Product status and timeline Andy Smith RAL. User products The GGSPS provides user access to the following products: Level 1.5 NANRG, ARG Level 2 ARG (and.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Stephen Burke - WP8 Status - 9/5/2002 Partner Logo WP8 Status Stephen Burke, PPARC/RAL.

Advertisements

1 MODAPS - Land Processing Status Robert Wolfe and Ed Masuoka Code 619, NASA GSFC Sadashiva Devadiga Sigma Space MODIS Science Team Meeting April 15-17,

A service of Maryland Health Benefit Exchange MHBE IAC System Update July 17, 2014.

SDCG-6 Oslo, Norway October 22-24, 2014 SDCG/USGS: Landsat 7 & 8 SDCG-6 Session 5: Roles and Responsibilities Data flows from CEOS agencies.

16 October th International Workshop on Laser Ranging 1 Implementing the Consolidated laser Ranging Data (CRD) Format throughout the ILRS Network.

GIST 19: GGSPS Planning GGSPS Development & Review Planning Andy Smith GGSPS software project manager.

1 The IIPC Web Curator Tool: Steve Knight The National Library of New Zealand Philip Beresford and Arun Persad The British Library An Open Source Solution.

UL Meeting July BusinessObjects Upgrade XI 3.1 Cristine Little Business Intelligence July

Testing - an Overview September 10, What is it, Why do it? Testing is a set of activities aimed at validating that an attribute or capability.

Modelling and Data Centre Requirements: CEDA ESGF UV-CDAT Conference December 2014 Philip Kershaw, Centre for Environmental Data Archival, RAL Space,

Jordan G. Powers Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Space Weather Workshop.

1 MTAC WORKGROUP 111 Status Update Nov 1, Work Group 111 Charter Issue Statement: Identify gaps, define solutions, highlight benefits, and improve.

Plans for interim data release J E Russell (Imperial)

Accelerated Stability Testing

Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite Daryl Swade September 24, 2014 TESS DMS Management Meeting.

GERB2-GERB 1 transition: discussion item J E Russell Imperial College, London

Data Management Subsystem: Data Processing, Calibration and Archive Systems for JWST with implications for HST Gretchen Greene & Perry Greenfield.

Web Trnsport – Beta Testing and Implementation TUG Roundtable Discussion Elizabeth Rodgers Info Tech, Inc. October 9, 2007.

Brett Neely IP Next Generation. To boldly go where no network has gone before...

ALMA Integrated Computing Team Coordination & Planning Meeting #2 Santiago, January 2014 Control Group Planning Rafael Hiriart, Control Group Lead.

Level 1.5 Processing Issues Martin Bates RAL. Level 1.5 Processing Issues Geolocation –Current Status –TSOL Jitter (CSOL-TSOL) correction –Longterm TSOL.

Level 1.5 Processing Updates Martin Bates, RAL GIST th December, 2005.

© 2011 IBM Corporation 1 Definition Optional add on to standard Base Support (SWMA/Support Line, Warranty/HWMA) that delivers the following 1.Personalized.

18 th GIST Meeting 14 th –16 th May 2003 Ground Segment (GGSPS) Report 1 Commissioning update B.C.Stewart RAL.

08/30/05GDM Project Presentation Lower Storage Summary of activity on 8/30/2005.

U.S. General Services Administration FTS2001 Transition Baseline Inventory Tool Adam Lesser GSA Networx Transition Team (Booz Allen Hamilton) October 25,

Data Release Requirements, decisions and plans. What we need New machine Implement (and test) all proposed changes from current Provide data quality summary,

MOWG 2 Sept 15-16,1999 David Hancock1 KEY PERSONNEL Dr. Bob Schutz, GLAS Science Team Leader Dr. Jay Zwally, ICESat Project Scientist, GLAS Team Member.

Label Design Tool Management Council F2F Washington, D.C. November 29-30, 2006

GIST 23 DWD, 27-29th Apr 2005 GGSPS development and operations Andy Smith RAL.

MSG, GERB calibration and data status May ‘07 J E Russell Imperial College, London

Swift HUG April Swift data archive Lorella Angelini HEASARC.

CCOS Status Report February 6, 2004 Policy Committee Meeting.

Slide 1 Archive Computing: Scalable Computing Environments on Very Large Archives Andreas J. Wicenec 13-June-2002.

GIST 19: GGSPS status Status of GGSPS development and operations Andy Smith GGSPS software project manager.

TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Voluntary Voting System Guidelines Roadmap Nelson Hastings, Ph.D. Technical Project Leader for Voting Standards, ITL

Operations Report PDS Management Council Meeting Flagstaff, Arizona August 2006

Monte-Carlo Event Database: current status Sergey Belov, JINR, Dubna.

© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Calibration Commissioning Report GIST 19 RAL, 27th August 2003 GERB Instrument Team & Operations Team.

Level 1.5 Geolocation Martin Bates, RAL GIST th December, 2005.

API 17N (and Q) Subsea Production System Reliability, Integrity, and Technical Risk Management.

Geolocation Tuning and Status Geolocation Accuracy of Available Data Problems –E-W, N-S Centering –Discrepancies Comparing with RGP –Axis Misalignments.

