Ehud Nakar California Institute of Technology Unmagentized relativistic collisionless shock Milos Milosavljevic (Caltech) Anatoly Spitkovsky (KIPAC) Venice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dissipation in Force-Free Astrophysical Plasmas Hui Li (Los Alamos National Lab) Radio lobe formation and relaxation Dynamical magnetic dissipation in.
Advertisements

Dimitrios Giannios Purdue Workshop, May 12th 2014 Sironi L. and Giannios D. 2014, ApJ in press, arXiv: Is the IGM heated by TeV blazars?
Many different acceleration mechanisms: Fermi 1, Fermi 2, shear,... (Fermi acceleration at shock: most standard, nice powerlaw, few free parameters) main.
The collective energy loss of the relativistic electron beam propagating through background plasma O. Polomarov*, I. Kaganovich**, and Gennady Shvets*
“Physics at the End of the Galactic Cosmic-Ray Spectrum” Aspen, CO 4/28/05 Diffusive Shock Acceleration of High-Energy Cosmic Rays The origin of the very-highest-energy.
Alfvén-cyclotron wave mode structure: linear and nonlinear behavior J. A. Araneda 1, H. Astudillo 1, and E. Marsch 2 1 Departamento de Física, Universidad.
Instabilities of a relativistic electron beam in a plasma A Review Talk Antoine Bret Universidad Castilla la Mancha – Ciudad Real – Spain KINETIC MODELING.
Mario A. Riquelme, Anatoly Spitkovsky Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University Generation of magnetic field upstream of shocks: the cosmic.
Relativistic Particle Acceleration in a Developing Turbulence Relativistic Particle Acceleration in a Developing Turbulence Shuichi M ATSUKIYO ESST Kyushu.
Nonlinear Evolution of Whistler Turbulence W.A. Scales, J.J. Wang, and O. Chang Center of Space Science and Engineering Research Virginia Tech L. Rudakov,
Electromagnetic instabilities and Fermi acceleration at ultra-relativistic shock waves Electromagnetic instabilities and Fermi acceleration at ultra-relativistic.
Beamline Design Issues D. R. Welch and D. V. Rose Mission Research Corporation W. M. Sharp and S. S. Yu Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Presented.
High-Mach Number Relativistic Ion Acoustic Shocks J. Fahlen and W.B. Mori University of California, Los Angeles.
Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar Krakow Oct. 6, 2008.
Joe Giacalone and Randy Jokipii University of Arizona
Collisional ionization in the beam body  Just behind the front, by continuity  →0 and the three body recombination  (T e,E) is negligible.
In-situ Observations of Collisionless Reconnection in the Magnetosphere Tai Phan (UC Berkeley) 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive)
Maser emission from relativistic shocks and electron-ion energy equilibration Yuri Lyubarsky Ben-Gurion University, Israel.
GRB Prompt Emission: Turbulence, Magnetic Field & Jitter Radiation Jirong Mao.
Acceleration of a mass limited target by ultra-high intensity laser pulse A.A.Andreev 1, J.Limpouch 2, K.Yu.Platonov 1 J.Psikal 2, Yu.Stolyarov 1 1. ILPh.
Shock Acceleration at an Interplanetary Shock: A Focused Transport Approach J. A. le Roux Institute of Geophysics & Planetary Physics University of California.
Generation of Solar Energetic Particles (SEP) During May 2, 1998 Eruptive Event Igor V. Sokolov, Ilia I. Roussev, Tamas I. Gombosi (University of Michigan)
1/39 New Relativistic Particle-In-Cell Simulation Studies of Prompt and Early Afterglows from GRBs Ken Nishikawa National Space Science & Technology Center/CSPAR.
1/39 Particle-in-cell simulations of GRB shocks Ken Nishikawa National Space Science & Technology Center/CSPAR (UAH)Meudon Observatory (visiting) (
Transverse instability of Alfven wave : Cluster observations and heuristic explication. Olga Alexandrova LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, France. Summer school.
Collisionless shocks in Gamma Ray Bursts Current results and future perspectives. Århus, September 2005 Troels Haugbølle Dark Cosmology.
Monte Carlo simulations of the first-order Fermi process Niemiec & Ostrowski (2004) ApJ 610, 851 Niemiec & Ostrowski (2006) ApJ 641, 984 Niemiec, Ostrowski.
Computationally efficient description of relativistic electron beam transport in dense plasma Oleg Polomarov*, Adam Sefkov**, Igor Kaganovich** and Gennady.
Radiation from Poynting Jets and Collisionless Shocks Edison Liang, Koichi Noguchi Shinya Sugiyama, Rice University Acknowledgements: Scott Wilks, Bruce.
1/39 Ken Nishikawa National Space Science & Technology Center/UAH 38th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, July 2010, Bremen, Germany Collaborators: J.
