Hydrodynamical Interpretation of Basic Nebular Structures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
arvard.edu/phot o/2007/m51/. Confronting Stellar Feedback Simulations with Observations of Hot Gas in Elliptical Galaxies Q. Daniel Wang,
Advertisements

Physical conditions of the shocked regions in collimated outflows of planetary nebulae Angels Riera (UPC)
X-Ray Emission from Planetary Nebulae and Their Central Stars: A Status Report Joel Kastner Rochester Institute of Technology w/ help from lots of other.
Stellar Evolution. Evolution on the Main Sequence Zero-Age Main Sequence (ZAMS) MS evolution Development of an isothermal core: dT/dr = (3/4ac) (  r/T.
Supernova Remnants Shell-type versus Crab-like Phases of shell-type SNR.
PROBLEMS IN GASEOUS HYDRODYNAMICS MICHAŁ RÓŻYCZKA NICOLAUS COPERNICUS ASTRONOMICAL CENTER WARSAW, POLAND PLANETARY NEBULAE AS ASTRONOMICAL TOOLS GDAŃSK,
The Nature and Origin of Molecular Knots in Planetary Nebulae Sarah Eyermann – U. of Missouri Angela Speck – U. of Missouri Margaret Meixner – STScI Peter.
From Progenitor to Afterlife Roger Chevalier SN 1987AHST/SINS.
The Independency of Stellar Mass-Loss Rates on Stellar X-ray Luminosity and Activity Space Telescope Science Institute – 2012.
Supernovae from Massive Stars: light curves and spectral evolution Bruno Leibundgut ESO.
The morphology and kinematics of planetary nebulae: a tribute to Hugo Schwarz Romano L.M. Corradi Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes.
3-D Simulations of Magnetized Super Bubbles J. M. Stil N. D. Wityk R. Ouyed A. R. Taylor Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Calgary,
Abundances and relation to PN morphological features Antonio Mampaso IAC, Tenerife. Spain.
Stars science questions Origin of the Elements Mass Loss, Enrichment High Mass Stars Binary Stars.
Post-AGB evolution. Learning outcome evolution from the tip of the AGB to the WD stage object types along the post-AGB evolution basics about planetary.
Injection of Small Bodies into the ISM by Planetary Nebulae. Bob O’Dell University of Chicago 18 April 2007.
The Narrow-Line Region and Ionization Cone Lei Xu.
NASA's Chandra Sees Brightest Supernova Ever N. Smith et al. 2007, astro-ph/ v2.
Hot Gas in Planetary Nebulae You-Hua Chu Robert A. Gruendl Martín A. Guerrero Univ. of Illinois.
IR Shell Surrounding the Pulsar Wind Nebula G SNRs and PWNe in the Chandra Era Boston, July 8, 2009 Tea Temim (CfA, Univ. of MN) Collaborators:
Structure of circumstellar envelope around AGB and post-AGB stars Dinh-V-Trung Sun Kwok, P.J. Chiu, M.Y. Wang, S. Muller, A. Lo, N. Hirano, M. Mariappan,
Episodic Mass Loss from Post- AGB Stars Angela Speck Angela Speck, Margaret Meixner, Maia Nenkova, Moshe Elitzur & Gill Knapp.
Dejan Urošević Department of Astronomy, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Belgrade Shock Waves: II. HII Regions + Planetary Nebulae.
Jonathan Slavin Harvard-Smithsonian CfA
Globules in Planetary Nebulae Review of some recent advances on the nature and origin of globules P. J. Huggins (NYU)
MOLECULAR GAS and DUST at the CENTER of the EGG NEBULA Jeremy Lim and Dinh-V-Trung (Institute of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, Taiwan) Introduction.
X-ray Emission from PNe Martín A. Guerrero You-Hua Chu Robert A. Gruendl Univ. of Illinois APN III, Mt Rainier, 7/30/03.
Chemical and Physical Structures of Massive Star Forming Regions Hideko Nomura, Tom Millar (UMIST) ABSTRUCT We have made self-consistent models of the.
Stellar Winds and Mass Loss Brian Baptista. Summary Observations of mass loss Mass loss parameters for different types of stars Winds colliding with the.
Anyone Out There? Post-AGB Stars in the Galactic Halo S. Weston, R.Napiwotzki & S. Catalán University of Hertfordshire, UK.
Resonance scattering in the X-ray emission line profiles of  Pup Maurice Leutenegger With David Cohen, Steve Kahn, Stan Owocki, and Frits Paerels.
Radio Jet Disruption in Cooling Cores OR, can radio jets solve the cooling core problem? OR, how do cooling cores disrupt radio jets?
