Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
Advertisements

Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision December 2008 Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
TEQSA Registration and Material Change Processes Senior Management Summit 15 February 2012 Professor Merran Evans, Pro Vice-Chancellor, Planning and Quality.
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
A Definition of Distance Education Distance education is a formal educational process in which the majority of the learning occurs when student and instructor.
© The Association of Independent Schools of NSW Preparing for the ASQA Audit.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
February 13, From NEW to MAINSTREAM 6.7 million students took at least one online course in the Fall % of all higher education students.
TBA Compliance Training Long Beach City College Developed & Presented by Bob Rapoza LBCCD Internal Audit Manager TBA Compliance Training Long Beach City.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
TRENDS CONFERENCE OCTOBER 12, 2012 Developing Quality Online Courses for Successful Learning Experiences.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Steps in the Accreditation Cycle A Collaboration Effort: The United Negro College Fund and The Commission on Colleges Steps in the Accreditation Cycle.
Performance-based Contracting and Maine’s State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) Dawn Kliphan March 28, 2010.
JAZAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSING & ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Dr. Constance Ray Vice President, Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness.
CEPA Programs – Accrediting Concerns Presenters: Dr. Deborah Loper, Assistant Vice President of Institutional Effectiveness at Colorado Mountain College.
Asst. Prof. Thapanee Thammetar, Ph.D. Director of Thailand Cyber Univ. Quality Assurance, e-Learning content development and operation ASEAN-ROK Session.
Supplemental Education Service Providers Becoming a Supplemental Education Service Provider.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Faculty Ensuring competency and integrity. Faculty The university employs competent faculty qualified to accomplish the mission and goals of the institution.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
Student Support Services Standard II B & C. II.B. The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Reviewer Training 5/18/2012. Welcome & Introductions Co-Chairs: NHDOE Representative:Bob McLaughlin.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Accreditation through the lens of Distance Education Marina Aminy, Ph.D. Interim Dean of Online Education and Learning Resources.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Parallel Paths: Distance Education Basics Kevin Bontenbal, Cuesta College Stephanie Low, Chancellor’s Office Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College ASCCC Curriculum.
Regardless of Location or Means of Delivery: Meeting the Standards for Every Student Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Alice Taylor—West Los Angeles College.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
October 14, 2014 Reaffirmation of UofL.
Evaluator Training Workshop March 1, 2012 Jeff Jordan Vice President for Student Life Seattle Pacific University.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Distance Education Issues
Wendy Bass, Los Angeles Pierce College
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
The NEW Distance Education Guidelines
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
HLC
All About Resources: Standard III
Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Alice Taylor—West Los Angeles College
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Smooth Transitions to Making Program Modifications or Expansions
Consideration of Core Outcomes for Strategic Plan
Evaluation of Distance Education Curriculum
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Supporting SEACs across the Province:
Curriculum and Distance Education
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Presentation transcript:

Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison

Topic The regional accreditation process, whether it’s your first or 50th, is a challenge. With the proliferation of for-profit institutions and the resulting increase in Federal government oversight of accreditation, It’s more important than ever to watch your P’s and Q’s. What do you need to know? Distance education is not addressed in one section of the compliance certificate, but should be addressed in many. What are they?

Distance Ed Defined SACS Definition : “Formal educational process in which the majority of the instruction (interaction between students and instructor and among students) in a course occurs when students and instructors are not in the same place. Instruction may be synchronous or asynchronous. A distance education course may employ correspondence study, or audio, video, or computer technologies.”

Substantive Changes Substantive Changes require notification and/or permission prior to beginning programs. Distance Ed items include offering distance education as part of a program. Threshold percentage triggers notification and/or permission prior. Offering an existing program at a new street address. Offering an existing program in the online format. Offering a new Distance Ed program.

SACS Handouts Distance Education Policy Statement (updated December 2006; endorsed June 2009) Defines Distance Ed. Suggests relevant information to be addressed in certain sections of the compliance certificate for distance education, specifically. Distance Education and the Principles of Accreditation : Documenting Compliance: Guidelines (not dated; added to the SACS website January 2010) Provides expectations, questions for consideration, and best practices for documenting compliance.

Policy Statement 1997/2006 What is the benefit of this document? Distance Learning Administrators can use these items as a guide for establishing policies and procedures. While preparing the compliance certificate, authors of each section should have the items that refer to the section so they will include specific language to indicate compliance.

Guidelines January 2010 What is the benefit of this document? The Guidelines intro: “Institutions are responsible for the quality of programs and courses delivered by means of distance education …complemented by support structures and resources that allow for the total growth and development of their distance education students.” Use the guidelines to establish needed structures and resources for distance students, regardless of your reaccreditation schedule.

