1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.
Advertisements

P.N. Burrows ATF2 Project Meeting, KEK, 14/12/091 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales Philip Burrows Glenn Christian Hamid Dabiri Khah Javier Resta Lopez.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 Preliminary resolution study results N. Blaskovic.
FONT Meeting1 Calibrations over IP LO power scan N. Blaskovic.
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 (T-488) Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University EM Background Tests of Feedback BPM.
IPBPM piezo-mover system and plans for in situ monitoring of calibration and stability Current status and plan for ATF2 Philip Bambade Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur.
-brief report of October runs and some inputs for the Nov/Dec planning – Nobuhiro Terunuma, KEK, ATF ATF session on LCWS13, Tokyo Univ., Nov. 13, 2013.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF February-March 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
FONT IP intra-train feedback prototype status
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
FONT GROUP MEETING RES VS SAMPLE NO. Talitha Bromwich - Monday, 20 July 2015.
Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) - Review of Feedback Prototype Tests at ATF(KEK) Glenn Christian John Adams Institute, Oxford for FONT collaboration.
1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.
Philip Burrows ECFA LC Workshop, Warsaw, 10 June Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University G. Christian, C. Clarke, B. Constance, H.
FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF21 FONT digitisation studies of IP BPMs D. Bett, N. Blaskovic, P. Burrows, G. Christian, M. Davis, Y. I. Kim, C. Perry John.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Robert Apsimon, Philip Burrows, Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Davide Gamba,
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Robert Apsimon, Philip Burrows, Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Davide Gamba,
P.N. Burrows ECFA/GDE Meeting, BDIR session, Valencia, 9/11/06 Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University FONT4 tests at KEK/ATF EM background.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
Philip Burrows ATF 15/03/05 FONT Group Progress + Plans 2005 Philip Burrows, Christine Clarke, Glenn Christian, Hamid Dabiri Khah, Stephen Molloy, Glen.
IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich.
1 FONT R&D status Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Philip Burrows ALCPG11, Eugene 21/03/111 Performance of FONT at ATF2 Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University.
1 FONT IP Feedback System Implications of increase of L* Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University.
ATF2 Software tasks: - EXT Bunch-Bunch FB/FF - IP Bunch-Bunch FB - FB Integration Status Javier Resta-Lopez JAI, Oxford University FONT meeting 1th August.
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
FONT Meeting1 Charge normalisation and IP LO power scan N. Blaskovic.
Design of the ATF2 FB/FF Systems Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group Final EUROTeV Scientific Workshop Uppsala, 25-27th.
Philip Burrows ATF2 project meeting 14/1/111 Plans for ATF2 IP Feedback Philip Burrows, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
Design and Simulation of Intra-train Feedback Systems at ATF2: Current Status and Future Plans Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF October 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis**, Colin Perry.
IPBPM issues (Limitation of resolution) Siwon Jang (KNU)
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme and First Results Stephen Molloy, QMUL 2 nd Mini-Workshop for Nano-Project at ATF.
ATF2 Report ALCW Kiyoshi KUBO, for ATF2 Collaboration.
ATF2: Summary of Scheduling Strategy Session Grahame Blair Feedback and Feedforward systems Fast Kicker for ILC bunch train structure Laser-wire Shintake.
CALIBRATIONS IPBPM FILTER TESTS Siwon Jang Hoyeong Jeong Glenn Christian Talitha Bromwich Friday, 1 May Talitha Bromwich, FONT Group Meeting.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
Philip Burrows ATF2 project meeting 1/07/101 Plans for ATF2 IP Feedback Philip Burrows, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
NumberMikey Davis02 November 2012 Roundup of ATF Trip.
FONT GROUP MEETING ATF JUNE SUMMARY Neven & Talitha Talitha Bromwich - Friday, 26 June 2015.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
Low-Q IP BPM Y. I. Kim *, A. Heo, E-S. Kim (KNU) S. T. Boogert (JAI) D. M. McCormick, J. May, J. Nelson, T. Smith, G. R. White (SLAC) Y. Honda, N. Terunuma,
1 IP FB tests at ATF2 Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
Overview of progress at FONT Neven Blaskovic TMD technologies CASE student John Adams Institute Oxford University.
FONT4 Status Report Glenn Christian John Adams Institute, Oxford for FONT collaboration.
1/33Mikey Davis24 January 2013 Review of 23 rd of January Shift.
1 FONT IP FB Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
FONT Oxford FONT REPORT NOVEMBER Neven Blaskovic Kraljevic and Talitha Bromwich Friday, 27 November
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Colin Perry, Rebecca Ramjiawan John Adams Institute,
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme Stephen Molloy, QMUL Nano-Project Mini-Workshop at ATF.
D. BettATF Operations Meeting - 15 June IP C. Perry G. Christian Y. Kim D. Bett N. Blaskovic Kraljevic.
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich, R. Ramjiawan
Roundup of Week at ATF Mikey Davis 19 April /26.
Fast Beam Collision Feedbacks for luminosity optimisation at next-generation lepton colliders Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Siwon Jang Hoyeong Jeong Glenn Christian Talitha Bromwich
Further Tracking Studies and March Trip Plan
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich, P. Burrows, G. Christian, C. Perry, R
ATF Shift Plans Rebecca, Talitha 08/09/2017 Friday, 08 September 2017
March Trip Plan Mikey Davis 01 March /7.
ATF2 Instrumentation Stewart T. Boogert
Progress towards nanometre beam stabilisation at ATF2
Progress towards nanometre level beam stabilisation
FONT stripline BPM resolution
Presentation transcript:

