NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT Mr. Sandford AP United States History.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Supreme Court Nullification Enter John Calhoun

Advertisements

Strengthening the Judicial Branch SOL: VUS.5e.  Born in Midland, Virginia  Veteran of the Revolutionary War.  He endured the harsh winter at.

The Marshal Court How was the Federalist party able to stay relevant despite not winning any presidential elections since the John Adam’s administration?

The Marshall Court Mr. Johnson AP US History.

Who was John Marshall?  The Democratic-Republican victory in the 1800 election began a long run of Republican political success.  In spite of Federalists'

Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The Constitution is not clear about the power of the Supreme Court.

John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court

Marbury v. Madison (Appointed fed. Judge by Pres. Adams night before Adams left office) (Sec. of State for Jefferson) (1803) Background –“Midnight Judge”

The Marshall Court. Marshall was born in the foothills of the Virginia's Blue Ridge Mountains in 1755, far from the wealthy tobacco and slave Tidewater.

In a series of Marshall Court decisions from , A) state charters were not recognized as legal contracts B) a strong federal government was promoted.

John Marshall, Chief Justice

SUPREME COURT CASES. THE CASE William Marbury, one of Adam’s “midnight appointments” was denied his job as a judge.

Federalism and the Supreme Court McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Marbury v. Madison (1803) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1824)

7.2 Nationalism at Center Stage Mr. Manelski CPUSH.

The Supreme Court (The Judicial Branch) What’s the big deal?

JOHN MARSHALL’S GREATEST HITS Marbury v. Madison1803 Fletcher v. Peck1810 McCulloch v. Maryland1819 Gibbons v. Ogden1824.

The Marshall Court Chapter 8. John Marshall and Judicial Nationalism Marshall was the most important chief justice in U.S. history ( ) Significantly.

John Marshall, Chief Justice  Nominated to Supreme Court by John Adams in1801  Marshall agreed, and upheld Hamilton’s doctrine of “implied powers” 

Served as an officer with General Washington during the Revolution Attended College of William and Mary and became a practicing attorney. 2 nd cousin of.

Marshall Court I.Chief Justice John Marshall A. Dominates Supreme Court B. Strengthened federal govt. at the expense of state governments.

Supreme Court Cases Overview. Marbury v. Madison Marbury sued Sec of State Madison for his appointment to be a judge (midnight judges – Adams administration)

“I shall…by the establishment of republican principles…sink federalism into an abyss from which there shall be no resurrection.” -Jefferson With their.

Confederation to Constitution 1776: 2 nd Continental Congress declares independence; PA creates democratic state constitution 1781 : Articles of Confederation.

Chief Justice John Marshall

The History of the Supreme Court HUSH Unit Three.

Thomas Jefferson Election of 1800 In a presidential election you are really voting for electors who meet in what is known as the electoral college.

Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION Topic 3: The Marshall Court (Judicial Nationalism)

The Marshall Courts. Purpose of the Judicial Branch  Interpret the Law –Set Legal Precedents –Determine if laws passed by Congress or Presidential Actions.

Born in Virginia, 1755 Served as an officer with General Washington during the Revolution Attended College of William and Mary and became a practicing.

The United States Supreme Court Article 3 of the US Constitution The U.S.S.C. interprets the Constitution and the Law How did the Supreme Court under.

The Emergence of the Supreme Court The Marshall Court

Supreme Court of the United States  SCOTUS Branch of gov’t which interprets/applies the law Makes sure laws/gov’t action are constitutional  Judicial.

Supreme Court USHC-1.7.

Implied Powers of the National Government

Supreme Court Cases Landmark Supreme Court cases that outlined the powers of the Judicial Branch.

Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION

Supreme Court USHC-1.7.

NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT

Establishing Judicial Review

VUS5e John Marshall How did Chief Justice John Marshall, a Virginian, contribute to the growth of the U.S. Supreme Court’s importance in relation to the.

