CERIF Interoperability and LOD Miguel-Angel Sicilia TG LOD leader, euroCRIS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 eXtended Metadata Registry (XMDR) Two Slides for Ontology Summit Presentation Bruce Bargmeyer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of.
Advertisements

Requirements. UC&R: Phase Compliance model –RIF must define a compliance model that will identify required/optional features Default.
CERIF Reference Implementation and Compatibility Testing Jan Dvorak, CERIF TG Leader Nikos Houssos, Arch TG Leader Valerie Brasse, Projects TG Leader Miguel-Angel.
A multi-level metadata approach for a Public Sector Information data infrastructure Nikos Houssos 1,2, Brigitte Jörg 1,3, Brian Matthews 4 1 euroCRIS 2.
The CERIF-2000 Implementation. Andrei S. Lopatenko CERIF Implementation Guidelines Andrei Lopatenko Vienna University of Technology
JSI Sensor Middleware. Slide 2 of x Embedded vs. Midleware based Architecture for Sensor Metadata Management Embedded approach assign an IP address to.
UNCERTML - DESCRIBING AND COMMUNICATING UNCERTAINTY Matthew Williams
™ Suggestions for Semantic Web Interfaces to Relational Databases Mike Dean W3C Workshop on RDF Access to Relational Databases Cambridge,
Information and Business Work
Andrei Lopatenko. CERIF Task Group CERIF TG Report 2001-Marth 2002 results Plans for 2002.
An Open Source Linked Data Infrastructure for Publishing Geospatial Data Arif Shaon, Andrew Woolf, Shirley Crompton, Will Rogers, Mike Jackson, Robert.
ReQuest (Validating Semantic Searches) Norman Piedade de Noronha 16 th July, 2004.
The RDF meta model: a closer look Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations.
Data Sources & Using VIVO Data Visualizing Scholarship VIVO provides network analysis and visualization tools to maximize the benefits afforded by the.
EuroCRIS Best Practice Task Group: a concept and workplan Sergey Parinov TG leader Best Practice.
Advances in Technology and CRIS Nikos Houssos National Documentation Centre / National Hellenic Research Foundation, Greece euroCRIS Task Group Leader.
Concluding Remarks Ed Simons, President of euroCRIS MEMBERS MEETING, BONN, 14 MAY 2013.
EARTH SCIENCE MARKUP LANGUAGE “Define Once Use Anywhere” INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS CENTER UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE.
9 th Open Forum on Metadata Registries Harmonization of Terminology, Ontology and Metadata 20th – 22nd March, 2006, Kobe Japan. XMDR Prototype Day: 21.
EuroCRIS Best Practice Task Group: a concept and workplan Sergey Parinov TG leader Best Practice.
Interoperable Digitised Content “Discover, search, extract, link, associate, and view digitised content” Les Carr.
Workshop – 10, December 2014, Berlin ICCS / NTUA Greece Efthymios Chondrogiannis An Intelligent Ontology Alignment Tool Dealing with Complicated Mismatches.
Strategy 2012 Anne Asserson & Keith G Jeffery. euroCRIS itself 1.Has achieved much – credibility – membership,. Member meetings, task groups, seminar,
Brian Matthews, DeFINE, Pisa 26/11/02 Trust and the Semantic Web Brian Matthews, Business & Information Technology Dept, CLRC
© Brigitte Jörg June 2nd, 2010 Aalborg, Denmark 1 euroCRIS Members Meeting CERIF TG Report Brigitte Jörg, M.A. (Information Science) Language Technology.
Supported by EU projects 12/12/2013 Athens, Greece Open Data in Agriculture Hands-on with data infrastructures that can power your agricultural data products.
Topic Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT Review Draft/Issued document 0.1.
© Brigitte Jörg November 11th, 2009 St. Andrews, Scottland 1 euroCRIS Members Meeting CERIF TG Report Brigitte Jörg, M.A. (Information Science) Language.
DDI & Model-View-Controller: An Architectural Perspective Dennis Wegener, Matthäus Zloch, Thomas Bosch (GESIS) Dagstuhl,
Grid Computing & Semantic Web. Grid Computing Proposed with the idea of electric power grid; Aims at integrating large-scale (global scale) computing.
Metadata Schema for CERIF Andrei Lopatenko Vienna University of Technology
Common Terminology Services 2 CTS 2 Submission Team Status Update HL7 Vocabulary Working Group May 17, 2011.
CERIF TG Report Brigitte Jörg CERIF National Coordinator, JISC, UKOLN, University of Bath, UK, CERIF TG Leader, euroCRIS euroCRIS Members Meeting, Madrid.
IST World Follow-Up – January 2009 – To merge with/add to the proposal presented by Keith Jeffery (STFC)
© 2012 HL7 ® International. Licensed under Creative Commons. HL7 & Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International. Reg.
The RDF meta model Basic ideas of the RDF Resource instance descriptions in the RDF format Application-specific RDF schemas Limitations of XML compared.
Semantic Phyloinformatic Web Services Using the EvoInfo Stack Speaker: John Harney LSDIS Lab, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Georgia Mentor(s):
+ agINFRA - a data infrastructure to support agricultural scientific communities Brussels, hearing at 22-feb-2011 Miguel-Angel Sicilia, UAH Nikos Manouselis,
+ agINFRA - a data infrastructure to support agricultural scientific communities Brussels, hearing at 22-feb-2011 Miguel-Angel Sicilia, UAH Kostas Kastrantas,
Conclusions Presenter: Manolis Koubarakis Extended Semantic Web Conference 2012.
Title of the presentation | Date |1 Nikos Houssos National Documentation Centre (EKT/NHRF) CRIS for research information management.
RDF and Relational Databases
Report 11th January 2013 TG Leader: Danica Zendulkova danica.
PROPOSAL FOR AIMS AND STRATEGY OF THE EUROCRIS LINKED OPEN DATA TASK GROUP (LOD-TG) Meeting at Bath (UK), 10 th February 2012.
1 Creation of National Directory of Environmental Organizations & Projects Paul Shabajee (University of Bristol) Steve Cayzer (HP Labs, Bristol)
Paloma Marín Arraiza 17 th International Conference on Grey Literature 1 st and 2 nd December 2015, Amsterdam (Netherlands) SCIENTIFIC AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS.
Semantic Data Extraction for B2B Integration Syntactic-to-Semantic Middleware Bruno Silva 1, Jorge Cardoso 2 1 2
Ewa Deelman, Virtual Metadata Catalogs: Augmenting Existing Metadata Catalogs with Semantic Representations Yolanda Gil, Varun Ratnakar,
E-Government Initiative Geospatial Information One-Stop FGDC Coordination Group January 10, 2002 John Moeller.
OWL Web Ontology Language Summary IHan HSIAO (Sharon)
CERIF Interoperability and LOD Miguel-Angel Sicilia TG LOD leader, euroCRIS.
+ The Data Object Description Type November 18, 2014.
What do Open APIs mean for our organization
Oksana Hoard LIS Overview MatML stands for Materials Markup Language It is a freely-available XML schema designed to describe materials (metals,
EuroCRIS services project Goals: Installing a CERIF reference implementation at euroCRIS Services web space.  Technical: deploying a mysql version (already.
ΕΚΤ Access to Knowledge ΕΚΤ Access to Knowledge R&D Statistics Information System: An Interoperability Tail between CERIF and SDMX Dimitris Karaiskos Dimitrios.
Data Sources & Using VIVO Data Visualizing Science VIVO provides network analysis and visualization tools to maximize the benefits afforded by the data.
INHA UNIVERSITY, KOREA Rainer Simon Austrian Institute of Technology.
Components.
VIRTA Publication Information Service
The evolution of the SDMX infrastructure and services
Uncontrolled copy when printed
Workshop on distributed architecture and web servcies
Vocabularies and Semantics
RDF Presentation and Correct Content Conveyance for Legacy
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
LOD reference architecture
Dr Kristin Stock Allworlds Geothinking
Information Networks: State of the Art
RDF Presentation and Correct Content Conveyance for Legacy
Presentation transcript:

CERIF Interoperability and LOD Miguel-Angel Sicilia TG LOD leader, euroCRIS

Interoperability: levels and purposes Transferring from one place to another or combining information while retaining meaning Some important facts: –Semantics are in the CERIF model –The LOD is not adding by itself any semantics, only exposing in a different format. So the LOD “ontologies” are no other thing than a RDF expression of CERIF. –Improvement in semantics should go either directly to the CERIF relational model or to some “extended” ontology

Reasons to share CERIF data For the benefit of the public –Applications collecting maps of science combining heterogeneous sources of information. For intelligent applications –Applications relating patterns of scientific production with the geospatial or disciplinary structure of countries. For partners that need the data transferred for internal processing –E.g. National Agency asks a University for the journal publication production per Department to benchmark and assign funding.. For partners that need on-line access to data. –E.g. a third party creates a Gmail extension that shows you some information on your contacts by accessing public RIS on-line. For translating data between schemas –E.g. to translate CERIF data into VIVO RDF.

Specification view CERIF model (SQL + E/R) CERIF Interchange (XML+BODs) CERIF REST interface (JSON) CERIF base vocabularies/ontologies (RDF) CERIF LOD (RDF) CERIF extended ontologies (OWL) CERIF mappings CERIF Conformance testing

Activity in 2012 This year: –VOA3R implementation (excl. bibliographical data). –Mapping of VIVO and CERIF at the CERIF model level. To-do: –Publish the base ontologies (and VIVO mapping) in EuroCRIS domain. –Finalize and publish the LOD recommendations. –Publish the package to expose CERIF data as LOD using D2RQ (config. Files + install manual). –Specs revised and augmented by ENGAGE.

Where we stand