1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry John Adams Institute, Oxford University * Now at CERN in collaboration with: KEK, KNU, LAL Intra-train Feedback Status

2 Outline Reminder of intra-train FB modes Results of 2013 beam runs (old IP chamber) Results of 2014 beam runs (new IP chamber) Summary + conclusions

FONT5 intra-train FBs ATF2 extraction line 33

FONT5 operation modes 4 Aim to stabilise beam in IP region using 2-bunch spill: 1. Upstream FB: monitor beam at IP 2. Feed-forward from upstream BPMs  IP kicker 3. Local IP FB using IPBPM signal and IP kicker 4

5 IP kickerIPBPMs FONT digital FB IPBPM electronics FONT amplifier e- ATF2 IP FB loop scheme Eventual goal is to stabilise the small ATF2 beam (design 37nm) at the nanometer level

6 IP kicker Designed by Oxford Fabrication arranged by KEK Installed May 2012

7 IP kickerIPBPMs FONT digital FB IPBPM electronics FONT amplifier e- Preparatory tests June 2013 Existing IPBPMs Honda low-latency electronics

8 New kicker A B

Interaction Point FONT System Analogue Front-end BPM processor FPGA-based digital processor Kicker drive amplifier Strip-line kicker Beam Cavity BPM 9 Latency ~ 160ns

2013 beam stabilisation results 1.Upstream FB: beam stabilised at IPB to ~ 300 nm 2. Feed-forward: beam stabilised at IPB to ~ 106 nm 3. IP FB: beam stabilised at IPB to ~ 93 nm 10

IP Feedback Results FB Off Jitter: 170 ± 10 nm FB On Jitter: 93 ± 4 nm FB Off Correlation: 81% 11

IP Feedback Results FB Off Jitter: 170 ± 10 nm FB On Jitter: 93 ± 4 nm FB Off Correlation: 81% FB On Correlation: -16% 12

In vacuum IP-BPMs and piezo movers BPM A&B BPM C Piezo Movers (PI) Piezo Movers (Cedrat) BPMs – Bolted aluminum plates, no brazing because of In- vacuum. – BPM A&B bolted together. – BPM C is independent. Piezo mover – BPM units are mounted on the base with three piezo movers. – Dynamic range of each mover is +/- 150 um. IP Slide from Terunuma Initial alignment need to be better than this. Installed summer 2013

14 IP kickerIPBPMs FONT digital FB IPBPM electronics FONT amplifier e- Tests started November 2013 New IP chamber installed Summer 2013 Honda electronics