18 th GIST Meeting 14 th –16 th May 2003 Ground Segment (GGSPS) Report 1 GERB Ground Segment B.C.Stewart RAL.

ASTRA Update Sunflower Project Statewide Management, Accounting and Reporting Tool (SMART) February 12, 2009.

LANCE Processing at the AMSR-E SIPS Presented by Kathryn Regner Information Technology and Systems Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville Joint.

Welcome to the PRECIS training workshop

CM-SAF Board Meeting, Helsinki, September 2006 CM-SAF TOA radiation status report D. Caprion Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.

ACRIS e-Recording for Portal Companies Next Steps August 14, /14/2013.

This is an example text TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING DecOctSepAugJulyJuneAprilMarchFebJanMayNov 12 Months Example text Go ahead and replace it with your own.

Public Libraries Survey Data File Overview. What We’ll Talk About PLS: Public Libraries Survey State level data Public library data (Administrative Entities)

Level 1.5 Processing Updates Martin Bates, RAL GIST th April, 2005.

Public Libraries Survey Data File Overview. 2 What We’ll Talk About PLS: Public Library Survey State level data Public library data (Administrative Entities)

Accounting in DataGrid HLR software demo Andrea Guarise Milano, September 11, 2001.

VIIRS NCC Imagery at Beta CCR DR 4859 Dr. Thomas Kopp – Imagery Validation Lead Dr. Donald Hillger – Imagery Product Lead Mr. Ryan Williams - Imagery.

03-May-2007GIST 26: Abingdon GGSPS status Andy Smith RAL.

D. Duellmann, IT-DB POOL Status1 POOL Persistency Framework - Status after a first year of development Dirk Düllmann, IT-DB.

GHRSST Science Team Meeting st – 5 th June, 2009, Santa Rosa ESA L2P Operational Service Nigel Houghton ESA / ESRIN NRT and Archive L2P Processing.

1 Financial Review Non-Sponsored Awards. Guiding Principles Review Financial Situation Periodically Timely correction of errors and omissions Accurately.

MarkeTrak Project Update Adam D. Martinez Mgr, Market Ops Divisional Projects Organization ERCOT RMS Meeting May 10, 2006.

14 th CAA Cross-calibration Workshop CIS archiving activities York October 5-7, 2011.

Validation status overivew

EDO PSSF - AC PROJECT STATUS

Validation status overivew

PCC Project Status Partnerships

Annual Computer Deployment 2018

AMIS 310 Foundations of Accounting

2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March

April May April May June July July June August Sept August

Surface Systems.

2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March

Presentation transcript:

Product status and timeline Andy Smith RAL

User products The GGSPS provides user access to the following products: Level 1.5 NANRG, ARG Level 2 ARG (and BARG?) fluxes Level 2 monthly means L2 means – work will not start until mid-year (if funded) L2 fluxes – depends on RMIB’s validation L1.5 follows…

Prerequisites 1.The GGSPS should generate NRT L1.5 products of acceptable data quality. 2.The data archive should give complete time coverage (as far as possible). 3.The data set should be consistent over time. 4.The interface for product download should be reliable and user-friendly. 5.The data products should be well documented.

Product quality Main issues affecting NRT L1.5 products data quality 1.Geolocation: Initial CSOL fix ready by April? Optical model – initial work by June? Follow-up later Long-term CSOL fix: EUM to review July ’04? Plus unknowns… 2.Stray light (deep space, Earth view, black body) Imperial to provide info on gain stability? Initial deep-space fix - prediction and use of fixed gains 3.Cal tables 4.Product validation – timing TBD?

Completeness The data archive should give complete time coverage (as far as possible). Current status: the GGSPS L0 and L1.5 archives are “gappy” UMARF holds the complete L0 data set Re-order L0 data from UMARF to fill in gaps Software required to ingest re-ordered L0 data - ready May/June? Process re-ordered data to L1.5 - wait for bulk re-processing

Consistency The data set should be consistent over time, i.e. L1.5 archive should be self-consistent - same algorithms and cal tables used throughout L1.5 archive should be consistent with available L2 data L1.5 archive - algorithms & cal. tables change with time Re-process with current algorithms & tables - Software ready August? Re-processing to L1.5 should be quick (~1 hour to catch up 1 day in NRT operations) No TSOL jitter data available before 16 th Feb ’04 - can’t reprocess old data with a consistent geolocation

Consistency Consistency with Level 2: Is it desirable to produce the “best possible” L1.5 data set? L1.5 data may become inconsistent with available L2 data - depends on RMIB’s ability to re-process to L2

Data access The interface for product download should be reliable and user-friendly. Current system cannot handle simultaneous large requests (but can be improved) Separate access to public/restricted data not yet available Use the BADC for public data? If so, what about bulk download of restricted data? Plus technical issues to be resolved with BADC

Documentation The data products should be well documented. L1.5 product user guides are available If known problems present in data, more documentation needed Issues affecting L2 (flux) release: Data quality: validation Data access and availability of documentation Support: Data release requires additional support effort Slows new development