Mission & Org Structure 1. Expectation: Distance education should be reflected in the institution’s mission & approved by the Board. Best Practice : 5-Year technology plan addressing goals for distance education related to enrollment, academic and student services, course development, & faculty support. Question : Does the institution’s organizational chart reflect Distance Ed?

Institutional Effectiveness 2. Expectation: The institution’s assessment process should involve Distance Ed courses along with others. Expectation : Distance Ed program should have purpose & outcomes “as a whole” (independent of academic program & course outcomes). Best Practice : Demonstrate that the institution uses data to improve Distance Ed courses & programs.

Educational Programs 3. Expectation: In consortial arrangements, institutions must ensure the effectiveness and quality of courses & programs offered by all participants. Questions : Are provisions of the agreement, contract, arrangement clearly delineated? Is there provision for regular evaluation of the effectiveness of the arrangement? Best Practice : Evidence of regular review of contracts & agreements for distance education.

Educational Programs (cont.) 4. Expectation: Faculty have played an appropriate role in designing the courses/programs to be offered by Distance Ed. Best Practices : Logical course development schedule involving faculty input & ensuring course availability. Schedule of course offerings is available for students to plan their programs. “Consistency in course format.” Support system for faculty teaching Distance Ed courses.

Educational Programs (cont.) 5. Expectation: Technology adequate to support courses/programs. Faculty members should be proficient in the use of the technology. Students should know what technological expertise they will need and what technology they will need to successfully complete Distance Ed courses. Questions : Is technology training available to faculty teaching Distance Ed courses? Do students have access to assistance in using technology?

Faculty 6. Expectation: Institution employs sufficient full-time faculty to support its mission. Question : Are faculty members expected to plan for, design, and teach Distance Ed courses? Best Practices : Institutional policies regarding expectations of faculty regarding Distance Ed. “Evidence that consideration is given to the demands of teaching distance education courses. Faculty loads reflect this consideration.”

Faculty (cont.) 7. Expectation: Institution should consider and define unique qualifications for faculty members teaching Distance Ed courses. Faculty teaching Distance Ed courses are qualified to teach them. Question : Has the institution considered differences between teaching Distance Ed and teaching using “traditional” methodologies? Best Practice : Institution documents appropriate qualifications for Distance Ed faculty members.

Faculty (cont.) 8. Expectation: Institution regularly evaluates effectiveness of faculty teaching in Distance Ed. Criteria by which Distance Ed faculty will be evaluated is clear. Professional development activities and training is available to Distance Ed faculty members & ensures they engage. Best Practices : Institution publishes criteria for evaluation of and expectations for teaching in Distance Ed courses. Evidence in faculty files of evaluation of Distance Ed faculty members using published criteria.

Learning Resources 9. Expectation: All Distance Ed students have access to library/learning resources adequate to support courses. Orientation for Distance Ed students regarding use of resources. Staff available to assist students. Effectiveness assessed regularly. Best Practices : Regularly scheduled orientation sessions for Distance Ed students. Data showing provision of learning resources is effective and regularly evaluated for improvement.

Student Support Services 10. Expectation: Institution should consider support needs of Distance Ed students & provide for them. Admissions and counseling support available. Academic assistance available. Institution informs students how to access services and makes sure services are available when advertised. Best Practices : Distance students are provided a list of services available and how to access them. Services are available at reasonable times. Outcomes established for services to show that services are effective.

Student Support Services (cont.) 11. Expectation: Institution is expected to monitor success of Distance Ed students including drop out rates, failure rates, and completion rates. Best Practices : Institution can identify its Distance Ed students. The institution identifies Distance Ed students who need academic assistance AND intervenes to provide it. Distance Ed students are tracked as a group for the achievement of learning outcomes.

Student Support Services (cont.) 12. Distance Ed students have a process for submitting complaints. Best Practices : At registration, students are provided information about the student complaint process. Documentation exists that shows the institution is responsive to student complaints. (Actual completed forms & files.)

Financial Resources 11. Expectation: Institution makes Distance Ed courses & programs part of its mission, so it must provide adequate funding for faculty, staff, services, and technology to support it. Question : Does the budget reflect the provision of funding for needs of Distance Ed? Best Practices : Adequate funding for: technology, faculty, staff, administrative personnel, learning resources, and services. Funding needs are reflected in long-range budget projections for the institution.

Physical Resources 12. Expectation: Institution provides adequate technology resources to offer high quality Distance Ed courses & programs. Question: What technology does the institution use for Distance Ed? Best Practice: Technology resources, means of delivery, and other physical resources are available, maintained, staffed, and upgraded on a regular basis.

Questions? Thank you! Dr. Heather Hartman Brenau University Gainesville, GA