1 Fédération Aéronautique Internationale 2015 CIAM Plenary Meeting Lausanne, Switzerland 24 and 25 April 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emergency COA Process Presented to: UAS All Users TELCON
Advertisements

The Public Finance and Empoyment Database of the OECD Dirk Kraan National Accounts Working Party Paris 1 December 2010.
ASTM Officers Training Workshop Subcommittee Chairmens Duties And Responsibilities September 11-12, 2006 Joe KouryChristi Sierk.
01 DEC 2006Koeln M-005: Limited Pilot owner maintenance EASA workshop 01 December 2006 JP Arnaud.
ODS3F –Observation and Detection Systems For Forest Fire Monitoring
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Presentation. Customization for each client Each order is specifically designed to meet each clients’ aerial needs. On-board.
Drones in the Legal Environment Gene Betler, CLVS CTTS AMA, AUVSI, & Small UAV Coalition member.
Definition of Light Sailplanes in the context of Annex II to EU Regulation 1592/2002 European Gliding Union and Europe Air Sports / 20 June 2005 EAS Reference:
AT 209 Introduction to Civil Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
Ballooning in Eurocontrol member states Hans Å kerstedt EAS Ballooning Working Party.
Aerospace Engineering By Patrick Ferrell. Aerospace Engineering is the main branch of engineering concerned with the research, design, development, construction,
Unmanned aerial systems, what they are and what is available? Professor Sandor M Veres University of Sheffield.
1 Small Unmanned Aircraft – Regulations and Safety Threats AOA Safety Conference – 23 Jun 2015 Gerry Corbett UK CAA UAS Programme Lead.
IAOPA Europe Regional Meeting Reykjavik - 7. Maj 2014 GA SUB SSCC.
Computational Mechanics and Robotics The University of New South Wales
Massachusetts Institute of Technology 4 April 2003
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
10/31/06 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Civil Aviation.
Second expert group meeting on Draft fiche on delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) Cohesion Policy
Vanderbilt Aerospace Club Rocket Launched Reconnaissance UAV Design Team William Runge (ME) Kyser Miree (ME) Thomas Carroll (ME) Thomas Bowden.
Transmitted by the representative of JAPAN Toward Realization of the “Mutual Recognition of International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA)” under the.
EGTEI – Expert Group on Techno-economic Issues History and organization Presented by Tициано ПИНЬЯТЕЛЛИ Co-Chairman of EGTEI ENEA (Italian Agency for New.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION TWO UNDERSTANDING THE ORGANIZATION OF CODEX Module 2.5 How do Codex Committees function?
08 June 2006 Portland 2006: aircraft certification session Yves Morier The EASA Advance -NPA for UAV systems Certification Presentation by: Y Morier EASA.
IRG/ERG Gabrielle Gauthey Member of the Board of ART.
Functional Check Flight Symposium ANAC Presentation Homero Montandon – Test Pilot Airworthiness Branch Vancouver – Canada, 7 and 8 Feb
Projects spanning over two programming periods Department for Programme and Project Preparation Beatrix Horváth, Deputy Head of Department Budapest, 5.
Rolling Resistance Standards Work at ISO (TC31 WG6) Prepared for GRB Review 19 Sep 2011 Angela Wolynski WG6 Convenor Informal document GRB (54th.
Farnborough Airspace Change Proposal Briefing to FACC 26 th November 2014 TAG Farnborough Airport.
DRONE: UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE Seminar Co-Ordinator:  Mr. A.K.Singh Seminar Presented by: Ajit Pal Singh.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems. What is a UAS? What is a DRONE?
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
1 EUROCONTROL EUROPE AIR SPORTS Sporting & Recreational Aviation Conference GLIDING Günter Bertram.
UNMANNED AVIATION QUALIFICATION FLIGHT SKILLS TEST BRIEFING UAVAirways Limited | Registered in England No: | UAQ Skills Test v1.0.
FAA sUAS ARC Support Documentation © ASTM International. All Rights Reserved. The Unmanned Aircraft System Initiative F38 on Unmanned Aircraft Systems.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.3 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.3 Considerations for selecting.
8 June 2006Portland, Oregon, USAE. Sivel EASA Working Group on regulation of non-complex motor aircraft engaged in non-commercial operations E Sivel (EASA)
1 DFRC SUAS Program Operations and Risk Management Approach for Small UAS Presented to the Certification Working Group 6/26/2008 Brad Flick/DFRC Chief.
Task Force on Electro-magnetic Compatibility (TF EMC) Status report of TF to GRE-75 Friday, 8 April 2016 Informal document GRE (75 th GRE, 5-8 April.
High Fidelity Simulation as a Route to Certification Autonomous Systems: Legal / Regulatory Aspects and V&V Workshop 22 nd February 2016 Dr. M. Jump.
Tim Stombaugh  Dr. Suzanne Smith, Director ◦ (859) ;  Ryan Nolin, Engineer Associate ◦ (802) ;
~ RPAS use and regulation of civil Air Traffic Control point of view Acceptable and reasonable rules are needed Mr. Kornél Szepessy CEO 3-4th of November.
1-800.FLY.0530.
DRONES: Reaching New Heights in Environmental Consulting
Regulation of Drones and Liability of their Operators
Unmanned Aircraft Systems
RPAS – legal frame work and normal use
Drones, RPAS, UAV’s, UAS Unmanned aircraft.
CanberraUAV Stephen Dade August 2016.
What the US can learn from international UAS law
History and Status Tallinn, 18 May 2005 Leo Huberts
Establishment of Space Weather Information Service
UA.I.A.K2.
Unmanned Aircraft System-Based Structural Health Monitoring
Status Report to GRB #68 Task Force on Reverse Warning issues
WRC-12 A.I. 1.3 Eric ALLAIX DGAC-DSNA.
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
EET2530 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)
Balanced Approach to Noise Mitigation
SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF EUPAN
Safety concept for automated driving systems
Review of the 1958 Agreement
European Statistical System Network on Culture (ESSnet Culture)
President of Eco-Trust Society
Balanced Approach to Noise Mitigation
Roles and Responsibilities
Brad Fritz USDA-ARS Aerial Application Technology Research Unit
Presentation transcript:

1 Fédération Aéronautique Internationale 2015 CIAM Plenary Meeting Lausanne, Switzerland 24 and 25 April 2015

2 FAI Aeromodelling Commission Lausanne, April 2015 Decision of the 2014 CIAM Plenary Meeting (approved unanimously): UAV/UAS Working Group to be ready for the December Bureau Meeting Terms of Reference of the UAV WG (version June 2014) –Mission: To evaluate the impact for CIAM activities of the current available technology especially regarding the sporting activity and events To prepare a draft rule to be considered as a base for future sporting events and consider whether a test event can be organized To define the interest of a new separate Sub-Committee and the qualifications required for the members of such a Sub-Committee If so tasked by CIAM Bureau, to prepare the necessary rules modifications in order to establish a new Sub-Committee –Term of the Working Group: from June 2014 to April 2015 Terms of Reference of the UAVWG

3 FAI Aeromodelling Commission Lausanne, April 2015 Chairman : Bruno DELOR - France (CIAM 1 st VP and CIAM delegate) Members: –Narve JENSEN - Norway (CIAM 2 nd VP and CIAM delegate) –Robert HERZOG - Belgium (CIAM Delegate) –Ivan HOREJSI - Czech Republic –John LANGFORD - USA (CIAM Space Models expert and CEO of AURORA Technologies) –Bengt LINDGREN - Sweden (CIAM Delegate and CASI member) –Graham LYNN (EAS Aeromodelling representant) - United Kingdom –Jure PECAR - Slovenia –David TRAINO - Australia Composition of the UAV WG

4 FAI Aeromodelling Commission Lausanne, April 2015 UAV WG Report –Edition st September 2014: as validated by the members of the UAVWG –Edition January 2015: final report as evaluated by the CIAM Bureau for presentation to the CIAM Plenary Meeting Draft Rule for Drone Model Aircraft Event –Edition st May 2015 –Two types of events are covered in the document: Contest event for multi-rotors (FPV Racing and Freestyle Aerobatics) Recreational event for based on a list of flight tasks to be done (for multi-rotors and/or fixed wing drones)  Basis of the discussion for the Open Forum UAV WG produced documents