15 December 2014 beam tests IP chamber was removed, re-worked and re-installed New IPBPMs were fabricated Commissioning began in October 2014 Some preliminary results to show today: Longitudinal IP position set at each IPBPM in turn: position calibration + beam jitter studies High-beta (‘pencil-beam’) optics: BPM resolution IP feedback with beam waist near IPB

16 Nominal optics

17 BPM calibration constant vs. attenuation

18 BPM calibration constant vs. attenuation Indicative of saturation of electronics

19 Beam jitter (at waist) vs. attenuation

20 Beam jitter (at waist) vs. attenuation Consistent with true beam jitter ~ 300nm (beam not tuned after DR extr. kicker issue)

21 High-beta (pencil beam) optics Resolution studies 1) 11/12/14: signal attenuation varied

22 Beam jitter vs. attenuation

23 Beam jitter vs. attenuation Consistent with true beam jitter ~ 500nm (pencil beam large)

24 Resolution vs. attenuation

25 Resolution vs. attenuation Resolution appears to be nm! (NB: C >> A, B)

Dependence on sample # (0db) position jitter resolution

Dependence on sample # (0db) position jitter resolution Such a large signal will saturate the electronics: averaging over sample #s is blind to such saturation!

Sigma#uncutPosition /um Jitter /um BPM Cor R value Res (fit) /nm Res (geom) All / / / / / / (1,2) (1,3) 0.06 (2,3) 126+/ / / / / / / / / /-2 77+/-2 86+/ / / / / / / /-2 54+/ / / / / / / /-3 36+/ / / / / / / / / / / / / / / /-7 31+/-7 79 Resolution study (0db, sample 1)

29 High-beta (pencil beam) optics Resolution studies 2) 20/12/14: 714 MHz BPF filters added on inputs to 2 nd stage mixers beam better centred in both x and y

position jitter Dependence on sample # (0db) IPC showing anomalous behaviour

Resolution vs. sample # (0db) FittingGeom 52nm 57nm54nm

0.1 sigma cut on charge (163/2001 pulses remaining) FittingGeom 47nm 51nm Resolution vs. sample # (0db)

Resolution – mean of samples FittingGeom 42nm 47nm55nm FittingGeom 42nm 46nm59nm sigma cut

34 Resolution summary Best direct measurement of resolution with pencil beam 20/12/14: Single sample point: 52-57nm (fitting); 54nm (geometric) : 42-47nm (fitting); 55nm (geometric) No improvement with tight cuts on data! Resolution is plausibly 50nm (possibly as good as 42nm) (Q = 0.4 e10) Evidence that IPC is not behaving well Care must be taken with beam position to avoid saturation; blindly averaging over samples may not reveal saturation!

35 Nominal optics: IPBPM B

36 Best IPFB results Bunch 1: not corrected, jitter ~ 400nm Bunch 2: corrected, jitter ~ 67nm Corrected jitter 67nm  resolution 47nm

37 Best IPFB results

38 Scan of bunch 2 position using IPK Apply constant kicks to bunch 2 to move its vertical position in the IPBPM Then turn on IPFB …

39 IPFB performance vs. bunch 2 posn. IPFB off IPFB on

40 IPFB performance vs. bunch 2 posn. IPFB off IPFB on

41 IPFB performance vs. bunch 2 posn. IPFB off IPFB on Kicker drive saturated

IPFB performance vs. QD0FF setting Prediction based on incoming jitters of bunches 1 and 2 and measured bunch 1-2 correlation, assuming perfect FB

43 Jitter vs. QD0FF setting (waist scan) 66nm (single)  49nm (avg.)

Reference cavity diode signal noisy stripline diode

45 Summary + conclusions Started commissioning of new ATF2 IP chamber/IPBPMs Lot of preliminary results; some mysteries to understand IPFB works well: corrects beam jitter to 67nm IPFB prediction matches data We believe this performance is resolution-limited Suspect IPBPM B resolution is currently ~ 50nm We suspect a problem with IPBPM C We are suspicious of reference cavity diode signal