Dust Envelopes around Oxygen-rich AGB stars Kyung-Won Suh Dept. of Astronomy & Space Science Chungbuk National University, Korea
Evolutionary Population Synthesis models Divakara Mayya INAOEhttp:// Advanced Lectures on Galaxies (2008 INAOE): Chapter 4.
Signatures of Magnetic Field Structure in Planetary Nebulae P. J. Huggins, New York University PNe as MHD systems PNe as MHD systems.
Hot gas in galaxy pairs Olga Melnyk. It is known that the dark matter is concentrated in individual haloes of galaxies and is located in the volume of.
Great Barriers in High Mass Star Formation, Townsville, Australia, Sept 16, 2010 Patrick Koch Academia Sinica, Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics.
Hee-Won Lee ARCSEC and Dept. of Astronomy Sejong University 2010 August 26.
Post Processing of ZEUS MHD Simulations of Young, Hot Stars Stephen V. St.Vincent and David H. Cohen Swarthmore College Department of Physics & Astronomy.
Composition and Mass Loss. 2 Two of the major items which can affect stellar evolution are Composition: The most important variable is Y – the helium.
Large Scale CO Emission in the Orion Nebula Núria Marcelino (NRAO-CV) Olivier Berné (Leiden Obs, The Netherlands) José Cernicharo (CSIC/INTA, Spain) HST.
Garching, 19/05/20041 Modelling the PNLF: Population Effects on the Bright Cut-off Paola Marigo – Dipartimento di Astronomia,Padova Léo Girardi – Osservatorio.
Dusty disks in evolved stars?
Magnetic fields in Planetary and Proto Planetary
Photoevaporative Mass Loss From Hot Jupiters Ruth Murray-Clay Eugene Chiang UC Berkeley.
Warm Absorbers: Are They Disk Outflows? Daniel Proga UNLV.
Planetary nebulae beyond the Milky Way - May , Magellanic Cloud planetary nebulae as probes of stellar evolution and populations Letizia Stanghellini.
Nebulae Associated with Ultraluminous X-ray Sources P. Abolmasov, Special Astrophysical Observatory.
Feedback Observations and Simulations of Elliptical Galaxies –Daniel Wang, Shikui Tang, Yu Lu, Houjun Mo (UMASS) –Mordecai Mac-Low (AMNH) –Ryan Joung (Princeton)
Stellar Population Synthesis Including Planetary Nebulae Paola Marigo Astronomy Department, Padova University, Italy Lèo Girardi Trieste Observatory, INAF,
Radio Galaxies part 4. Apart from the radio the thin accretion disk around the AGN produces optical, UV, X-ray radiation The optical spectrum emitted.
Expected Gamma-Ray Emission of SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (d = 50 kpc) E.G.Berezhko 1, L.T. Ksenofontov 1, and H.J.Völk 2 1 Yu.G.Shafer Institute.
The Chemistry of PPN T. J. Millar, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester.
Cornelia C. Lang University of Iowa collaborators:
Formation and evolution of dust in Type IIb SN: Application to Cas A Takaya Nozawa (IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborators; T. Kozasa (Hokkaido Univ.), N.
Competitive Science with the WHT for Nearby Unresolved Galaxies Reynier Peletier Kapteyn Astronomical Institute Groningen.
What the UV SED Can Tell Us About Primitive Galaxies Sally Heap NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center.
The Ionization Toward The High-Mass Star-Forming Region NGC 6334 I Jorge L. Morales Ortiz 1,2 (Ph.D. Student) C. Ceccarelli 2, D. Lis 3, L. Olmi 1,4, R.
Formation of stellar systems: The evolution of SED (low mass star formation) Class 0 –The core is cold, 20-30K Class I –An infrared excess appears Class.
Lecture 10: Bubbles and PNe September 26, III. Conduction Layer - Probe the thermal conduction layer High ions produced by thermal collisions O.
By: Mike Malatesta Introduction to Open Clusters.
Lecture 9: Wind-Blown Bubbles September 21, 2011.
Globular Clusters Globular clusters are clusters of stars which contain stars of various stages in their evolution. An H-R diagram for a globular cluster.
By: Mike Malatesta Introduction to Open Clusters.
CSI in SNRs You-Hua Chu Inst of Astron and Astroph
SN 1987A: The Formation & Evolution of Dust in a Supernova Explosion
HCO+ in the Helix Nebula
HST Surveys of the LMC Planetary Nebulae
The Interstellar Medium
Planetary Nebula abundances in NGC 5128 with FORS
Presentation transcript:

Hydrodynamical Interpretation of Basic Nebular Structures M. Steffen & D. Schönberner Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam, Germany Abell 39 (WIYN)

Hydrodynamical Interpretation of Basic Nebular Structures M. Steffen & D. Schönberner Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam, Germany Introduction: observed structures PN physics and hydrodynamical modeling  Results from state-of-the-art simulations  typical time evolution of PN structures  dependence on mass loss of AGB progenitor Conclusions and outlook Manchado 2003: Round: 25% (22%), Elliptical 58% (66%), Bipolar 17% (12%)

Observed PN structures: An overview

Sharp ionization front, optically thick in Ly-continuum Examples of young Planetary Nebulae He 2-131 HST H Image IC 418 HST H Image Teff  30 000 K Teff  36 000 K Sharp ionization front, optically thick in Ly-continuum

Typical double-shell PNe, optically thin in Ly-continuum Examples of middle-aged Planetary Nebulae NGC 6826 HST color composite IC 3568 HST V image Rim Shell Teff  50 000 K Halo Teff  50 000 K Typical double-shell PNe, optically thin in Ly-continuum

NGC 6826, observed with PMAS A&G camera (© 2004, M. Roth) Example of an AGB halo: NGC 6826 AGB Halo OIII, long Einstein Cross V600 blue 2x1800 23/10/01 TOTAL 1 hour Einstein Cross V600 blue 4x1800 25/10/01 TOTAL 2 hours OIII, short NGC 6826, observed with PMAS A&G camera (© 2004, M. Roth)

Typical double-shell PNe, optically thin in Ly-continuum Examples of middle-aged Planetary Nebulae NGC 3242 HST V image NGC 2022 HST V image Rim Shell Xrays Teff  75 000 K Teff  100 000 K Halo Typical double-shell PNe, optically thin in Ly-continuum

NGC 2022 [OIII] images obtained with NTT/EMMI (Corradi et al. 2003) Example of an AGB halo: NGC 2022 Einstein Cross V600 blue 2x1800 23/10/01 TOTAL 1 hour Einstein Cross V600 blue 4x1800 25/10/01 TOTAL 2 hours NGC 2022 [OIII] images obtained with NTT/EMMI (Corradi et al. 2003)

Single-shell PN, fully ionized Examples of old Planetary Nebulae Abell 39 WIYN [OIII] image NGC 3587 KPNO 0.9m Rim no Shell Teff  110 000 K Teff  117 000 K Double-shell PN, but no bright rim partially ionized, complex morphology Single-shell PN, fully ionized

Example of an old Planetary Nebulae NGC 2438 NTT H+[NII] NGC 2438 NTT H+[NII] Bright halo Faint halo Bright ´core´ Bright ´core´ Teff  114 000 K L  500 L (Data from Corradi et al. 2000) Triple-shell configuration, partially recombined 2nd shell ?

X-ray detection of hot gas in PNe NGC 3242 Sharply bounded diffuse X-ray emission from central cavity Central Cavity Shell Rim central star (no X-ray source) Limb-brightening x-ray morphology Tight correlation morphology with H-alpha The wind-wind interaction works, we’ll see later some problems Point-source HST [N II] HST H XMM X-rays © M. Guerrero 2005

Origin and evolution of observed structures ? Theoretical concepts and models including the essential physics !

Hydrodynamical modeling of Planetary Nebulae Essential physical ingredients: AGB & post-AGB stellar evolution with mass loss Teff (t), L (t), M(t), Vwind (t) • Radiation hydrodynamics of stellar winds Dust-driven outflows (AGB) Wind -wind interaction (PPN, PN) Potsdam NEBEL Models Non-equilibrium physics of a low-density plasma time-dependent ionization / recombination  energy balance due to radiative heating / cooling 1D  Rotation, magnetic fields, binarity  2D, 3D

Rotation, magnetic fields, binarity ? Example of complex structures: NGC 6543 HST color composite Einstein Cross V600 blue 2x1800 23/10/01 TOTAL 1 hour Einstein Cross V600 blue 4x1800 25/10/01 TOTAL 2 hours Rotation, magnetic fields, binarity ?