Radio Jet Disruption in Cooling Cores OR, can radio jets solve the cooling core problem? OR, how do cooling cores disrupt radio jets?
GRB workshop 2008 Nanjing, June 26, 2008 Mikhail Medvedev (KU) Students (at KU): Sarah Reynolds, Sriharsha Pothapragada Simulations: Ken-Ichi Nishikawa.
Relativistic Collisionless Shocks in the Unmagnetized Limit
Simulation of relativistic shocks and associated radiation from turbulent magnetic fields 2010 Fermi Symposium 9 – 12 May 2011 Rome Italy K.-I. Nishikawa.
Amir Levinson Tel Aviv University Levinson+Bromberg PRL 08 Bromberg et al. ApJ 11 Levinson ApJ 12 Katz et al. ApJ 10 Budnik et al. ApJ 10 Nakar+Sari ApJ.
PIC simulations of magnetic reconnection. Cerutti et al D PIC simulations of relativistic pair plasma reconnection (Zeltron code) Includes – Radiation.
1 Non-neutral Plasma Shock HU Xiwei (胡希伟) 工 HU Xiwei (胡希伟) HE Yong (何勇) HE Yong (何勇) Hu Yemin (胡业民) Hu Yemin (胡业民) Huazhong University of Science and.
Courtesy of John Kirk Particle Acceleration. Basic particle motion No current.
Radiation spectra from relativistic electrons moving in turbulent magnetic fields Yuto Teraki & Fumio Takahara Theoretical Astrophysics Group Osaka Univ.,
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
A. Vaivads, M. André, S. Buchert, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, A. Eriksson, A. Fazakerley, Y. Khotyaintsev, B. Lavraud, C. Mouikis, T. Phan, B. N. Rogers, J.-E.
Non-thermal emission and particle acceleration by reverse shock in SNR ejecta Jiangtao Li
The Generation of Magnetic Fields and X-ray Observations Yutaka Fujita National Astronomical Observatory, Japan → Osaka University, Japan.
Particle Acceleration by Relativistic Collisionless Shocks in Electron-Positron Plasmas Graduate school of science, Osaka University Kentaro Nagata.
Multiple Sheet Beam Instability of Current Sheets in Striped Relativistic Winds Inertial Parallel E in Neutron Star Magnetospheres: Return Cuurent Sheets.
Multiple Sheet Beam Instability of Current Sheets in Striped Relativistic Winds Jonathan Arons University of California, Berkeley 1.
Radio-Loud AGN Model (Credit: C.M. Urry and P. Padovani ) These objects also have hot, ADAF-type accretion flows, where the radiative cooling is very.
Gamma-Ray Bursts and unmagnetized relativistic collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar Caltech.
1/39 Ken Nishikawa National Space Science & Technology Center/UAH Acceleration & Emission Processes at High Energies and their Application to AGN Observatoire.
The impact of magnetic turbulence spectrum on particle acceleration in SNR IC443 I.Telezhinsky 1,2, A.Wilhelm 1,2, R.Brose 1,3, M.Pohl 1,2, B.Humensky.
Electrostatic fluctuations at short scales in the solar-wind turbulent cascade. Francesco Valentini Dipartimento di Fisica and CNISM, Università della.
Numerical simulations of wave/particle interactions in inhomogeneous auroral plasmas Vincent Génot (IRAP/UPS/CNRS, Toulouse) F. Mottez (LUTH/CNRS, Meudon)
Rice 05/15/07 Simulations: Anatoly Spitkovsky (Princeton) Luis Silva and the Plasma Simulation Group (Portugal) Ken Nishikawa (U. Alabama, Huntsville)
Simulation of relativistic shocks and associated radiation from turbulent magnetic fields 2009 Fermi Symposium 2-5 November 2009 Hyatt Regency Washington,
Ionization Injection E. Öz Max Planck Institute Für Physik.
1/39 Ken Nishikawa National Space Science & Technology Center/UAH DECIPHERING THE ANCIENT UNIVERSE WITH GAMMA- RAY BURSTS Kyoto, April 19 – 23, 2010 Collaborators:
Magnetized Shocks & Prompt GRB Emission
Computational Methods for Kinetic Processes in Plasma Physics
Ken Nishikawa National Space Science & Technology Center/UAH
Kinetic Structure of the Reconnection Layer and of Slow Mode Shocks
An overview of turbulent transport in tokamaks
101° Congresso della societa italiana fisica
Large scale magnetic field generation by accelerated particles in galactic medium I.N.Toptygin Saint – Petersburg State Polytechnical University, department.
Particle acceleration and the microphysics of gamma-ray burst shocks
ESS 154/200C Lecture 19 Waves in Plasmas 2
Edison Liang, Koichi Noguchi Orestes Hastings, Rice University
Particle Acceleration by Relativistic Expansion of Magnetic Arcades
Arianna Ligorini Department of Gamma-ray Astrophysics Institute of Nuclear Physics PAS, Krakow Jacek Niemiec Department of Gamma-ray Astrophysics Institute.
Intense Coherent Emission in Relativistic Shocks
FilamenTATION INSTABILITIES IN RELATIVISTIC PLASMA
Presentation transcript:

Ehud Nakar California Institute of Technology Unmagentized relativistic collisionless shock Milos Milosavljevic (Caltech) Anatoly Spitkovsky (KIPAC) Venice 2006

External Shock Upstream Downstream Black Box  Generate collisionality  B - Generate long lasting magnetic field  e,p – Accelerate electrons

The transverse Wiebel instability (Weibel 59; Fried 59) Moiseev & Sagdeev 63 Medvedev & Loeb 98

The transverse weibel instability is expected to produce current filaments and build equipartition * magnetic field. This field provides collisionallity and produce a shock with the following properties (Moiseev & Sagdeev 63; Lee & Lampe 73; Gruzinov & Waman 99; Medvedev & Loeb 99, …) : The shock width is ~ s At the shock  B ~10 -1 The magnetic field coherence length is s The magnetic field is within the shock plane However – easy come easy go: A magnetic field on s scale is expected to decay within s as well (Grizinov 2001) *Assuming here that the equipartition, and therefore s, is with respect to the ions (A non-trivial assumption) R/  2 ~ 10 9 s !!!

3D Numerical simulations of interpenetrating plasmas (Silva et al; Nordlund et al.; Jaroschek et al.; Nishikawa et al.; Spitkovsky et al;) Currents Silva et al 2003 Size: [8×8×3] s ; time 50/  p Initial conditions: two interpenetrating pair-plasma shells Final state: current filaments The simulations have not yet achieved a steady-state shock!

The steady-state shock structure in pair plasma Structure guideline: Filamentation arises where cold upstream plasma and hot counter-stream plasma interpenetrate e+e+ e+e+ e-e- e-e-     Cold upstream e+e+ e+e+ e-e- e-e-     e+e+ e-e-   e+e+ e+e+ e-e- ee   e+e+ e+e+ e-e-   ee   Shock layer  Hot downstream e-e-  e+e+ All the discussion is in the shock frame

Two stages in the shock structure: I)Laminar charge separation layer: A nearly maximal charge separation of the upstream takes place in the first generation of filaments producing a quasi-static 2D structure II) Turbulent compression layer Unstable and interacting filaments produce a 3D turbulent layer that isotropize and compress the plasma

What prevents the counterstream particles from escaping the shock layer into the upstream? Filamentation: e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e-e- e-e- e-e- e-e- e-e- J J J Hot Counterstream Cold Upstream E E E  us >>  cs  E·J<0 The first generation of filaments functions as a diode protecting the upstream from the downstream The charge separation layer

The first generation of filaments >R L A quasi-static 2D structure with E An electrostatic layer with |    ~  mc 2 e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e+e+ e-e- e-e- e-e- e-e- e-e- J J J Hot Counter-stream Cold Upstream E E E x0x0

Stage II - electrodynamic compression layer Filaments become unstable (Milosavljevic & Nakar 05) Neighboring filaments interact (Silva et al 03; Medvedev et al 04, Kato 05, etc...) A 3-dimensional structure B ~B Liberation of particles from the filaments Decay of I and B Growth of filament size Onset of thermalization and compression

Conclusions Two stages in the shock structure: I)Quasi-static 2D charge separation layer: E with a significant electrostatic potential Highly charged filaments  /n~1  B ~1 Blocking most of the counterstream particles Some counterstream particles do escape to the upstream – candidates for accelerated particles II) Dynamic 3D compression layer Unstable interacting filaments Decaying  B B ~B

Thanks!