Plessy v. Ferguson (state of Louisiana) Unit 7 – The Times They Are A- Changin’

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois: Two Paths to Ending Jim Crow
Advertisements

 Was a landmark decision of the supreme court of the U.S.A. concerning racial segregation.
Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896
By Bri Dickerson, Gillian Mendez, Kaitlyn Strada, & Stephanie Dellavia
1896 During the later part of Reconstruction, Southern State legislatures started enforcing more Jim Crow laws to legally make African Americans more.
Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896 “ Separate But Equal ” Power point created by Robert L. Martinez Primary Content: The Americans.
Everything You Need To Know About Plessy v. Ferguson To Succeed In APUSH
Civil Rights Intro A Legal Background. Reconstruction Amendments.
Segregation and Discrimination
Brown v. Board of Education 60 th Anniversary. Post Civil War - Racial Tensions Still High Voting rights were restricted through polling taxes, literacy.
Famous Civil Rights Cases and Events. Plessy vs. Ferguson Case 1892, Homer Plessy was jailed for sitting in the "White" car of the East Louisiana Railroad.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). Background: The Missouri Compromise 1803: U.S. purchases Louisiana Territory from France 1820: Compromise allows slavery.
PROJECT LEGAL TIPS PROGRAM DR. JAMES CARROLL, DIRECTOR MR. HOWARD KRIEGER,BA,MS., STAFF DEVELOPER LOIS M. WILLIAMS SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHER, IS166.
Plessy vs. Ferguson Background Activists in Louisiana were looking for a person to help them challenge the Separate Car Act in Louisiana. The act.
Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Dubois
Journal: What might you think of when you hear the phrase “separate but equal”?
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).
Plessy v. Ferguson By: Kaylla Vaughn, Shyla Woodworth, Nick Zinni, Whitney Wallace.
Reconstruction in the South Section 3 Chapter 17.
Brown V. Board of Education
“Separate But Equal” The Brown v. Board of Education decision.
Brown vs. Board of Education By Jackson Sullivan.
Plessy V. Ferguson U.S. 537 Cassidy Osborne.
Ryan, Brandon, Mckayla, Alexis, Taylor
Plessy v. Ferguson Big Papi Vinny. In 1892, Homer Plessy took a seat in the “whites only” car of a train and refused to move. He was arrested, and convicted.
Civil Rights Cases (1883) Background Civil Rights Act in 1875 declared it a crime to deny equal access to public accommodations on account of race or color.
Plessy V. Ferguson 1892 Homer Plessy 1/8 black, looked white Under state law he is black Bought train ticket and tried to sit in white section Arrested.
The Civil Rights Movement
African Americans become full citizens. 13 th Amendment – ended slavery. 14 th Amendment – forbid states from denying Constitutional rights to any citizens.
Plessy vs Ferguson By Raheem Roher. 1.The case In 1896 a man name Homer Plessy boarded a all whit train car Plessy was one eighth Black and seven eight.
A history of the constitutionality of segregation in the United States Christine Glacken.
 Reconstruction Amendments:  13 th Amendment ▪ Abolished slavery  14 th Amendment ▪ Granted citizenship, equal protection  15 th Amendment ▪ Suffrage.
Plessy v. Ferguson A Supreme Court Case By Juston Bass-McNeill and Jalen Dozier.
The New South, Social Changes (Social Segregation)
ISSUES OF RECONSTRUCTION THE ECONOMY DRIVES IT ALL.
ISSUES OF RECONSTRUCTION THE ECONOMY DRIVES IT ALL.
Plessy vs. Ferguson 1896 Angelina Uzueta, Emily Trevino, Elias Ybarra.
Plessy v. Ferguson. Background O Louisiana railways were to “provide equal but separate accommodations for the white & colored races” O Homer Plessy decided.
Plessy VS Ferguson Alexis, Chloe, Juan, and Katana.
Civil Rights. African Americans The 14 th and 15 th amendments had not done what they were to do. African Americans were not equal. The South found unique.
Plessy VS. Ferguson (1896) Mor, Yuval P.3. Facts of the Case When Louisiana passed the Separate Car Act, legally segregating common carriers in 1892,
Jim Crow & Segregation How were groups legally discriminated against?
By: Kelsey Byers, Ethan Carter, Micah Hault Plessy vs. Ferguson.
Ali Lawson and Ethan Ealy
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896) By Colton Baburich.
FOA: April 15th, 2016 In Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a Louisiana law passed in 1890 "providing for.
Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896
Origins of the Civil Rights Movement
PROJECT LEGAL TIPS PROGRAM DR. JAMES CARROLL, DIRECTOR
Equal Protection & the 14th Amendment
REVIEW: How will the Regents thematic essay test our knowledge of U. S
Origins of the Civil Rights Movement
Journal 1-21 What does “Separate but equal” mean?
And how they affected the American Civil Rights Movement
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) In 1890, the state of Louisiana passed the "Separate Car Act" Comité des Citoyens (Committee of Citizens) formed and decided.
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).
Civil rights.
Chapter 21: Civil Rights: Equal Justice Under Law Opener
Let’s see your cell phones.
Civil Rights- Day 1 Class Discussion
Plessy vs. Ferguson (1896).
Overturned by the decision in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954
Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896
April 6, 2015 TURN IN YOUR SERVICE HOURS PAPERS. Look at
By: Isabella Armstrong and Brianna Dinch
Plessy v. Ferguson Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) 163 U.S. 537
Plessy v. Ferguson 1896.
Presentation transcript:

Plessy v. Ferguson (state of Louisiana) Unit 7 – The Times They Are A- Changin’

Plessy v. Ferguson 1896 court case set the policy of separate but equal through the 1950s

Background: In the 1890s Homer Plessy was an African American who had purchased a first-class ticket on a Louisiana train When he tried to sit in the first-class car, he was arrested because Louisiana’s laws did not allow African Americans to ride in first class with whites

Background Plessy and his lawyers argued that this violated the 14 th Amendment’s guarantee of equal legal treatment

The Court Ruling The Supreme Court (the highest court in the country) ruled against Plessy, arguing that it was legal to force African Americans and whites to use separate facilities as long as the facilities were of equal quality According to the Court, this was fair so long as “separate-but-equal” facilities were provided for African Americans

The Judge Who Disagreed John Mashall Harlan said: “In the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant [controlling], ruling class of citizens…Our constitution is color blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law.”