Transiting Exoplanet Working Group Nikole K. Lewis STScI 10/20/2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Search for Earth-size Planets Borucki – Page 1 KEPLER; Data Validation and Follow Up Observations CoRoT Symposium W.J. Borucki & the Kepler Team 5 February.
Advertisements

London & Zurich Plc User Guide. Service Benefits Full on-line management of client accounts Paperless direct debit – no signatures required Standing orders.
Mark Clampin (GSFC) John Stansberry (STScI)
MOST - Moving Object Search Tool for NEOWISE and IRSA Kevin Yau 6/11/2010.
NEAT: Very high precision astrometry to detect nearby planetary systems down to one Earth mass F. Malbet, A. Crouzier, M. Shao, A. Léger and the NEAT collaboration.
GCSE Astronomy Controlled Assessment
Time Series Photometry; Some Musings Steve B. Howell, NASA Ames Research Center.
Oversampling mode Roi Alonso, Pierre-Yves Chabaud Christian Surace, Raphael Cautain, P. Barge.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Instrument Requirements Antonin Bouchez PALM-3000 Requirements Review November 12, 2007.
A Profusion of Exoplanets: Key Science Results from the Kepler Mission Jon M. Jenkins SETI Institute/NASA Ames Research Center Thursday September 22, 2011.
Attempts to separate apparent observational range bias from true geodetic signals Graham Appleby, Philip Gibbs, Matthew Wilkinson, Vicki Smith Space Geodesy.
1 08 January 2015 Stephen Horan Cube Quest Kick-off: Communications Rules PI for Avionics Space Technology Mission Directorate.
PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars Thierry Appourchaux for the PLATO Consortium
Stellar Linearity Test Jason Surace (Spitzer Science Center)
1 Presenter: Chien-Chih Chen Proceedings of the 2002 workshop on Memory system performance.
Yu. Artyukh, V. Bespal’ko, E. Boole, V. Vedin Institute of Electronics and Computer Science Riga, LATVIA 16th International Workshop on Laser.
Jupiter Mutual Events Sep 2014 to Aug 2015.
NICMOS IntraPixel Sensitivity Chun Xu and Bahram Mobasher Space Telescope Science Institute Abstract We present here the new measurements of the NICMOS.
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
6e-1 Science Data Products Daryl Swade DMS Systems Engineer S&OC System Design Review #1.
Data Management Subsystem: Data Processing, Calibration and Archive Systems for JWST with implications for HST Gretchen Greene & Perry Greenfield.
Distortion in the WFC Jay Anderson Rice University
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE.
Data Management Subsystem Jeff Valenti (STScI). DMS Context PRDS - Project Reference Database PPS - Proposal and Planning OSS - Operations Scripts FOS.
2-1 DMS Requirements Status Daryl Swade DMS Systems Engineer Nov. 6, 2013 S&OC Data Management System Design Review 3.
Impacts of temporal resolution and timing of streambed temperature measurements on heat tracing of vertical flux Paper No. H11D-1228 INTRODUCTION 1D heat.
1 Description and Benefits of JWST Commanding Operations Concept TIPS/JIM Meeting 17 July 2003 Vicki Balzano.
Time Series Data Analysis - I Yaji Sripada. Dept. of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen2 In this lecture you learn What are Time Series? How to.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Mark Swain THESIS – the Terrestrial and Habitable-zone Exoplanet Spectroscopy Infrared Spacecraft characterizing.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
HST Quarterly Review Page 1 Space Telescope Science Institute 12 February 2004 SI Status: COS STScI Support of COS Thermal-Vacuum Testing COS Thermal-Vacuum.
2004 January 27Mathematical Challenges of Using Point Spread Function Analysis Algorithms in Astronomical ImagingMighell 1 Mathematical Challenges of Using.
MAST Users Group – July 2009 MAST will provide the archive user interface for Kepler data, primarily light curves and target pixel data. ASB Staffing for.
JWST Calibration Error Budget Jerry Kriss. 15 March 20072/14 JWST Flux & Wavelength Calibration Requirements SR-20: JWST shall be capable of achieving.
This dataset contains calibrated, to 4.8-micron spectral images of comet 103/P Hartley 2 acquired by the High Resolution Infrared Spectrometer (HRII)
Data Challenges in Astronomy: NASA’s Kepler Mission and the Search for Extrasolar Earths Jon M. Jenkins SETI Institute/NASA Ames Research Center Thursday.
Kailash C. Sahu NIRCam: Status Update 1m Cold, space-facing side
HARPS Data Flow System Christophe Lovis Geneva Observatory HARPS-N PDR, 6-7 December 2007, Cambridge MA.
COS PIPELINE CDR Jim Rose July 23, 2001OPUS Science Data Processing Space Telescope Science Institute 1 of 12 Science Data Processing
Exoplanet Characterization with JWST
JWST Time-Series Pipeline Nikole K. Lewis STScI. Data Pipeline for Transiting Exoplanets The foundation for the Spitzer and Hubble data pipelines were.
1 Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite Daryl Swade Archive Team Meeting June 16, 2014.
APT Overview for Transiting Exoplanet Proposals Chris Moriarty – APT Developer.
Tracing the JWST Proposal from User Interface to Commanding of an Instrument Margaret Meixner & WIT Balzano, Robinson & CMD.
Introduction: Goals for JWST Transit Meeting C. Beichman Jonathan Lunine March 11, 2014.
CCD Image Processing: Issues & Solutions. CCDs: noise sources dark current –signal from unexposed CCD read noise –uncertainty in counting electrons in.
APT Visit Planner Review Chris O’Dea. The Gallant Crew v Chris O’Dea - Project Scientist v Jesse Doggett - Software Engineer/Coordinator v Tricia Royle.
1 Future Directions in HST Data Processing 19 November 2004.
Kalman Filter and Data Streaming Presented By :- Ankur Jain Department of Computer Science 7/21/03.
WEC meeting TED status and WEC timing.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 1 Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland * now at PosiTim, Germany 5th International GOCE User.
Single Object Spectroscopy and Time Series Observations with NIRSpec
Exoplanet Characterization ToolKit (ExoCTK)
Single Object Slitless Spectroscopy Simulations
NIRSpec Time Series Observations
“ Who will I blame my mistakes on. ” Dr
NAC flat fielding and intensity calibration
JWST Pipeline Overview
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
JWST NIRCam Time Series Observations
Mission Planning Updates
Chris Willott, Loic Albert, René Doyon, and the FGS/NIRISS Team
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
Summary Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy Jeff Valenti JWST Mission Scientist Space Telescope Science Institute.
Precision Time Protocol
GPI Astrometric Calibration
How to implement coordinated parallels
Databases, Web Pages and Archives
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Presentation transcript:

Transiting Exoplanet Working Group Nikole K. Lewis STScI 10/20/2015

Science Case: Transiting Exoplanets

Signal Strengths Less Than Eclipse Depth

Transiting Exoplanets: Requirements Exposures on the order of hours to days Stable pointing (no dithers, no parallels) Brightest host stars generally present best SNR

Time-Series Observations (TSOs) Other use cases with similar operational and pipeline processing requirements include: Solar system stellar occultations, eclipses, mutual events Eclipsing cataclysmic variables Brown Dwarf Variability Non-transiting exoplanet phase curves

Time-series Observations (TSO) Req’s Exposures longer than 10,000 secPhase Constraints in APT ([-1,1]) Visits exceeding 24 hoursMinimum number of guide stars required (mitigate failure during long stares) Uninterruptible observations > 48 hoursBJD_TDB time standard (HJD and BJD_UTC) Slew to science target ASAP and wait (allows for thermal settling) Time-tagging of integrations Timing of target acquisition relative to slew and start of science data collection FITS file format for TSO exposures Disable Dithers in TSO observationsFlag integrations acquired during HGA moves Avoid electronic and mechanical disturbances (NO_PARALLEL) Cross-instrument TSO functionality (APT, pipeline, etc.) Open, development in progress Nearly Closed Closed

Time Tagging of Integrations What sets limits on accuracy/precision of time tags? – 10 μs precision on frame time – Onboard time tags (UTC) are generated when the last pixel of “science image” is read – Onboard clock sampled at a rate of 64 ms, which sets the precision limit for the time tags of SSR science data files – Corrections to the onboard clock can be updated on 12hr contact interval. Linear correction is applied on s intervals (with 0.5 ms accuracy), with steps on the order of a few microseconds. Clock will not be allowed to drift more than 1 s away from the true UTC time over a 24 hour period. Clock performance can be estimated starting in 2016 (EMTB, OTB facilities). Bottom line: 64 ms clock sampling rate is limiter to time-tag accuracy.

Time Tagging of Integrations What is a “science image”? Packet of data equivalent to one full frame (2048x2048). Subarray data will stacked frame-by-frame (group-by-group) until it meets this size. For example x256 subarrays would be included in one science image. This means timestamps are generated every 10.7/42.2 seconds (accurate to 64 ms). Bottom line/Take Away: Don’t panic! Very similar to subarray stacking and timestamp cadence used by Spitzer (64 frames per image with one timestamp) Frame times are precise and allow extrapolation between timestamps Reformatting of data will take care of timestamp propagation (discussion on next slide).

Fits File Formatting for TSO Original Plan: one fits file per exopsure with a timestamp(s) propagated from last pixel read. Suggested Plan: A new pipeline processing module created that will repackage all TSO data products (raw frames, calibrated ramps, etc.) and include time tags with each frame. – Time tags will be generated in multiple flavors including BJD_TT, BJD_UTC, HJD_UTC – HST/Spitzer include time tags in header, Kepler as a table extension (I’ve been told the latter is more computationally efficient). – Work continues on one fits file per exopsure vs. one fits file per integration. Need solution that will work in context of current pipeline/archive architecture.

TSO Version of Pipeline Standard pipeline design would require TSO users to work with raw integrations TSO pipeline minimizes corrections that could introduce unwanted errors (less is more). TSO pipeline provides high-level data products in temporal space as opposed to stacking integrations. Currently working Calibration and Pipeline WGs to enable TSO science.

Tracking Data ‘Features’ Persistence/Latent Images Saturation/Linearity Pointing Jitter/Settling IPSV, IPC Background Noise (white, 1/f, red) Flat-Fielding Errors On orbit calibration High-Precision Time Series Observation w/JWST Website Coming Online at the end of October! SSCSSC HAT-P-2, 8 μm

Enabling Transiting Exoplanet Science with JWST A STScI Mini- Workshop November 16 th -18 th, 2015

Goals of the Workshop Inform the community about JWST’s capabilities for transiting exoplanet observations, so that they can start thinking about good science cases now. Inform both STScI and the broader community about some of the cutting edge exoplanet science that can be enabled with JWST through invited science talks. Facilitate discussions in the transiting exoplanet community about wants/needs for early release science programs and support from STScI (clearing house for data reduction tools, data challenges, etc.) Currently ~60 in person participants. Workshop Link