Agenda Methodology Major Findings –Perceptions of Congestion –Ease of Travel –Transportation Planning Issues –Interest in Using Public Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
11-12 February 2014 Issues in planning for future transport systems in Middle East Cities Jubail City Planning Forum, Saudi Arabia Omar Al Battaineh, Arup.
Advertisements

Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
Transit $315 million/year Bus service continues New rapid transit lines Regional Investment Direction Bridge $74 million/year Gets better Walking and.
TDM Migration Fund: Revenue Sources for Sustainable Transportation Projects Presentation to ACT Cananda TDM Summit November 18, 2009 Roxane MacInnis TDM.
Transportation Demand Management: Transport Canada Initiatives Canadian TDM Summit, November RDIMS
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
October 4-5, 2010 TCRP H-37: Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode Prepared for: AMPO Modeling Subcommittee Prepared by:
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
City of Salem Transportation Department Public Opinion Survey Summary Report August 2007 Presented By Tim Hibbitts, Principal Davis, Hibbitts & Midghall,
BOWLING GREEN CITIZEN CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY Fall 2010 – National Citizen Survey.
HART Community Survey Ilium Associates Inc. July–August 2009.
2 Presentation Overview Study Objectives Survey Design Trip Purpose and Trip Chaining Overview – Satisfaction with Roadways and Transportation in Communities.
Economic Development Survey Findings. In partnership with… 2.
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12.
Transportation Operations/Mobility in the Baltimore Region Customer Satisfaction Survey AMPO Operations Work Group September 28-29, 2006 Las Vegas.
Integrated Network Performance in Denmark INFORMS Annual Meeting 2014, San Francisco Dr. Steven Harrod Railway Network Design in Denmark.
COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Coalition for Smarter Growth Presentation on Staff Recommendations for Bus Rapid Transit Silver Spring.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Jennifer Tsien, PBS&J Angela Jacobs, Federal Highway Administration.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Stigma & Place Zaher Sbai Reggie Carillo Arlis Jenkins Monica Trejo Abstract The influence of stigma on place was evaluated, through locals’ perception.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City June.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM A SURVEY OF LIKELY VOTERS IN DENVER What Is the Public Telling Us? Ben Kelly.
A New Regional Vision ASPA Conference April 2010 Steve Heminger, MTC Executive Director.
Florida Department of Transportation District 5 Regional Commuter Assistance Program Courtney Miller Program Manager.
Multimodal Corridor System Management – Incorporating Analysis of Transit, Demand Management Programs and Operational Strategies Presented by Bill Loudon,
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Public Comment Mobility Vision Plan 2035 MVP Website 2035 MVP Brochure and Survey. Provides specific information on the Plan Update. Survey – your opinion.
TAG 2012 Survey Data. Survey sent to 16, responded.
2001 National Household Travel Survey Kentucky Add-on Ben Pierce Presentation By.
TransLink’s role in supporting Cycling in Greater Vancouver ProWalk/ProBike 2004 Gavin Davidson, Program Manager, Bicycle Planning Greater Vancouver Transportation.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
City of Sarasota 2008 National Citizen Survey Conducted by the National Research Center (NRC) for the City of Sarasota.
Draft Transportation 2035 Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area ACT February 24, 2009.
Imagine the Possibilities… Vision from the 2002 Rail Plan.
2008 Missoula Long-Range Transportation Plan Survey May 20, 2008.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
Challenges and Choices San Francisco Bay Area Long Range Plan Therese W. McMillan Deputy Executive Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
Transportation 2035 Survey Results Presented to: MTC Planning Committee November 9, 2007.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
Urban Transport: background, problems and challenges
Understanding the Values and Priorities of Central Floridians Presentation to the River to Sea TPO CAC & TCC August 19, 2014.
2030 Transit-Oriented Development Scenario: Travel Model Results
1 Destination 2030 Kern Regional Transportation Needs * Information provided by Kern Council of Governments.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee Overview of RCTC’s Major Projects December 8, 2015.
2009 COMMUNITY SURVEY Presentation of Final Results January 21, 2010.
Bill White, Mayor A Model for Curbing the Growth of Congestion Presented By Maureen Crocker, Mobility Coordinator Planning & Development Department.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Summary of the WILMAPCO Congestion Management Process Prepared for T3 Webinar September 18, 2007.
Transportation 2035: S.F. Bay Area Targeting Health through Environment Metropolitan Transportation Commission Therese W. McMillan, Deputy Executive Director,
2004 City Budget Allocation Survey January Since 1997, tracking of City of Vancouver residents’ attitudes on: Main local issues of concern Perceptions.
Add Your Thoughts: love 1.What do you love about your neighborhood? most want to change 2.What would you most want to change about your neighborhood? big.
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Statewide Transportation Survey Arizona Transportation Summit May 29, 2008.
MARICOPA COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SURVEY TOPLINE FINDINGS.
Ashland, VA Key Findings January 6, 2015 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
City of Decatur National Citizen Survey 2012 Results City Commission Work Session July 16, 2012.
City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results  Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for second time  Survey conducted by mail  1200 randomly.
1 MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN SURVEY TOPLINE FINDINGS.
2013 RTD Paratransit Customer Satisfaction Survey Results – Executive Summary July, 2013.
Changing the Commuter Equation
2017 Community Survey City of Mountain Brook, Alabama
Meaningful Public Input for…
City of Washougal 2016 Community Survey Findings
2017 Community Survey Town of Snowmass Village, CO
DirectionFinder® Survey
2010 DirectionFinder® Survey City of Blue Springs, Missouri
WELCOMES YOU TO THE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Agenda Methodology Major Findings –Perceptions of Congestion –Ease of Travel –Transportation Planning Issues –Interest in Using Public Transportation –Most Important Regional Transportation Investments –Freight Issues –How funding for transportation should change Summary and Questions

