IRMOS Diffraction Grating Integral Tab Design  Performance of an optical system is highly sensitive to the surface distortion of the optics in the system.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optimal Shape Design of Membrane Structures Chin Wei Lim, PhD student 1 Professor Vassili Toropov 1,2 1 School of Civil Engineering 2 School of Mechanical.
Advertisements

6-7 July 20051B. C. Bigelow - UM Physics Finite element analysis of DECam May 11 C1 corrector lens – gravity and thermal load cases Bruce C. Bigelow, Physics.
Topsfield Engineering Service, Inc. Figure 1 Thermoelastic Analysis in Design William Bell & Paul-W. Young Topsfield Engineering Service, Inc. John Stewart,
FourStar Image Motion Stephen Smee (410)
A vertical-flexure CCD module Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 10/7/04.
1 Bolts in Tension pt1 Andrei Lozzi. The flanges at the end of the two turbine shafts seen above, are bolted together to form a very rigid friction coupling.
1 TYPICAL ELEMENTS Triangular shell element 6 D.O.F. per node Tetrahedral solid element 3 D.O.F. per node First order elements Linear displacement distribution.
Some Ideas Behind Finite Element Analysis
1 Grating Mount Requirements Weight:< 75 Lbs including grating (43.1 Lbs) Size:Fit within structural envelope. 1.5” for cell behind grating. Alignment:Adjust.
Be Reflector Thermal Distortion Analysis Sept. 26, 2005 Page 1 C. Powell/542 Beryllium Hollow Cube Retroreflector Thermal Distortion Analysis C. Powell/542.
Lecture 2 – Finite Element Method
MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 Iron Shield Mounting Design Stephanie Yang.
Copyright 2001, J.E. Akin. All rights reserved. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis.
Copyright © 2002J. E. Akin Rice University, MEMS Dept. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress.
FE calculations for the bolted helium vessel May 6th 2015
1 RF-Structures Mock-Up FEA Assembly Tooling V. Soldatov, F. Rossi, R. Raatikainen
Cryostat Structural, Thermal, and Vacuum Systems 14 October 2008 Martin Nordby, Gary Guiffre, John Ku, John Hodgson.
Integration and Alignment of Optical Subsystem Roy W. Esplin Dave McLain.
Oct 17, 2001SALT PFIS PDR - Structure1 Structure Interface/ constraints Loads Structure design rationale Truss Weight and CG Finite Element Analysis/ Image.
Introduction to virtual engineering László Horváth Budapest Tech John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics Institute of Intelligent Engineering.
Plate and shell elements All the following elements enable to create FE mesh of a thin-walled body, with the thickness being one of the important input.
SAM PDR1 SAM LGS Mechanical Design A. Montane, A. Tokovinin, H. Ochoa SAM LGS Preliminary Design Review September 2007, La Serena.
Design Analysis ‘n Manufacturing By - Yogesh Arora and Sangam Sinha.
MUON_EDR-06 (Alignment) Enrique Calvo Alamillo February 28-March 1, 2002 Link Mechanics: Status.
TSU F.E ANALYSIS YAIR SOFFAIR. Ojective Dynamic Response Calculation Temperature Distribution LOS Retention due to Temperatures Design Recommendations.
ZTF Cryostat Finite Element Analysis Andrew Lambert ZTF Technical Meeting 1.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
Copyright © 2010 Altair Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.Altair Proprietary and Confidential Information Section 13 Loads and Boundary Conditions.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 5.1 Grid Box Design 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Brewer Ozone Spectrophotometer Pointing and Levelling C.T. McElroy York University Canada.
Reproduction interdite © ALMA EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM Reproduction forbidden Design, Manufacture, Transport and Integration in Chile of ALMA Antennas Page.
1 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Hexapod Detector Mounts B. C. Bigelow, UM Physics 3/24/05.
Chris Chrzanowski Charles Frohlich Swales Aerospace, Inc.
US SKA TDP DVA-1 June 28-29, 2012Dish Verification Antenna No. 1 Critical Design Review, Penticton, BC Overview Of DVA-1 Optics Lynn Baker Bill Imbriale.
K-D-PR Fabrication and testing of KGMT FSM prototype Oct Ho-Soon Yang, Hak-Yong Kihm, Il-Kwon Moon, Jae-Bong Song, Yun-Woo Lee Korea.
Image courtesy of National Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, under cooperative agreement.
VXD Mechanical R&D at the University of Washington H. Lubatti, C. Daly, W. Kuykendall LCRD in conjunction with Fermilab, SLAC.
Spacecraft Interface/Handling Ring Robert Besuner 12 August 2004.
M. Gilchriese Module Assembly and Attachment at LBNL M. Gilchriese for F. Goozen April 2000.
Alignment Bars Requirements Strategy Layout Length Prediction Shape Prediction Readout Scheme Model to predict bar shape in the experiment Calibration.
4/20/2004s.e.mathews1 Steward Observatory Technical Division Mechanical Engineering Seminar Series Seminar #1 April 20, 2004.
Reproduction interdite © ALMA EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM Reproduction forbidden Design, Manufacture, Transport and Integration in Chile of ALMA Antennas Page.
An alternative spectrograph mount Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 5/14/04.
FVTX Review, November 17th, FVTX Mechanical Status: WBS 1.6 Walter Sondheim - LANL Mechanical Project Engineer; VTX & FVTX.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Bolt Preload and Shear Load
Design and Development of the FSM (Fast steering Secondary Mirror)
Status report AHCAL Mechanics Karsten Gadow CALICE Collaboration Meeting KEK, Studies of AHCAL absorber structure stability.
W.O. Miller i T i VG 1 Two Pixel Configurations Under Study First: A Monolithic Integrated Structure First: A Monolithic Integrated Structure –Axial array.
F. Dahlgren -SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 PF, TF, & Trim Coil Supports (WBS-15) Core Base Support Structure (WBS-17) F. Dahlgren NCSX Coil.
Jeff Bolognese p1 Super Nova/Acceleration Probe 16 November 2001 Structural Analysis Jeff Bolognese 16 November 2001.
Periscope Configuration
Silicon-to-Titanium Bond Preload Determination of the JWST NIRSpec Micro Shutter Subsystem FEMCI Workshop 2006 Eduardo Aguayo Jim Pontius.
Update: TF Outer Ring and Clevis Design TF Outer Ring – Implemented recommendations from P. Rogoff. Modified Bolted Joint. Modified weldment to reduce.
1 FPA Stage 2 Peer Review May 12, 2006 T. Brown. 2 FPA Stage 2 Status Summary of Stage 2 activities Review current design status Review schedule details.
Design of a Precision Robot Wrist Interface
A View of NCSX Structural System and Load Path for the Base Support Structure.
CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational.
Simulation: Editing Non-Native Geometry. © 2016 Autodesk Design Academy Editing Non-Native Geometry How to edit CAD models using Autodesk® SimStudio Tools.
TS Cool Down Studies TSu Unit Coils (24-25) N. Dhanaraj and E. Voirin Tuesday, 10 March 2015 Reference: Docdb No:
3 rd ESAC Review, 27 th February to 1 st March 2013, CEA Saclay Fresca2 Dipole Structure Assembly J.C Perez on behalf of Fresca2 collaboration team.
Finite element mesh and load definition
By: Udayasri Jandhyala Kanchan Joshi 03/18/2003 ME250 Prof. Furman.
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
CAD and Finite Element Analysis
DESIGN MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF SINGLE PLATE CLUTCH
PFIS Camera & Collimator Conceptual Design
DESIGN OF CONSTRAINT LECTURE
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Vertical-flexure CCD module: Thermal and Dynamic FEA
Another Modular Focal Plane: Part 2 – FP assembly
Presentation transcript:

