TCH Fill tanks Jan 20 Feb 3 Backfill Cover tanks Run DOMs Evenson 12/4 – 12/27 Gaisser 11/26-12/14 Tilav 1/12 – 2/1 Roth 11/26-12/16 Jamesway SMURF TCH Lundberg 12/17-1/13 Kelley 12/17-1/18

IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser28 SMURF = temporary temporary counting house to provide power, & monitoring of freeze control ~ 12/1 to 1/15 when TCH is ready

Some events

IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser30 time in 25 ns bins  calibration in Auger events muon charge distribution 3 PMT avg traces

IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser31 Muon self-calibration procedure Take in-tank coincidence data for each tank for commissioning Compare to lab template (in water) Interpret deltas with simulations Fix parameters for interpretation of signals Add to data base Vertical  (defined by  -telescope) In-tank coincidence (defined by 2 OMs) broadened  peak + low energy e-m background Data with test-tank setup at UD in water. (Large negative amplitudes on left.)

IceTop Collaboration Meeting Uppsala, Oct. 9, 2004Tom Gaisser32 Compress by ~10 for IceTop