HUMAN RESOURCES Teach Cobb! It’s Better at the Top! Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presenters: Maureen Chalmers (NWCC) and Terry Delaney(TRCC)
Advertisements

Unclassified Performance Management Process For Unclassified Administrative and Professional (Non-Teaching) Employees Summer 2011.
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Special Education Teachers Performance Evaluation Orientation
1 PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE Classified Staff Performance Evaluation To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select “Picture” Locate.
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
UMW Administrative and Professional Faculty Performance Evaluation Process.
Evaluations: Administrative & Classified Employees
UCLA Student Affairs Performance Management Program (PMP)
Educational Support Professional Evaluation Orientation August,
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
Orientation: Classified Evaluation Process
KCTCS PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCESS RESULTS OF KCTCS EMPLOYEE PPE SURVEY (Overall 317 faculty and 614 staff responded, a total of 931) Only 6% of.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams, CHRO.
WSU Training for Supervisors September 2014 Position Descriptions, Expectations, and Annual Reviews.
Performance Appraisal in the Public Sector
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Georgia Teacher Evaluation Program Orientation
Annual Self Assessment Workshop for Employees
Evaluating School Counselors SY13-14
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys ™ Module 8: Georgia Teacher Duties and Responsibilities Spring 2010 Teacher and.
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 School Counseling Office, SSS Gail Smith, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams,
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
CCSD Performance Evaluation Systems
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY11-12
Career Management A Roadmap for Planning Your Career.
  The Human Resources staff seeks to empower employee success.  We seek to inform, involve and inspire employees at every level.  We support the University.
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1 for Districts & Schools for Educators.
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
Library Media Specialist Evaluator Training August 2010 Library Media Education Dept, C&I Andy Spinks, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR Jan Holley,
Library Media Specialist Evaluator Training SY Library Media Education Dept, C&I Andy Spinks, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR Jan Holley,
The world is changing. Meet the future. Every student prepared for a world yet to be imagined Provide excellent, distinctive educational experiences that.
EVALUATIONS EVALUATIONS ARE REGULATED AND REQUIRED BY KDE (KAR’S AND KRS’S)
Evaluating School Counselors SY11-12 School Counseling Program, SSS Gail Smith, Ed. S., Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR Jan Holley, PHR, Director.
Martha Van Leeuwen University of Kansas Resources for Paraeducators Website The Laws for Paraeducators.
HUMAN RESOURCES Teach Cobb! It’s Better at the Top! Evaluating Central Office Employees Evaluator Training for Clerical Evaluations July 2008.
Faculty Orientation for Certified Evaluation SY13-14
School Social Workers’ Evaluation System Orientation SY10-11 School Social Workers Office, SSS Paulette Herbert, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office,
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY10-11 Guidance Services Office, SSS Gail Smith, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR Jan Holley,
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY15-16 Gail M. Smith, Supervisor School Counseling Office, Teaching and Learning Support and Specialized.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Evaluating School Counselors August 2010 School Counseling Program, SSS Gail Smith, Ed. S., Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR Jan Holley, PHR,
Office of Human and Resources 2014/2015 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS & GUIDELINES.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
HUMAN RESOURCES Teach Cobb! It’s Better at the Top! Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation Evaluator Training SY
Employability Skills Portfolio material.aspwww.communitycc.ca/ccc/resources/prog material.asp.
Unrepresented Staff Yearly Performance Reviews Tips for an Effective Review.
Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation Evaluator Training SY.
WSU Training for Supervisors September 2016 Position Descriptions, Expectations, and Annual Reviews.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.
WSU Training for Developing Leaders
Performance Review Tool Updates College of Engineering
UCLA Student Affairs Performance Management Program (PMP)
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
WSU Training for Developing Leaders
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
WSU Training for Developing Leaders
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation
Performance Management System
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
Presenters: Maureen Chalmers (NWCC) and Steve Krevisky (MXCC)
Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation
Kyrene School District Employee Information and Resources
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Kyrene School District Employee Information and Resources
WSU Training for Supervisors
Presentation transcript:

HUMAN RESOURCES Teach Cobb! It’s Better at the Top! Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation

Human Resources: Teach Cobb! It’s better at the Top! Classified Employees Evaluation Process Classified employees are evaluated in three Performance Categories, each containing performance descriptors which describe expected behaviors within the category ~ see your job-specific evaluation form  Job Competencies  Workplace Qualities  Human Relations