5 FAI Aeromodelling Commission Lausanne, April Classes covering aircraft which does not carry a human being : –Class F- Model Aircraft  CIAM –Class S - Space Model  CIAM –Class U - Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)  CASI (Air Sport General Commission) Class F : aircraft of limited dimensions, with or without a propulsion device, not able to carry a human being and to be used for competition, sport or recreational purposes Class U : aerodyne with means of propulsion that does not carry a human, and which is designed for scientific research, commercial, governmental or military purposes Class S : spacecraft or aerospacecraft of limited dimensions and limited payload-carrying capability unable to carry a human being or commercial payloads )  Class S is not affected by UAV considerations FAI Classification

6 FAI Aeromodelling Commission Lausanne, April 2015 Impact of technology on the actual FAI Model Aircraft Classes –Actual FAI model aircraft classes are defined for competition purposes only –Use of electronic devices offers possibility of increased performances  Each CIAM Sub-Committee must define if such devices can (or cannot) be used and the appropriate requirements and limitations New types of aircraft with possibility of different events (recreational or competition) –CIAM must take attention on new activities possible with current available technology (FPV, circuit with GPS guidance,...) –CIAM must show its interest for new types of model aircraft such as multi-rotor (multi-copter) General considerations

7 FAI Aeromodelling Commission Lausanne, April 2015 Recommendation 1: Consider as aeromodelling all sportive and recreational activities done with all types of aircraft of limited dimensions not able to carry a human being Recommendation 2: Use the terms UAV (and UAS or UA), RPA/RPAS only for professional activities (scientific research, commercial, governmental or military purposes) Note: Class F (Model Aircraft) and class U (UAV) must stay clearly differentiated. Class U does not concern CIAM. Regarding sport purpose, this class is only concerned by record attempts. UAV WG recommendations (1/3)

8 FAI Aeromodelling Commission Lausanne, April 2015 General definitions –Drone model aircraft: model aircraft equipped with on-board electronic devices (gyro sensors, altimeter, telemetry, GPS, video camera,...) or associated flight systems (flight stabilisation, automatic flight control,...) Note: Drone model aircraft can be rotorcraft or fixed wing –Multi-rotor (or multi-copter): rotary wing drone with more than two rotors Visual line of sight (VLOS): the flight operator who assumes directly the control of the model aircraft must maintain direct unaided visual contact with the model aircraft Note: VLOS must be assumed by a main operator in situation at any moment of the flight to take the direct control or to inform immediately the flight operator of any danger. FPV flight requires a “safety operator” (other than the FPV flyer). Useful definitions (1/2)

9 FAI Aeromodelling Commission Lausanne, April 2015 Other definitions –First Person View (FPV): video view of the model aircraft's camera transmitted to a pilot headset goggle or to a screen on ground Note: It is strongly recommended that the system is configured to initiate a failsafe procedure cutting off motors when losing the radio link –Self-guided drone: drone equipped with a programmable autopilot system which can automatically stabilize the drone and/or initiate a programmed flight path Note: Such a drone is mission orientated and computer controlled nearly its entire flight, but it must be possible for the flight operator to desactivate at any moment the autopilot. It is strongly recommended that the system includes a "Return To Home" (RTH) function so that the drone may automatically return to a selected location in case of lost of the radio link –Flight operator: the pilot who flies the drone and takes flight decisions based on received information; a helper that can feed information from a video link can be allowed Useful definitions (2/2)