IRMOS Diffraction Grating Integral Tab Design  Performance of an optical system is highly sensitive to the surface distortion of the optics in the system  Several factors contribute to the surface distortion of an optic  Machining  Gravity Sag  Thermal Loads  Assembly Loads  Isolation of the load path between the optic and it’s mount is one way to minimize surface distortion  IRMOS Aluminum optics have flexure-like tabs to help minimize the load transferred into the optic from various loading conditions

IRMOS System level FEM (Dewar and Adapter removed)

IRMOS Diffraction Grating Integral Mounting Tab

Diffraction Grating Assembly Loads  Tab flexures must be designed such that they are flexible enough to allow motion of the tab without violating optical surface RMS requirements, but strong enough to take the stresses induced by the motions of the tabs  One concern with the integral tab design is that the flexibility of the tabs allows for minimal translations and rotations during assembly  In high precision optics these minimal motions can induce undesirable distortion in the optical surface  IRMOS project set requirements for the minimum motion of a tab in any one direction during assembly  Translation : 0.005”  Rotation : 0.1 deg  These motions could arise if the tabs had to be moved to align bolt holes between the grating and it’s carrier, or if shims were required under the grating tabs during alignment of the optics

Diffraction Grating FEA  Grating FEM uses a combination of solid and plate elements  RSSCON cards used to connect shell and solid elements  Solid element face equal to shell element thickness  Shell edge is placed in the middle of the solid face  3 bolt holes in the mounting tabs were used as the boundary conditions  Load cases – gravity, thermal, assembly  Using FEA, Optical surface distortion can be obtained for all load cases and compared to the requirements set by optics group  Iterative process  If requirements are not met for a specific load case, FEM is modified and analysis is redone  Results of the FEA produce an optimum flexure design that can meet the stiffness requirements of gravity, thermal, and assembly loads and also be flexible enough to not transmit the motion to the surface of the optic

Detail View of Flexure FEM

IRMOS Diffraction Grating FEM

FEA Grating Optical Distortion Results Assembly Loads (.044 micron RMS requirement) ** rz limited by Fty = psi Gravity Loads (.032 micron RMS requirement) Thermal Loads (.032 micron RMS requirement) * Grating is limited to a.1 degree gradient in the z-direction based on the.032 micron RMS requirement

FEA Grating Optical Distortion Results Stresses in the grating tab flexures due to a.005” Dy motion of the –y tab (Fty = psi)

FEA Correlation  IRMOS diffraction grating test optics were used as one method of FEM validation  Test optics were attached to a “dummy” optical bench by the 3 integral mounting tabs  Test loading conditions included various torque sequences and various shim thickness/ placement as defined by FEA  Testing was performed at room temperature, with the grating oriented such that gravity was applied along the y-axis  Optical surface distortion was measured using an interferometer Dummy Bench Test Grating x y

FEA /Optical Test Results  Results from FEA and optical testing compared ** RMS surface error of unmounted grating was determined to be. 136 waves, this was removed from the optical test data Method RMS Error** (waves) FEA Test RMS Surface Error Induced by DZ Assembly Load (.005” shim placed under –y tab)  Good correlation between analysis and test results seen for all other load cases

Summary  FEA was used as an efficient and effective tool for optimizing the design of the diffraction grating tab flexure for maximum flexibility and minimum stress  Interferometric testing of the grating optical surface distortion was used to correlate FEA results with optical test results, and provided FEM validation  FEA methods used in the grating tab flexure design optimization were able to be applied to the flexible mounting tabs in all of the Aluminum IRMOS optics