Recommendations for: Upgrading Technology Enhanced Learning Spaces Upgrade of Computers in Open & College Labs IT Governance Executive Committee January.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing a Student Technology Fee Jim Stenerson Beth Gordon Klingner July 27, 2011 Pace University.
Advertisements

Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Report Oakland University Senate November 13, 2008.
Overview of Performance Funding Model for Ohio’s Community Colleges
Integrated Budget Allocation & Program Review Process Rick Bennett VPAS CBAC Chair CBAC 10/8 and Academic Senate 10/9.
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
Dr. James M. Keane Executive Dean and Campus CEO.
1 The Florida International University Faculty Senate Meeting Operating Budget FY07-08 & Budget Reduction Plan September 18, 2007.
Overall the recurring budget increase is $9.8 million. In addition, the budget has $9.5 million of carry forward funds. This budget reflects no tuition.
Provisional Budget Reduction Plan Linda P. Brady, Chancellor Presentation to UNCG Faculty Senate April 2, 2014.
RE-ADOPTED BUDGET December 16, 2014 DAAC presentation January /16/20141My job is to accelerate learning for every APS student, every day.
to 2015 Operating Budgets Governance & Priorities Committee March 7, 2013.
Non-Class Events in Classroom Project 1 Classroom Scheduling & Utilization Project: Capturing Non-Class Events in Held in Classrooms March 25, 2009.
Equipment Replacement & Support Information Technology Services Board Retreat – February 7, 2009.
1 Board of Trustees FY 2009 Budget Presentation F. John Case, Ed. D. May 19, 2008.
BUILDING AND SUPPORTING A STRONG, EQUITABLE AND STABLE CHILD CARE SYSTEM NOW AND FOR THE FUTURE. COMMUNITY SERVICES STANDING COMMITTEE JUNE 16, 2014 Child.
Academic Technology Advisory Committee December 2013.
What is the Focus?  Round 2 Analysis observed trends in student perception after first survey.  Allows us to recognize improvements of lower measures.
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
Building for Their Future Dublin Unified School District.
The University of Texas at Brownsville and Texas Southmost College Career Services Welcome to the Student Employment Initiative Program Information Session.
1 F&A Advisory Committee REAB Project Briefing January 20,
CBPA Computer Lab Redesign Development of the Career and Placement Center Ted Strickland Department of Computer Information Systems March 21, 2005 DRAFT.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Managing the Facilities Asset Portfolio Prepared for the Tuition Policy Advisory Committee by The University of Texas Physical Plant September 10, 2003.
University Technology Fee Presentation to: Student Fee Review Board November 30, 2004.
Student Success Fee for Cal Poly Pomona September 26, 2012 Academic Senate.
TOWN OF TYNGSBOROUGH Article 6 Capital Exclusion Overview.
Arlington Independent School District More Than A Remarkable Education Technology Overview Summer Leadership August 5, 2010.
Campus Day, Week 0 January 14, Looking Ahead Enrollment update Associate Dean search BIT meetings Shelter in place drills and door locks.
Enrollment Task Force Membership: Lyn Ragdale and Dan Carson, co-chairs Sidney Burrus, Marj Corcoran, Bart Sinclair, Matt Taylor, Ken Whitmire We met several.
CD FY09 Tactical Plan Status FY09 Tactical Plan Status Report for Site Networking Anna Jordan April 28, 2009.
Natick Public Schools Technology Update April 28, 2008 Dennis Roche, CISA Director of Technology.
Jan 31, 2005 Community Update. Jan 31, 2005 Thanks to the voters… Measure R passed with over 63% of the vote $3.87 billion for “the Safe and Healthy Neighborhood.
CLASSROOM REVIEW BOARD Proposal Presentation to the UTFAB Tuesday, March 1, 2005, 5 PM, Library Tom Maher, Dir. of OIS,
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
Policies and Procedures for Summer Supplements on Federal Awards April
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
Colorado State University Library Student Technology Fee Update.
Technology Coordinating Team.  1.The Technology Coordinating Team will determine technology strategic initiatives (4-year technology plan)
South Seattle Community College BUDGET HEARING Fiscal Year June 6, 2006.
Reality Check: Planning and Budgeting for the Next-Gen Classroom Campus Technology July 30, 2008.
Senate Budget Committee Report Budget Recommendations based on Budget Hearings & Budget Forum February 27, 2015.
Aligning Institutional Strategic and SEM Plans: Indiana State University November 12, 2012 Tom Green, Ph.D. Senior Consultant.
Total Cost of Ownership for Technology Resources at Mission College Description and Recommendations.
Physical I&IT Infrastructure Proposal Presentation to the UTFAB Monday, February 16, 2003, 4-5 PM, 202 Weber Pat Burns, IAVPIIT,
Informational Update Student Success Fee Funded Project Status Emerging Technologies & Instructional Technologies Committees IT Governance Executive Committee.
Classroom Instructional Technology Enhancements Proposal to UTFAB James Lyall Assistant to the Dean – Information and Instructional Technology College.
Student Services Fee Wednesday, November 11,
Fiscal Advisory Committee Highlights. Committee Charge The purpose of this committee shall be to review the University's fiscal resources and.
Physical I&IT Infrastructure Proposal Presentation to the UTFAB Monday, November , 5-6:30 PM, Library Tom Maher, Dir. of OIS,
Instructional and Information Technology Services The Technology Refresh Program.
Funding Technology at Mission College Challenges and Recommendations.
UND MASTER PLANNING Phase I: Information Gathering & Analysis.
Winter Symposium January 20, Why are we here today? To discuss ways that we can take control of our future and make the outcomes we desire more.
TOWN OF TYNGSBOROUGH Ballot Question September 14, 2010 Capital Exclusion Overview.
Information Technology Assessment Findings Presented to the colleges of the State Center Community College District.
Updates & Recommendations from Instructional Technology Committee Computers in College Labs IT Governance Executive Committee March 28, 2014 Meeting IT.
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
IT Governance Purpose: Information technology is a catalyst for productivity, creativity and community that enhances learning opportunities in an environment.
Technology Fee Presentation
Occupational Therapy Classroom Proposal
Astronomy/Physics/Physical Science
Classroom support 2018 update – 2019 preview
HEALTH AND EXERCISE SCIENCE CLASSROOM PROPOSAL
Measure E Technology Update
House Appropriations Committee Retreat Update on Degree Funding Initiative Tony Maggio November 13, 2018.
ONGARD Modernization Project Certification: Planning: Change Request September 17th, 2014 Tim Elsbrock, Project Manager Tony Hoffman, Director of.
UTFAB Proposal College Computer Classroom Upgrade
Food Science and Human Nutrition Classroom Proposal
Presentation transcript:

Recommendations for: Upgrading Technology Enhanced Learning Spaces Upgrade of Computers in Open & College Labs IT Governance Executive Committee January 31, 2014 Meeting IT Governance - Instructional Technology Working Group

Emerging Technologies Working Group FACULTY & STAFF Shanthi Srinivas Assoc. V.P. for Academic Planning, Policy & Faculty Affairs (Co-Chair) Kevin Morningstar Associate CIO, I&IT Ops (Co-Chair) Olive Yao Li Assistant Professor, Human Nutrition and Food Science Muditha Senanayake Assistant Professor Apparel Merchandising & Management STUDENTS Jasmine Andino ASI Engineering Senator Nailah Zoi Givens ASI Senator-at-Large Greek Obi Okafor ASI Science Senator Raquel Mercado ASI CLASS Senator IT Governance - Instructional Technology Working Group

Working Group Guiding Principles Classrooms that have a high demand for AV equipment will be prioritized for basic presentation technology Classrooms that have existing outdated/poorly functioning technology that significantly impacts instruction will be prioritized for upgrade of basic presentation technology Every attempt will be made to honor a fair allocation of resources to meet the needs of the colleges and the university Colleges will be consulted on their classroom needs Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #1

Recommendation #1 – Upgrade of Technology Enhanced Learning Spaces (TELS) IT Governance - Instructional Technology Working Group

Proposed Strategy for Upgrade of Learning Spaces Start with the basics in the first funding cycle Allocation strategy focuses on replacing the TELS classrooms over the next two fiscal years Beginning in FY 14/15, add rooms without AV equipment that have regular requests for AV delivery Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #1

Focus on Technology Enhanced Learning Spaces (TELS) TELS classrooms built in 2000 to TELS classrooms have been upgraded since classrooms remain in 4 colleges These classrooms are in serious need of replacement Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #1

Overall Classroom AV & Lecture Station Status 40 projectors have been identified as lecture stations with regular problems 65 classroom computers have been identified as needing a refresh (7+ years old); computers will be replaced in this round Estimated cost to replace all classrooms with out-of- date equipment is well over one million dollars Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #1