Methodology Survey was conducted during the spring of 2008 The resident survey was administered to a random sample of 1,628 residents. –results have a precision of at least +/-2.5% at the 95% level of confidence. The employer survey was administered to a random sample of 305 employers –results have a precision of at least +/-5% at the 95% level of confidence. The transit survey was administered to a random sample of 334 transit users –results have a precision of at least +/-5% at the 95% level of confidence. Administered in English and Spanish Good representation from all demographic groups Home address of respondents was geocoded

Perceptions of Traffic Congestion and Other Issues

Ease of Travel in the San Antonio Area

Note: “Other” areas did not contain enough responses to show statistically significant results Very Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very Satisfied Other LEGEND Satisfaction with the Ease of Travel from Home to Work

Note: “Other” areas did not contain enough responses to show statistically significant results Very Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very Satisfied Other LEGEND Satisfaction with the Ease of East-West Travel

Note: “Other” areas did not contain enough responses to show statistically significant results Very Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very Satisfied Other LEGEND Satisfaction with the Ease of Travel by Walking

Transportation Planning Issues

Interest in Using Public Transportation

Impact of Higher Gas Prices

Regional Transportation Investment Priorities

Significant Changes in the Priority Residents Place on Various Regional Transportation Investments Since 1998 More Important Light Rail Building Park and Ride Lots Building/Widening Sidewalks Less Important Building a network of bicycle lanes

Freight Issues

How the Level of Funding for Transportation Should Change

Summary Residents were MOST satisfied with: (1) the ease of travel from Bexar County to other communities outside Bexar County, (2) the ease of travel between their home & downtown, and (3) the ease of travel between their home and work Residents were LEAST satisfied with: (1) the ease of travel by bicycle, (2) the ease of travel by walking, and (3) the ease of east/west travel in the region Transportation Planning Priorities: –relieving traffic congestion was the most important transportation planning issue to all three groups Interest in Using Public Transportation: –61% were interested in using commuter or light rail –57% were interested in using Bus Rapid Transit Investment Priorities: –Widening freeways was the most important transportation investment priority for residents and employers –Improving public transportation was the most important investment priority to transit users –Developing light rail was one of the most important transportation investments for all three groups

Questions ??? THANK YOU