Modeling the combined evolution of star + circumstellar envelope Hydrodynamical models of Planetary Nebulae Modeling the combined evolution of star + circumstellar envelope Post-AGB tracks of Blöcker (1995) Post-AGB mass loss rate and wind velocity (Reimers 1975; Pauldrach et al. 1988; Marten & Schönberner 1991) Initial wind envelope: from hydrodynamical AGB wind model (Steffen et al. 1998) [or simple density power law  ~ r-] Dynamical evolution of wind envelope:  time-dependent boundary conditions ( Teff (t), L (t), Vi (t), i (t) )  time-dependent hydrodynamics  non-equilibrium ionization / recombination (9 elements, 76 ions)  detailed radiative heating / cooling

Evolution of a PN central star with M=0.6 M Lwind Reimers (1975) Pauldrach et al. (1988, A&A 207, 123) VCPN Vesc  R-0.5 M  L 1.9 Pauldrach et al. (1988, A&A 207, 123)

AGB wind model gas & dust gas & dust Input: Mini, i  stellar evolution M*(t), L*(t), T*(t), M*(t) Dust properties Tc, a, I, Qabs(), Qsca() d/ g • Slow AGB wind V  10 .. 15 km/s gas & dust dust-free gas & dust zone Output: Wind structure & evolution r1(t), Vg(r,t), Vd(r,t), g(r,t), d(r,t), Td(r,t) Maps I(x,t,) SEDs F(,t) 5 1014 cm ISM

The final 350 000 years on the AGB Stellar evolution + two-component hydrodynamics: Stellar evolution: Blöcker 1995 ( Mi = 3 M  Mf = 0.605 M ) Dust: astronomical silicates (r) ~ r-,   3 V(r)  10 .. 15 km/s Steffen et al. 1998 / 2005

Environment for PN formation: detached gas/dust envelope with Transition AGB  post-AGB Environment for PN formation: detached gas/dust envelope with =-2 (r) ~ r-,   3 V(r)  10 .. 15 km/s =-3 Po =100 d Po = 50 d Reimers 1975 Blöcker (1995) mass loss rate AGB  post-AGB transition Pauldrach et al. 1988 Short shut-down time t2-t1200 yrs  double-peak SED in PPN phase

The first 3 000 years of post-AGB evolution M=0.595 M

Snapshot: IC 418 M=0.595 M

Comparison of observation and model: IC 418 Surface brightness profiles: IC 418 HST H Image d [arcsec] Proto rim Proto rim Sharp outer edge of shell: D-type ionization front Future rim very faint: wind interaction still weak

Observed and synthetic line profiles: IC 418 Central line profiles indicate positive velocity gradient: 2 x 15 km/s 2 x 15 km/s [N II] [N II] [O III] [O III] Observation © 2003 R. Corradi Model nebula (Teff=36300 K, optically thick)

Physical structure of a Planetary Nebula Slow AGB wind Shell 104 K outer shock Rim 104 K PN shaped by 1: photoionization by UV radiation of hot central star  shell Contact discontinuity hot Bubble 106 .. 108 K fast wind 2: colliding winds fast central star wind  shock  hot bubble  compression of shell  rim inner wind shock Slow AGB wind

The formation of a double-shell nebula M=0.595 M

Snapshot: NGC 6826 M=0.595 M Rim Shell Shell Rim Halo Halo

Observed and modeled surface brightness profiles (Schönberner, Jacob & Steffen, 2005) NGC 6826 – [O III] IC 2448 – [O III] NGC 3242 – [O III] NGC 3242 – He II

Observed and synthetic surface brightness distributions NGC 6826 H NGC 3242 H NGC 1535 H

Comparison of observation and model: NGC 3242 Stellar evolution + radiation hydrodynamics: CCD images (Balick 1987): H [O III] H [O III] [He II] [N II] [N II] [He II]