Methodology for Selection Rooms were selected using the number of enrolled students scheduled in the room for all sessions in 2013 This year’s proposed classrooms would upgrade half of the remaining TELS rooms Upgrades occur in four of the five colleges that have TELS equipment Remaining TELS rooms would be upgraded in 2015 Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #1

Classrooms Identified by Methodology Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #1 FUNDING ALLOCATION COLLEGELOCATION’13 ROOM ENROLLMENT EQUIIP AGE (yrs) $30,000ENG9-3071,11910 $30,000ENG $30,000CLASS $30,000CBA98-C $30,000AG Typo in original room number $30,000ENG $30,000CBA98-C OptionCEIS $70,00044 Projectors for classrooms identified with failing equipment $20, Classroom computers

Recommendation to Upgrade of Technology Enhanced Learning Spaces (TELS) FY 13/14 fund replacement of half of the Technology Enhanced Learning Spaces (TELS) this Fiscal Year with the remaining TELS classrooms to be upgraded in FY 14/15 Designate 30% of funding for the replacement of projectors and lecture computers that have been identified by I&IT staff as failing or in need of immediate replacement Validate room prioritization with Academic Affairs and colleges Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #1

Feedback from I&IT Instructional & Desktop Technology Actual room specific estimates are not available for the rooms identified; costs provided to the committee were general targets Each room is different and often requires varying room construction designs and labor Consultation with Academic Affairs and colleges needs to occur to validate room needs and availability during the summer Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #1

QUESTIONS & RECOMMENDATION Upgrade of Technology Enhanced Learning Spaces (TELS) For FY 13/14 the committee recommends that half of the Technology Enhanced Learning Spaces (TELS) be funded for upgrades this year with the remaining TELS classrooms to be upgraded in FY 14/15. Funding for these seven classrooms is projected to be $210,000 (or approximately 70% of the total available SSF funding) for FY 13/14. The committee further recommends that the remaining 30% of the funds be used for the replacement of projectors and lecture stations that have been identified by I&IT staff as failing or in need of immediate replacement. Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #1

Recommendation #2 – Upgrade of Computers in Open & College Labs IT Governance - Instructional Technology Working Group

Background on Open & College Labs An Open Lab is the designation of common areas with computers that are available to any student at any time A College Lab is generally considered an instructional space and is used primarily for classroom instruction and college specific use Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #2

Background on Computers in Open & College Labs Approximately 90 areas on campus that are identified as being either an Open or College Lab A full inventory of lab computers did not exist prior to this request for information for the committee Replacement of computers in College and Open labs have not been maintained on a regular schedule Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #2

Background on Computers in Open & College Labs Estimate to replace all of lab equipment 4 years and older would cost over 1.2 million dollars encompassing a total of 55 labs and 1,350 computers 48 out of approximately 77 College Labs need replacement totaling over 1,050 new computers Almost 50% of the computers in the 10 Open Labs are older than 4 years – over 275 computers need to be replaced Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #2

Methodology for Selection Designate 80% for College Labs (or $240,000) and 20% for Open Labs ($60,000) Model for identifying College Labs 50%Age of computers 30%Number of students enrolled 20%Size of lab - number of computers Some labs with much older equipment may not be funded due to their smaller size and student utilization Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #2

Labs Identified by Methodology Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #2 FUNDING ALLOCATION COLLEGELOCATION’13 RM ENROLL. # PCsEQUIIP AGE Notes $50,600CBA98-C4-351, Correction of room number $34,100ENG Confirmed with college tech $50,600CBA98-C Confirmed with college tech $39,800AG45-102b College tech recommending based on student utilization $33,000ENG Engineering tech staff advising based on student utilization $27,500CLASS Confirmed

Factors to Consider Historically funding varied significantly for labs Method distributes funding unevenly Will colleges continue to fund their own lab upgrades or depend upon SSF Configurations and costs will vary depending upon software and hardware requirements in College Labs All computers in a College Labs must be replaced at the same time while Open Labs can have multiple models Academic Affairs and colleges need to be consulted – locations may change Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #2

QUESTIONS & RECOMMENDATION Upgrade of Computers in Open & College Labs For FY 13/14 the committee recommends that funding for the replacement of lab computers be designated as 80% for College Labs (or $240,000) and 20% for Open Labs ($60,000). Instructional Technology Working Group – Recommendation #2