1 SIP Performance Benchmarking draft-poretsky-sip-bench-term-03.txt draft-poretsky-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-01.txt BMWG, IETF-69 Chicago July 2007 Poretsky,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 SIP End-to-End Performance Metrics (draft-ietf-pmol-sip-perf-metrics-00.txt)draft-ietf-pmol-sip-perf-metrics-00.txt 71 st IETF Conference PMOL Daryl.
Advertisements

69th IETF Chicago IETF BMWG WLAN Switch Benchmarking Tarunesh Ahuja, Tom Alexander, Scott Bradner, Sanjay Hooda, Jerry Perser, Muninder Sambi.
Remote Call/Device Control IETF82, Dispatch WG, Taipei November 15, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Cullen Jennings Alan Johnston.
Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 60th IETF – San Diego, CA Thursday, August 5, 2004, Chairs: –Kevin Dubray –Al Morton.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 84th IETF Thursday, August 2, 2012 (1730 Vancouver Local Time, GMT-7:00) Chairs: –Al Morton If.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) Virtual Interim Meeting prior to 76th IETF Friday, October 30, 2009, GMT Chairs: –Al Morton
SIP Performance Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-04 draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-04 August 2, 2012 Prof. Carol Davids, Illinois Inst. of Tech.
IETF BMWG – Benchmarking Methodology WG: Considerations for Benchmarking VNFs and their Infrastructure Al Morton Nov 19, 2014
SIP Performance Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-03 draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-03 March 28, 2011 Prof. Carol Davids, Illinois Inst. of Tech.
Testing SIP Services Over IP. Agenda  SIP testing – advanced scenarios  SIP testing - Real Life Examples.
SIP Performance Metrics 66 th IETF – Montreal Daryl Malas.
Draft-novak-bmwg-ipflow-meth-05.txt IP Flow Information Accounting and Export Benchmarking Methodology
Doc.: IEEE /1102r0 Submission July 06 Tom Alexander, VeriWaveSlide 1 BMWG Presentation Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.
66th IETF Meeting Montreal IETF BMWG WLAN Switch & Mesh Benchmarking Jerry Perser
67th IETF San Diego IETF BMWG WLAN Switch Benchmarking Jerry Perser, Tom Alexander, Muninder Singh Sambi,
SIP End-to-End Performance Metrics draft-malas-performance-metrics-06.txt.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 70th IETF – Vancouver, Canada Thursday, December 6, 2007, 9:00-11:30 (Oak) Chairs: –Al Morton If.
P2PSIP Charter Proposal Many people helped write this charter…
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 80th IETF Tuesday, March 29, 2011, CDT (Central Europe Daylight Time, GMT+2:00) Chairs: –Al Morton
03/09/2003Helsinki University of Technology1 Overview of Thesis Topic Presented By: Zhao Xuetao.
1 Proposal for BENCHMARKING SIP NETWORKING DEVICES draft-poretsky-sip-bench-term-01.txt draft-poretsky-sip-bench-meth-00.txt Co-authors are Scott Poretsky.
BEHAVE BOF (Behavior Engineering for Hindrance AVoidancE) Cullen Jennings Jiri Kuthan.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 82nd IETF Monday, November 14, 2011, (Taipei Local Time, GMT+8:00) Chairs: –Al Morton
Proposal for new Working Group Item: Core Router Software Accelerated Life Testing (draft-poretsky-routersalt-term-00.txt) Authors: Scott Poretsky, Avici.
SPEERMINT Terminology Draft th IETF - Chicago Editors: Daryl Malas David Meyer.
Application Performance Metrics APM BOF July 25, 2007 Alan Clark Al Morton IETF 69 – Chicago – July 2007.
SIP Performance Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-02 draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-02 July 24, 2010 Prof. Carol Davids, Illinois Inst. of Tech.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 85th IETF Tuesday, November 6, 2012 (1520 Atlanta Local Time, GMT-5:00) Chairs: –Al Morton – PLEASE.
Authentication of Signaling in VoIP Applications Authors: Srinivasan et al. (MIT Campus of Anna University, India) Source: IJNS review paper Reporter:
Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 61st IETF – Washington, D.C. Thursday, November 11, 2004, Chairs: –Kevin Dubray –Al.
1 Traffic Management Benchmarking Framework IETF 85 Atlanta Barry Constantine Tim Copley Ram Krishnan.
1 SIP Performance Benchmarking draft-poretsky-sip-bench-term-04.txt draft-poretsky-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-02.txt BMWG, IETF-70 Vancouver Dec 2007 Davids IIT.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 77th IETF Monday, March 22, 2010, PDT (GMT – 7:00, due to DST in US) Chairs: –Al Morton
SIPeerior Technologies A superior way to connect Emerging IETF Standards Work on P2PSIP David A. Bryan.
SIP Performance Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-term-01 draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-01 March 22, 2010 Prof. Carol Davids, Illinois Inst. of Tech.
1 Content-Aware Device Benchmarking Methodology (draft-hamilton-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-04) BMWG Meeting Maastricht July 2010 Mike Hamilton
Page 1 IETF Speermint Working Group Speermint Requirements/Guidelines for SIP session peering draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-02 IETF 69 - Monday July.
26Jul BGP Data-Plane Benchmarking Applicable to Modern Routers Rajiv Papneja Ilya Varlashkin Bhavani Parise Dean Lee Sue Hares.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 79th IETF Thursday, November 11, 2010, CST (China Standard Time GMT +8:00) Chairs: –Al Morton
July 28, 2010IETF 78 – Maastricht, Netherlands1 IP Multicast Performance Monitoring: update on IPPM experience Vero Zheng Alberto Tempia Bonda.
Energy Perspectives draft-nordman-eman-energy-perspective-01 Bruce Nordman.
Sub-IP Layer Protection Mechanism Performance Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-04.txt draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-meth-03.txt BMWG, IETF-72.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 67th IETF – San Diego CA, USA Tuesday, November 7, 2006, 13:00-15:00 (Spinnaker) Chairs: –Al Morton
IGP Data Plane Convergence draft-ietf-bmwg-dataplane-conv-meth-15.txt draft-ietf-bmwg-dataplane-conv-term-15.txt draft-ietf-bmwg-dataplane-conv-app-15.txt.
SIP wg: New Drafts Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 66th IETF – Montreal, Canada Thursday, June 13, 2006, 13:00-15:00 (519A) Chairs: –Al Morton – If.
1 IGP Data Plane Convergence Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-app-01.txt draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term-01.txt draft -ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-01.txt.
75 th IETF, Stockholm, Sweden July 26-31, 2009 BMWG SIP Benchmarking BMWG, Monday July 27, 2009 Scott Poretsky Carol Davids Vijay K. Gurbani.
1 Authors: Scott Poretsky, Reef Point Systems Shankar Rao, Qwest Communications 64th IETF Meeting – Vancouver Accelerated Stress Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-term-07.txt.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 71st IETF – Philadelphia, PA USA Monday, March 10, 2008, 13:00-15:00 (Salon J) Chairs: –Al Morton
1 Content-Aware Device Benchmarking Methodology (draft-hamilton-bmwg-ca-bench-meth-05) BMWG Meeting IETF-79 Beijing November 2010 Mike Hamilton
1 Traffic Management Benchmarking Framework IETF 90 Toronto draft-constantine-bmwg-traffic-management-04 Barry Constantine Tim.
82nd IETF Taipei, Nov 2011 IETF BMWG Security Effectiveness Benchmarking Kenneth Green.
1 IGP Data Plane Convergence Benchmarking draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-app-00.txt draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term-00.txt draft -ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-00.txt.
RADIUS attributes commonly used in fixed networks draft-klammorrissette-radext-very-common-vsas-00 Devasena Morrissette, Frederic Klamm, Lionel Morand.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 78th IETF Thursday, July 29, 2010, CET (GMT – 0:00, due to DST in Europe) Chairs: –Al Morton
SIPPING Working Group IETF 67 Mary Barnes Gonzalo Camarillo.
1 IGP Data Plane Convergence draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-21 draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term-21 BMWG, IETF-78 Maastricht, July 2010.
1 Benchmarking Methodology WG (bmwg) 73rd IETF – Minneapolis, MN USA Monday, November 17, 2008, Afternoon Session I (Rochester) Chairs: –Al Morton.
1 SIP End-to-End Performance Metrics 70 th IETF Conference PMOL Daryl Malas.
Authors: Scott Poretsky, Quarry Technologies Brent Imhoff, LightCore
IPv6 Benchmarking Methodology
SIP Performance Benchmarking
Benchmarking Framework
Authors: Scott Poretsky, Quarry Technologies Brent Imhoff, LightCore
IETF BMWG FRR Related Benchmarking Drafts Status and Update
Terminology for IPv6 Benchmarking <draft-ietf-martin-term-ipv6-00
SIP Performance Metrics
$DN Software Defined Networking Benchmarking SDN
COMS BoF Addressing the Questions
Presentation transcript:

1 SIP Performance Benchmarking draft-poretsky-sip-bench-term-03.txt draft-poretsky-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-01.txt BMWG, IETF-69 Chicago July 2007 Poretsky, Gurbani, Davids

2 Motivation Problem Statement: –Service Providers are now deploying VoIP and Multimedia using the IETF developed Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). –Industry lacks common terminology for SIP performance benchmarks –SIP allows a wide range of configuration and operational conditions that can influence performance benchmark measurements. Goals: –Service Providers use the benchmarks to compare performance of RFC 3261 network devices –Vendors and others can use benchmarks to ensure performance claims are based on common terminology and methodology. –Benchmark metrics can be applied to make device deployment decisions for IETF SIP and 3GPP IMS networks

3 Scope SUT SIP Server (DUT) SIP ALG /NAT Tester (Emulated Agents) Benchmark SIP Signaling Performance (not Associated Media). Terminology defines Performance benchmark metrics for black-box measurements of SIP networking devices Methodology describes how to measure the metrics for a DUT or SUT SIP Signaling

4 Benchmarks Maximum Session Establishment Rate Maximum Registration Rate Maximum IM Rate Session Capacity Session attempt performance Session setup delay Session disconnect delay Standing sessions

5 Revision Changes draft-poretsky-sip-bench-term-03.txt Describe a session as a 3-dimensional vector –Sess.sig –Sess.med –Sess.medc Identifies session states - in words and diagram draft-poretsky-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-01.txt Incorporates terminology changes

6 Complements Proposed SIPPING or OPS - apm Work draft-malas-performance-metrics-05 –This draft relates to end-to-end performance metrics –To be discussed in OPS BoF on application performance metrics The BMWG drafts define metrics whose values contribute to end-to-end delay budgets and total capacity The metrics in the current draft are consistent with a subset of the metrics defined in the malas draft.

7 Next Steps Incorporate comments from meeting and mailing list Consider for BMWG work item?