Observed and synthetic line profiles: NGC 6826 [O III] [O III] 2 x 8 km/s Rim 2 x 24 km/s Shell Chu et al. 1984 (Data © 1999 Lehmann/Hildebrandt) Model nebula (Teff=67 800 K) Rim and shell expand independently (different driving mechanisms)  Vrim ~ strength of central star wind & ambient density ( MAGB ) Vshell ~ density gradient of ambient AGB wind & sound speed

Observed expansion velocities of double-shell PNe (Schönberner et al. 2005) Doppler velocities from Gaussian decomposition Vshell > Vrim Expansion velocities increase with evolution

Expansion velocities and kinematic ages of double-shell Planetary Nebulae (Schönberner, Jacob & Steffen 2005) Rim Shell Kinematic age [1000 yr] Kinematic age [1000 yr] True age [1000 yr] True age [1000 yr] Rim Doppler velocity: roughly constant kinematic age  useless Shell Doppler velocity: kinematic age  real age  [N II] preferred method

The phase of partial recombination M=0.605 M

Snapshot: NGC 2438 M=0.605 M Rim Shell Shell Rim

Observation and model: NGC 2438 H+[N II] H+[N II] Outer halo = Fossil AGB wind Inner halo = Recombined shell Bright core = Rim NTT image, Corradi et al. 2000 Hydrodynamical interpretation:

PN evolution of low mass CS: no recombination phase M=0.565 M

Snapshot: Abell 39 M=0.565 M

Observation and model: Abell 39 Surface brightness profiles: relic of shell Observed E-W [O III] slice (Jacoby et al. 2001) Hydrodynamical model, M=0.565 M (Perinotto et al. 2004) Shell swallowed by rim

PN evolution of massive CS: trapped ionization M=0.696 M

Snapshot: NGC 7027 M=0.696 M rim shell

Comparison of observation and model: NGC 7027 Surface brightness profiles: HST NICMOS IR image rim shell Teff  200 000 K, L  8000 L Optically thick rim/shell structure Diffuse outer edge of shell: D-type ionization front  beginning recombination Schönberner, Jacob, Steffen 2005

Does the AGB mass loss history influence the PN evolution ? Yes ! Structure and expansion properties of Planetary Nebulae provide constraints on the final phases of AGB mass loss

Influence of AGB mass loss on PN structure AGB Hydro simulation (r) ~ r-,   3 H surface brightness Rim Shell Halo Simple initial model (r) ~ r-2 H surface brightness Rim Shell Halo

Circumstellar environment and expansion properties of Planetary Nebulae (Schönberner et al. 2005) Typical double-shell PNe: 25 km/s < Vshell < 40 km/s (Vshell-VAGB) / cs  2.5 <  < 3.3 Shell expansion velocity depends only on slope of AGB wind density  (and cs) (cf. Chevalier 1997, Shu et al. 2002) Initial AGB wind density:   r-

The halo of NGC 6826 Inner halo: I ~ r –,   5 .. 7 Outer edge: last TP on AGB   ~ r –,   3 .. 4 (Corradi et al. 2003)

Structure and expansion properties of Planetary Nebulae provide constraints on the final phases of AGB mass loss AGB ~ r –, 2.5 <  < 3.5 AGB:  > 2.5 (Kwok et al. 2002) PPN: 3 <  < 4 (Hrivnak & Bieging 2005) Mass loss increases towards end of AGB

How does the central star wind influence the PN evolution ? Comparison of two different wind models: Pauldrach et al. (1988) Pauldrach et al. (2004) Pauldrach et al. (1988) Pauldrach et al. (2004)

Influence of central star wind on rim structure CSPN wind: Pauldrach et al. (1988) CSPN wind: Pauldrach et al. (2004) Rim: density gradient & velocity gradient reversed, increased width

Conclusions Time-dependent 1D modeling combining  Single star evolution with mass loss +  radiation-hydrodynamics of stellar winds +  non-equilinrium low-density plasma physics can explain the observed basic nebular structures:  X-ray emission of the central hot bubble  radial intensity profiles in various emission lines  internal kinematics and expansion properties  structure and evolution of PN haloes Models allow a classification of observed PNe in terms of evolutionary state and central star mass

Discussion & Outlook Main uncertainties of present models: Mass loss during end of AGB and beyond Transition times Improved models:  New AGB and post-AGB tracks with mass loss PN evolution for different metallicities  PN evolution for Wolf-Rayet (WC) central stars