10 FAI Aeromodelling Commission Lausanne, April 2015 Recommendation 3: Modify as follows definition of a Model Aircraft in Volume ABR (Section 4C Part 1) 1.1. General Definition of Model Aircraft a)A model aircraft is an aircraft of limited dimensions, with or without a propulsion device, not able to carry a human being and to be used for competition, sport or recreational purposes. b)For the whole flight, a radio-controlled model aircraft shall be in the direct control of the flier, via a transmitter, and in the flier’s sight other than for momentary periods must be within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the person who assumes directly its control or who is in a situation to take the direct control at any moment, including if the model is being flown automatically to a selected location. c)For control line model aircraft, the flier must physically hold the control line handle and control the model aircraft himself. d)Free flight model aircraft must be launched by the flier, and must not be equipped with any device that allows it to be flown automatically to a selected location or controlled remotely during the flight other than to stop the motor and/or to terminate the flight. UAV WG recommendations (2/3)

11 FAI Aeromodelling Commission Lausanne, April 2015 Recommendation 3 (end): e)A model aircraft shall not be equipped with any device that allows it to be flown automatically to a selected location. f)e)In the case of record attempts conducted under Part 2, the claimant(s) shall confirm that the submitted record claim is for a model aircraft record as noted in Table III. Note: Each Country Regulations take precedence over 1.1.  Bureau proposal unanimously approved by the 2015 CIAM Plenary Meeting Recommendation 4 : Formalize a typology of the different types of model aircraft and take it in account for the naming of the actual FAI model aircraft classes.  To be evaluated at the occasion of the revision of the Volume ABR to be done in 2015 Recommendation 4 : Formalize a typology of the different types of model aircraft and take it in account for the naming of the actual FAI model aircraft classes. UAV WG recommendations (3/3)

12 FAI Aeromodelling Commission Lausanne, April 2015 Aircraft (vehicle sustained in the atmosphere y forces exerted on it by the air ) Aerodyne (heavier than air) Aerostat (lighter than air) Glider (fixed wing capable of sustained soaring flight having no means of propulsion) Rotorcraft (lift from a rotary wing system) Helicopter (rotorcraft with a power driven rotor) Aeroplane (fixed wing with means of propulsion) Motor glider (fixed wing with means of propulsion capable of substained soaring flight) Drone Model Aircraft Defined as a model aircraft equipped with on-board electronic devices (video camera, gyro sensors, altimeter, telemetry, GPS,,...) at ends of catch of sight and/or for automatic flight control Aerodyne (multi-rotor or fixed wing) or aerostat

13 FAI Aeromodelling Commission Lausanne, April 2015 Drone model aircraft general characteristics: –Maximum flying mass of 5 kg recommended Note: In any case, flying mass must be under 25 kg (general characteristic of a model aircraft as defined in Volume ABR Section 4C 1.2) –Noise limit of 96 dB(A) at 3 metres strongly recommended –Other specifications may be defined for the event such as a maximum span for a fixed wing drone or swept area of the lifting rotor(s) for a rotary wing drone 2 types of events are considered: –Multi-rotor Contest event (FPV Racing and Freestyle Aerobatics) –Recreational Event based on a list of flight tasks to be done (8 tasks defined at the moment) for drones (rotorcraft or fixed-wing configurations) Draft Rule (1/2) Edition st May 2015

14 FAI Aeromodelling Commission Lausanne, April 2015 Local rules may be defined by the organizer for example in order to respect the airworthiness and for airspace regulations applicable in its country which may especially concern : –How to respect the permanent VLOS of the drone (safety operator, …) –National regulation applicable for FPV flight (safety operator with or without a dual radio-control transmitter, RTH function, …) –Limitation regarding dropping of objects  Draft Rule must not be considered as official or “rigid” competition rules Draft rule is only a guideline document for organization of an event for drone model aircraft on which each country Regulations take precedence Draft Rule (2/2) Edition st May 2015

15 FAI Aeromodelling Commission Lausanne, April 2015 In accordance with Terms of Reference, UAV WG has completed its mission, and so can terminate its activity end of April 2015 as initially planned It is not necessary to propose new FAI classes (even as provisional rules) and/or to establish a new CIAM Sub- Committee in order to cover the corresponding events Coordination can be done on behalf of the CIAM Bureau Note: a new CIAM Sub-committee will be necessary only when specific FAI classes with real international competitions will be realized Conclusion