The Federalist Judiciary

McCulloch v Maryland (1819)

John Marshall and the United States Supreme Court

Expanding the powers of the Judicial Branch

The Marshall Court.

The United States Supreme Court Article 3 of the US Constitution

Judicial decisions Colin Bouchard.

The United States Supreme Court Article 3 of the US Constitution

The Marshall Court 6.3.

Unit 4: GROWTH OF THE YOUNG NATION

NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT

Growth of the Supreme Court

Do Now: What is the main job of the Judicial Branch?

John Marshall Court US History.

THE MARSHALL COURT Chief Justice John Marshall ( )

Establishing Judicial Review

If this image captures Jefferson’s vision of an ideal America, what was his vision? What role did Jefferson want the government to play in this ideal America?

Do Now: What is the main job of the Judicial Branch?

Topic: Evaluating the Decisions of the Marshall Court

Supreme Court Cases of the early Republic

Growth of the Supreme Court

The United States Supreme Court Article 3 of the US Constitution

JOHN MARSHALL Born in Virginia, 1755

JOHN MARSHALL Born in Virginia, 1755

Do Now (Background Essay)

Marshall Court AIM: Did the Supreme Court under John Marshall Give Too Much Power to the Federal Government at the Expense of the State Governments?

How is power distributed in Federalism?

The Legacy of the Marshall Court

The Marshall Court.

Presentation transcript:

NATIONALISM & THE MARSHALL COURT Mr. Sandford AP United States History

John Marshall’s Background He served as Washington’s Aide in the Revolutionary War. He served as Secretary of State under John Adams. Appointed as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court by Adams after he lost the election. He continued as Sec. of State and Chief Justice for 2 months.

Marshall’s Politics He was a Federalist He had a “loose” interpretation of the Constitution. He believed strongly in implied powers. He developed “Judicial Review” He believed strongly in the “national supremacy clause”.

Marshall’s Motives Promote Nationalism in spite of Election of 1800 and the rise of Jefferson. Strengthen the federal government at expense of the states. Strengthen the court at the expense of President. Advance the interests of the commerce class. Protect free enterprise from state control. Protect the sanctity of contracts. Promote economic growth and industrialization.

Marbury v. Madison (1803) Federalists (Adams) passed the JUDICIARY ACT of 1801 and appointed the “midnight judges” in their last hours in office. Found ACT unconstitutional and established the precedent of JUDICIAL REVIEW. Power of the Court established, instant respectability.

Fletcher v. Peck (1810) ISSUE: The Georgia Leg. gave large amount of land to Yazoo Company (bribes) A year later, after election, wanted land back. Land grant contracts can not be repealed, SC. PRECEDENT: Made Contracts “sacred”. Power of the Court to overrule decisions made by the states. Judicial Review of State Laws – “NATIONAL SUPREMACY CLAUSE”

Dartmouth Col v Woodward (1819) ISSUE: States trying to control board overseeing a private college, established under royal charter. SC: Charters are legal contracts. Dartmouth remained private. PRECEDENT: Loose interpretation of the constitution, “contract” Judicial Review of State Decisions. Marshall said states gave up some rights when ratified the Constitution, no longer sovereign.

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) ISSUE: Southern States seek to limit the power of the National Bank. Maryland placed a high tax on the Bank. SC: Bank is Constitutional, necessary and proper clause. PRECEDENT: Loose interpretation of the Constitution, esp. necessary and proper clause. States can not tax federal institution. Supremacy Clause.

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) ISSUE: NY gave Ogden monopoly over Hudson River Ferry Service. US gave Gibbons control of the same river. State monopolies are worthless. PRECEDENT: State power to grant monopolies is limited. Federal supremacy over- interstate commerce. Loose interpretation of the Constitution, federal government regulates inter-state commerce.

Attacks on the Court Impeachment attacks to silence aggressive federalist judges. Repealed the Judiciary Act. Jefferson argued the Court overstepped its bounds and the court power should be changed. Gibbons court case, very popular, TJ attacks end and the power of Judicial Review is insured.