Human Resources: Teach Cobb! It’s better at the Top! 1 st Performance Category Job Competencies The first of 8 performance descriptors in this category references your job description Although the items on your job description are not specifically rated, the importance of your performance on the essential duties of your job can not be overstated The first descriptor in the Job Competency category is your supervisor’s assessment of your performance of your essential duties (job description) If you should receive a Needs Improvement (NI) on this single descriptor, you will not receive an overall Meets Expectations (ME) rating for this Performance Category

Human Resources: Teach Cobb! It’s better at the Top! Two Other Performance Categories… Workplace Qualities  These six performance descriptors address desirable behaviors in the workplace as related to your department and specific position, such as “self-motivated” Human Relations  These six performance descriptors address desirable traits related to professional interpersonal skills, such as “teamwork”

Human Resources: Teach Cobb! It’s better at the Top! How are these performance descriptors rated? Each descriptor is assigned one of three individual ratings based on the employee’s performance  Meets Expectations (ME)  Needs Improvement (NI)   Non-Applicable (NA) 

Human Resources: Teach Cobb! It’s better at the Top! What do the performance descriptor ratings mean? Simply put…. Meets Expectations (ME) means that the employee did what was expected of him/her and did it in a certain manner. Needs Improvement (NI) means that the employee didn’t do some of the things that were expected or that the things were not done in the expected manner. Non-applicable (NA) means the descriptor is not applicable to that employee. NA counts as an ME. Evaluator determines if a descriptor is NA.

Human Resources: Teach Cobb! It’s better at the Top! How is each overall category rating determined? Each Performance Category is given an Overall Category Rating based on the number of individual descriptors within the category and the rating received on each one: Job Competencies: 6 of 8 ME = Overall ME Workplace Qualities: 4 of 6 ME = Overall ME Human Relations: 4 of 6 ME = Overall ME Remember NA = ME

Human Resources: Teach Cobb! It’s better at the Top! So, how is the overall annual rating determined? The Annual Overall Rating is assigned based on the overall ratings earned on the three Performance Categories  Meets Expectations ME in all 3 Overall Ratings  Needs Improvement NI in 1 Overall Rating  Unsatisfactory NI in 2 or 3 Overall Ratings Just add ‘em up!

Human Resources: Teach Cobb! It’s better at the Top!  No Surprises!  No employee should receive an Annual Overall Unsatisfactory Rating unless he/she has been informed in writing of specific performance concerns during the year.

Human Resources: Teach Cobb! It’s better at the Top! Recognizing the Best! Your administrative evaluator is strongly encouraged to acknowledge exceptional performance with specific written commentary in Section VI of the evaluation document.

Human Resources: Teach Cobb! It’s better at the Top! When do I have my annual evaluation conference? Paraprofessionals must have their annual conferences by March 31st ~ State law, PSC regulation, and District Rule Other classified employees must have their annual conferences before June 30 th ~ District Rule

Human Resources: Teach Cobb! It’s better at the Top! What if I wish to appeal my annual evaluation rating? If an employee wishes to appeal his/her evaluation results, he/she must complete an evaluation appeal form (found on EMWeb) and submit it, along with any evidence and/or documentation, to the evaluator within 10 business days of the receipt of the original evaluation report The evaluator must respond to the appeal within 20 business days of receipt of the appeal If the rating is upheld by the evaluator, the employee may submit an appeal to the evaluator’s supervisor within 10 days of receipt of the evaluator’s response The evaluator’s supervisor must respond to the appeal within 20 days of receipt of the appeal If the evaluator’s supervisor upholds the rating, the appeal process is exhausted

Human Resources: Teach Cobb! It’s better at the Top! Unsatisfactory Annual Ratings~ Paraprofessionals Because Paraprofessionals are certified by the PSC, per GA law and PSC regulation, an annual Unsatisfactory rating earned by a paraprofessional must be recorded on the PSC’s UNSAT statewide database If a paraprofessional has 2 Unsatisfactory ratings on the database and has not demonstrated remediation (improvement), the PSC will not renew the paraprofessional’s certification

Human Resources: Teach Cobb! It’s better at the Top! Unsatisfactory Annual Ratings In accordance with Administrative Rule GBC, any employee earning an overall UNSAT annual rating will have his/her salary/step frozen until he/she has earned a satisfactory annual rating in a subsequent year Human Resources will receive the originals of all classified evaluations for filing in employees’ personnel files

Human Resources: Teach Cobb! It’s better at the Top! Help is on the way! As needed and at the Supervisor’s discretion, a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) may be developed to support professional growth at any time during the year A PIP may also result following Needs Improvement or Unsatisfactory Performance Evaluation Ratings

Human Resources: Teach Cobb! It’s better at the Top! QUESTIONS?